Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • ARTICLES
    • Current Issue
    • Ahead of Print
    • Archives
    • Abstracts In Press
    • Special Issue Archive
    • Subject Collections
  • INFO FOR
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Call For Papers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • SUBMIT
    • Manuscript
    • Peer Review
  • ABOUT
    • The JABFM
    • Editorial Board
    • Indexing
    • Editors' Blog
  • CLASSIFIEDS
  • Other Publications
    • abfm

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
American Board of Family Medicine
  • Other Publications
    • abfm
American Board of Family Medicine

American Board of Family Medicine

Advanced Search

  • HOME
  • ARTICLES
    • Current Issue
    • Ahead of Print
    • Archives
    • Abstracts In Press
    • Special Issue Archive
    • Subject Collections
  • INFO FOR
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Call For Papers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • SUBMIT
    • Manuscript
    • Peer Review
  • ABOUT
    • The JABFM
    • Editorial Board
    • Indexing
    • Editors' Blog
  • CLASSIFIEDS
  • JABFM On Twitter
  • JABFM On YouTube
  • JABFM On Facebook
Research ArticleOriginal Research

How Much Shared Decision Making Occurs in Usual Primary Care of Depression?

Leif I. Solberg, A. Lauren Crain, Lisa Rubenstein, Jürgen Unützer, Robin R. Whitebird and Arne Beck
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine March 2014, 27 (2) 199-208; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3122/jabfm.2014.02.130164
Leif I. Solberg
the HealthPartners Institute for Education and Research, Minneapolis, MN (LIS, ALC, RRW); the RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, CA (LR); the Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle (JU); and Kaiser Permanante Colorado, Denver (AB).
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
A. Lauren Crain
the HealthPartners Institute for Education and Research, Minneapolis, MN (LIS, ALC, RRW); the RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, CA (LR); the Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle (JU); and Kaiser Permanante Colorado, Denver (AB).
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Lisa Rubenstein
the HealthPartners Institute for Education and Research, Minneapolis, MN (LIS, ALC, RRW); the RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, CA (LR); the Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle (JU); and Kaiser Permanante Colorado, Denver (AB).
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jürgen Unützer
the HealthPartners Institute for Education and Research, Minneapolis, MN (LIS, ALC, RRW); the RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, CA (LR); the Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle (JU); and Kaiser Permanante Colorado, Denver (AB).
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Robin R. Whitebird
the HealthPartners Institute for Education and Research, Minneapolis, MN (LIS, ALC, RRW); the RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, CA (LR); the Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle (JU); and Kaiser Permanante Colorado, Denver (AB).
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Arne Beck
the HealthPartners Institute for Education and Research, Minneapolis, MN (LIS, ALC, RRW); the RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, CA (LR); the Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle (JU); and Kaiser Permanante Colorado, Denver (AB).
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

References

  1. 1.↵
    Institute of Medicine. Crossing the quality chasm: a new health system for the 21st century. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 2001.
  2. 2.↵
    1. Epperly T
    . The patient-centred medical home in the USA. J Eval Clin Pract 2011;17:373–5.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. 3.↵
    1. Peikes D,
    2. Zutshi A,
    3. Genevro JL,
    4. Parchman ML,
    5. Meyers DS
    . Early evaluations of the medical home: building on a promising start. Am J Manag Care 2012;18:105–16.
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
  4. 4.↵
    1. Barry MJ,
    2. Edgman-Levitan S
    . Shared decision making–pinnacle of patient-centered care. N Engl J Med 2012;366:780–1.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  5. 5.↵
    1. Lin GA,
    2. Dudley RA
    . Patient-centered care: what is the best measuring stick? Arch Intern Med 2009;169:1551–3.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  6. 6.↵
    1. Kryworuchko J,
    2. Stacey D,
    3. Bennett C,
    4. Graham ID
    . Appraisal of primary outcome measures used in trials of patient decision support. Patient Educ Couns 2008;73:497–503.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. 7.↵
    1. Saba GW,
    2. Wong ST,
    3. Schillinger D,
    4. et al
    . Shared decision making and the experience of partnership in primary care. Ann Fam Med 2006;4:54–62.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  8. 8.↵
    1. Towle A,
    2. Godolphin W,
    3. Grams G,
    4. Lamarre A
    . Putting informed and shared decision making into practice. Health Expect 2006;9:321–32.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  9. 9.↵
    1. Hanson JL
    . Shared decision making: have we missed the obvious? Arch Intern Med 2008;168:1368–70.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  10. 10.↵
    1. Gilbody S,
    2. Bower P,
    3. Fletcher J,
    4. Richards D,
    5. Sutton AJ
    . Collaborative care for depression: a cumulative meta-analysis and review of longer-term outcomes. Arch Intern Med 2006;166:2314–21.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  11. 11.↵
    1. Williams JW Jr.,
    2. Gerrity M,
    3. Holsinger T,
    4. Dobscha S,
    5. Gaynes B,
    6. Dietrich A
    . Systematic review of multifaceted interventions to improve depression care. Gen Hosp Psychiatry 2007;29:91–116.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  12. 12.↵
    1. Christensen H,
    2. Griffiths KM,
    3. Gulliver A,
    4. Clack D,
    5. Kljakovic M,
    6. Wells L
    . Models in the delivery of depression care: a systematic review of randomised and controlled intervention trials. BMC Fam Pract 2008;9:25.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  13. 13.↵
    1. Clever SL,
    2. Ford DE,
    3. Rubenstein LV,
    4. et al
    . Primary care patients' involvement in decision-making is associated with improvement in depression. Med Care 2006;44:398–405.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  14. 14.↵
    1. Loh A,
    2. Simon D,
    3. Wills CE,
    4. Kriston L,
    5. Niebling W,
    6. Harter M
    . The effects of a shared decision-making intervention in primary care of depression: a cluster-randomized controlled trial. Patient Educ Couns 2007;67:324–32.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  15. 15.↵
    1. Young HN,
    2. Bell RA,
    3. Epstein RM,
    4. Feldman MD,
    5. Kravitz RL
    . Physicians' shared decision-making behaviors in depression care. Arch Intern Med 2008;168:1404–8.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  16. 16.↵
    1. Solberg LI,
    2. Glasgow RE,
    3. Unützer J,
    4. et al
    . Partnership research: a practical trial design for evaluation of a natural experiment to improve depression care. Med Care 2010;48:576–82.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  17. 17.↵
    1. Korsen N,
    2. Cartwright C
    . Developing and disseminating a model to improve depression care in primary care practices. J Clin Outcomes Manage 2006;13:506–11.
    OpenUrl
  18. 18.↵
    1. Unutzer J,
    2. Katon W,
    3. Callahan CM,
    4. et al
    . Collaborative care management of late-life depression in the primary care setting: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA 2002;288:2836–45.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  19. 19.↵
    1. Kroenke K,
    2. Spitzer RL
    . The PHQ-9: a new depression and diagnostic severity measure. Psychiatric Ann 2002;32:509–21.
    OpenUrlWeb of Science
  20. 20.↵
    1. Kroenke K,
    2. Spitzer RL,
    3. Williams JB
    . The PHQ-9: validity of a brief depression severity measure. J Gen Intern Med 2001;16:606–13.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  21. 21.↵
    1. Mattke S,
    2. Balakrishnan A,
    3. Bergamo G,
    4. Newberry SJ
    . A review of methods to measure health-related productivity loss. Am J Manag Care 2007;13:211–7.
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
  22. 22.↵
    1. Glasgow RE,
    2. Wagner EH,
    3. Schaefer J,
    4. Mahoney LD,
    5. Reid RJ,
    6. Greene SM
    . Development and validation of the Patient Assessment of Chronic Illness Care (PACIC). Med Care 2005;43:436–44.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  23. 23.↵
    1. Glasgow RE,
    2. Whitesides H,
    3. Nelson CC,
    4. King DK
    . Use of the Patient Assessment of Chronic Illness Care (PACIC) with diabetic patients: relationship to patient characteristics, receipt of care, and self-management Diabetes Care 2005;28:2655–61.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  24. 24.↵
    1. Shim RS,
    2. Baltrus P,
    3. Ye J,
    4. Rust G
    . Prevalence, treatment, and control of depressive symptoms in the united states: results from the national health and nutrition examination survey (NHANES), 2005–2008. J Am Board Fam Med 2011;24:33–8.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  25. 25.↵
    1. Proctor EK,
    2. Hasche L,
    3. Morrow-Howell N,
    4. Shumway M,
    5. Snell G
    . Perceptions about competing psychosocial problems and treatment priorities among older adults with depression. Psychiatr Serv 2008;59:670–5.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  26. 26.↵
    1. Callahan EJ,
    2. Stange KC,
    3. Zyzanski SJ,
    4. Goodwin MA,
    5. Flocke SA,
    6. Bertakis KD
    . Physician-elder interaction in community family practice. J Am Board Fam Pract 2004;17:19–25.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  27. 27.↵
    1. Wittink MN,
    2. Givens JL,
    3. Knott KA,
    4. Coyne JC,
    5. Barg FK
    . Negotiating depression treatment with older adults: primary care providers' perspectives. J Ment Health 2011;20:429–37.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  28. 28.↵
    1. Chapman BP,
    2. Duberstein PR,
    3. Epstein RM,
    4. Fiscella K,
    5. Kravitz RL
    . Patient-centered communication during primary care visits for depressive symptoms: what is the role of physician personality? Med Care 2008;46:806–12.
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
  29. 29.↵
    1. Sherbourne CD,
    2. Weiss R,
    3. Duan N,
    4. Bird CE,
    5. Wells KB
    . Do the effects of quality improvement for depression care differ for men and women? Results of a group-level randomized controlled trial. Med Care 2004;42:1186–93.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  30. 30.↵
    1. Tai-Seale M,
    2. Foo PK,
    3. Stults CD
    . Patients with mental health needs are engaged in asking questions, but physicians' responses vary. Health Aff (Millwood) 2013;32:259–67.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  31. 31.↵
    1. Swanson KA,
    2. Bastani R,
    3. Rubenstein LV,
    4. Meredith LS,
    5. Ford DE
    . Effect of mental health care and shared decision making on patient satisfaction in a community sample of patients with depression. Med Care Res Rev 2007;64:416–30.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  32. 32.↵
    1. Stein BD,
    2. Kogan JN,
    3. Mihalyo MJ,
    4. et al
    . Use of a computerized medication shared decision making tool in community mental health settings: impact on psychotropic medication adherence. Community Ment Health J 2013;49:185–92.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  33. 33.↵
    1. Duncan E,
    2. Best C,
    3. Hagen S
    . Shared decision making interventions for people with mental health conditions. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2010;(1):CD007297.
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of the American Board of Family     Medicine: 27 (2)
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine
Vol. 27, Issue 2
March-April 2014
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Cover (PDF)
  • Index by author
  • Back Matter (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Board of Family Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
How Much Shared Decision Making Occurs in Usual Primary Care of Depression?
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Board of Family Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Board of Family Medicine web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
3 + 12 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
How Much Shared Decision Making Occurs in Usual Primary Care of Depression?
Leif I. Solberg, A. Lauren Crain, Lisa Rubenstein, Jürgen Unützer, Robin R. Whitebird, Arne Beck
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine Mar 2014, 27 (2) 199-208; DOI: 10.3122/jabfm.2014.02.130164

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
How Much Shared Decision Making Occurs in Usual Primary Care of Depression?
Leif I. Solberg, A. Lauren Crain, Lisa Rubenstein, Jürgen Unützer, Robin R. Whitebird, Arne Beck
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine Mar 2014, 27 (2) 199-208; DOI: 10.3122/jabfm.2014.02.130164
Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Acknowledgments
    • Notes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • National Survey of Decision-Making for Antidepressants and Educational Level
  • Healthcare Options for People Experiencing Depression (HOPE*D): the development and pilot testing of an encounter-based decision aid for use in primary care
  • Shared decision-making experienced by Canadians facing health care decisions: a Web-based survey
  • No Magic Pill: A Prescription for Enhanced Shared Decision-Making for Depression Treatment
  • Competing priorities in treatment decision-making: a US national survey of individuals with depression and clinicians who treat depression
  • Investigating Patient-Centered Care
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Increasing Primary Care Utilization of Medication-Assisted Treatment (MAT) for Opioid Use Disorder
  • Priorities for Artificial Intelligence Applications in Primary Care: A Canadian Deliberative Dialogue with Patients, Providers, and Health System Leaders
  • Perceptions of Artificial Intelligence Use in Primary Care: A Qualitative Study with Providers and Staff of Ontario Community Health Centres
Show more Original Research

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • Decision Making
  • Depression
  • Patient-Centered Care
  • Patient Satisfaction
  • Primary Health Care

Navigate

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues

Authors & Reviewers

  • Info For Authors
  • Info For Reviewers
  • Submit A Manuscript/Review

Other Services

  • Get Email Alerts
  • Classifieds
  • Reprints and Permissions

Other Resources

  • Forms
  • Contact Us
  • ABFM News

© 2023 American Board of Family Medicine

Powered by HighWire