Results of a Mixed-Methods Evaluation of Partnerships for Health: A Quality Improvement Initiative for Diabetes Care

References

1. 1.↵
   International Diabetes Federation. IDF Diabetes Atlas, 4th ed. 2011. Available from: http://www.idf.org/sites/default/files/Economic%20impact%20of%20 Diabetes_0.pdf. Accessed July 28, 2011.
2. 2.↵
   1. Danaei G,
   2. Finucane MM,
   3. Lu Y,
   4. et al

   . National, regional, and global trends in fasting plasma glucose and diabetes prevalence since 1980: systematic analysis of health examination surveys and epidemiological studies with 370 country-years and 2.7 million participants. Lancet 2011;378:31–40.

   OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
3. 3.↵
   1. Nasmith L,
   2. Ballem P,
   3. Baxter R,
   4. et al

   . Transforming care for Canadians with chronic health conditions: put people first, expect the best, manage for results. 2010. Available from: http://www.cahs-acss.ca/wp-content/uploads/2011/09/cdm-final-English.pdf. Accessed July 29, 2011.
4. 4.↵
   1. Friedberg MW,
   2. Hussey PS,
   3. Schneider EC

   . Primary care: a critical review of the evidence on quality and costs of health care. Health Aff (Millwood) 2010;29:766–72.

   OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
5. 5.↵
   World Health Organization. Preventing chronic diseases: a vital investment. 2005. Available from: http://www.who.int/chp/chronic_disease_report/full_report. pdf. Accessed May 2, 2011.
6. 6.↵
   1. Coleman K,
   2. Mattke S,
   3. Perrault PJ,
   4. Wagner EH

   . Untangling practice redesign from disease management: how do we best care for the chronically ill? Annu Rev Public Health 2009;30:385–408.

   OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
7. 7.↵
   1. Hutchison B,
   2. Levesque JF,
   3. Strumpf E,
   4. Coyle N

   . Primary health care in Canada: systems in motion. Milbank Q 2011;89:256–88.

   OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
8. 8.↵
   1. Ludwick DA,
   2. Doucette J

   . Adopting electronic medical records in primary care: lessons learned from health information systems implementation experience in seven countries. Int J Med Inf 2009;78: 22–31.

   OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
9. 9.↵
   1. Terry AL,
   2. Thorpe CF,
   3. Giles G,
   4. Brown JB,
   5. Harris SB,
   6. Reid GJ

   . Implementing electronic health records: key factors in primary care. Can Fam Physician 2008;54:730–6.

   OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
10. 10.↵
    Canadian Diabetes Association Clinical Practice Guidelines Expert Committee. Canadian Diabetes Association 2008 clinical practice guidelines for the prevention and management of diabetes in Canada. Can J Diabetes 2008;32(Suppl 1):S1–201.

    OpenUrl
11. 11.↵
    1. Li R,
    2. Zhang P,
    3. Lawrence EB,
    4. Chowdhury FM,
    5. Zhang X

    . Cost-effectiveness of interventions to prevent and control diabetes mellitus: a systematic review. Diabetes Care 2010;33:1872–94.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
12. 12.↵
    1. Harris SB,
    2. Kapor J,
    3. Lank CN,
    4. Willan AR,
    5. Houston T

    . Clinical inertia in patients with T2DM requiring insulin in family practice. Can Fam Physician 2010;56:e418–24.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
13. 13.↵
    1. Schouten LM,
    2. Hulscher ME,
    3. van Everdingen JJ,
    4. Huijsman R,
    5. Grol RP

    . Evidence for the impact of quality improvement collaboratives: systematic review. Br Med J 2008;336:1491–4.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
14. 14.↵
    1. Jones K,
    2. Piterman L

    . The effectiveness of the breakthrough series methodology. Aust J Prim Health 2008;14:59–65.

    OpenUrl
15. 15.↵
    1. Shojania KG,
    2. Ranji SR,
    3. McDonald KM,
    4. et al

    . Effects of quality improvement strategies for type 2 diabetes on glycemic control: a meta-regression analysis. JAMA 2006;296:427–40.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
16. 16.↵
    1. Chin MH,
    2. Drum ML,
    3. Guillen M,
    4. et al

    . Improving and sustaining diabetes care in community health centers with the health disparities collaboratives. Med Care. 2007;45:1135–43.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
17. 17.↵
    1. Craig P,
    2. Petticrew M

    . Developing and evaluating complex interventions: reflections on the 2008 MRC guidance. Int J Nurs Stud 2013;50:585–7.

    OpenUrlPubMed
18. 18.↵
    1. Dubois N,
    2. Lloyd S,
    3. Houle J,
    4. Mercier C,
    5. Brousselle A,
    6. Rey L

    . Discussion: practice-based evaluation as a response to address intervention complexity. Can J Program Eval 2011;26:105–13.

    OpenUrl
19. 19.↵
    1. Zimmerman BJ,
    2. Dubois N,
    3. Houle J,
    4. et al

    . How does complexity impact evaluation? Can J Program Eval 2011;26:v–xx.

    OpenUrl
20. 20.↵
    1. Campbell M,
    2. Fitzpatrick R,
    3. Haines A,
    4. et al

    . Framework for design and evaluation of complex interventions to improve health. Br Med J 2000;321:694–6.

    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
21. 21.↵
    1. Mittman BS

    . Creating the evidence base for quality improvement collaboratives. Ann Intern Med 2004;140:897–901.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
22. 22.↵
    1. Craig P,
    2. Dieppe P,
    3. Macintyre S,
    4. Michie S,
    5. Nazareth I,
    6. Petticrew M

    . Developing and evaluating complex interventions: the new Medical Research Council guidance. Int J Nurs Stud 2013;50:587–92.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
23. 23.↵
    1. Tashakkori A,
    2. Teddlie C

    1. Song MK,
    2. Sandelowski M,
    3. Happ MB

    . Current practices and emerging trends in conducting mixed methods intervention studies in health sciences. In: Tashakkori A, Teddlie C, editors. Mixed methods in social and behavioral research. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications; 2010:725–47.
24. 24.↵
    1. Tashakkori A,
    2. Teddlie C

    , editors. Mixed methods in social and behavioral research. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications; 2010.
25. 25.↵
    1. Tashakkori A,
    2. Teddlie C

    1. Bamberger M,
    2. Rao V,
    3. Woolcock M

    . Using mixed methods in monitoring and evaluation. In: Tashakkori A, Teddlie C, eds. Mixed methods in social and behavioral research. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications; 2010:613–41.
26. 26.↵
    1. Chen H

    . Practical program evaluation :assessing and improving planning, implementation, and effectiveness. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications; 2005.
27. 27.↵
    1. Petrosino A

    . Answering the why question in evaluation: the causal-model approach. Can J Program Eval 2000;15:1–24.

    OpenUrl
28. 28.↵
    1. Rush B,
    2. Ogborne A

    . Program logic models: expanding their role and structure for program planning and evaluation. Can J Program Eval 1991;6:93–106.

    OpenUrl
29. 29.↵
    1. Creswell JW,
    2. Plano Clark VL

    . Designing and conducting mixed methods research. 2nd ed. Los Angeles: Sage Publications; 2011.
30. 30.↵
    1. Crabtree BF,
    2. Chase SM,
    3. Wise CG,
    4. et al

    . Evaluation of patient centered medical home practice transformation initiatives. Med Care 2011;49:10–6.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
31. 31.↵
    Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care. Preventing and managing chronic disease: Ontario's framework. May 2007. Available from: http://www.health. gov.on.ca/en/pro/programs/cdpm/pdf/framework_ full.pdf. Accessed July 29, 2011.
32. 32.↵
    The Breakthrough Series: IHI's collaborative model for achieving breakthrough improvement. IHI Innovation Series white paper. Boston: Institute for Healthcare Improvement; 2003. Available from: www.IHI.org. Accessed January 27, 2011.
33. 33.↵
    1. Langley GJ

    . The improvement guide: a practical approach to enhancing organizational performance. 2nd ed. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass; 2009.
34. 34.↵
    1. Wagner EH,
    2. Glasgow RE,
    3. Davis C,
    4. et al

    . Quality improvement in chronic illness care: a collaborative approach. Jt Comm J Qual Improv 2001;27:63–80.

    OpenUrlPubMed
35. 35.↵
    1. Barr VJ,
    2. Robinson S,
    3. Marin-Link B,
    4. et al

    . The expanded chronic care model: an integration of concepts and strategies from population health promotion and the chronic care model. Hosp Q 2003;7:73–82.

    OpenUrlPubMed
36. 36.↵
    1. Bricker PL,
    2. Baron RJ,
    3. Scheirer JJ,
    4. et al

    . Collaboration in Pennsylvania: rapidly spreading improved chronic care for patients to practices. J Contin Educ Health Prof 2010;30:114–25.

    OpenUrlPubMed
37. 37.↵
    1. Harris SB,
    2. Worrall G,
    3. Macaulay A,
    4. et al

    . Diabetes management in Canada: baseline results of the group practice diabetes management study. Can J Diabetes 2006;30:131–7.

    OpenUrl
38. 38.↵
    1. Harris SB,
    2. Leiter LA,
    3. Webster-Bogaert S,
    4. Van DM,
    5. O'Neill C

    . Teleconferenced educational detailing: diabetes education for primary care physicians. J Contin Educ Health Prof 2005;25:87–97.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
39. 39.↵
    1. Crabtree BF,
    2. Miller WL

    1. Borkan J

    . Immersion/crystallization. In: Crabtree BF, Miller WL, eds. Doing qualitative research. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications;1999:179–94.
40. 40.↵
    1. Crabtree BF,
    2. Miller WL

    . Doing qualitative research. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications; 1999.
41. 41.↵
    National Physician Survey, College of Family Physicians of Canada, Canadian Medical Association, Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada. National Physician Survey. 2010 survey results. Available from: http://nationalphysiciansurvey.ca/surveys/2010-survey/2010-results/. Accessed January 9, 2012.
42. 42.↵
    1. Daniel DM,
    2. Norman J,
    3. Davis C,
    4. et al

    . A state-level application of the chronic illness breakthrough series: results from two collaboratives on diabetes in Washington state. Jt Comm J Qual Saf 2004;30: 69–79.

    OpenUrlPubMed
43. 43.↵
    1. Benedetti R,
    2. Flock B,
    3. Pedersen S,
    4. Ahern M

    . Improved clinical outcomes for fee-for-service physician practices participating in a diabetes care collaborative. Jt Comm J Qual Saf 2004;30:187–94.

    OpenUrlPubMed
44. 44.↵
    1. Wang A,
    2. Wolf M,
    3. Carlyle R,
    4. Wilkerson J,
    5. Porterfield D,
    6. Reaves J

    . The North Carolina experience with the diabetes health disparities collaboratives. Jt Comm J Qual Saf 2004;30:396–404.

    OpenUrlPubMed
45. 45.↵
    1. Goderis G,
    2. Borgermans L,
    3. Grol R,
    4. et al

    . Start improving the quality of care for people with type 2 diabetes through a general practice support program: cluster randomized trial. Diabetes Res Clin Pract 2010;88:56–64.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
46. 46.↵
    1. Landon BE,
    2. Hicks LS,
    3. O'Malley AJ,
    4. et al

    . Improving the management of chronic disease at community health centers. N Engl J Med 2007;356:921–34.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
47. 47.↵
    1. Chin MH,
    2. Cook S,
    3. Drum ML,
    4. et al

    . Improving diabetes care in midwest community health centers with the health disparities collaborative. Diabetes Care 2004;27:2–8.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text