Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • ARTICLES
    • Current Issue
    • Ahead of Print
    • Archives
    • Abstracts In Press
    • Special Issue Archive
    • Subject Collections
  • INFO FOR
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Call For Papers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • SUBMIT
    • Manuscript
    • Peer Review
  • ABOUT
    • The JABFM
    • Editorial Board
    • Indexing
    • Editors' Blog
  • CLASSIFIEDS
  • Other Publications
    • abfm

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
American Board of Family Medicine
  • Other Publications
    • abfm
American Board of Family Medicine

American Board of Family Medicine

Advanced Search

  • HOME
  • ARTICLES
    • Current Issue
    • Ahead of Print
    • Archives
    • Abstracts In Press
    • Special Issue Archive
    • Subject Collections
  • INFO FOR
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Call For Papers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • SUBMIT
    • Manuscript
    • Peer Review
  • ABOUT
    • The JABFM
    • Editorial Board
    • Indexing
    • Editors' Blog
  • CLASSIFIEDS
  • JABFM On Twitter
  • JABFM On YouTube
  • JABFM On Facebook
Research ArticleOriginal Research

Comparative Effectiveness of Antihypertensive Therapeutic Classes and Treatment Strategies in the Initiation of Therapy in Primary Care Patients: A Distributed Ambulatory Research in Therapeutics Network (DARTNet) Study

Michael R. Bronsert, William G. Henderson, Robert Valuck, Patrick Hosokawa and Karl Hammermeister
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine September 2013, 26 (5) 529-538; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3122/jabfm.2013.05.130048
Michael R. Bronsert
the Colorado Health Outcomes Program (MRB, WGH, PH, KH) and the Division of Cardiology (KH), University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora; the Department of Biostatistics and Informatics, University of Colorado School of Public Health, Aurora (WGH); the Department of Clinical Pharmacy, Skaggs School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Colorado, Aurora (RV).
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
William G. Henderson
the Colorado Health Outcomes Program (MRB, WGH, PH, KH) and the Division of Cardiology (KH), University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora; the Department of Biostatistics and Informatics, University of Colorado School of Public Health, Aurora (WGH); the Department of Clinical Pharmacy, Skaggs School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Colorado, Aurora (RV).
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Robert Valuck
the Colorado Health Outcomes Program (MRB, WGH, PH, KH) and the Division of Cardiology (KH), University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora; the Department of Biostatistics and Informatics, University of Colorado School of Public Health, Aurora (WGH); the Department of Clinical Pharmacy, Skaggs School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Colorado, Aurora (RV).
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Patrick Hosokawa
the Colorado Health Outcomes Program (MRB, WGH, PH, KH) and the Division of Cardiology (KH), University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora; the Department of Biostatistics and Informatics, University of Colorado School of Public Health, Aurora (WGH); the Department of Clinical Pharmacy, Skaggs School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Colorado, Aurora (RV).
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Karl Hammermeister
the Colorado Health Outcomes Program (MRB, WGH, PH, KH) and the Division of Cardiology (KH), University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora; the Department of Biostatistics and Informatics, University of Colorado School of Public Health, Aurora (WGH); the Department of Clinical Pharmacy, Skaggs School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Colorado, Aurora (RV).
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

References

  1. 1.↵
    1. Roger VL,
    2. Go AS,
    3. Lloyd-Jones DM,
    4. et al
    . Executive summary: heart disease and stroke statistics–2012 update: a report from the American Heart Association. Circulation 2012; 125:188–97.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  2. 2.↵
    1. Lewington S,
    2. Clarke R,
    3. Qizibash N,
    4. Peto R,
    5. Collins R
    . Age-specific relevance of usual blood pressure to vascular mortality: a meta-analysis of individual data for one million adults in 61 prospective studies: prospective studies collaboration. Lancet 2002; 360:1903–13.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  3. 3.↵
    1. Collins R,
    2. Peto R,
    3. MacMahon S,
    4. et al
    . Blood pressure, stroke, and coronary heart disease. Part 2: short-term reductions in blood pressure: overview of randomized drug trials in their epidemiological context. Lancet 1990; 335:827–38.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  4. 4.↵
    1. Turnbull F
    . Blood Pressure Lowering Treatment Trialists' Collaboration: effects of different blood-pressure-lowering regimens on major cardiovascular events: results of prospectively-designed overviews of randomized trials. Lancet 2003; 362:1527–35.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  5. 5.↵
    1. Chobanian AV,
    2. Bakris GL,
    3. Black HR,
    4. et al
    ; The National High Blood Pressure Education Program Coordinating Committee. Seventh report of the Joint National Committee On Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure. Hypertension 2003; 42:1206–52.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. 6.↵
    1. Cushman WC,
    2. Ford CE,
    3. Cutler JA,
    4. et al
    ; ALLHAT Collaborative Research Group. Success and predictors of blood pressure control in diverse North American settings: the antihypertensive and lipid-lowering treatment to prevent heart attack trial (ALLHAT). J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich) 2002; 4:393–404.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. 7.↵
    1. Bakris GL,
    2. Weir MR
    .; Study of Hypertension and the Efficacy of Lotrel in Diabetes (SHIELD) Investigators. Achieving goal blood pressure in patients with type 2 diabetes: Conventional versus fixed-dose combination approaches. J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich) 2003; 5:202–9.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  8. 8.↵
    1. Brown MJ,
    2. McInnes GT,
    3. Papst CC,
    4. Zhang J,
    5. MacDonald TM
    . Aliskiren and the calcium channel blocker Amlodipine combination as an initial treatment strategy for hypertension control (ACCELERATE): a randomised, parallel-group trial. Lancet 2011; 377:312–20.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  9. 9.↵
    1. Neutel JM,
    2. Mancia G,
    3. Black HR,
    4. et al
    ; TEAMSTA Severe HTN Study Investigators. Single-pill combination of telmisartan/amlodipine in patients with severe hypertension: results from the TEAMSTA Severe HTN Study. J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich) 2012; 14:206–15.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  10. 10.↵
    1. Baser O,
    2. Andrews LM,
    3. Wang L,
    4. Xie L
    . Comparison of real-world adherence, healthcare resource utilization and costs for newly initiated valsartan/amlodipine singe-pill combination versus angiotensin receptor blocker/calcium channel blocker free-combination therapy. J Med Econ 2011; 14:576–83.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  11. 11.↵
    1. Sherrill B,
    2. Halpern M,
    3. Khan S,
    4. Zhang J,
    5. Panjabi S
    . Single-pill vs. free-equivalent combination therapies for hypertension: a meta-analysis of health care costs and adherence. J Clin Hypertens 2011; 13:898–909.
    OpenUrl
  12. 12.↵
    1. Libby AM,
    2. Pace W,
    3. Bryan C,
    4. et al
    . Comparative effectiveness research in DARTNet primary care practices: point of care data collection on hypoglycemia and over-the-counter and herbal use among patients diagnosed with diabetes. Med Care 2010; 48:S39–44.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  13. 13.↵
    1. Pace WD,
    2. Cifuentes M,
    3. Valuck RJ,
    4. Staton EW,
    5. Brandt EC,
    6. West DR
    . An electronic practice-based network for observational comparative effectiveness research. Ann Intern Med 2009; 151:338–40.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  14. 14.↵
    1. Pace WD,
    2. West DR,
    3. Valuck RJ,
    4. Cifuentes M,
    5. Staton EW
    . Distributed Ambulatory Research in Therapeutics Network (DARTNet): summary report (prepared by University of Colorado DEcIDE Center under contract no. HHSA29020050037I TO2). Report No. 14. Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; 2009.
  15. 15.↵
    1. Levely AS,
    2. Stevens LA,
    3. Schmid CH,
    4. et al
    . A new equation to estimate glomerular filtration rate. Ann Intern Med 2009; 150:604–12.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  16. 16.↵
    1. Law MR,
    2. Wald NJ,
    3. Morris JK,
    4. Jordan RE
    . Value of low dose combination treatment with blood pressure lowering drugs: analysis of 354 randomised trials. BMJ 2003; 326:1427.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  17. 17.↵
    1. Neaton JD,
    2. Grimm RH Jr.,
    3. Prineas RJ,
    4. et al
    . Treatment of Mild Hypertension Study. JAMA 1993; 270:713–24.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  18. 18.↵
    1. Cushman WC,
    2. Ford CE,
    3. Einhorn PT,
    4. et al
    ; ALLHAT Collaborative Research Group. Blood pressure control by drug group in the antihypertensive and lipid-lowering treatment to prevent heart attack trial (ALLHAT). J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich) 2008; 10:751–60.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  19. 19.↵
    1. Materson BJ,
    2. Reda DJ,
    3. Cushman WC,
    4. et al
    . Single-drug therapy for hypertension in men. N engl J Med 1993; 328:914–21.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  20. 20.↵
    1. Byrd JB,
    2. Zeng C,
    3. Tavel HM,
    4. et al
    . Combination therapy as initial treatment for newly diagnosed hypertension. Am Heart J 2011; 162:340–6.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  21. 21.↵
    1. Egan BM,
    2. Bandyopadhyay D,
    3. Shaftman SR,
    4. Wagner CS,
    5. Zhao Y,
    6. Yu-Isenber KS
    . Initial monotherapy and combination therapy and hypertension control the first year. Hypertension 2012; 59:1124–31.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  22. 22.↵
    1. Gradman AH,
    2. Basile JN,
    3. Carter BL,
    4. Bakris GL
    . Combination therapy in hypertension. J Am Soc Hypertens 2010; 4:42–50.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  23. 23.↵
    1. Wald DS,
    2. Law M,
    3. Morris JK,
    4. Bestwick JP,
    5. Wald NJ
    . Combination therapy versus monotherapy in reducing blood pressure: meta-analysis on 11,000 participants from 42 trials. Am J Med 2009; 122:243–62.
    OpenUrl
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of the American Board of Family     Medicine: 26 (5)
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine
Vol. 26, Issue 5
September-October 2013
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Cover (PDF)
  • Index by author
  • Back Matter (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Board of Family Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Comparative Effectiveness of Antihypertensive Therapeutic Classes and Treatment Strategies in the Initiation of Therapy in Primary Care Patients: A Distributed Ambulatory Research in Therapeutics Network (DARTNet) Study
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Board of Family Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Board of Family Medicine web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
7 + 8 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Comparative Effectiveness of Antihypertensive Therapeutic Classes and Treatment Strategies in the Initiation of Therapy in Primary Care Patients: A Distributed Ambulatory Research in Therapeutics Network (DARTNet) Study
Michael R. Bronsert, William G. Henderson, Robert Valuck, Patrick Hosokawa, Karl Hammermeister
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine Sep 2013, 26 (5) 529-538; DOI: 10.3122/jabfm.2013.05.130048

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Comparative Effectiveness of Antihypertensive Therapeutic Classes and Treatment Strategies in the Initiation of Therapy in Primary Care Patients: A Distributed Ambulatory Research in Therapeutics Network (DARTNet) Study
Michael R. Bronsert, William G. Henderson, Robert Valuck, Patrick Hosokawa, Karl Hammermeister
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine Sep 2013, 26 (5) 529-538; DOI: 10.3122/jabfm.2013.05.130048
Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Conclusions
    • Acknowledgments
    • Notes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Excessive dietary sodium intake and elevated blood pressure: a review of current prevention and management strategies and the emerging role of pharmaconutrigenetics
  • The Nitrate-Independent Blood Pressure-Lowering Effect of Beetroot Juice: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
  • Content Usage and the Most Frequently Read Articles by Issue in 2013
  • Patient-Centered Research Happens in Practice-based Research Networks
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Interpersonal Primary Care Continuity for Chronic Conditions Is Associated with Fewer Hospitalizations and Emergency Department Visits Among Medicaid Enrollees
  • Documentation and Treatment of Obesity in Primary Care Physician Office Visits: The Role of the Patient-Physician Relationship
  • Patients’ Willingness to Accept Social Needs Navigation After In-Person versus Remote Screening
Show more Original Research

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • Antihypertensives
  • Comparative Effectiveness Research
  • Drug Therapy
  • Hypertension
  • Practice-Based Research
  • Primary Health Care

Navigate

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues

Authors & Reviewers

  • Info For Authors
  • Info For Reviewers
  • Submit A Manuscript/Review

Other Services

  • Get Email Alerts
  • Classifieds
  • Reprints and Permissions

Other Resources

  • Forms
  • Contact Us
  • ABFM News

© 2023 American Board of Family Medicine

Powered by HighWire