Validation of the Diagnostic Algorithms for 5 Chronic Conditions in the Canadian Primary Care Sentinel Surveillance Network (CPCSSN): A Kingston Practice-based Research Network (PBRN) Report

References

1. 1.↵
   1. Schoen C,
   2. Osborn R,
   3. Doty MM,
   4. Bishop M,
   5. Peugh J,
   6. Murukutla N

   . Toward higher-performance health systems: adults' health care experiences in seven countries, 2007. Health Aff (Millwood) 2007; 26: w717– 34.

   OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
2. 2.↵
   1. Dai S,
   2. Robitaille C,
   3. Bancej C,
   4. Loukine L,
   5. Waters C,
   6. Baclic O

   . Executive summary–report from the Canadian Chronic Disease Surveillance System: hypertension in Canada, 2010. Chronic Dis Can 2010;31:46–7.

   OpenUrlPubMed
3. 3.↵
   Public Health Agency of Canada. Report from the National Diabetes Surveillance System–Diabetes in Canada, 2009. Ottawa: Public Health Agency of Canada; 2009.
4. 4.↵
   Public Health Agency of Canada. The human face of mental health and mental illness in Canada, 2006. Ottawa: Public Health Agency of Canada; 2006.
5. 5.↵
   Public Health Agency of Canada. Life and breath: respiratory disease in Canada. Ottawa: Public Health Agency of Canada; 2007.
6. 6.↵
   1. Lagacé C

   , Public Health Agency of Canada. Life with arthritis in Canada: a personal and public health challenge. Ottawa: Public Health Agency of Canada; 2010.
7. 7.↵
   1. Birtwhistle R,
   2. Keshavjee K,
   3. Lambert-Lanning A,
   4. et al

   . Building a pan-Canadian Primary Care Sentinel Surveillance Network: Initial development and moving forward. J Am Board Fam Med 2009;22:412–22.

   OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
8. 8.↵
   1. Juurlink D

   . Institute for Clinical Evaluative Services. Canadian Institute for Health Information Discharge Abstract Database: a validation study [report online]. June 2006. Available from: http://www.ices.on.ca/file/cihi_dad_reabstractors_study.pdf. Accessed January 5, 2013.
9. 9.↵
   1. Hux JE,
   2. Ivis F,
   3. Flintoft V,
   4. Bica A

   . Diabetes in Ontario: determination of prevalence and incidence using a validated administrative data algorithm. Diabetes Care 2002;25:512–6.

   OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
10. 10.↵
    1. Dean BB,
    2. Lam J,
    3. Natoli JL,
    4. Butler Q,
    5. Aguilar D,
    6. Nordyke RJ

    . Review: use of electronic medical records for health outcomes research: a literature review. Med Care Re Rev 2009;66:611–38.

    OpenUrl
11. 11.↵
    1. Kerby J,
    2. Keshavjee K,
    3. Holbrook A

    . Comparison of diagnostic codes in a clinical-research database and an administrative database. Proc AMIA Symp 2000; 1045.
12. 12.↵
    1. Broemeling A-M,
    2. Watson DE,
    3. Prebtani F

    . Population patterns of chronic health conditions, co-morbidity and healthcare use in Canada: implications for policy and practice. Healthc Q 2008;11:70–6.

    OpenUrlPubMed
13. 13.↵
    1. Wurst KE,
    2. Ephross SA,
    3. Loehr J,
    4. Clark DW,
    5. Guess HA

    . The utility of the general practice research database to examine selected congenital heart defects: a validation study. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf 2007;16:867–77.

    OpenUrlPubMed
14. 14.↵
    1. Thomas SL,
    2. Edwards CJ,
    3. Smeeth L,
    4. Cooper C,
    5. Hall AJ

    . How accurate are diagnoses for rheumatoid arthritis and juvenile idiopathic arthritis in the general practice research database? Arthritis Rheum 2008;59:1314–21.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
15. 15.↵
    1. Jordan K,
    2. Porcheret M,
    3. Croft P

    . Quality of morbidity coding in general practice computerized medical records: a systematic review. Fam Pract 2004;21:396–412.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
16. 16.↵
    1. Herrett E,
    2. Thomas SL,
    3. Schoonen WM,
    4. Smeeth L,
    5. Hall AJ

    . Validation and validity of diagnoses in the General Practice Research Database: a systematic review. Br J Clin Pharmacol 2010;69:4–14.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
17. 17.↵
    1. Goulet JL,
    2. Erdos J,
    3. Kancir S,
    4. et al

    . Measuring performance directly using the veterans health administration electronic medical record: a comparison with external peer review. Med Care 2007;45:73–9.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
18. 18.↵
    1. Hurdle JF,
    2. Weir CR,
    3. Roth B,
    4. Hoffman J,
    5. Nebeker JR

    . Critical gaps in the world's largest electronic medical record: ad hoc nursing narratives and invisible adverse drug events. AMIA Annu Symp Proc 2003; 309– 12.
19. 19.↵
    1. Landis JR,
    2. Koch GG

    . The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 1977;33:159–74.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
20. 20.↵
    1. Zou KH,
    2. O'Malley AJ,
    3. Mauri L

    . Receiver-operating characteristic analysis for evaluating diagnostic tests and predictive models. Circulation 2007;115:654–7.

    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
21. 21.↵
    1. de Burgos-Lunar C,
    2. Salinero-Fort MA,
    3. Cardenas-Valladolid J,
    4. et al

    . Validation of diabetes mellitus and hypertension diagnosis in computerized medical records in primary health care. BMC Med Res Methodol 2011; 11: 146.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
22. 22.↵
    1. Duggan S,
    2. Aylett MJ,
    3. Eccles M,
    4. Ford GA

    . Defining hypertension in older people from primary care case notes review. J Hum Hypertens 1997;11:193–9.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
23. 23.↵
    1. Mapel DW,
    2. Frost FJ,
    3. Hurley JS,
    4. et al

    . An algorithm for the identification of undiagnosed COPD cases using administrative claims data. J Manag Care Pharm 2006;12:457–65.

    OpenUrlPubMed
24. 24.↵
    1. Han MK,
    2. Kim MG,
    3. Mardon R,
    4. et al

    . Spirometry utilization for COPD: how do we measure up? Chest 2007;32:403–9.

    OpenUrl
25. 25.↵
    1. Chubak J,
    2. Pocobelli G,
    3. Weiss NS

    . Tradeoffs between accuracy measures for electronic health care data algorithms. J Clin Epidemiol 2012; 65: 343– 49.e2.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed