Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • ARTICLES
    • Current Issue
    • Ahead of Print
    • Archives
    • Abstracts In Press
    • Special Issue Archive
    • Subject Collections
  • INFO FOR
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Call For Papers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • SUBMIT
    • Manuscript
    • Peer Review
  • ABOUT
    • The JABFM
    • The Editing Fellowship
    • Editorial Board
    • Indexing
    • Editors' Blog
  • CLASSIFIEDS
  • Other Publications
    • abfm

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
American Board of Family Medicine
  • Other Publications
    • abfm
American Board of Family Medicine

American Board of Family Medicine

Advanced Search

  • HOME
  • ARTICLES
    • Current Issue
    • Ahead of Print
    • Archives
    • Abstracts In Press
    • Special Issue Archive
    • Subject Collections
  • INFO FOR
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Call For Papers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • SUBMIT
    • Manuscript
    • Peer Review
  • ABOUT
    • The JABFM
    • The Editing Fellowship
    • Editorial Board
    • Indexing
    • Editors' Blog
  • CLASSIFIEDS
  • JABFM on Bluesky
  • JABFM On Facebook
  • JABFM On Twitter
  • JABFM On YouTube
Research ArticleOriginal Research

Efficacy of a New Postpartum Transition Protocol for Avoiding Pregnancy

Thomas Bouchard, Richard J. Fehring and Mary Schneider
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine January 2013, 26 (1) 35-44; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3122/jabfm.2013.01.120126
Thomas Bouchard
From the Department of Family Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada (TB); the Marquette University College of Nursing Institute for Natural Family Planning, Milwaukee, WI (RJF, MS); and the Institute for Natural Family Planning (RJF).
BSc, MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Richard J. Fehring
From the Department of Family Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada (TB); the Marquette University College of Nursing Institute for Natural Family Planning, Milwaukee, WI (RJF, MS); and the Institute for Natural Family Planning (RJF).
PhD, RN, FAAN
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Mary Schneider
From the Department of Family Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada (TB); the Marquette University College of Nursing Institute for Natural Family Planning, Milwaukee, WI (RJF, MS); and the Institute for Natural Family Planning (RJF).
MSN, APRN
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Figure 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    Figure 1.

    ClearBlue Easy Fertility Monitor with a test stick inserted. Three bars indicate low (1 bar), high (2 bars, based on detection of E3G rise), or peak fertility (3 bars and an egg symbol, based on detection of luteinizing hormone threshold).

  • Figure 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    Figure 2.

    These 3 cycles are illustrative of the online charting system that records monitor readings, intercourse, bleeding, and mucus observations. L refers to low fertility per the monitor or mucus, H refers to high fertility, and P refers to peak fertility and impending ovulation. Cycle 10 illustrates the artificial 20-day cycle and testing every second day on the monitor. Cycle 11 illustrates the first ovulation as picked up by the electronic hormonal fertility monitor (EHFM) and reflected in mucus observations. Cycle 12 illustrates the first menses (menses score ! 12) occurring soon after the first ovulation and shows the later ovulation and longer length of the first menstrual cycle postpartum. Note that the “fertile window” shown on the website applies to only women with regular cycles and not to the first 2 cycles during amenorrhea.

  • Figure 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    Figure 3.

    Inclusion flow diagram.

Tables

  • Figures
    • View popup
    Table 1.

    Revised Postpartum Protocol With Additional Rules

    Original Protocol* for Artificial Cycles During AmenorrheaAdditional Rules for First 6 Cycles After the Return of Menses
    1. Trigger a cycle by pushing the “M” button on the monitor.

    2. Fast-forward the monitor to day 5.

    3. The monitor will ask for a test for the next 20 days.

    4. Test your first morning urine every other day.

    5. When a high is recorded, test the urine every day.

    6. Retrigger the monitor and fast-forward every 20 days.

    7. Continue steps 1–6 until you detect a peak reading and resume menses.

    8. To avoid pregnancy, avoid intercourse on high and peak days and 3 full days after the last peak day.

    • 9. When menses returns, reset the monitor and erase the memory (erase the memory for all 6 cycles postpartum). Day 1 is the first day of menses. Begin testing when the monitor asks for a test on day 6.

    • 10. Fertility begins on day 10 of the first cycle after the return of menses, day 9 in the second cycle, day 8 in the third cycle, day 7 in the fourth cycle, and day 6 in the fifth cycle onward. However, if the monitor records a high reading before these days, then fertility starts on the day of the first high reading.

    • 11. (Optional) Beginning on day 6 of the first menstrual cycle postpartum, women may do a second test for the LH surge in the evening with a separate LH test kit.

    • This study used the rules of the original protocol, which are listed in the left column. The revised rules are in the right column.

    • ↵* The original protocol is taken from Ref. 21.

    • LH, luteinizing hormone.

    • View popup
    Table 2.

    Demographics of Total Participants (N = 337) and Online Charting Participants (n =198)*

    DemographicsTotal (N = 337)Charting (n = 198)
    Age, years (mean [SD])30.5 ± 5.130.2 ± 4.9
    Years married (mean [SD])5.7 ± 4.65.3 ± 4.3
    Living children (mean [SD])3.0 ± 1.72.9 ± 1.7
    White ethnicity (%)7073
    Catholic religion (%)7979
    • ↵* There were no significant differences in demographics between the total online participants and the online charting participants.

    • View popup
    Table 3.

    Rate of Unintended Pregnancies With Use Over 12 Months

    MonthsWomen Exposed (n)Cumulative Pregnancy Rate (n)
    11980
    31380
    61170
    12748
    • View popup
    Table 4.

    Acceptability and Ease of Use Surveys at 1, 3, and 6 Months

    Month 1Month 2Month 6
    Ease of including into daily routine4.9 ± 1.94.8 ± 1.84.8 ± 2.0
    Ease of using electronic chart5.6 ± 1.75.7 ± 1.55.9 ± 1.3
    Understanding information available on the website5.7 ± 1.46.0 ± 1.05.8 ± 1.3
    Overall opinion of website6.0 ± 1.16.0 ± 1.36.2 ± 1.0
    Increased ability to avoid pregnancy with website5.2 ± 1.55.7 ± 1.45.8 ± 1.3
    Decreased anxiety about becoming pregnant with website4.8 ± 1.75.4 ± 1.65.5 ± 1.6
    Ease of using website5.9 ± 1.26.1 ± 0.96.2 ± 1.0
    Do you like the website?5.5 ± 1.35.7 ± 1.15.8 ± 1.0
    Compared with other methods to avoid pregnancy, how much of an improvement is the website?5.7 ± 1.36.0 ± 1.16.0 ± 1.2
    Chances of avoiding pregnancy this month5.7 ± 1.16.1 ± 1.16.0 ± 1.2
    Totals55.4 ± 8.857.7 ± 8.358.3 ± 7.7
    • Values are means ± standard deviations. Items are scored on a scale of 1 to 7, with 1 being the most negative response and 7 being the most positive response.

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of the American Board of Family     Medicine: 26 (1)
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine
Vol. 26, Issue 1
January-February 2013
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Cover (PDF)
  • Index by author
  • Back Matter (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Board of Family Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Efficacy of a New Postpartum Transition Protocol for Avoiding Pregnancy
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Board of Family Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Board of Family Medicine web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
13 + 5 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Efficacy of a New Postpartum Transition Protocol for Avoiding Pregnancy
Thomas Bouchard, Richard J. Fehring, Mary Schneider
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine Jan 2013, 26 (1) 35-44; DOI: 10.3122/jabfm.2013.01.120126

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Efficacy of a New Postpartum Transition Protocol for Avoiding Pregnancy
Thomas Bouchard, Richard J. Fehring, Mary Schneider
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine Jan 2013, 26 (1) 35-44; DOI: 10.3122/jabfm.2013.01.120126
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Conclusions
    • Acknowledgments
    • Notes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Content Usage and the Most Frequently Read Articles by Issue in 2013
  • Researching Together and Improving Practice Outcomes
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Integrating Adverse Childhood Experiences and Social Risks Screening in Adult Primary Care
  • A Pilot Comparison of Clinical Data Collection Methods Using Paper, Electronic Health Record Prompt, and a Smartphone Application
  • Associations Between Modifiable Preconception Care Indicators and Pregnancy Outcomes
Show more Original Research

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • Breast Feeding
  • Lactation
  • Natural Family Planning Methods
  • Ovulation Detection
  • Postpartum Period

Navigate

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues

Authors & Reviewers

  • Info For Authors
  • Info For Reviewers
  • Submit A Manuscript/Review

Other Services

  • Get Email Alerts
  • Classifieds
  • Reprints and Permissions

Other Resources

  • Forms
  • Contact Us
  • ABFM News

© 2025 American Board of Family Medicine

Powered by HighWire