Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • ARTICLES
    • Current Issue
    • Abstracts In Press
    • Archives
    • Special Issue Archive
    • Subject Collections
  • INFO FOR
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Call For Papers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • SUBMIT
    • Manuscript
    • Peer Review
  • ABOUT
    • The JABFM
    • The Editing Fellowship
    • Editorial Board
    • Indexing
    • Editors' Blog
  • CLASSIFIEDS
  • Other Publications
    • abfm

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
American Board of Family Medicine
  • Other Publications
    • abfm
American Board of Family Medicine

American Board of Family Medicine

Advanced Search

  • HOME
  • ARTICLES
    • Current Issue
    • Abstracts In Press
    • Archives
    • Special Issue Archive
    • Subject Collections
  • INFO FOR
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Call For Papers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • SUBMIT
    • Manuscript
    • Peer Review
  • ABOUT
    • The JABFM
    • The Editing Fellowship
    • Editorial Board
    • Indexing
    • Editors' Blog
  • CLASSIFIEDS
  • JABFM on Bluesky
  • JABFM On Facebook
  • JABFM On Twitter
  • JABFM On YouTube
Research ArticleOriginal Research

Are Pediatric Quality Care Measures Too Stringent?

Allison Casciato, Heather Angier, Christina Milano, Nicholas Gideonse, Rachel Gold and Jennifer DeVoe
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine September 2012, 25 (5) 686-693; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3122/jabfm.2012.05.120041
Allison Casciato
From the Department of Family Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University (AC, HA, CM, NG, JD); Kaiser Permanente Northwest, Center for Health Research (RG); and OCHIN Community Health Information Network (JD), Portland, Oregon.
BA (MSIII)
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Heather Angier
From the Department of Family Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University (AC, HA, CM, NG, JD); Kaiser Permanente Northwest, Center for Health Research (RG); and OCHIN Community Health Information Network (JD), Portland, Oregon.
MPH
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Christina Milano
From the Department of Family Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University (AC, HA, CM, NG, JD); Kaiser Permanente Northwest, Center for Health Research (RG); and OCHIN Community Health Information Network (JD), Portland, Oregon.
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Nicholas Gideonse
From the Department of Family Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University (AC, HA, CM, NG, JD); Kaiser Permanente Northwest, Center for Health Research (RG); and OCHIN Community Health Information Network (JD), Portland, Oregon.
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Rachel Gold
From the Department of Family Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University (AC, HA, CM, NG, JD); Kaiser Permanente Northwest, Center for Health Research (RG); and OCHIN Community Health Information Network (JD), Portland, Oregon.
PhD, MPH
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jennifer DeVoe
From the Department of Family Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University (AC, HA, CM, NG, JD); Kaiser Permanente Northwest, Center for Health Research (RG); and OCHIN Community Health Information Network (JD), Portland, Oregon.
MD, DPhil
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Figure 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    Figure 1.

    Percentage of children who received the recommended number of well-child visits by 15 months of age versus by 2 years of age. The original timeline for having 6 well child visits is before 15 months of age; we modified this timeline to include children up to 2 years of age.

  • Figure 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    Figure 2.

    Percentage of children up to date on each vaccine series by age 2 versus those completed by age 3, percentage of adolescents up to date by age 13 versus those completed by age 15, and those with documentation of parent refusal. The original timeline means children are up to date with immunizations by age 2 and adolescents are up to date by age 13. The modified timeline includes children who completed childhood immunizations by age 3 and adolescent immunizations by age 15. Dtap, diphtheria, tetanus, acellular pertussis; IPV, polio; MMR, measles, mumps, rubella; Hib, Haemophilus influenza type b; Hep B, hepatitis B; VZV, varicella; PCV, pneumococcal; Hep A, hepatitis A; Flu, influenza; Men, meningococcal; Tdap/Td, tetanus, diphtheria acellular pertussis/tetanus, diphtheria booster vaccine.

  • Figure 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    Figure 3.

    Percentage of body mass index (BMI) percentile recorded within 12 months and within 36 months of the measurement year, by age.

Tables

  • Figures
    • View popup
    Table 1. Patient Characteristics at Initial Data Collection as Reported in the Electronic Medical Record (N = 1,544)
    Demographic Characteristics*
    Sex
        Male787 (51.0)
        Female757 (49.0)
    Age
        6 months-3 years499 (32.3)
        4–11 years727 (47.1)
        12–15 years318 (20.6)
    Insurance type
        Private291 (18.8)
        Public1045 (67.7)
        None (self-pay)181 (11.7)
        Other†27 (1.7)
    • The original timeline is for children/adolescents to have a BMI percentile recorded within the measurement year (12 months) and our modified timeline included children/adolescents that had a BMI percentile recorded within 36 months of the measurement year.

    • Values provided as n (%).

    • ↵* Collected on July 1, 2011.

    • ↵† Denotes public health insurance plans contracted to private health insurance companies for management.

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of the American Board of Family     Medicine: 25 (5)
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine
Vol. 25, Issue 5
September-October 2012
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Cover (PDF)
  • Index by author
  • Back Matter (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Board of Family Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Are Pediatric Quality Care Measures Too Stringent?
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Board of Family Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Board of Family Medicine web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
6 + 1 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Are Pediatric Quality Care Measures Too Stringent?
Allison Casciato, Heather Angier, Christina Milano, Nicholas Gideonse, Rachel Gold, Jennifer DeVoe
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine Sep 2012, 25 (5) 686-693; DOI: 10.3122/jabfm.2012.05.120041

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Are Pediatric Quality Care Measures Too Stringent?
Allison Casciato, Heather Angier, Christina Milano, Nicholas Gideonse, Rachel Gold, Jennifer DeVoe
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine Sep 2012, 25 (5) 686-693; DOI: 10.3122/jabfm.2012.05.120041
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Conclusions
    • Acknowledgments
    • Notes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Primary Care Research Conducted in Networks: Getting Down to Business
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Identifying and Addressing Social Determinants of Health with an Electronic Health Record
  • Integrating Adverse Childhood Experiences and Social Risks Screening in Adult Primary Care
  • A Pilot Comparison of Clinical Data Collection Methods Using Paper, Electronic Health Record Prompt, and a Smartphone Application
Show more Original Research

Similar Articles

Navigate

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues

Authors & Reviewers

  • Info For Authors
  • Info For Reviewers
  • Submit A Manuscript/Review

Other Services

  • Get Email Alerts
  • Classifieds
  • Reprints and Permissions

Other Resources

  • Forms
  • Contact Us
  • ABFM News

© 2025 American Board of Family Medicine

Powered by HighWire