Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • ARTICLES
    • Current Issue
    • Abstracts In Press
    • Archives
    • Special Issue Archive
    • Subject Collections
  • INFO FOR
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Call For Papers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • SUBMIT
    • Manuscript
    • Peer Review
  • ABOUT
    • The JABFM
    • The Editing Fellowship
    • Editorial Board
    • Indexing
    • Editors' Blog
  • CLASSIFIEDS
  • Other Publications
    • abfm

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
American Board of Family Medicine
  • Other Publications
    • abfm
American Board of Family Medicine

American Board of Family Medicine

Advanced Search

  • HOME
  • ARTICLES
    • Current Issue
    • Abstracts In Press
    • Archives
    • Special Issue Archive
    • Subject Collections
  • INFO FOR
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Call For Papers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • SUBMIT
    • Manuscript
    • Peer Review
  • ABOUT
    • The JABFM
    • The Editing Fellowship
    • Editorial Board
    • Indexing
    • Editors' Blog
  • CLASSIFIEDS
  • JABFM on Bluesky
  • JABFM On Facebook
  • JABFM On Twitter
  • JABFM On YouTube
Research ArticleOriginal Research

Azithromycin for Bronchial Asthma in Adults: An Effectiveness Trial

David L. Hahn, Mike Grasmick, Scott Hetzel and Steven Yale
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine July 2012, 25 (4) 442-459; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3122/jabfm.2012.04.110309
David L. Hahn
MD, MS
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Mike Grasmick
PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Scott Hetzel
MS
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Steven Yale
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Figure 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    Figure 1.

    CONSORT diagram. *Unavailable pulmonary function tests (PFTs) as the only disqualification of 67 of 170. †Nonqualifying PFTs in 10 of 24.

  • Figure 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    Figure 2.

    Differences from baseline for asthma symptoms, quality of life, and control. A: Symptoms—rating of overall asthma symptoms for the past 24 hours (negative numbers indicate decreased symptoms and hence improvement). B: Quality of life— Juniper Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (AQLQ); positive numbers indicate higher quality of life scores and hence improvement). C: Control—Juniper Mini-Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ; negative numbers indicate better control and hence improvement). See Methods for details. Symbols represent the mean paired differences from baseline. Bars represent 95% confidence intervals. *P < 0·05, **P < 0·01, ***P < 0·001 (t tests, placebo versus open label).

  • Figure 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    Figure 3.

    Improvement in asthma quality of life (AQL) after azithromycin treatment may be “all or none.” AQL change scores from baseline to 12 months after enrollment (9 months after treatment completion) are defined as follows: “AQL change <0” = AQL change worse than baseline; “AQL change 0 < .5” = change between 0 to <.5 units; “AQL change 0.5 < 1” = change between 0.5 to <1 (change of 0.5 unit is considered the minimum clinically important change); “AQL change 1 < 2” = change between 1 and 2 (change >1.5 units represents a large change); “AQL change ≥2” = change of 2 units or more. The contrasting patterns between placebo and open-label azithromycin were statistically significant, as noted in the text. The differences between randomized azithromycin and placebo were not statistically significant, as noted in the text.

Tables

  • Figures
    • View popup
    Table 1. Inclusion, Exclusion, and Outcome Criteria
    Criteria
    Inclusions
    • Adults ≥18 years of age with physician-diagnosed asthma (symptomatic ≥2 days per week and/or ≥2 nights per month or in exacerbation)

    • Objective evidence for reversible airway obstruction (≥12% and ≥200 mL change in FEV18 and/or a 25% and 60 L/min change in PEFR9) either spontaneously or after treatment

    • Asthma for at least 6 months before enrollment

    Exclusions
    • Not English literate or has no email address or Internet access

    • Macrolide allergy

    • Pregnant or lactating

    • ≥4 weeks of continuous use of macrolides, tetracyclines, or quinolones within 6 months of randomization

    • Asthma symptoms less than 6 months' duration

    • Unstable asthma requiring immediate emergency care

    • Comorbidities likely to interfere with study assessments or follow-up (eg, cystic fibrosis, obstructive sleep apnea requiring CPAP, cardiomyopathy, congestive heart failure, terminal cancer, alcohol or other drug abuse, or any other serious medical condition that, in the opinion of the study physician, would seriously interfere with or preclude assessment of study outcomes or completion of study assessments)

    • Medical conditions for which macrolide administration may possibly be hazardous (eg, acute or chronic hepatitis, cirrhosis, or other liver disease; chronic kidney disease; or history of prolonged cardiac repolarization and QT interval or torsades de pointes).

    • Specified medications for which close monitoring has been recommended in the setting of macrolide administration (digoxin, theophylline, warfarin, ergotamine or dihydroergotamine, triazolam, carbamazepine, cyclosporine, hexobarbital, or phenytoin)

    Outcomes
    • Asthma symptom scores (0 = none, 1 = mild, 2 = moderate, 3 = severe, 4 = worst ever) within the past 24 hours; every 1.5 months

    • AQL (Juniper AQL questionnaire)10 within the past 2 weeks; every 3 months

    • Asthma control (mini-Juniper Asthma Control Questionnaire, without pulmonary function)11,12 within the past week; every 3 months

    • Exacerbations (a steroid burst, an unscheduled or emergency visit and/or a hospitalizations for asthma) within the past 1.5 months; every 1.5 months

    • Other respiratory illnesses within the past 1.5 months; every 1.5 months

    • Off-study antibiotic use within the past 1.5 months; every 1.5 months

    • Adverse events within the past 1.5 months; every 1.5 months

    • Use of asthma-controller medications (oral or inhaled steroids, LABAs, or antileukotriene agents) within the past 3 months; every 3 months

    • Self-reported improvement in asthma (compared with baseline) within the past 3 months; every 3 months

    • AQL, asthma quality of life; CPAP, continuous positive airway pressure; FEV1, forced expiratory volume in 1 second; LABA, long-acting bronchodilators; PEFR, peak expiratory flow rate.

    • View popup
    Table 2. Patient Characteristics
    CharacteristicRandomized Placebo (n=37)Randomized Azithromycin (n=38)Open-Label Azithromycin (n=22)P*
    Age(years), mean(SD)47.4 (14.2)45.7 (15.5)45.4 (15.2).621/.745
        At asthma diagnosis24 (<1–59)24 (<1–58)28 (11–59).603/.104
    Diagnosis at age ≥18 years21 (57)24 (63)19 (86).641/.023
    Male sex13 (35)11 (29)12 (55).626/.078
    Smoking status.187/.028
        Never13 (35)20 (53)16 (73)
        Former19 (51)12 (32)6 (27)
        Current5 (14)6 (16)0 (0)
    White race33 (89)36 (95)18 (82).430/.227
    Education, median years (range)15 (10–20)14 (12–22)17 (12–25).550/<.001
        ≥High school graduate35 (95)38 (100)21 (100).240/1.000
    Chronic sinusitis11 (30)14 (37)17 (77).626/<.001
    Atopy
    Allergy tested18 (53)18 (49)19 (86).814/.003
        Negative2 (11)1 (6)6 (32).759/.003
        Positive for 1–3 positive4 (22)3 (17)8 (42)
        Positive for ≥412 (67)14 (78)5 (26)
    Infectious asthma†6 (16)17 (46)13 (59).011/.024
    Exacerbations (previous 2 years), n (%)24 (65)26 (68)14 (64).809/.802
        Hospitalized0 (0)2 (5)4 (18).493/.023
        Emergency visit14 (38)19 (50)9 (41).355/1.000
        Steroid burst22 (59)24 (63)13 (59).815/1.000
    Baseline asthma severity, n (%)
        Day symptom frequency‡.675/.009
            Mild to moderate35 (95)34 (89)15 (68)
            Severe2 (5)4 (11)7 (32)
        Night symptom frequency‡1.000/.046
            Mild to moderate33 (89)33 (87)15 (68)
        Severe4 (11)5 (13)7 (32)
    Coexisting COPD8 (22)5 (13)2 (9).375/.509
    Lung function, mean (SD)
    FEV1, L (n)18197
        Low§2.24 (1.25)2.33 (1.05)2.48 (1.19).812/.688
        % Change‖42 (47.4)26 (25.9)33 (26.8).214/.969
    PEFR, L/min (n with value)252518
        Low§258 (110)276 (110)300 (105).566/.281
        % Change‖62 (56)63 (49)85 (63).927/.140
    Any controller medication33 (89)25 (66)19 (86).026/.549
        Inhaled corticosteroid30 (81)24 (63)18 (82)
        Long-acting bronchodilator¶26 (70)14 (37)15 (68)
        Leukotriene inhibitor8 (22)9 (24)6 (27)
        Oral prednisone4 (11)2 (5)1 (5)
    Baseline asthma measures, mean (SD)**
        Overall asthma symptoms1.48 (0.94)1.42 (0.77)2.06 (0.73).744/.005
        Asthma quality of life4.97 (1.28)4.98 (1.27)4.12 (1.29).988/.023
        Asthma control1.56 (1.02)1.75 (0.93)2.26 (1.35).424/.090
    • Values provided as n (%) unless otherwise indicated.

    • ↵* P values comparing randomized placebo versus randomized azithromycin/randomized cohort versus open-label cohort.

    • ↵† History showed first asthma symptoms began after an acute respiratory illness.

    • ↵‡ Day: mild = ≥2 days/week to less than daily; moderate = ≥1 per day to less than continuous; severe = continuous. Night: mild = ≥2 per month to ≤1 per week; moderate = >1 per week to ≤1 per night; severe = >1 per night.

    • ↵§ Before bronchodilator use or lowest spontaneous value.

    • ↵‖ Based on data after bronchodilator use or highest spontaneous value. Some subjects had either FEV1 or PEFR values, not both.

    • ↵¶ All subjects using a long-acting bronchodilator also were using an inhaled corticosteroid.

    • ↵** See Methods for definitions.

    • COPD, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; FEV1, forced expiratory volume in 1 second; PEFR, peak expiratory flow rate.

    • View popup
    Table 3. Asthma Outcomes*
    Randomized PlaceboRandomized AzithromycinOpen-label AzithromycinP, Placebo vs Randomized AzithromycinP, Placebo vs Open-Label
    Change in overall asthma symptoms, from baseline
        Week 6−0.60 (1.07) (n=30)−0.15 (0.83) (n=33)−0.88 (0.81) (n=16).071/.071†.333/.428†
        Week 12−0.48 (1.16) (n=23)−0.31 ((0.74) (n=32)−1.0 (1.37) (n=16).551/.580†.223/.723†
        Week 18−0.15 (1.13) (n=27)0.10 (0.75) (n=31)−0.94 (1.12) (n=16).344/.178†.034/.161†
        Week 24−0.08 (0.95) (n=25)−0.10 (0.96) (n=30)−1.0 (1.17) (n=17).939/.599†.012/.013†
        Week 30−0.05 (1.09) (n=22)−0.34 (1.01) (n=29)−0.81 (1.17) (n=16).322/.280†.048/.870†
        Week 36−0.21 (1.14) (n=24)−0.22 (0.70) (n=27)−1.27 (0.70) (n=15).959/.942†.001/.017†
        Week 42−0.04 (0.88) (n=23)−0.12 (0.93) (n=25)−1.21 (0.70) (n=14).770/.858†<.001/.001†
        Week 48−0.10 (1.07) (n=20)−0.07 (0.88) (n=29)−1.07 (0.95) (n=13).916/.758†.011/.067†
    Change in AQL, from baseline
        Week 120.50 (0.95) (n=22)0.67 (1.10) (n=26)1.54 (1.91) (n=15).584/.682†.067/.180†
        Week 240.31 (1.36) (n=22)0.49 (1.11) (n=27)1.36 (1.75) (n=17).618/.382†.049/.151†
        Week 360.23 (1.02) (n=23)0.58 (1.04) (n=22)2.05 (1.40) (n=15).261/.342†<.001/.001†
        Week 480.40 (1.33) (n=19)0.50 (1.10) (n=25)1.70 (1.42) (n=13).784/.929†.015/.068†
    Change in asthma control, from baseline
        Week 6−0.37 (0.88) (n=30)−0.46 (0.60) (n=33)−1.24 (1.14) (n=16).634/.654†.014/.009†
        Week 12−0.41 (1.01) (n=23)−0.40 (0.80) (n=32)−1.38 (1.87) (n=16).946/.998†.075/.324†
        Week 18−0.40 (1.05) (n=27)−0.28 (0.88) (n=31)−1.18 (1.53) (n=16).637/.573†.085/.179†
        Week 24−0.37 (1.12) (n=25)−0.34 (1.03) (n=30)−1.35 (1.69) (n=17).925/.536†.045/.034†
        Week 30−0.25 (1.22) (n=22)−0.56 (0.81) (n=29)−1.04 (1.38) (n=16).307/.281†.078/.163†
        Week 36−0.39 (1.00) (n=24)−0.39 (0.79) (n=27)−1.63 (1.41) (n=15)1.000/.852†.007/.015†
        Week 42−0.22 (1.32) (n=23)−0.38 (0.72) (n=25)−1.42 (1.41) (n=14).604/.817†.016/.068†
        Week 48−0.45 (1.00) (n=20)−0.34 (0.88) (n=29)−1.08 (1.20) (n=13).692/.525†.132/.379†
    AQL improved ≥1 unit, n/N (%)
        Week 125/22 (23)11/26 (42)9/15 (60).221/.136‡.038/.098‡
        Week 246/22 (27)8/27 (30)11/17 (65)1.000/.745‡.026/.048‡
        Week 365/23 (22)6/22 (27)12/15 (80).738/.738‡.001/.003‡
        Week 484/19 (21)9/25 (36)7/13 (54).335/.386‡.072/.116‡
    Asthma control improved ≥1 unit, n/N (%)
        Week 66/30 (20)4/33 (12)9/16 (56).498 /.421‡.021/.010‡
        Week 127/23 (30)7/32 (22)11/16 (69).539/.531‡.025/.045‡
        Week 187/27 (26)4/31 (13)9/16 (56).315/.437‡.059/.054‡
        Week 246/25 (24)10/30 (33)10/17 (59).556/.144‡.029/.017‡
        Week 305/22 (23)9/29 (31)8/16 (50).546/.502‡.098/.105‡
        Week 365/24 (21)6/27 (22)10/15 (67)1.000/.875‡.007/.009‡
        Week 426/23 (26)7/25 (28)8/14 (57)1.000/.862‡.085/.152‡
        Week 485/20 (25)8/29 (28)5/13 (38)1.000/.980‡.461/.998‡
    • All values are mean (SD) unless otherwise indicated.

    • ↵* See Methods for definitions.

    • ↵† Univariate (t test)/multivariate (analysis of variance); controlled for age, sex, and ever-smoking at each time point, as well as for controller medication use at weeks 12, 24, 36, and 48 (controller data is unavailable for other time points).

    • ↵‡ Univariate (Fisher exact test)/multivariate (logistic regression); controlled for age, sex, and ever-smoking at each time point, as well as for controller medication use at weeks 12, 24, 36, and 48 (controller data is unavailable for other time points).

    • AQL, asthma quality of life.

    • View popup
    Table 4. Side Effects*
    Side Effects, n (%)Randomized PlaceboRandomized AzithromycinOpen-Label AzithromycinP†
    Nausea.016/.008/.458
        None31 (91)25 (71)12 (60)
        Mild to moderate1 (3)9 (26)6 (30)
        Severe2 (6)1 (3)2 (10)
    Vomiting1.000/.128/.456
        None32 (94)33 (94)18 (90)
        Mild to moderate0 (0)1 (3)2 (10)
        Severe2 (6)1 (3)0 (0)
    Stomach pain.076/.001/.196
        None30 (88)24 (69)9 (45)
        Mild to moderate3 (9)10 (29)10 (50)
        Severe1 (3)1 (3)1 (5)
    Diarrhea.106/.002/.196
        None29 (85)23 (66)9 (45)
        Mild to moderate3 (9)10 (29)10 (50)
        Severe2 (6)2 (6)1 (5)
    Rash.743/.046/.420
        None33 (97)33 (94)16 (80)
        Mild to moderate0 (0)2 (6)3 (15)
        Severe1 (3)1 (3)1 (5)
    Swelling.239/.716/.128
        None32 (94)35 (100)18 (90)
        Mild to moderate1 (3)0 (0)2 (10)
        Severe1 (3)0 (0)0 (0)
    Hearing loss.743/1.000/.999
        None32 (94)34 (97)19 (95)
        Mild to moderate1 (3)1 (3)1 (5)
        Severe1 (3)0 (0)0 (0)
    Vaginal candidiasis.670/1.000/.999
        None20 (91)21 (84)7 (88)
        Mild to moderate3 (9)4 (16)1 (13)
        Severe0 (0)0 (0)0 (0)
    • ↵* Worst reported severity during the 12-week treatment period.

    • ↵† Fisher exact tests: randomized placebo versus randomized azithromycin/randomized placebo versus open-label azithromycin/randomized azithromycin versus open-label azithromycin.

    • View popup
    Table 5. Randomized Trials of Second-Generation Macrolides/Azalides for Asthma: Study Designs
    ReferenceAge GroupSampling FrameAsthma SeveritySubjects (n)DesignRX/DurationObservation after RX
    Shoji (1999)17AdultsHospital asthma clinicMild/moderate14Single site; double-blind cross-over (4-week washout)Roxithromycin, 300 mg daily or placebo/8 weeksNone
    Aspirin-intolerant asthma
    Amayasu (2000)18AdultsNot stated (hospital asthma clinic[s]?)Mild/moderate17Single site; double-blind cross-over (4-week washout)Clarithromycin, 200 mg daily or placebo/8 weeksNone
    Black (2001)1918–60 years oldMajority of subjects recruited from the general population; recruitment method(s) not specifiedModerate/severe232Multinational; double-blind, parallel groups (Australia, New Zealand, Italy, Argentina)Roxithromycin, 300 mg daily or placebo/6 weeks24 weeks
    Kraft (2002)20Young adultsSubjects recruited from the general population via advertisingNot stated
    Mean FEV1%pred = 69.3
    35% were taking ICS
    52Single site; double-blind parallel groups
    All subjects underwent bronchoscopy before and after prescription
    Clarithromycin, 1000 mg daily or placebo/6 weeksNone
    Kostadima (2004)2118–70 years oldNot stated (referral speciality setting)Not stated, probably mild63Single site; double-blind, parallel groupsClarithromycin, 500 or 750 mg daily or placebo/8 weeksNone
    Mean FEV1%pred ∼85% Subjects using albuterol >2 times weekly were excluded
    Hahn (2006)22≥18 years oldCommunity-based healthcare settingsMostly mild/moderate46Multisite; double-blind, parallel groupsAzithromycin, 600 mg daily for 3 days then 600 mg weekly or placebo/6 weeks12 weeks
    Piacentini (2007)23ChildrenInpatient settingNot stated16Single site; double-blind, parallel groupsAzithromycin, 10 mg/kg/day for 3 of 7 days or placebo/8 weeksNone
    Simpson (2008)24AdultsSpecialty outpatient clinicSevere refractory45Single site; double-blind, parallel groupsClarithromycin, 1000 mg daily or placebo/8 weeks4 weeks
    Stratified by high (>61%)/low induced sputum neutrophil proportion
    Strunk (2008)25ChildrenAcademic asthma centersModerate/severe55Multisite; double-blind, parallel groups
    This was a study of macrolide as a “steroid-sparing” agent, not as an antimicrobial
    Azithromycin, 250–500 mg daily or montelukast 5–10 mg daily of placebo/24 weeks6 weeks
    Sutherland (2010)2618–60 years oldAcademic asthma centersSuboptimally controlled asthma92Multisite; double-blind, parallel groups
    Stratified on Mpn or Cpn PCR± (bronchoscopic sampling) The study was underpowered to test PCR+ cases
    Clarithromycin, 1000 mg daily or placebo/16 weeksNone
    Hahn (2012), current study≥18 years oldCommunity-based healthcare settingsMild/moderate (randomized)75 randomized 22 open-labelMultisite; double-blind, parallel groupsAzithromycin, 600 mg daily for 3 days then 600 mg weekly or placebo/12 weeks36 weeks
    Severe (open-label)
    • %pred, percent of the predicted value; Cpn, Chlamydia pneumoniae; FEV1, forced expiratory volume in 1 second; ICS, inhaled corticosteroid; Mpn, Mycoplasma pneumoniae; PCR, polymerase chain reaction.

    • View popup
    Table 6. Randomized Trials of Second-Generation Macrolides/Azalides for Asthma: Exclusions, Outcomes, and Results
    ReferenceExclusions*Outcomes ReportedResults of Macrolide Treatment
    Shoji (1999)17SmokersBlood eosinophils and ECPDecreased eosinophils/ECP
    Controller medicationSputum cell counts and ECPDecreased eosinophils/ECP
    (No differences in sputum neutrophils)
    Sulpyrine provocation testNot improved
    (No patient-oriented outcomes reported)
    Amayasu (2000)18SmokersBlood eosinophils and ECPDecreased eosinophils/ECP
    Aspirin sensitivitySputum cell counts and ECPDecreased eosinophils/ECP
    ARI for 6 weeksBHRImproved
    Any asthma controller medicationPulmonary functionNot improved
    Overall asthma symptomsImproved
    Black (2001)19FEV1 <50% predictedPulmonary function(PEF)Improvement at end of prescription that waned after prescription
    C. pneumoniae IgG < 1:64 and IgA < 1:16Pulmonary function(FEV1)Not improved
    Smoking ≥20 pack-yearsAsthma symptomsNot improved
    BronchiectasisAQLNot improved
    Prednisone burst in previous month
    Respiratory illness
    Kraft (2002)20Smoking >5 pack yearsPCR+ for Mpn or Cpn31 of 55 were PCR+ for Mpn and/or Cpn
    Any cigarette within 2 yearsPulmonary functionImproved FEV1 in PCR+ subject subgroup
    Any lung comorbidityLung inflammationDecreased inflammatory cytokines
    Any LRTi within 3 months(No patient-oriented outcomes reported)
    Kostadima (2004)21Asthma diagnosis <1 year agoBHRDecreased BHR
    Not on ICSPulmonary functionNot improved
    Rescue inhaler >2 times weeklySerum free cortisolNot affected
    Any smoking history(No patient-oriented outcomes reported)
    Any other medication
    FEV1 < 50% predicted
    Any ARI or exacerbation within 4 weeks before or during the study
    Hahn (2006)22NoneAQLNo improvement
    Rescue medication useNo improvement
    Cpn IgG and IgA antibodiesBaseline IgA predicted worsening symptoms
    Overall asthma symptomsImproved at end of prescription and persisted after prescription
    Piacentini (2007)23Oral steroids in the preceding 3 months or during the studyLung functionNo improvement
    Signs of airway infection in the preceding month or during the studyBHRImproved
    Lung inflammationReduced induced sputum neutrophils
    Simpson (2008)24Current smokingSputum inflammatory markersDecreased airway IL-8 and neutrophils
    History of smoking, >5 pack-yearsPulmonary functionNo improvement
    Antihistamine medicationBHRNo improvement
    Asthma controlNo improvement
    Asthma symptomsDecreased wheezing after prescription
    AQLImproved (NNT = 6 for ≥0.5 units improvement)
    It was unclear whether the AQL was reported at the end of the prescription or after the prescription
    Strunk (2008)25No controller medicationTime to inadequate control after steroid step-downNo improvement in asthma control (futility analysis)
    FEV1 < 50%predRecruitment was discontinued early (292 screened, only 55 randomized)
    >3 hospitalizations in past year
    Sinus surgery in past year
    Lung comorbidities
    Sutherland (2010)26Exacerbation within 6 weeksAsthma controlNo differences in asthma control
    ARI within 6 weeksPulmonary functionNo improvement
    >2 exacerbations or ARI prior to entryExhaled nitric oxideNo improvement
    SmokingBHRImproved
    History of smoking, ≥10 pack-yearsRescue medication useNo improvement
    Lung comorbiditiesAQLNo improvement
    Hahn (2012), current studyNoneOverall asthma symptomsRandomized: no improvements in any outcome
    AQLOpen label: improved overall asthma symptoms and AQL score at end of prescription that persisted after prescription (improvements maximal at the 9-month study point)
    ACQ
    • ↵* Other than for safety and logistics.

    • ACQ, asthma control questionnaire; ARI, acute respiratory illness; AQL, asthma quality of life; BHR, bronchial hyperresponsiveness; Cpn, Chlamydia pneumoniae; ECP, eosinophil cationic protein; FEV1, forced expiratory volume in 1 second; ICS, inhaled corticosteroid; Ig, immunoglobulin; IL, interleukin; LRTi, lower respiratory tract illness; Mpn, Mycoplasma pneumoniae; NNT, number needed to treat; PCR, polymerase chain reaction; PEF, peak expiratory flow.

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of the American Board of Family     Medicine: 25 (4)
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine
Vol. 25, Issue 4
July-August 2012
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Cover (PDF)
  • Index by author
  • Back Matter (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Board of Family Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Azithromycin for Bronchial Asthma in Adults: An Effectiveness Trial
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Board of Family Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Board of Family Medicine web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
13 + 5 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Azithromycin for Bronchial Asthma in Adults: An Effectiveness Trial
David L. Hahn, Mike Grasmick, Scott Hetzel, Steven Yale
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine Jul 2012, 25 (4) 442-459; DOI: 10.3122/jabfm.2012.04.110309

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Azithromycin for Bronchial Asthma in Adults: An Effectiveness Trial
David L. Hahn, Mike Grasmick, Scott Hetzel, Steven Yale
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine Jul 2012, 25 (4) 442-459; DOI: 10.3122/jabfm.2012.04.110309
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Methods
    • Results
    • Outcomes
    • Discussion
    • Conclusions
    • Acknowledgments
    • Notes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Management of severe asthma: summary of the European Respiratory Society/American Thoracic Society task force report
  • British Thoracic Society guideline for the use of long-term macrolides in adults with respiratory disease
  • Azithromycin as an add-on treatment for persistent uncontrolled asthma in adults: protocol of a systematic review and meta-analysis
  • Management of severe asthma: a European Respiratory Society/American Thoracic Society guideline
  • Does maintenance azithromycin reduce asthma exacerbations? An individual participant data meta-analysis
  • The differential effects of azithromycin on the airway epithelium in vitro and in vivo
  • Meta-Analysis of the Adverse Effects of Long-Term Azithromycin Use in Patients with Chronic Lung Diseases
  • Asthma, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD), and the Overlap Syndrome
  • Development of a Population Pharmacokinetic Model To Describe Azithromycin Whole-Blood and Plasma Concentrations over Time in Healthy Subjects
  • Cardiovascular Diseases and Other Evidence for Primary Care Clinical Practice
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Identifying and Addressing Social Determinants of Health with an Electronic Health Record
  • Integrating Adverse Childhood Experiences and Social Risks Screening in Adult Primary Care
  • A Pilot Comparison of Clinical Data Collection Methods Using Paper, Electronic Health Record Prompt, and a Smartphone Application
Show more Original Research

Similar Articles

Navigate

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues

Authors & Reviewers

  • Info For Authors
  • Info For Reviewers
  • Submit A Manuscript/Review

Other Services

  • Get Email Alerts
  • Classifieds
  • Reprints and Permissions

Other Resources

  • Forms
  • Contact Us
  • ABFM News

© 2025 American Board of Family Medicine

Powered by HighWire