Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • ARTICLES
    • Current Issue
    • Ahead of Print
    • Archives
    • Abstracts In Press
    • Special Issue Archive
    • Subject Collections
  • INFO FOR
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Call For Papers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • SUBMIT
    • Manuscript
    • Peer Review
  • ABOUT
    • The JABFM
    • The Editing Fellowship
    • Editorial Board
    • Indexing
    • Editors' Blog
  • CLASSIFIEDS
  • Other Publications
    • abfm

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
American Board of Family Medicine
  • Other Publications
    • abfm
American Board of Family Medicine

American Board of Family Medicine

Advanced Search

  • HOME
  • ARTICLES
    • Current Issue
    • Ahead of Print
    • Archives
    • Abstracts In Press
    • Special Issue Archive
    • Subject Collections
  • INFO FOR
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Call For Papers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • SUBMIT
    • Manuscript
    • Peer Review
  • ABOUT
    • The JABFM
    • The Editing Fellowship
    • Editorial Board
    • Indexing
    • Editors' Blog
  • CLASSIFIEDS
  • JABFM on Bluesky
  • JABFM On Facebook
  • JABFM On Twitter
  • JABFM On YouTube
Research ArticleOriginal Research

Racial Disparities and Barriers to Colorectal Cancer Screening in Rural Areas

Thad Wilkins, Ralph A. Gillies, Stacie Harbuck, Jeonifer Garren, Stephen W. Looney and Robert R. Schade
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine May 2012, 25 (3) 308-317; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3122/jabfm.2012.03.100307
Thad Wilkins
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ralph A. Gillies
PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Stacie Harbuck
MS
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jeonifer Garren
MS, MPH
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Stephen W. Looney
PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Robert R. Schade
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Figure 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    Figure 1.

    Subject flow diagram.

Tables

  • Figures
    • View popup
    Table 1. Comparison of Screening Status By Respondent Demographic Characteristics
    Not Current With CRC ScreeningCurrent With CRC ScreeningP
    Age, years (n =622)
        50–59121 (46.4)140 (53.6).002
        60–6992 (38.3)148 (61.7)
        70–7933 (27.3)88 (72.7)
    Sex (n = 623)
        Female178 (39.5)273 (60.5).779
        Male70 (40.7)102 (59.3)
    Race* (n = 615)
        African American60 (49.6)61 (50.4).009
        White181 (36.6)313 (63.4)
    Marital status (n = 562)
        Not married83 (41.3)118 (58.7).171
        Married or member of unmarried couple128 (35.5)233 (64.5)
    Education (n = 562)
        Some high school or less47 (43.9)60 (56.1).005
        High school graduate, GED, or some college135 (40.2)201 (59.8)
        College graduate30 (25.2)89 (74.8)
    Insurance status (n = 563)
        No health care insurance coverage47 (74.6)16 (25.4)<.0001
        Health care insurance coverage167 (33.4)333 (66.6)
    Personal doctor (n = 562)
        Does not have personal doctor34 (85.0)6 (15.0)<.0001
        Does have personal doctor179 (34.3)343 (65.7)
    County (n = 627)
        McDuffie164 (42.8)219 (57.2).036
        Screven84 (34.4)160 (65.6)
    Knows family member with CRC (n = 561)
        Family member without CRC190 (40.4)280 (59.6).006
        Family member with CRC23 (25.3)68 (74.7)
    Knows person with CRC (n = 558)
        No known person with CRC130 (43.2)171 (56.8).003
        Knows person with CRC80 (31.1)177 (68.9)
    Worried about CRC (n = 558)
        No worry about CRC177 (37.8)291 (62.2).557
        Worries about CRC37 (41.1)53 (58.9)
    Perceived risk of CRC compared to others (n = 365)
        Lower than men or women same age30 (33.3)60 (66.7).015
        Same as men or women same age83 (44.4)104 (55.6)
        Higher than men or women same age24 (27.3)64 (72.7)
    • Values shown as n (%). χ2 analyses were conducted for the above factors.

    • ↵* Other races not included in analyses because of small sample size (n = 7).

    • CRC, colorectal cancer; GED, general education development certificate.

    • View popup
    Table 2. Current Screening Status by Fecal Occult Blood Test, Flexible Sigmoidoscopy, or Colonoscopy, By Demographics
    FOBT*PFlexible Sigmoidoscopy*PColonoscopy*P
    Sex
        Male43 (25.0).5347 (27.3).1682 (47.7).66
        Female124 (27.5)99 (22.0)206 (45.7)
    Race†
        White132 (26.7).81125 (25.3).15252 (51.0)<.001
        African American31 (25.6)23 (19.0)36 (29.8)
    Age (years)
        50–5957 (21.8).00353 (20.3).13109 (41.8)<.001
        60–6981 (33.8)57 (23.8)106 (44.2)
        70–7925 (20.7)36 (29.8)75 (62.0)
    • Values provided as n (%).

    • ↵* Percentages for specific tests do not sum to 100% because some respondents had more than one current screening test.

    • ↵† Other races were not included in analyses because of small sample size (n = 7).

    • FOBT, fecal occult blood test.

    • View popup
    Table 3. Perceived Barriers to Colorectal Cancer Screening by Screening Status, Race, and Education*
    Screening StatusRaceEducation
    Not CurrentCurrentPWhitesAfrican AmericansPHigh School or LessGreater Than High School EducationP
    General (n = 588)†
        CRC screening is not needed because I have no problems2.522.01<.0012.192.25.5982.251.96.003
        Physician spent enough time discussing CRC screening2.513.13<.0012.952.70.0182.873.01.19
        CRC screening cost is high2.451.92<.0012.062.37.0052.211.83<.001
        CRC screening is embarrassing2.242.07.0332.201.91.0052.162.00.10
        Afraid might find something wrong2.061.62<.0011.761.92.0871.801.57.006
        Insufficient time for CRC screening1.931.57<.0011.701.75.5541.741.52.005
        Barriers scale (summed general barriers items)13.5512.21<.00112.6712.70.92311.7712.85<.001
    FOBT‡ (n = 326)
        Do not know how to perform FOBT2.192.17.882.902.49<.0012.672.06<.001
        Collecting a sample for FOBT is unpleasant2.072.13.562.172.31.182.202.20.999
        I do not have privacy to collect sample for FOBT1.801.86.611.802.41<.0012.001.58<.001
    Flexible sigmoidoscopy (n = 367)§
        Think flexible sigmoidoscopy is painful2.492.11.032.472.64.182.211.93.07
        Anxious because don't really understand what is done1.871.97.472.162.37.052.262.01.009
        Following special diet or taking laxative, enema keeps me from having flexible sigmoidoscopy1.861.79.581.802.14<.0011.821.71.007
    Colonoscopy (n = 539)‖
        I think colonoscopy is painful2.691.82<.0012.122.46.0032.211.93.007
        I am anxious because I don't really understand what is done2.131.77.121.922.35<0.0012.061.71<.001
        I am afraid of possible bleeding or tearing of colon2.441.79.0021.962.28.0012.021.85.05
        Special diet or taking laxatives or enema will keep me from having a colonoscopy1.691.64.791.752.05<.0011.821.71.16
        I will have transportation problems (need someone to drive you home)1.801.57.201.622.021.86<.0011.741.50.001
    General: all tests (n = 559)¶
        Find CRC early may save my life3.533.68.0013.643.57.213.613.71.078
        If you find CRC early, it is not as bad3.423.54.0173.513.43.213.473.60.038
        Need to find CRC early3.443.58.0023.523.55.703.523.60.130
        Finding CRC decrease chances of dying from it3.223.45.0013.413.14.0023.333.52.020
        If screened for CRC, then I would worry less3.203.47<.0013.413.19.0043.353.45.165
        Benefits scale (n = 484) (summed benefits items)16.8817.84<.00117.5916.99.0417.3718.01.013
    • ↵* Survey used 4-point Likert scale (1 = strongly disagree, 2 = disagree, 3 = agree, 4 = strongly agree).

    • ↵† Includes all respondents who completed these items; current status based on any current colorectal cancer (CRC) test.

    • ↵‡ Includes respondents who had heard of fecal occult blood test (FOBT) prior to interview; current status based on current status on FOBT test.

    • ↵§ Includes respondents who had heard of flexible sigmoidoscopy prior to interview; current status based on current status on flexible sigmoidoscopy test.

    • ↵‖ Includes respondents who had heard of colonoscopy prior to interview; current status based on current status on colonoscopy test.

    • ↵¶ Includes all respondents who completed these items; current status based on any current CRC test.

    • View popup
    Table 4. Selected Explanatory Variables for Current Colorectal Cancer Screening
    Explanatory VariableEstimated CoefficientStandard Errorχ2POdds Ratio95% CI
    Barrier items
        My physician has spent enough time discussing colorectal cancer and the screening tests.0.800.1246.81<.0012.221.76–2.78
        You do not need to do a screening test for colorectal cancer because you have no problems.−0.580.1224.92<.0010.560.44–0.70
    Benefit item
        A screening test will decrease your chances of dying from colorectal cancer.0.350.146.26.0121.421.08–1.87
    Social influences and support question
        Has anyone in your immediate family had colorectal cancer?0.580.293.86.0491.791.00–3.18
    • CI, confidence interval

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of the American Board of Family     Medicine: 25 (3)
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine
Vol. 25, Issue 3
May-June 2012
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Cover (PDF)
  • Index by author
  • Back Matter (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Board of Family Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Racial Disparities and Barriers to Colorectal Cancer Screening in Rural Areas
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Board of Family Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Board of Family Medicine web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
8 + 12 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Racial Disparities and Barriers to Colorectal Cancer Screening in Rural Areas
Thad Wilkins, Ralph A. Gillies, Stacie Harbuck, Jeonifer Garren, Stephen W. Looney, Robert R. Schade
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine May 2012, 25 (3) 308-317; DOI: 10.3122/jabfm.2012.03.100307

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Racial Disparities and Barriers to Colorectal Cancer Screening in Rural Areas
Thad Wilkins, Ralph A. Gillies, Stacie Harbuck, Jeonifer Garren, Stephen W. Looney, Robert R. Schade
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine May 2012, 25 (3) 308-317; DOI: 10.3122/jabfm.2012.03.100307
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Conclusions
    • Acknowledgments
    • Notes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Access to cancer clinical trials for racialised older adults: an equity-focused rapid scoping review protocol
  • Focus on Clinical Practice: Improving the Quality of Care
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Integrating Adverse Childhood Experiences and Social Risks Screening in Adult Primary Care
  • A Pilot Comparison of Clinical Data Collection Methods Using Paper, Electronic Health Record Prompt, and a Smartphone Application
  • Associations Between Modifiable Preconception Care Indicators and Pregnancy Outcomes
Show more Original Research

Similar Articles

Navigate

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues

Authors & Reviewers

  • Info For Authors
  • Info For Reviewers
  • Submit A Manuscript/Review

Other Services

  • Get Email Alerts
  • Classifieds
  • Reprints and Permissions

Other Resources

  • Forms
  • Contact Us
  • ABFM News

© 2025 American Board of Family Medicine

Powered by HighWire