Article Figures & Data
Figures
- Figure 1.
Bipolar screening form.
Tables
Clinician Intervention (n = 75) Control (n = 81) Sex Male 52 58 Female 48 42 Race White 87 90 Asian 9 3 Other 4 7 Clinician Physician 88 89 Nurse practitioner or physician assistant 12 11 Specialty Family Medicine 76 88 Internal Medicine 24 11 Other 0 1 Years since residency* <2 5 5 2–5 16 7 6–10 12 37 11–30 60 48 >30 7 3 Practice location* Urban 9 30 Suburban 79 58 Rural 12 12 Values provided as %.
↵* P < .01 for difference between intervention and control groups.
Outcome Intervention Comparison P Patient Population n (%) Patient Population n (%) New diagnoses of bipolar disorder 8335 93 (1.11) 8799 32 (0.36) <.01 New bipolar medication 7884 146 (1.85) 8370 100 (1.19) <.01 Patient Outcomes Intervention Patient Population (n = 8355), n (%) Screened for bipolar disorder 3,969 (47.5) Bipolar screen not appropriate 184 (2.2) Completed CIDI screening questions 261 (3.1) Accessed quick answers 34 (0.04) CIDI Risk Level CIDI Score Patients Completing CIDI (n = 261), n (%) Very low risk 0–4 86 (33) Low risk 5 36 (13.8) Moderate risk 6 41 (15.7) High risk 7 or 8 74 (28.4) Very high risk 9 24 (9.2) CIDI, Composite International Diagnostic Interview.
In this issue
Jump to section
Related Articles
Cited By...
- A Review of 50-Years of International Literature on the Internal Environment of Building Practice-Based Research Networks (PBRNs)
- Planning for Action: The Impact of an Asthma Action Plan Decision Support Tool Integrated into an Electronic Health Record (EHR) at a Large Health Care System
- Use of health information technology to reduce diagnostic errors
- Focus on Clinical Practice: Improving the Quality of Care
- Guest Family Physician Commentaries