Article Figures & Data
Figures
- Figure 1.
Number of emotional responses selected per reported patient safety incident.
- Figure 2.
Reported Emotional Responses.
Tables
Emotional Response Reports Submitted (n) Reported an Emotional Response (n [%]) Difference (%) Confidence Interval (%) By provider type Clinic staff 100 74 (74.0) −14.4 (Clinic staff − physicians) −25.4% to −3.4% Physicians 138 122 (88.4) Duration of harm No duration 154 121 (78.6) 12.0 (Some duration − no duration) 0.5% to 23.5% Some duration 53 48 (90.6) - Table 3. Number of Reports With an Emotional Response and the Resulting Coping Strategy By Provider Type, Female Providers, Physician Gender, Duration and Severity of Harm
Reports With an Emotional Response (%) Reports With a Coping Strategy (n [%]) Difference (%) Confidence Interval Provider type Clinic staff 74 54 (73.0) 16.4 (Clinic staff − physicians) 1.9% to 30.9% Physicians 122 69 (56.6) Female providers Clinic staff 74 54 (73.0) 27.5 (Clinic staff − physicians) 11.2% to 43.6% Physicians 77 35 (45.5) Physicians by sex Male 45 34 (75.6) 30.1 (Male physicians − female physicians) 11.6% to 48.1% Female 77 35 (45.5) Duration of harm No duration 121 63 (52.1) 22.9 (Some duration − no duration) 6.3% to 39.5% Some duration 48 36 (75.0) Severity of harm No severity 103 53 (51.5) 23.5 (Some severity − no severity) 8.7% to 38.4% Some severity 76 57 (75.0)
