More Black Box to Explore: How Quality Improvement Collaboratives Shape Practice Change

References

1. 1.↵
   1. Bate S,
   2. Robert G,
   3. McLeod H

   , Report on the “breakthrough” collaborative approach to quality and service improvement within four regions of the NHS. A research-based investigation of the orthopedic services collaborative within the Eastern, South & West, South East, and Trent regions. Birmingham, UK: Health Services Management Center, University of Birmingham; 2001.
2. 2.↵
   1. Kilo C

   . A framework for collaborative improvement: lessons from the Institute for Healthcare Improvement's Breakthrough series. Qual Manag Health Care 1998;6:1–13.

   OpenUrlPubMed
3. 3.↵
   1. Mittman B

   . Creating the evidence base for quality improvement collaboratives. Ann Intern Med 2004;140:897–901.

   OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
4. 4.↵
   1. Ovretveit J,
   2. Bate P,
   3. Cleary P,
   4. et al

   . Quality collaboratives: lessons from research. Qual Saf Health Care 2002;11:345–51.

   OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
5. 5.↵
   1. Shortell S,
   2. Bennett C,
   3. Byck G

   . Assessing the impact of continuous quality improvement on clinical practice: what it will take to accelerate progress. Milbank Q 1998;76:593–624.

   OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
6. 6.↵
   1. Wilson T,
   2. Berwick D,
   3. Cleary P

   . What do collaborative improvement projects do? Experience from seven countries. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf 2003;29:85–93.

   OpenUrl
7. 7.↵
   1. Wilson T,
   2. Plsek P,
   3. Berwick D,
   4. et al

   . Learning from lessons from around the world: experiences and thoughts of collaborative improvement from seven countries. Boston: Institute for Healthcare Improvement; 2001.
8. 8.↵
   1. Schouten L,
   2. Hulscher M,
   3. van Everdingen J,
   4. Huijsman R,
   5. Grol R

   . Evidence for the impact of quality improvement collaboratives: systematic review. Br Med J 2008;336:1491–4.

   OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
9. 9.↵
   1. Cretin S,
   2. Shortell S,
   3. Keeler E

   . An evaluation of collaborative interventions to improve chronic illness care. Eval Rev 2004;28:28–51.

   OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
10. 10.↵
    1. Lindenauer PK

    . Effects of quality improvement collaboratives. BMJ 2008;336:1448–9.

    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
11. 11.↵
    1. Horbar JD

    . The Vermont Oxford Network: evidence-based quality improvement for neonatology. Pediatrics 1999;103:350–9.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
12. 12.↵
    1. Khuri SF,
    2. Daley J,
    3. Henderson W,
    4. et al

    . The Department of Veterans Affairs' NSQIP: the first national, validated, outcome-based, risk-adjusted, and peer-controlled program for the measurement and enhancement of the quality of surgical care. National VA Surgical Quality Improvement Program. Ann Surg 1998;228:491–507.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
13. 13.↵
    1. O'Connor GT,
    2. Plume SK,
    3. Olmstead EM,
    4. et al

    . A regional intervention to improve the hospital mortality associated with coronary artery bypass graft surgery. The Northern New England Cardiovascular Disease Study Group. JAMA 1996;275:841–6.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
14. 14.↵
    1. Duckers ML,
    2. Spreeuwenberg P,
    3. Wagner C,
    4. Groenewegen PP

    . Exploring the black box of quality improvement collaboratives: modelling relations between conditions, applied changes and outcomes. Implement Sci 2009;4:74.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
15. 15.↵
    1. Vos L,
    2. Duckers ML,
    3. Wagner C,
    4. van Merode GG

    . Applying the quality improvement collaborative method to process redesign: a multiple case study. Implement Sci 2010;5:19.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
16. 16.↵
    1. Hudson SV,
    2. Hahn KA,
    3. Ohman-Strickland P,
    4. Cunningham RS,
    5. Miller SM,
    6. Crabtree BF

    . Breast, colorectal and prostate cancer screening for cancer survivors and non-cancer patients in community practices. J Gen Intern Med 2009;24(Suppl 2):S487–90.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
17. 17.↵
    1. Howard J,
    2. Shaw EK,
    3. Clark EC,
    4. Crabtree BF

    . Up close and (inter)personal: insights from a primary care practice's efforts to improve office relationships over time, 2003–2009. Qual Manag Health Care 2010;20:49–61.

    OpenUrl
18. 18.↵
    1. Ferrante JM,
    2. Balasubramanian BA,
    3. Hudson SV,
    4. Crabtree BF

    . Principles of the patient-centered medical home and preventive services delivery. Ann Fam Med 2010; 8:108–16.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
19. 19.↵
    1. Crabtree B,
    2. Miller W,
    3. Stange K

    . Understanding practice from the ground up. J Fam Pract 2001;50:881–7.

    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
20. 20.↵
    1. Stroebel C,
    2. McDaniel R,
    3. Crabtree B,
    4. Miller W,
    5. Nutting P,
    6. Stange K

    . How complexity science can inform a reflective process for improvement in primary care practices. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf 2005;31:438–46.

    OpenUrlPubMed
21. 21.↵
    1. Crabtree B,
    2. Miller W

    1. Borkan J

    . Immersion/crystallization. In: Crabtree B, Miller W (eds.). Doing Qualitative Research. 2nd edition. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications; 1999:179–94.
22. 22.↵
    1. Edmondson AC,
    2. Smith DM

    . Too hot to handle? How to manage relationship conflict. Calif Manage Rev 2006, 49:6–31.

    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
23. 23.↵
    1. Schwarz R

    . The skilled facilitator. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass; 2002.
24. 24.↵
    1. Shaw E,
    2. Looney J,
    3. Chase S,
    4. et al

    . “In the moment”: the impact of intentional facilitators on group processes. Group Facil 2010;10:4–16.

    OpenUrlPubMed
25. 25.↵
    1. Baumgartner LM,
    2. Lee M-Y,
    3. Birden S,
    4. Flower D

    . Adult learning theory: a primer. Columbus, OH: Center on Education and Training for Employment; 2003.