Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • ARTICLES
    • Current Issue
    • Abstracts In Press
    • Archives
    • Special Issue Archive
    • Subject Collections
  • INFO FOR
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Call For Papers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • SUBMIT
    • Manuscript
    • Peer Review
  • ABOUT
    • The JABFM
    • The Editing Fellowship
    • Editorial Board
    • Indexing
    • Editors' Blog
  • CLASSIFIEDS
  • Other Publications
    • abfm

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
American Board of Family Medicine
  • Other Publications
    • abfm
American Board of Family Medicine

American Board of Family Medicine

Advanced Search

  • HOME
  • ARTICLES
    • Current Issue
    • Abstracts In Press
    • Archives
    • Special Issue Archive
    • Subject Collections
  • INFO FOR
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Call For Papers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • SUBMIT
    • Manuscript
    • Peer Review
  • ABOUT
    • The JABFM
    • The Editing Fellowship
    • Editorial Board
    • Indexing
    • Editors' Blog
  • CLASSIFIEDS
  • JABFM on Bluesky
  • JABFM On Facebook
  • JABFM On Twitter
  • JABFM On YouTube
Research ArticleOriginal Research

Mailed Fecal Immunochemical Tests Plus Educational Materials to Improve Colon Cancer Screening Rates in Iowa Research Network (IRENE) Practices

Barcey T. Levy, Jeanette M. Daly, Yinghui Xu and John W. Ely
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine January 2012, 25 (1) 73-82; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3122/jabfm.2012.01.110055
Barcey T. Levy
PhD, MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jeanette M. Daly
PhD, RN
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Yinghui Xu
MS
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
John W. Ely
MD, MSPH
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Figure 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    Figure 1.

    Fecal Immunochemical Test (FIT) Return Rate. All patients were initially unscreened. There was no difference between these two groups (P = .498, chi-square test), but there was a significant increase in FIT return in both groups when compared with Medicare beneficiaries in the state of Iowa (P < .0001, individually and overall, one-sided binomial exact test).

Tables

  • Figures
    • View popup
    Table 1.

    Demographic Summary of Subjects (n = 373)

    VariablesPercentage or Mean
    Age (mean years ± SD)61.2 ± 6.7
    Sex
        Female51.7
        Male48.3
    Marital status
        Single14.3
        Married78.2
        Widowed7.5
    Ethnicity
        Hispanic0.8
    Race
        White99.2
        Black0.5
        Asian0.3
    Educational level
        High school or less38.5
        Some college or higher61.5
    Insurance status
        Private65.2
        Medicare30.3
        None7.2
    Annual income
        <$40,00039.6
        $40,000 to <$80,00044.4
        ≥$80,00016.1
    • View popup
    Table 2.

    Summary of Baseline Survey for Those Assigned to Educational Intervention (n = 373)

    Subject and Physician CharacteristicsPercentage
    Male patient sex48.3
    Male physician sex63.5
    Family history
        Immediate family member12.4
        More distant relative11.4
    Physician or nurse ever discussed having a test for CRC64.2
    Physician or nurse ever recommended CRC screening53.8
    Physician ever recommended a test for CRC because you had symptoms10.0
    My doctor has discussed CRC screening with me46.1
    Tests recommended by physician (n = 290)
        Colonoscopy48.8
        Fecal occult blood test (×3)33.1
        Flexible sigmoidoscopy14.2
        Barium enema12.3
        Fecal immunochemical test10.0
    Quality of CRC screening discussions (n = 237)*
        Comfort with asking your doctor questions about CRC screening75.5
        Satisfaction with doctor's discussions of screening importance73.3
        Input into the screening decision67.2
        Satisfaction with doctor's discussion of screening options60.3
    • ↵* Responses were provided as “very” or “extremely.”

    • CRC, colorectal cancer.

    • View popup
    Table 3.

    Attitudes, Readiness, and Barriers to Screening at Baseline

    Attitudes Toward Screening (n = 319)Category (%)
    Sample items*1 (Strongly Disagree)2–45 (Strongly Agree)
        I really think I should try to be screened for CRC in the next 6 months.37325
        I have been thinking about whether I will be able to be screened for CRC.13799
        I have had CRC screening in the past and I plan to continue.22708
        I am aware of the importance of regular screening for CRC, but I can't do it right now.15804
        I have set up a day and a time to be screened within the next 2 months.46513
        As far as I am concerned, I don't need CRC screening.25742
        I have not been screened and right now I don't care.38602
        I don't have the time or energy to be screened for CRC right now.33652
        I could be screened for CRC, but I don't plan to.24751
    Readiness for CRC screening† (n = 336)0–2 (Not Ready)3–78–10 (Very or Definitely Ready)
        Confidence in ability to be screened4.818.377.0
        Importance of CRC screening for you5.729.964.4
        Readiness for CRC screening6.929.763.4
        Interest in CRC screening8.636.954.5
        Likelihood of being tested in next 6 months20.938.740.5
        Likelihood of bringing up CRC screening at next visit20.242.637.2
    Barriers to screening (n = 298)0 or 1 (Not a Factor)2 or 34 or 5 (Strong Factor)
        Not covered by insurance/copayment is too high58.816.324.8
        Physician has not recommended57.219.923.0
        Physician has not discussed57.820.621.6
        Afraid or anxious about the test51.832.915.3
        I am too busy62.124.313.6
        I am confused about all of the options available65.222.812.0
        I am low risk for CRC60.628.910.6
        Too embarrassing65.823.810.4
        No medical insurance87.73.39.6
        Test requires too much time66.724.88.6
        Test will be too painful73.818.97.3
        Test is difficult to schedule78.016.75.3
        Test is not available in my area91.96.81.4
    • ↵* Total of 14 sample items.

    • ↵† 0 = not at all likely or not interested, important, confident, ready, etc.; 10 = definitely or very interested, important, confident, ready, etc. CRC, colorectal cancer.

    • View popup
    Table 4.

    Comparison of Mean Attitudes, Readiness, and Barriers Scores from Baseline to Follow-up

    DomainMean at BaselineMean at Follow-UpMean Difference (Follow-Up Minus Baseline)P*
    Attitudes†3.303.550.22<.0001
    Readiness‡7.147.820.60<.0001
    Barriers§1.231.10−0.18.0342
    • ↵* Wilcoxon signed rank test.

    • ↵† Subjects chose a value from 1 (unfavorable attitude) to 5 (extremely favorable attitude) for 14 questions.

    • ↵‡ Subjects chose a value from 0 (not ready) to 10 (definitely ready) for 6 questions.

    • ↵§ Subjects chose a value from 0 (no barrier) to 5 (major barrier) for 15 questions.

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of the American Board of Family     Medicine: 25 (1)
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine
Vol. 25, Issue 1
January-February 2012
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Cover (PDF)
  • Index by author
  • Back Matter (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Board of Family Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Mailed Fecal Immunochemical Tests Plus Educational Materials to Improve Colon Cancer Screening Rates in Iowa Research Network (IRENE) Practices
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Board of Family Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Board of Family Medicine web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
6 + 2 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Mailed Fecal Immunochemical Tests Plus Educational Materials to Improve Colon Cancer Screening Rates in Iowa Research Network (IRENE) Practices
Barcey T. Levy, Jeanette M. Daly, Yinghui Xu, John W. Ely
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine Jan 2012, 25 (1) 73-82; DOI: 10.3122/jabfm.2012.01.110055

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Mailed Fecal Immunochemical Tests Plus Educational Materials to Improve Colon Cancer Screening Rates in Iowa Research Network (IRENE) Practices
Barcey T. Levy, Jeanette M. Daly, Yinghui Xu, John W. Ely
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine Jan 2012, 25 (1) 73-82; DOI: 10.3122/jabfm.2012.01.110055
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Conclusion
    • Notes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Faecal immunochemical test for suspected colorectal cancer symptoms: patient survey of usability and acceptability
  • Patient Attitudes and Issues in Colon Cancer Screening
  • A Randomized Controlled Trial to Improve Colon Cancer Screening in Rural Family Medicine: An Iowa Research Network (IRENE) Study
  • Answers to Common Clinical Questions
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Identifying and Addressing Social Determinants of Health with an Electronic Health Record
  • Integrating Adverse Childhood Experiences and Social Risks Screening in Adult Primary Care
  • A Pilot Comparison of Clinical Data Collection Methods Using Paper, Electronic Health Record Prompt, and a Smartphone Application
Show more Original Research

Similar Articles

Navigate

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues

Authors & Reviewers

  • Info For Authors
  • Info For Reviewers
  • Submit A Manuscript/Review

Other Services

  • Get Email Alerts
  • Classifieds
  • Reprints and Permissions

Other Resources

  • Forms
  • Contact Us
  • ABFM News

© 2025 American Board of Family Medicine

Powered by HighWire