Research ArticleOriginal Research

Increased Emergency Department Computed Tomography Use for Common Chest Symptoms Without Clear Patient Benefits

Andrew S. Coco and David T. O'Gurek
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine January 2012, 25 (1) 33-41; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3122/jabfm.2012.01.110039

References

  1. 1.↵
    1. Brenner DJ,
    2. Hall EJ
    . Computed tomography–an increasing source of radiation exposure. N Engl J Med 2007; 357: 2277–84.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  2. 2.↵
    1. Mettler FA,
    2. Thomadsen BR,
    3. Bhargavan M,
    4. et al
    . Medical radiation exposure in the U.S. in 2006: preliminary results. Health Phys 2008; 95 (5): 502–7.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  3. 3.↵
    1. McCaig LF
    . National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey: emergency department summary. Hyattsville, MD: National Center for Health Statistics; 2000; 326: 1–31.
  4. 4.↵
    1. Kohn MA,
    2. Kwan E,
    3. Gupta M,
    4. Tabas JA
    . Prevalence of acute myocardial infarction and other serious diagnoses in patients presenting to an urban emergency department with chest pain. J Emerg Med 2005; 29 (4): 383–90.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  5. 5.↵
    1. Wittram C,
    2. Meehan MJ,
    3. Halpern EF,
    4. Shepard JA,
    5. McLoud TC,
    6. Thrall JH
    . Trends in thoracic radiology over a decade at a large academic medical center. J Thorac Imaging 2004; 19 (3): 164–70.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  6. 6.↵
    1. Hall WB,
    2. Truitt SG,
    3. Scheunemann LP,
    4. et al
    . The prevalence of clinically relevant incidental findings on chest computed tomographic angiograms ordered to diagnose pulmonary embolism. Arch Intern Med 2009; 169: 1961–5.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  7. 7.↵
    1. Schnatter A
    . Computed tomographic pulmonary angiography to diagnose acute pulmonary embolism: the good, the bad and the ugly. Arch Intern Med 2009; 169: 1966–8.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  8. 8.↵
    1. Brenner DJ,
    2. Doll R,
    3. Goodhead DT,
    4. et al
    . Cancer risks attributable to low doses of ionizing radiation: assessing what we really know. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2003; 100: 13761–6.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  9. 9.↵
    1. Fazel R,
    2. Krumholz HM,
    3. Wang Y,
    4. et al
    . Exposure to low-dose ionizing radiation from medical imaging procedures. N Engl J Med 2009; 361 (9): 849–57.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  10. 10.↵
    1. Einstein AJ,
    2. Henzlova MJ,
    3. Rajagopalan S
    . Estimating risk of cancer associated with radiation exposure from 64-slice computed tomography coronary angiography. JAMA 2007; 298 (3): 317–23.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  11. 11.↵
    1. Rothenberg BM,
    2. Korn A
    . The opportunities and challenges posed by the rapid growth of diagnostic imaging. J Am Coll Radiol 2005; 2: 407–10.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  12. 12.↵
    Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Ambulatory health care data. Questionnaires, datasets, and related documentation. Survey methodology. Available at http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/ahcd/ahcd_questionnaires.htm. Accessed October 23, 2009.
  13. 13.↵
    Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Classification of diseases, functioning, and disability. International Classification of Disease, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification. Available at http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/icd/icd9cm.htm. Accessed November 20, 2009.
  14. 14.↵
    1. Donohoo JH
    . Utilization patterns and diagnostic yield of 3421 consecutive multidetector row computed tomography pulmonary angiograms in a busy emergency department. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2008; 32: 421–5.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  15. 15.↵
    1. Hayden GE,
    2. Wrenn KW
    . Chest radiograph vs. computed tomography scan in the evaluation for pneumonia. J Emerg Med 2009; 36 (3): 266–70.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  16. 16.↵
    1. Syrjala H,
    2. Broas M,
    3. Suramo I,
    4. Ojala A,
    5. Lahde S
    . High-resolution computed tomography for the diagnosis of community-acquired pneumonia. Clin Infect Dis 1998; 27 (2): 358–63.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  17. 17.↵
    1. Tsai KL,
    2. Gupta E,
    3. Haramati LB
    . Pulmonary atelectasis: a frequent alternative diagnosis in patients undergoing CT-PA for suspected pulmonary embolism. Emerg Radiol 2004; 10 (5): 282–6.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  18. 18.↵
    1. van Strijen MJ,
    2. de Monyé W,
    3. Schiereck J,
    4. et al.
    , Advances in New Technologies Evaluating the Localisation of Pulmonary Embolism Study Group. Single-detector helical computed tomography as the primary diagnostic test in suspected pulmonary embolism: a multicenter clinical management study of 510 patients. Ann Intern Med 2003; 138 (4): 307–14.
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
  19. 19.↵
    1. Rixe J,
    2. Conradi G,
    3. Rolf A,
    4. et al
    . Radiation dose exposure of computed tomography coronary angiography: comparison of dual-source, 16-slice and 64-slice CT. Heart 2009; 95 (16): 1337–42.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  20. 20.↵
    1. Ghotbi N,
    2. Iwanaga M,
    3. Ohtsuru A,
    4. Ogawa Y,
    5. Yamashita S
    . Cancer screening with whole-body PET/CT for healthy asymptomatic people in Japan: re-evaluation of its test validity and radiation exposure. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev 2007; 8 (1): 93–7.
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
  21. 21.↵
    1. Mitchell AM,
    2. Kline JA
    . Contrast nephropathy following computed tomography angiography of the chest for pulmonary embolism in the emergency department. J Thromb Haemost 2007; 5 (1): 50–4.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  22. 22.↵
    1. Byrne MM,
    2. Weissfeld J,
    3. Roberts MS
    . Anxiety, fear of cancer, and perceived risk of cancer following lung cancer screening. Med Decis Making 2008; 28 (6): 917–25.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  23. 23.↵
    1. Iribarren C,
    2. Hlatky MA,
    3. Chandra M,
    4. et al
    . Incidental pulmonary nodules on cardiac computed tomography: prognosis and use. Am J Med 2008; 121 (11): 989–96.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  24. 24.↵
    1. Dunnick NR,
    2. Applegate K,
    3. Arenson RL
    . The inappropriate use of imaging studies: a report of the 2004 Intersociety Conference. J Am Coll Radiol 2005; 2: 401–6.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  25. 25.↵
    Medicare Payment Advisory Commission. Impact of physician self-referral on use of imaging services within an episode. In: Report to the Congress—improving incentives in the Medicare program. Washington, DC: Medicare Payment Advisory Commission; June 2009: 81–96. Available at http://www.medpac.gov/documents/Jun09_EntireReport.pdf. Accessed July 22, 2010.
  26. 26.↵
    1. Hillman BJ,
    2. Goldsmith JC
    . The uncritical use of high-tech medical imaging. N Engl J Med 2010; 363: 4–6.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  27. 27.↵
    Massachusetts Medical Society. Investigation of defensive medicine in Massachusetts. Informational report I-08. Waltham, MA: Massachusetts Medical Society; November 2008. Available at http://www.ncrponline.org/PDFs/Mass_Med_Soc.pdf. Accessed July 22, 2010.
  28. 28.↵
    1. Iglehart JK
    . The emergence of physician-owned specialty hospitals. N Engl J Med 2005; 352: 78–84.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  29. 29.↵
    1. Guterman S
    . Specialty hospitals: a problem or a symptom? Health Aff (Millwood) 2006; 25: 95–105.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  30. 30.↵
    1. Mitchell JM
    . Utilization trends for advanced imaging procedures: evidence from individuals with private insurance coverage in California. Med Care 2008; 46: 460–6.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  31. 31.↵
    1. Piazza G,
    2. Goldhaber SZ
    . Chest computed tomography in the emergency department for suspected pulmonary embolism: it's time to practice what we preach. N Engl J Med 2009; 54: 49–52.
    OpenUrl
  32. 32.↵
    Medicare Payment Advisory Commission. A data book: healthcare spending and the Medicare program. June 2007. Available at http://www.aamc.org/download/73232/data/. Accessed May 16, 2011.
  33. 33.↵
    1. Smith-Bindman R,
    2. Miglioretti DL,
    3. Larson EB
    . Rising use of diagnostic medical imaging in a large integrated health system. Health Aff 2008; 27 (6): 1491–502.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  34. 34.↵
    1. Iglehart JK
    . The new era of medical imaging: progress and pitfalls. N Engl J Med 2006; 354 (26): 2822–8.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  35. 35.↵
    1. Shiralkar S,
    2. Rennie A,
    3. Snow M,
    4. Galland RB,
    5. Lewis MH,
    6. Gower-Thomas K
    . Doctor's knowledge of radiation exposure: questionnaire study. BMJ 2003; 327: 371–2.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  36. 36.↵
    1. Lee CI,
    2. Haims AH,
    3. Monico EP,
    4. Brink JA,
    5. Forman HP
    . Diagnostic CT scans: assessment of patient, physician, and radiologist awareness of radiation dose and possible risks. Radiology 2004; 231: 393–8.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  37. 37.↵
    1. Cardis E,
    2. Vrijheid M,
    3. Blettner M,
    4. et al
    . The 15-country collaborative study of cancer risk among radiation workers in the nuclear industry: estimates of radiation-related cancer risks. Radiat Res 2007; 167: 396–416.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  38. 38.↵
    1. Sodickson A,
    2. Baeyens PF,
    3. Andriole KP,
    4. et al
    . Recurrent CT, cumulative radiation exposure, and associated radiation-induced cancer risks from CT of adults. Radiology 2009; 251 (1): 175–84.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  39. 39.↵
    1. Berrington de Gonzalez A,
    2. Mahesh M,
    3. Kim KP,
    4. et al
    . Projected cancer risks from computed tomographic scans performed in the United States in 2007. Arch Intern Med 2009; 169 (22): 2071–7.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  40. 40.↵
    1. Rice HE,
    2. Frush DP,
    3. Farmer D,
    4. Waldhausen JH
    . Review of radiation risks from computed tomography: essentials for the pediatric surgeon. J Pediatr Surg 2007; 42 (4): 603–7.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  41. 41.↵
    1. Karsli T,
    2. Kalra MK,
    3. Self JL,
    4. Rosenfield JA,
    5. Butler S,
    6. Simoneaux S
    . What physicians think about the need for informed consent for communicating the risk of cancer from low-dose radiation. Pediatr Radiol 2009; 39 (9): 917–25.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  42. 42.↵
    1. Roy PM,
    2. Durieux P,
    3. Gillaizeau F,
    4. et al
    . A computerized handheld decision-support system to improve pulmonary embolism diagnosis. Ann Intern Med 2009; 151: 677–86.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
Back to top

In this issue

Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Email Article
Citation Tools

Jump to section