Quasi-Experimental Designs in Practice-based Research Settings: Design and Implementation Considerations

References

1. 1.↵
   1. Bonell CP,
   2. Hargreaves J,
   3. Cousins,
   4. et al

   . Alternatives to randomization in the evaluation of public health interventions: design challenges and solutions. J Epi Comm Health 2009.
2. 2.↵
   1. Brown CA,
   2. Lilford RJ

   . The stepped wedge trial design: a systematic review. BMC Med Res Methodol 2006;6:54.

   OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
3. 3.↵
   1. Hussey M,
   2. Hughes JP

   . Design and analysis of stepped wedge cluster randomized designs. Contemp Clin Trials 2007;182–91.
4. 4.↵
   1. Cousens S,
   2. Hargreaves J,
   3. Bonell C,
   4. et al

   . Alternatives to randomisation in the evaluation of public-health interventions: statistical analysis and causal inference. J Epidemiol Community Health July 13, 2010 [Epub ahead of print].
5. 5.↵
   1. Fan E,
   2. Laupacis A,
   3. Pronovost P,
   4. et al

   . How to use an article about quality improvement. JAMA 2010;304:2279–87.

   OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
6. 6.↵
   1. Li F,
   2. Frangakis CE

   . Designs in partially controlled studies: messages from a review. Stat Methods Med Res 2005;14:417–31.

   OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
7. 7.↵
   1. Tunis SR,
   2. Stryer DB,
   3. Clancy CM

   . Practical clinical trials: increasing the value of clinical research for decision making in clinical and health policy. JAMA 2003;290:1624–32.

   OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
8. 8.↵
   1. Green LW

   . Making research relevant: if it is an evidence-based practice: where's the practice-based evidence? Fam Pract 2008;25(Suppl 1):i20–4.

   OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
9. 9.
   Available at: http://developmentalmedicine.ucsf.edu/research/research_programs/crn/crn.aspx.
10. 10.↵
    1. Dainty K,
    2. Scals D,
    3. Brooks S,
    4. et al

    . A knowledge translation collaborative to improve use of therapeutic hypothermia in post-cardiac arrest patients: protocol for a stepped wedge randomized trial. Implement Sci 2011.
11. 11.↵
    1. Turner J,
    2. Kelly B,
    3. Clarke D,
    4. et al

    . A randomised trial of a psychosocial intervention for cancer patients integrated into routine care: the PROMPT study (Promoting Optimal Outcomes in Mood through tailored Psychosocial Therapies). BMC Cancer 2011;11:48.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
12. 12.↵
    1. Killam WP,
    2. Tambatamba BC,
    3. Chintu N,
    4. et al

    . Antiretroviral therapy in antenatal care to increase treatment initiation in HIV-infected pregnant women: a stepped-wedge evaluation. AIDS 2010;24:85–91.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
13. 13.↵
    1. Ciliberto MA,
    2. Sandige H,
    3. MacDonald LN,
    4. et al

    . Comparison of home-based therapy with ready-to-use therapeutic food with standard therapy in the treatment of malnourished Malawian children: a controlled, clinical effectiveness trial. Am J Clin Nutr 2005;81:864–70.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
14. 14.↵
    1. Ratanawongsa N,
    2. Handley M,
    3. Quan J,
    4. et al

    . Scaling up a health information technology intervention for patients with diabetes in a Medi-Cal managed care plan: the SMART Steps Program. HRQ Health IT Grantee Conference. Washington, DC: 2010.
15. 15.↵
    ATSM Fact Sheet. Available at: http://www.cvp-sf.com/_media/ideall-fact-sheet.pdf.
16. 16.↵
    1. Schillinger D,
    2. Hammer H,
    3. Wang F,
    4. et al

    . Seeing in 3-D: examining the reach of diabetes self-management support strategies in a public healthcare system. Health Educ Behav 2008;35:664–82.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
17. 17.↵
    1. Schillinger D,
    2. Handley MA,
    3. Hammer H,
    4. et al

    . Effects of self-management support on structure, process, and outcomes among vulnerable patients with diabetes: a three-arm practical clinical trial. Diabetes Care. 2009;32:559–66.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
18. 18.↵
    1. Handley MA,
    2. Hammer H,
    3. Schillinger D

    , Navigating the terrain between research and practice: a Collaborative Research Network (CRN) case study in diabetes research. J Am Board Fam Med 2006;19:85–92.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
19. 19.↵
    1. Handley M,
    2. Shumway M,
    3. Schillinger D

    . Cost-effectiveness of an automated telephone self management support intervention with nurse care management among vulnerable patients with type-2 diabetes. Ann Fam Med 2008;6:512–8.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
20. 20.↵
    1. Sarkar U,
    2. Handley MA,
    3. Gupta R,
    4. et al

    . Use of an interactive, telephone-based self-management support program to identify adverse events among ambulatory diabetes patients. J Gen Intern Med 2008;23:459–65.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
21. 21.↵
    Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. Automated, telephone-based interactive, language-appropriate monitoring engages and improves health behaviors of low-income diabetes patients. Innovations Exchange 2010.
22. 22.↵
    1. Schillinger D

    . R18 HS 017261, Harnessing Health Information Technology for Self-Management Support and Medication Activation in a Medicaid Health Plan. Awarded 2007.