The Influence of Research Compensation Options on Practice-based Research Network (PBRN) Physician Participation: A North Texas (NorTex) PBRN Study

References

1. 1.↵
   1. Lanier D

   . Primary care practice-based research comes of age in the United States Ann Fam Med 2005;3:S2–4.

   OpenUrlFREE Full Text
2. 2.↵
   1. Westfall JM,
   2. Mold J,
   3. Fagnan L

   . Practice-based research: “Blue Highways” on the NIH roadmap. JAMA 2007;297:403–6.

   OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
3. 3.↵
   1. Bakken S,
   2. Lantigua RA,
   3. Busacca LV,
   4. Bigger JT

   . Barriers, enablers, and incentives for research participation: a report from the Ambulatory Care Research Network (ACRN). J Am Board Fam Med 2009;22:436–45.

   OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
4. 4.↵
   1. Ross S,
   2. Grant A,
   3. Counsell C,
   4. et al

   . Barriers to participation in randomised controlled trials: a systematic review. J Clin Epidemiol 1999;52:1143–56.

   OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
5. 5.↵
   1. Silagy CA,
   2. Carson NE

   . Factors affecting the level of interest and activity in primary care research among general practitioners. Fam Pract 1989;6:173–6.

   OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
6. 6.↵
   1. Green LA

   . Putting practice into research: a 20-year perspective. Fam Med 2000;32:396–7.

   OpenUrlPubMed
7. 7.↵
   1. Griffiths F,
   2. Wild A,
   3. Harvey J,
   4. Fenton E

   . The productivity of primary care research networks. Br J Gen Pract 2000;50:913–5.

   OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
8. 8.↵
   1. Sinclair-Lian N,
   2. Rhyne RL,
   3. Alexander SH,
   4. Williams RL

   . Practice-based research network membership is associated with retention of clinicians in underserved communities: a Research Involving Outpatient Settings Network (RIOS Net) study. J Am Board Fam Med 2008;21:353–5.

   OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
9. 9.↵
   1. Kroth PJ,
   2. McPherson L,
   3. Leverence R,
   4. et al

   . Combining web-based and mail surveys improves response rates: a PBRN study from PRIME Net. Ann Fam Med 2009;7:245–8.

   OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
10. 10.↵
    1. Green LA,
    2. White LL,
    3. Barry HC,
    4. et al

    . Infrastructure requirements for practice-based research networks. Ann Fam Med 2005;3(Suppl 1):S5–11.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
11. 11.↵
    MLwiN Version 2.1 [computer program]: Centre for Multilevel Modelling, University of Bristol; 2009.
12. 12.↵
    1. Hahn DL

    . Physician opportunity costs for performing practice-based research. J Fam Pract 2000;49:983–4.

    OpenUrlPubMed
13. 13.↵
    1. Bentley JP,
    2. Thacker PG

    . The influence of risk and monetary payment on the research participation decision making process. J Med Ethics 2004;3:293–8.

    OpenUrl
14. 14.↵
    1. Grady C

    . Money for research participation: does in jeopardize informed consent? Am J Bioeth 2001;1:40–4.

    OpenUrlPubMed
15. 15.↵
    1. Schwartz KL,
    2. Roe T,
    3. Northrup J,
    4. et al

    . Family medicine patients' use of the Internet for health information: a MetroNet study. J Am Board Fam Med 2006;19:39–45.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
16. 16.↵
    1. Spann SJ,
    2. Nutting PA,
    3. Galliher JM,
    4. et al

    . Management of type 2 diabetes in the primary care setting: a practice-based research network study. Ann Fam Med 2006;4:23–31.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
17. 17.↵
    1. Westfall JM,
    2. Zittleman L,
    3. Staton EW,
    4. et al

    . Card studies for observational research in practice. Ann Fam Med 2011;9:63–8.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
18. 18.↵
    1. Croughan M

    . Factors influencing physician participation in practice-based research network studies: a call for further research. J Fam Pract 2001;50:978–9.

    OpenUrlPubMed
19. 19.↵
    1. de Wit NJ,
    2. Quartero AO,
    3. Zuithoff AP,
    4. Numans ME

    . Participation and successful patient recruitment in primary care. J Fam Pract Nov 2001;50:976.

    OpenUrl
20. 20.↵
    1. Foy R,
    2. Parry J,
    3. McAvoy B

    . Clinical trials in primary care: targeted payments for trials might help improve recruitment and quality. BMJ 1998;317:1168–9.

    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
21. 21.↵
    1. Green LA,
    2. Niebauer LJ,
    3. Miller RS,
    4. Lutz LJ

    . An analysis of reasons for discontinuing participation in a practice-based research network. Fam Med 1991;23:447–9.

    OpenUrlPubMed
22. 22.↵
    1. Ward J

    . General practitioners' experience of research. Fam Pract 1994;11:418–23.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
23. 23.↵
    1. Murphy E,
    2. Spiegal N,
    3. Kinmonth AL

    . ‘Will you help me with my research?' Gaining access to primary care settings and subjects. Br J Gen Pract 1992;42:162–5.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
24. 24.↵
    1. Kuyvenhoven MM,
    2. Dagnelie CF,
    3. de Melker RA

    . Recruitment of general practitioners and patients in a sore throat study. Br J Gen Pract 1997;47:126–7.

    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
25. 25.↵
    1. van Weel C,
    2. Smith H,
    3. Beasley JW

    . Family practice research networks: experiences from 3 countries. J Fam Pract 2000;49:938–43.

    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science