Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • ARTICLES
    • Current Issue
    • Abstracts In Press
    • Archives
    • Special Issue Archive
    • Subject Collections
  • INFO FOR
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Call For Papers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • SUBMIT
    • Manuscript
    • Peer Review
  • ABOUT
    • The JABFM
    • The Editing Fellowship
    • Editorial Board
    • Indexing
    • Editors' Blog
  • CLASSIFIEDS
  • Other Publications
    • abfm

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
American Board of Family Medicine
  • Other Publications
    • abfm
American Board of Family Medicine

American Board of Family Medicine

Advanced Search

  • HOME
  • ARTICLES
    • Current Issue
    • Abstracts In Press
    • Archives
    • Special Issue Archive
    • Subject Collections
  • INFO FOR
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Call For Papers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • SUBMIT
    • Manuscript
    • Peer Review
  • ABOUT
    • The JABFM
    • The Editing Fellowship
    • Editorial Board
    • Indexing
    • Editors' Blog
  • CLASSIFIEDS
  • JABFM on Bluesky
  • JABFM On Facebook
  • JABFM On Twitter
  • JABFM On YouTube
Research ArticleOriginal Research

Nasolaryngoscopy in a Family Medicine Clinic: Indications, Findings, and Economics

Thad Wilkins, Ralph A. Gillies, April Getz, Dave Zimmerman and Larry Kang
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine September 2010, 23 (5) 591-597; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3122/jabfm.2010.05.090186
Thad Wilkins
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ralph A. Gillies
PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
April Getz
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Dave Zimmerman
MD, MBA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Larry Kang
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Tables

    • View popup
    Table 1.

    Demographics of Patients Referred for Nasolaryngoscopy (n = 276)

    Factor
    Age (mean years ± SD)51.3 ± 14.6
    Female sex197 (71.4)
    Race
        Black121 (46.9)
        White124 (48.1)
        Other13 (4.7)
    Alcohol use
        Current (yes)66 (24.7)
        Past (yes)83 (31.1)
    Tobacco use
        Current70 (25.8)
        Ever104 (38.4)
    • Values provided as n (%) unless otherwise indicated.

    • View popup
    Table 2.

    Indications for Nasolaryngoscopy (n = 276)

    Age (years)SexRaceAlcohol UseTobacco Use
    <50≥50P*FemaleMalePBlackWhitePNoneEverPNoneEverP
    Symptoms
        Chronic cough17 (14.2)30 (19.9).2238 (19.4)9 (11.4).1118 (15.0)22 (17.7).5634 (18.9)12 (14.0)0.3230 (18.1)17 (16.3).72
        Globus sensation41 (34.2)47 (31.1).6065 (33.2)23 (29.1).5233 (27.5)47 (37.9).0854 (30.0)32 (37.2)0.2455 (33.1)31 (29.8).57
        Hoarseness59 (49.2)81 (53.6).46103 (52.6)38 (48.1).5065 (52.4)62 (51.7).9193 (51.7)44 (51.2)0.9481 (48.8)58 (55.8).26
        Reflux6 (5.0)9 (6.0).7313 (6.6)2 (2.5).1810 (4.1)4 (3.2).0910 (5.6)5 (5.8)0.939 (5.4)6 (5.8).91
        Sore throat17 (14.2)13 (8.6).1524 (12.2)6 (7.6).2614 (11.3)12 (10.0).7423 (12.8)6 (20.7)0.1621 (12.7)8 (7.7).20
    Diagnoses
        Chronic rhinitis24 (20.0)13 (8.6).00724 (12.2)13 (16.5).3519 (15.8)14 (11.3).3027 (15.0)9 (10.5)0.3126 (15.7)10 (9.6).16
        Chronic sinusitis11 (9.2)4 (2.6).0211 (5.6)4 (5.1).868 (6.7)5 (4.0).369 (5.0)3 (3.5)0.5811 (5.5)3 (4.3).69
        Dysphagia4 (3.3)13 (8.6).0810 (5.1)7 (8.9).247 (5.8)10 (8.1).496 (3.3)11 (12.8)0.0037 (4.2)10 (9.6).08
        Epistaxis5 (4.2)10 (6.6).3812 (6.1)6 (7.6).669 (7.5)8 (6.5).759 (5.0)8 (9.3)0.1812 (7.2)6 (5.8).64
        Hemoptysis2 (1.7)1 (0.7).432 (1.0)1 (1.3).862 (1.7)0 (0.0).153 (1.7)0 (0.0)0.233 (1.8)0 (0.0).17
        History of vocal cord polyp1 (0.8)7 (4.6).075 (2.6)3 (3.8).583 (2.5)2 (1.6).635 (2.8)2 (2.3)0.831 (0.6)7 (6.7).004
    • Values provided as n (%). Note that denominator numbers may vary slightly from numbers listed in Table 1 because of missing data for that particular analysis.

    • * χ2 analyses for other demographics.

    • View popup
    Table 3.

    Findings from Completed Nasolaryngoscopy (n = 273)*

    Findingsn (%)†
    Laryngopharyngeal reflux116 (42.5)
    Chronic rhinitis88 (32.2)
    Other‡84 (30.8)
    Vocal cord lesion36 (13.2)
    Nasal polyps10 (3.7)
    Other pharyngeal lesion8 (2.9)
    Precancerous lesion5 (1.8)
    Laryngeal mass2 (0.7)
    Normal findings35 (12.8)
    • * Three of the 276 patients did not complete the entire nasolaryngoscopy procedure.

    • † Percentages do not sum to 100% because patients may have had more than one finding.

    • ‡ “Other” includes tissue hypertrophy, acute inflammation, aspiration, eustachian tube dysfunction, candidal infection, septal perforation, bony spur, aphthous ulcer, vocal cord dysfunction, prominent vessel, and hemangioma.

    • View popup
    Table 4.

    Management Changes After Nasolaryngoscopy (n = 276)

    Managementn (%)*
    Medication changes
        Added140 (50.7)
        Deleted9 (3.3)
    Referrals
        Otolaryngology72 (26.1)
        Gastroenterology8 (2.9)
    Other diagnostic tests
        CAT scan18 (6.5)
        Barium swallow14 (5.1)
        Esophagogastroduodenoscopy12 (4.3)
        Repeat nasolaryngoscopy5 (1.8)
    Other†16 (5.8)
    No changes to therapeutic plan56 (20.3)
    • * Percentages do not sum to 100% because patients may have had more than one change.

    • † “Other” includes sleep study, allergy/immunology consult, manometry, pillcam, and transnasoesophagoscopy.

    • CAT, computed axial tomography.

    • View popup
    Table 5.

    Referral Outcomes*

    Referred patients† (n = 127)(n [%])Overall (n = 276) (%)
    Referral Outcome
    Laryngeal cancer (confirmed by biopsy)3 (2.4)(1.1)
    Vocal cord lesion9 (7.1)(3.3)
    Laryngopharyngeal reflux25 (19.7)(9.1)
    Other‡40 (31.5)(14.5)
    • * Patient may have more than one outcome.

    • † One hundred twenty-seven patients were referred for follow-up assessment by otolaryngology or gastroenterology or for other diagnostic tests.

    • ‡ “Other outcome” includes vocal cord granuloma, sinonasal disease, nodules, vocal cord polyp, esophageal cancer with metastasis, parotid adenoma, small cell lung cancer, enlarged thyroid, esophagitis, and gastritis.

    • View popup
    Table 6.

    Estimated Breakeven Points Assuming Various Ratios of Payor Sources and Current Procedural Technology (CPT) Billing Codes

    Relative CPT Billing Code Ratio*Relative Payor Ratio (Medicare/Private Insurance)
    0%/100%20%/80%40%/60%60%/40%80%/20%100%/0%
    0% 9251156667897129190
    100% 31575
    20% 92511667690110141199
    80% 31575
    40% 925117990105125156208
    60% 31575
    60% 9251198111126147175218
    40% 31575
    80% 92511131143158176199229
    40% 31575
    100% 92511197205213222231242
    0% 31575
    • Data are presented as Q values at different payor mix and CPT code ratios. Q equals the no. of procedures required to breakeven at the end of the first year, calculated as: Embedded Image where N equals the percentage of procedures performed coded as nasopharyngoscopy; L equals the percentage of procedures performed coded as laryngoscopy; M equals the percentage of procedures covered by Medicare insurance; P equals the percentage of procedures covered by private insurance; and T equals the total estimated startup costs for the first year ($12,850).

    • * CPT code 92511: Nasopharyngoscopy with endoscope; CPT code 31575: Laryngoscopy, flexible fiber optic.

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine: 23 (5)
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine
Vol. 23, Issue 5
September-October 2010
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Cover (PDF)
  • Index by author
  • Back Matter (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Board of Family Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Nasolaryngoscopy in a Family Medicine Clinic: Indications, Findings, and Economics
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Board of Family Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Board of Family Medicine web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
11 + 9 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Nasolaryngoscopy in a Family Medicine Clinic: Indications, Findings, and Economics
Thad Wilkins, Ralph A. Gillies, April Getz, Dave Zimmerman, Larry Kang
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine Sep 2010, 23 (5) 591-597; DOI: 10.3122/jabfm.2010.05.090186

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Nasolaryngoscopy in a Family Medicine Clinic: Indications, Findings, and Economics
Thad Wilkins, Ralph A. Gillies, April Getz, Dave Zimmerman, Larry Kang
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine Sep 2010, 23 (5) 591-597; DOI: 10.3122/jabfm.2010.05.090186
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Conclusion
    • Notes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • Guest Family Physician Commentaries
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • The Words We Use, the Procedures We Do, and How We Change (Medical Care Information for Family Physicians)
  • Guest Family Physician Commentaries
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Successful Implementation of Integrated Behavioral Health
  • Identifying and Addressing Social Determinants of Health with an Electronic Health Record
  • Integrating Adverse Childhood Experiences and Social Risks Screening in Adult Primary Care
Show more Original Research

Similar Articles

Navigate

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues

Authors & Reviewers

  • Info For Authors
  • Info For Reviewers
  • Submit A Manuscript/Review

Other Services

  • Get Email Alerts
  • Classifieds
  • Reprints and Permissions

Other Resources

  • Forms
  • Contact Us
  • ABFM News

© 2025 American Board of Family Medicine

Powered by HighWire