Evaluating Primary Care Research Networks: A Review of Currently Available Tools

References

1. ↵
   van Weel C, Smith H, Beasley JW. Family practice research networks. Experiences from 3 countries. J Fam Pract 2000; 49: 938–43.

   OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
2. Laurence COM, Beilby JJ, Marley JE, Newbury J, Wilkinson D, Symon B. Establishing a practice-based primary care research network. The University Family Practice Network in South Australia. Aust Fam Physician 2001; 30: 508–12.

   OpenUrlPubMed
3. Thomas P, Griffiths F, Kai J, O'Dwyer A. Networks for research in primary health care. BMJ 2001; 322: 588–90.

   OpenUrlFREE Full Text
4. Abyad A. Research networks. MEJFM 2007; 5: 55–7.

   OpenUrl
5. ↵
   Tierny WM, Oppenheimer CC, Hudson BL, et al. A national survey of primary care practice-based research networks. Ann Fam Med 2007; 5: 242–50.

   OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
6. ↵
   Green LA. A short history of primary care practice-based research networks: from concept to essential research laboratories. J Am Board Fam Med 2006; 19: 1–10.

   OpenUrlFREE Full Text
7. ↵
   Nutting PA, Green LA. Practice-based research networks: reuniting practice and research around the problems most of the people have most of the time. J Fam Pract 1994; 38: 335–6.

   OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
8. Nutting PA. Practice-based research networks: building the infrastructure of primary care research. J Fam Pract 1996; 42: 199–203.

   OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
9. Nutting PA, Beasley JW, Werner, JJ. Practice-based research networks answer primary care questions. JAMA 1999; 281: 686–8.

   OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
10. van Weel C. General Practice research networks: gateway to primary care evidence. Med J Aust 2002; 177: 62–3.

    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
11. Lindbloom EJ, Ewigman BG, Hickner JM. Practice-based research networks—the laboratories in primary care research. Med Care 2004; 42: 45–9.

    OpenUrl
12. ↵
    Griffiths F, Wild A, Harvey J, et al. The productivity of primary care research networks. Br J Gen Pract 2000; 50: 913–5.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
13. ↵
    Fenton E, Harvey J, Griffiths F, Wild A, Sturt J. Reflections from organizational science on the development of primary health care research networks. Fam Pract 2001; 18: 540–4.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
14. ↵
    Genel M, Dobs A. Translating clinical research into practice: practice-based research networks—a promising solution. J Investg Med 2003; 51: 64–71.

    OpenUrl
15. Cohen DJ, Crabtree BF, Etz RS, et al. Fidelity versus flexibility: translating evidence-based research into practice. Am J Prev Med 2008; 35(5 Suppl): S381–9.

    OpenUrl
16. Thomas P, While A. West London Research Network. Increasing research capacity and changing the culture of primary care towards reflexive inquiring practice. J Interprol Care 2001; 15: 133–9.

    OpenUrl
17. ↵
    Metsemakers JF, Knottnerus JA, van Schendel GJ, Kocken RJ, Limonard CB. Unlocking patients’ records in general practice for research, medical education and quality assurance: the Registration Network Family Practices. Int J Biomed Comput 1996; 42: 43–50.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
18. Interfaculty Council of General Practice. Report on the results of the Dutch academic practices networks 1992–1997 [Dutch]. Nijmegen: Department of General Practice, University of Nijmegen; 1998.
19. Thomas P, Kai J, O'Dwyer A, Griffiths F. Primary care groups and research networks: opportunities for R&D in context. Br J Gen Pract 2000; 50: 91–2.

    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
20. Edwards JB, Oppewal S, Logan CL. Nurse-managed primary care: outcomes of a faculty practice network. J Am Ac of Nurse Pract 2003; 15: 563–9.

    OpenUrl
21. Mold JW, Peterson KA. Primary care practice-based research networks: working at the interface between research and quality improvement. Ann Fam Med 2005; 3(Suppl 1): S12–S20.

    OpenUrl
22. Thomas P, Graffy J, Wallace P, Kirby M. How primary care networks can help integrate academic and service initiatives in primary care. Ann Fam Med 2006; 4: 235–9.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
23. ↵
    Carter YH, Shaw S, Sibbald B. Primary care research networks: an evolving model meriting national evaluation. Br J Gen Pract 2000; 50: 859–60.

    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
24. Gunn JM. Should Australia develop primary care research networks? Med J Aust 2002; 177: 63–6.

    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
25. Stock N, Smith H. Primary care research networks for Australia? Austr Fam Phys 2002; 31: 95–6.

    OpenUrl
26. ↵
    Doorn B, Kocken RJJ, Crebolder HFJM, Dinant GJ, Knottnerus JA. The development of an tool for academic general practices [Dutch]. Huisarts Wet 1999; 42: 57–60.

    OpenUrl
27. ↵
    Terwee CB, Bot SDM, de Boer MR, et al. Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires. J Clin Epidemiol 2007; 60: 34–42.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
28. ↵
    Mokkink LB, Terwee CB, Patric DL, et al. The COSMIN checklist for assessing the methodological quality of studies on measurement properties of health status measurement instruments: an international Delphi study. Qual Life Res 2010; 19: 539–49.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
29. ↵
    Bot SDM, Terwee CB, van der Windt DAW, Bouter LM, Dekker J, de Vet HCW. Clinimetric evaluation of shoulder disability questionnaires: a systematic review of the literature. Ann Rheum Dis 2004; 63: 335–41.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
30. ↵
    Streiner DL, Norman GR. Health measurement scales: a practical guide to their development and use. New York, NY: Oxford University Press; 2003.
31. ↵
    Doorn B, Kocken RJJ, Crebolder HFJM, Dinant GJ, Knottnerus JA. HALMA: validating a tool for academic general practices [Dutch]. Huisarts Wet 1999; 42: 267–70.

    OpenUrl
32. ↵
    Clement S, Pickering A, Rowland G, Thiry K, Candy B, de Lusignan S. Towards a conceptual framework for evaluating primary care research networks. Br J Gen Pract 2000; 50: 651–2.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
33. ↵
    Carter YH, Shaw S, Macfarlane F. Primary Care Research Team Assessment (PCRTA): development and evaluation. Occas Pap R Coll Gen Pract 2002; (81): iii-vi, 1–72.

    OpenUrl
34. ↵
    Harvey J, Fenton E, Sturt J. Evaluation of primary care R&D networks in North Thames region. Final report. Coventry, West Midlands, UK: Centre for Creativity, Strategy and Change, Warwick Business School. University of Warwick; 2002.
35. ↵
    Fenton E, Harvey J, Sturt J. Evaluating primary care research networks. Health Serv Manage Res 2007; 20: 162–73.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
36. ↵
    National Health Services. Executive R&D in primary care: National Working Group report (Mant Report). London: Department of Health; 1997.
37. ↵
    Royal College of General Practitioners. Royal College of General Practicioners –investigator led accredited practices. Available at http://www.rcgp.org.uk/clinical_and_research/circ/research/primary_care_research_team_ass/investigator_led_accredited_pr.aspx. Accessed 5 November 2009.
38. ↵
    Gray S. Mapping teaching and research activity in general practice. Med Teach 2000; 22: 64–9.

    OpenUrl