Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • ARTICLES
    • Current Issue
    • Abstracts In Press
    • Archives
    • Special Issue Archive
    • Subject Collections
  • INFO FOR
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Call For Papers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • SUBMIT
    • Manuscript
    • Peer Review
  • ABOUT
    • The JABFM
    • The Editing Fellowship
    • Editorial Board
    • Indexing
    • Editors' Blog
  • CLASSIFIEDS
  • Other Publications
    • abfm

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
American Board of Family Medicine
  • Other Publications
    • abfm
American Board of Family Medicine

American Board of Family Medicine

Advanced Search

  • HOME
  • ARTICLES
    • Current Issue
    • Abstracts In Press
    • Archives
    • Special Issue Archive
    • Subject Collections
  • INFO FOR
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Call For Papers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • SUBMIT
    • Manuscript
    • Peer Review
  • ABOUT
    • The JABFM
    • The Editing Fellowship
    • Editorial Board
    • Indexing
    • Editors' Blog
  • CLASSIFIEDS
  • JABFM on Bluesky
  • JABFM On Facebook
  • JABFM On Twitter
  • JABFM On YouTube
OtherHealth Policy

Policy Challenges in Building the Medical Home: Do We Have a Shared Blueprint?

Robert J. Stenger and Jennifer E. DeVoe
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine May 2010, 23 (3) 384-392; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3122/jabfm.2010.03.090140
Robert J. Stenger
MD, MPH
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jennifer E. DeVoe
MD, DPhil
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Tables

    • View popup
    Table 1.

    Joint Policy Statement: Patient-Centered Medical Home Principles*

    Personal physician
    • Patients have an ongoing relationship with a personal physician

    • First contact, continuous and comprehensive care

    Physician-directed medical practice
    • Personal physician leads a team of individuals at the practice level

    • Collective responsibility for the ongoing care of patients

    Whole-person orientation
    • Medical home provides for all the patient's health care needs or appropriately arranges care with other qualified professionals

    • Care for all stages of life: acute care, chronic care, preventive services, and end-of-life care

    Care is coordinated and/or integrated
    • Coordination of care across the health care system and patient's community

    • Care is facilitated by registries, information technology, health information exchange, use of interpreters, and other means

    Quality and safety
    • Quality and safety improvement are hallmarks of the medical home

    • Specific activities could include individualized care plans, evidence-based decision support tools, collection and reporting of quality improvement data, use of information technology, and voluntary certification of practices as medical homes

    Enhanced access
    • Patients can easily access health care via their medical home

    • Specific improvements could include open access scheduling, expanded hours, and enhanced phone or e-mail communication

    Payment
    • Increased payments support the added level of service and value provided to patients who receive care from a medical home

    • * Issued jointly by the American Academy of Family Physicians, American College of Physicians, the American Academy of Pediatrics, and the American Osteopathic Association.

    • View popup
    Table 2.

    Summary of Selected State and Federal Enacted Legislation Referencing the Medical Home

    EntityMedical Home Definition and AttributesImpact of Legislation
    US Congress PL 109–432 (12/20/2006)
    • Care planning and coordination

    • Use of health information technology

    • Personal physician within a medical home practice

    • Individual health assessment and management plans

    • Prospective care management fee

    • 3-year medical home demonstration for “high need” Medicare beneficiaries

    • Demonstration to run in 8 states with mix of practice types and locations

    • Requires CMS to create care management fee codes and provide a prospective fee for care management

    California SL Ch. 483 (10/112007)Defines medical home as “a single provider or facility that maintains all of an individual's medical information. The ···provider shall be a provider from which the enrollee can access primary and preventive care.”Establishes the availability of medical homes as one of 10 criteria to judge local government proposals for insurance coverage expansion under an existing Medicaid waiver demonstration project
    Idaho H 168 (7/1/2007)Defines medical home as a primary care case manager
    • Requires all Medicaid applicants to receive information about primary care case management

    • Allows the state HHS Director to require Medicaid enrollees to designate a primary care case manager

    Louisiana Act 243 (8/15/2007)Defines medical home “system of care” that includes:
    • PCP-directed, patient-centered care

    • Coordination of preventive and primary care

    • Integrated system of PCPs, specialists and hospitals

    • PCPs must have EMR

    • Requires the state department of health to develop, implement, and evaluate a medical home system of care for Medicaid and low-income uninsured

    • Requires the state department of health to develop an “enhanced Medicaid reimbursement methodology” for participating providers

    Minnesota H 1078, SL 147 (7/1/2007)Primary care medical homes must include the following attributes:
    • Comprehensive care, including chronic disease management

    • Coordination of care

    • Longitudinal care

    • 24-hour access (via phone)

    • Systematic process for quality improvement

    • Requires the state human services commissioner to develop at least 4 primary care medical home pilot projects for Medicaid-enrolled children or adults with complex medical needs

    • Requires an evaluation of the pilot projects

    • Appropriation of about $1.7 million over 2 years (2009 and 2010)

    Vermont Act 0071 (6/5/2007)Defines medical home as a primary care practice that provides access to personal health information, individualized health assessments, and training for office staff in care management. Medical home PCPs shall provide:
    • Care coordination, integration and oversight

    • Point-of-care EBM and decision support tools

    • Use of health information technology

    • Patient self-management tools

    • Funds a medical home demonstration project for Medicaid, Catamount Health, and State Employee Health Plan enrollees

    • Requires the state DHS to develop a care management fee schedule and performance-based incentive payment structure for demonstration sites

    • Establishes community-based care coordination teams that will work with medical home practices to coordinate care and promote the medical home

    Washington PL Ch 259 (7/22/2007)Defines medical home as “a site of care that provides comprehensive preventive and coordinated care centered on the patient's needs and assures high-quality, accessible, and efficient care”
    • Requires the state department of health to develop a 5-year plan to provide a medical home to all enrollees of state health plans

    • Requires the state DOH to design and implement medical homes for aging, blind, and disabled clients

    • Payment reform emphasized, with the goal of allowing primary care providers to remain in practice and better coordinate chronic disease care.

    • CMS, Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services; HHS, Health and Human Services; DOH, Department of Health; PCP, primary care provider; EMR, electronic medical record; EBM, evidence-based medicine; DHS, Department of Human Services.

    • View popup
    Table 3.

    Summary of Key Stakeholder Perspectives on Medical Home Principles

    Primary Care ProvidersClinic and Health System AdministratorsInsurers and PayersPolicymakers
    Personal physicianFamiliar concept Highly valuedFamiliar concept Not highly valuedFamiliar concept Not highly valuedFamiliar concept Somewhat valued
    Physician-directed medical practiceForeign concept May be reluctant to participate in team-based careGood understanding of team dynamics and differing roles of primary care team membersVery limited understanding of team-based primary careVery limited understanding of primary care teams and roles
    Whole-person orientationFamiliar concept Important core value of primary careLimited understanding of concept Not highly valuedLimited understanding of concept Not highly valuedSome understanding of concept Somewhat valued
    Care is coordinated and/or integratedLimited understanding of care coordination strategies (patient-level focus) Sometimes part of current practice Variable understandingLimited understanding of care coordination strategies (systems-level focus) Some understandingSome understanding of concept May not link care coordination to the medical home (caved out services) Highly valuedSome understanding of concept Limited understanding of quality improvement Not valued
    Quality and safetyVariable desire to participate in new projects Skeptical of new requirements/oversightImportance driven by regulatory and licensure requirementsFavor tighter regulation and oversight of primary care to improve quality and safetyHighly valued (regulatory mindset)
    Enhanced accessWell understood Limited support because of overwork of providers in current systemWell understood Customer-service mentalityWell understood (emphasis on customer service and costs) May not link to medical homeWell understood Somewhat valued
    PaymentVery highly valued, of critical importance Skeptical of pay-for-performanceVery highly valued, of critical importance Skeptical of new payment methodologiesVery sensitive to rising health care costs Likely to demand proof of value/cost savingsExtremely sensitive to overall system costs and impact on health care budgets Supportive of demonstrations
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine: 23 (3)
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine
Vol. 23, Issue 3
May-June 2010
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Cover (PDF)
  • Index by author
  • Back Matter (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Board of Family Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Policy Challenges in Building the Medical Home: Do We Have a Shared Blueprint?
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Board of Family Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Board of Family Medicine web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
1 + 5 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Policy Challenges in Building the Medical Home: Do We Have a Shared Blueprint?
Robert J. Stenger, Jennifer E. DeVoe
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine May 2010, 23 (3) 384-392; DOI: 10.3122/jabfm.2010.03.090140

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Policy Challenges in Building the Medical Home: Do We Have a Shared Blueprint?
Robert J. Stenger, Jennifer E. DeVoe
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine May 2010, 23 (3) 384-392; DOI: 10.3122/jabfm.2010.03.090140
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Conclusions
    • Acknowledgments
    • Notes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Back to the Future: Reflections on the History of the Future of Family Medicine
  • The OCHIN Community Information Network: Bringing Together Community Health Centers, Information Technology, and Data to Support a Patient-Centered Medical Village
  • Defining the Medical Home: The Oregon Experience
  • Receipt of Diabetes Preventive Care Among Safety Net Patients Associated with Differing Levels of Insurance Coverage
  • Electronic Health Records vs Medicaid Claims: Completeness of Diabetes Preventive Care Data in Community Health Centers
  • Veteran Family Reintegration, Primary Care Needs, and the Benefit of the Patient-Centered Medical Home Model
  • Policy and Financing in Family Medicine and the Medical Home
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Primary Care and Public Health – Both Essential for National Health Security and Population Health
  • Primary Health Care As a Common Good
  • National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine Standing Committee on Primary Care: An Objective Venue to Inform Policy
Show more Health Policy

Similar Articles

Navigate

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues

Authors & Reviewers

  • Info For Authors
  • Info For Reviewers
  • Submit A Manuscript/Review

Other Services

  • Get Email Alerts
  • Classifieds
  • Reprints and Permissions

Other Resources

  • Forms
  • Contact Us
  • ABFM News

© 2025 American Board of Family Medicine

Powered by HighWire