Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • ARTICLES
    • Current Issue
    • Ahead of Print
    • Archives
    • Abstracts In Press
    • Special Issue Archive
    • Subject Collections
  • INFO FOR
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Call For Papers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • SUBMIT
    • Manuscript
    • Peer Review
  • ABOUT
    • The JABFM
    • The Editing Fellowship
    • Editorial Board
    • Indexing
    • Editors' Blog
  • CLASSIFIEDS
  • Other Publications
    • abfm

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
American Board of Family Medicine
  • Other Publications
    • abfm
American Board of Family Medicine

American Board of Family Medicine

Advanced Search

  • HOME
  • ARTICLES
    • Current Issue
    • Ahead of Print
    • Archives
    • Abstracts In Press
    • Special Issue Archive
    • Subject Collections
  • INFO FOR
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Call For Papers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • SUBMIT
    • Manuscript
    • Peer Review
  • ABOUT
    • The JABFM
    • The Editing Fellowship
    • Editorial Board
    • Indexing
    • Editors' Blog
  • CLASSIFIEDS
  • JABFM on Bluesky
  • JABFM On Facebook
  • JABFM On Twitter
  • JABFM On YouTube
OtherEvidence-Based Clinical Medicine

Are Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors and Angiotensin Receptor Blockers Especially Useful for Cardiovascular Protection?

Hean Teik Ong
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine November 2009, 22 (6) 686-697; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3122/jabfm.2009.06.090094
Hean Teik Ong
FRCP, FACC, FESC
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Tables

    • View popup
    Table 1.

    Trials Comparing Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors/Angiotensin Receptor Blockers with Other Regimes in Hypertensive Patients*

    TrialYearType of Patients (n)Years of Follow-up (n)Drugs ComparedEntry BP (mm Hg)BP Difference During StudyPPrimary EndpointRelative Risk95% CIOther Significant Outcome DifferencesP
    UKPDS71998Hypertensive (n = 758)9Captopril vs atenolol159/93NSNACli diab event1.10.86–1.41NoneNS
    Diabetes death1.270.82–1.97NS
    Total mortality1.140.81–1.61NS
    CAPPP81999Hypertensive (n = 10,985)6.1Captopril vs DIUs/β-blockers162/100Captopril; BP higher 2/2NAMI, stroke, CV death1.050.90–1.2243% higher incidence of stroke in captopril group.004
    STOP-291999Hypertensive (n = 4418)4.6ACEIs vs conventional194/98NSNACV death1.010.84–1.22NoneNS
    LIFE102002Hypertensive (n = 9193)4.8Losartan vs atenolol174/98Losartan; SBP lower 1.1.017CV death, stroke, MI†0.870.77–0.9825% stroke reduction in losartan group.001
    ALLHAT112002/2003Hypertensive (n = 24,309)4.9Chlorthalidone vs lisinopril146/84Lisinopril SBP higher 2<.001Fatal CHD, nonfatal MI0.990.91–1.08Lisinopril group: 15% higher stroke.02
    19% higher HF<.001
    ANBP-2122003(n = 26,083)4.1ACEIs vs DIUs168/91NSNACVS event total mortality‡0.890.79–1.00In men, RR = 0.83.02
    In women, RR = 0.98;.98
    JMIC-B132004Hypertensive (n = 1650)3ACEIs vs nifedipine145/82ACEI BP higher 4/1<.01Cardiac event1.050.81–1.37ACEI group coronary lumen narrowedNS
    VALUE142004Hypertensive (n = 15,245)4.2Amlodipine vs valsartan155/88Valsartan BP higher 2.1/1.7<.0001CV event1.040.94–1.15Valsartan group 19% higher MI.02
    • * Trials should show (1) no significant difference in primary endpoint in most studies and (2) the group with lower blood pressure had lower adverse clinical outcome regardless of strategy.

    • † P = .021.

    • ‡ P = .05.

    • Cli diab, clinical diabetes; DIUs, diuretics; ACEIs, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors; NS, not significant; NA, not available; BP, blood pressure; MI, myocardial infarction; CV, cardiovascular; SBP, systolic blood pressure; CHD: coronary heart disease; UKPDS, United Kingdom Prospective Diabetes Study Group; CAPPP, Captopril Prevention Project; STOP-2, Swedish Trial in Old Patients with Hypertension 2; LIFE, Losartan Intervention For Endpoint Reduction in Hypertension Study; ALLHAT, Antihypertensive and Lipid-Lowering Treatment to Prevent Heart Attack Trial; ANBP-2, Second Australian National Blood Pressure Study Group; JMIC-B, Japan Multicenter Investigation for Cardiovascular Diseases-B randomized trial; VALUE, Valsartan Antihypertensive Long-Term Use Evaluation; RR, relative risk; HF, heart failure.

    • View popup
    Table 2.

    Trials Comparing Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors/Angiotensin Receptor Blockers with Placebo in Patients at High Risk of Cardiovascular Events*

    TrialYearType of Patient (n)Years of Follow-up (n)ACEI DosageARB DosageEntry BP (mm Hg)Mean BP Reduction† (mm Hg)Primary EndpointRelative Risk95% CIP
    HOPE262000High risk (n = 9297)5Ramipril, 10 mg139/793/2§MI, stroke, CV death0.780.70–0.86<.001
    PROGRESS‡272001Stroke/TIA (n = 2561)3.9Perindopril, 4 mg147/865/3Stroke0.950.81–1.23NS
    EUROPA282003IHD (n = 12,218)4.2Perindopril, 8 mg137/825/2CV death, MI, cardiac arrest0.800.71–0.91.0003
    CAMELOT292004IHD (n = 1328)2Enalapril, 20 mg129/786/3CV events0.850.67–1.07NS
    PEACE302004IHD (n = 8290)4.8Trandolapril, 4 mg133/783/1CV death, MI, revascularization0.960.88–1.06NS
    JIKEI¶312007High risk (n = 3081)3.1Valsartan, 40–160 mg139/811/1‖CV morbidity/mortality0.610.47–0.79.0002
    TRANSCEND322008High risk (n = 5926)4.7Telmisartan, 80 mg141/824/2CV death, MI, Stroke, CCF hospitalization0.920.81–1.05NS
    PROFESS332008Stroke (n = 20,332)2.5Telmisartan, 80 mg144/844/2Stroke0.950.86–1.04NS
    • * These trials do not consistently produce a significant reduction of clinical primary end point.

    • † As compared with placebo.

    • ‡ Results of patients only on perindopril (single drug) compared with placebo.

    • § HOPE substudy: Mean 24-hr BP reduction vs placebo, 10/4; P = .03. Mean nighttime BP reduction vs placebo, 17/8; P < .001.

    • ‖ Results of patients on enalapril compared with placebo.

    • ¶ Mean BP reduction vs placebo at 6 months, SBP 2.1 (P = .0005); DBP 2.1 (P < .0001). Mean BP reduction vs placebo at 1 year, SBP 1.5 (P = .0034); DBP 1.3 (P = .0003).

    • TIA, transient ischemic attack; IHD, ischemic heart disease; ACEI, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor; BP, blood pressure; MI, myocardial infarction; CV, cardiovascular; ARB, angiotensin receptor blocker; CCF, congestive cardiac failure; NS, not significant; HOPE, Heart Outcomes Prevention Evaluation; PROGRESS, Perindopril Protection Against Recurrent Stroke Study; EUROPA, European Trial on Reduction of Cardiac Events with Perindopril in Stable Coronary Artery Disease; CAMELOT, Comparison of Arnlodipine vs Enalapril to Limit Occurrences of Thrombosis Trial; PEACE, Prevention of Events with ACEIs Trial; JIKEI, Jikei Heart Study; TRANCSCEND, Telmisartan Randomised Assessment Study in ACE-Intolerant Subjects with Cardiovascular Disease; PROFESS, Prevention Regimen for Effectively Avoiding Second Strokes Trial.

    • View popup
    Table 3.

    Discontinuation Rate of Antihypertensive Drugs in the Comparative Trials

    TrialAntihypertensive Drug Class (%)
    ACEIARBACEI + ARBBBCCBDIU
    ONTARGET (n = 25,620)252329
    LIFE (n = 9193)2327
    VALUE (n = 15,245)2624
    ALLHAT (n = 24,309)272020
    UKPDS (n = 758)2235
    JMIC-B (n = 1650)95
    • ACEI, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor; ARB, angiotensin receptor blocker; CCB, calcium channel blocker; DIU, diuretic; BB, β-blocker; ONTARGET, Ongoing Telmisartan Alone and in Combination with Ramipril Global Endpoint Trial; LIFE, Losartan Intervention For Endpoint Reduction in Hypertension Study; VALUE, Valsartan Antihypertensive Long-Term Use Evaluation; ALLHAT, Antihypertensive and Lipid-Lowering Treatment to Prevent Heart Attack Trial; UKPDS, United Kingdom Prospective Diabetes Study Group; JMIC-B, Japan Multicenter Investigation for Cardiovascular Diseases-B randomized trial.

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine: 22 (6)
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine
Vol. 22, Issue 6
November-December 2009
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Cover (PDF)
  • Index by author
  • Back Matter (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Board of Family Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Are Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors and Angiotensin Receptor Blockers Especially Useful for Cardiovascular Protection?
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Board of Family Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Board of Family Medicine web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
6 + 7 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Are Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors and Angiotensin Receptor Blockers Especially Useful for Cardiovascular Protection?
Hean Teik Ong
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine Nov 2009, 22 (6) 686-697; DOI: 10.3122/jabfm.2009.06.090094

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Are Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors and Angiotensin Receptor Blockers Especially Useful for Cardiovascular Protection?
Hean Teik Ong
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine Nov 2009, 22 (6) 686-697; DOI: 10.3122/jabfm.2009.06.090094
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Method
    • Conclusion
    • Notes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Coagulation Factors and the Risk of Ischemic Heart Disease: A Mendelian Randomization Study
  • A Typical Day in the Family Medicine Office
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Practical Recommendations for Minimizing Pain and Anxiety with IUD Insertion
  • A Simplified Approach to Evaluate and Manage Shoulder Pain
  • Treatment of Vasomotor Symptoms
Show more Evidence-Based Clinical Medicine

Similar Articles

Navigate

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues

Authors & Reviewers

  • Info For Authors
  • Info For Reviewers
  • Submit A Manuscript/Review

Other Services

  • Get Email Alerts
  • Classifieds
  • Reprints and Permissions

Other Resources

  • Forms
  • Contact Us
  • ABFM News

© 2025 American Board of Family Medicine

Powered by HighWire