Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • ARTICLES
    • Current Issue
    • Ahead of Print
    • Archives
    • Abstracts In Press
    • Special Issue Archive
    • Subject Collections
  • INFO FOR
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Call For Papers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • SUBMIT
    • Manuscript
    • Peer Review
  • ABOUT
    • The JABFM
    • The Editing Fellowship
    • Editorial Board
    • Indexing
    • Editors' Blog
  • CLASSIFIEDS
  • Other Publications
    • abfm

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
American Board of Family Medicine
  • Other Publications
    • abfm
American Board of Family Medicine

American Board of Family Medicine

Advanced Search

  • HOME
  • ARTICLES
    • Current Issue
    • Ahead of Print
    • Archives
    • Abstracts In Press
    • Special Issue Archive
    • Subject Collections
  • INFO FOR
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Call For Papers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • SUBMIT
    • Manuscript
    • Peer Review
  • ABOUT
    • The JABFM
    • The Editing Fellowship
    • Editorial Board
    • Indexing
    • Editors' Blog
  • CLASSIFIEDS
  • JABFM on Bluesky
  • JABFM On Facebook
  • JABFM On Twitter
  • JABFM On YouTube
Research ArticleOriginal Research

Are a Speculum Examination and Wet Mount Always Necessary for Patients With Vaginal Symptoms? A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial

Matthew Anderson, Andreas Cohrssen, Kathleen Klink and Danit Brahver
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine November 2009, 22 (6) 617-624; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3122/jabfm.2009.06.090006
Matthew Anderson
MD, MSc
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Andreas Cohrssen
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Kathleen Klink
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Danit Brahver
BS
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

References

  1. ↵
    Kent HL. Epidemiology of vaginitis. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1991; 165(4 Pt 2): 1168–76.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  2. ↵
    Lipsky MS, Waters T, Sharp LK. Impact of vaginal antifungal products on utilization of health care services: evidence from physician visits. J Am Board Fam Pract 2000; 13: 178–82.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  3. ↵
    Eckert LO. Clinical practice. Acute vulvovaginitis. N Engl J Med 2006; 355: 1244–252.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  4. ACOG Committee on Practice Bulletins–Gynecology. ACOG Practice Bulletin. Clinical management guidelines for obstetrician-gynecologists, Number 72, May 2006: Vaginitis. Obstet Gynecol 2006; 107: 1195–206.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  5. Workowski KA, Berman SM. Sexually transmitted diseases treatment guidelines, 2006. MMWR Recomm Rep 2006; 55(RR-11): 1–94.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  6. ↵
    Schaaf VM, Perez-Stable EJ, Borchardt K. The limited value of symptoms and signs in the diagnosis of vaginal infections. Arch Intern Med 1990; 150: 1929–33.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  7. Berg AO, Heidrich FE, Fihn SD, et al. Establishing the cause of genitourinary symptoms in women in a family practice. Comparison of clinical examination and comprehensive microbiology. JAMA 1984; 251: 620–5.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  8. Mayaud P, ka-Gina G, Cornelissen J, et al. Validation of a WHO algorithm with risk assessment for the clinical management of vaginal discharge in Mwanza, Tanzania. Sex Transm Infect 1998; 74(Suppl 1): S77–84.
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
  9. ↵
    Bergman JJ, Berg AO. How useful are symptoms in the diagnosis of Candida vaginitis? J Fam Pract 1983; 16: 509–11.
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
  10. ↵
    Blake DR, Duggan A, Joffe A. Use of spun urine to enhance detection of Trichomonas vaginalis in adolescent women. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 1999; 12: 1222–5.
    OpenUrl
  11. ↵
    Anderson MR, Klink K, Cohrssen A. Evaluation of vaginal complaints. JAMA 2004; 291: 1368–79.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  12. ↵
    Anderson MR, Karasz A. How do clinicians manage vaginal complaints? An Internet survey. Med Gen Med 2005; 7: 61.
    OpenUrl
  13. ↵
    Wiesenfeld HC, Macio I. The infrequent use of office-based diagnostic tests for vaginitis. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1999; 181: 39–41.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  14. ↵
    Allen-Davis JT, Beck A, Parker R, Ellis JL, Polley D. Assessment of vulvovaginal complaints: accuracy of telephone triage and in-office diagnosis. Obstet Gynecol 2002; 99: 18–22.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  15. ↵
    Chandeying V, Skov S, Kemapunmanus M, Law M, Geater A, Rowe P. Evaluation of two clinical protocols for the management of women with vaginal discharge in southern Thailand. Sex Transm Infect 1998; 74: 194–201.
    OpenUrlAbstract
  16. ↵
    Ryan CA, Courtois BN, Hawes SE, Stevens CE, Eschenbach DA, Holmes KK. Risk assessment, symptoms, and signs as predictors of vulvovaginal and cervical infections in an urban US STD clinic: implications for use of STD algorithms. Sex Transm Infect 1998; 74(Suppl 1): S59–76.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  17. ↵
    Nyirjesy P, Sobel JD. Advances in diagnosing vaginitis: development of a new algorithm. Curr Infect Dis Rep 2005; 7: 458–62.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  18. ↵
    Amsel R, Totten PA, Spiegel CA, Chen KC, Eschenbach D, Holmes KK. Nonspecific vaginitis. Diagnostic criteria and microbial and epidemiologic associations. Am J Med 1983; 74: 14–22.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  19. ↵
    Bornstein J, Lakovsky Y, Lavi I, Bar-Am A, Abramovici H. The classic approach to diagnosis of vulvovaginitis: a critical analysis. Infect Dis Obstet Gynecol 2001; 9: 105–11.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  20. ↵
    Nyirjesy P, Peyton C, Weitz MV, Mathew L, Culhane JF. Causes of chronic vaginitis: analysis of a prospective database of affected women. Obstet Gynecol 2006; 108: 1185–91.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  21. ↵
    Karasz A, Anderson M. The vaginitis monologues: women's experiences of vaginal complaints in a primary care setting. Soc Sci Med 2003; 56: 1013–21.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  22. Patel V, Pednekar S, Weiss H, et al. Why do women complain of vaginal discharge? A population survey of infectious and pyschosocial risk factors in a South Asian community. Int J Epidemiol 2005; 34: 853–62.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  23. Nansel TR, Riggs MA, Yu KF, Andrews WW, Schwebke JR, Klebanoff MA. The association of psychosocial stress and bacterial vaginosis in a longitudinal cohort. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2006; 194: 381–6.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  24. ↵
    Kulp JL, Chaudhry S, Wiita B, Bachmann G. The accuracy of women performing vaginal pH self-testing. J Womens Health (Larchmt) 2008; 17: 523–6.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  25. ↵
    Mabey D, Ackers J, Adu-Sarkodie Y. Trichomonas vaginalis infection. Sex Transm Infect 2006; 82(Suppl 4): iv26–7.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  26. ↵
    Mayta H, Gilman RH, Calderon MM, et al. 18S ribosomal DNA-based PCR for diagnosis of Trichomonas vaginalis. J Clin Microbiol 2000; 38: 2683–7.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  27. ↵
    Anderson MR, Karasz A, Friedland S. Are vaginal symptoms ever normal? A review of the literature. MedGenMed 2004; 6: 49.
    OpenUrlPubMed
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine: 22 (6)
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine
Vol. 22, Issue 6
November-December 2009
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Cover (PDF)
  • Index by author
  • Back Matter (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Board of Family Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Are a Speculum Examination and Wet Mount Always Necessary for Patients With Vaginal Symptoms? A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Board of Family Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Board of Family Medicine web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
2 + 15 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Are a Speculum Examination and Wet Mount Always Necessary for Patients With Vaginal Symptoms? A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial
Matthew Anderson, Andreas Cohrssen, Kathleen Klink, Danit Brahver
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine Nov 2009, 22 (6) 617-624; DOI: 10.3122/jabfm.2009.06.090006

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Are a Speculum Examination and Wet Mount Always Necessary for Patients With Vaginal Symptoms? A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial
Matthew Anderson, Andreas Cohrssen, Kathleen Klink, Danit Brahver
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine Nov 2009, 22 (6) 617-624; DOI: 10.3122/jabfm.2009.06.090006
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Acknowledgments
    • Notes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • Guest Family Physician Commentaries
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Guest Family Physician Commentaries
  • A Typical Day in the Family Medicine Office
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Integrating Adverse Childhood Experiences and Social Risks Screening in Adult Primary Care
  • A Pilot Comparison of Clinical Data Collection Methods Using Paper, Electronic Health Record Prompt, and a Smartphone Application
  • Associations Between Modifiable Preconception Care Indicators and Pregnancy Outcomes
Show more Original Research

Similar Articles

Navigate

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues

Authors & Reviewers

  • Info For Authors
  • Info For Reviewers
  • Submit A Manuscript/Review

Other Services

  • Get Email Alerts
  • Classifieds
  • Reprints and Permissions

Other Resources

  • Forms
  • Contact Us
  • ABFM News

© 2025 American Board of Family Medicine

Powered by HighWire