Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • COVID-19
    • Ahead of Print
    • Archives
    • Abstracts In Press
    • Editors' Blog
    • Email Alerts
  • Info For
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • SUBMIT
    • Manuscript
    • Peer Review
  • About
    • The JABFM
    • Editorial Board
    • Indexing
  • Classifieds
  • More
    • Email Alerts
    • Feedback
    • ABFM News
    • Folders
    • Help
  • Other Publications
    • abfm

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
American Board of Family Medicine
  • Other Publications
    • abfm
American Board of Family Medicine

American Board of Family Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • COVID-19
    • Ahead of Print
    • Archives
    • Abstracts In Press
    • Editors' Blog
    • Email Alerts
  • Info For
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • SUBMIT
    • Manuscript
    • Peer Review
  • About
    • The JABFM
    • Editorial Board
    • Indexing
  • Classifieds
  • More
    • Email Alerts
    • Feedback
    • ABFM News
    • Folders
    • Help
  • JABFM On Twitter
  • JABFM On YouTube
  • JABFM On Facebook
Research ArticleOriginal Research

The Decision to Intensify Therapy in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes: Results from an Experiment Using a Clinical Case Vignette

Richard W. Grant, Karen E. Lutfey, Eric Gerstenberger, Carol L. Link, Lisa D. Marceau and John B. McKinlay
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine September 2009, 22 (5) 513-520; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3122/jabfm.2009.05.080232
Richard W. Grant
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Karen E. Lutfey
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Eric Gerstenberger
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Carol L. Link
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Lisa D. Marceau
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
John B. McKinlay
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

References

  1. ↵
    American Diabetes Association. Standards of medical care in diabetes—2008. Diabetes Care 2008; 31(Suppl 1): S12–S54.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  2. ↵
    Nathan DM, Buse JB, Davidson MB, et al. Management of hyperglycemia in type 2 diabetes: a consensus algorithm for the initiation and adjustment of therapy: a consensus statement from the American Diabetes Association and the European Association for the Study of Diabetes. Diabetes Care 2006; 29: 1963–72.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  3. ↵
    Chobanian AV, Bakris GL, Black HR, et al. The Seventh Report of the Joint National Committee on Prevention. Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure. JAMA 2003; 289: 2560–72.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  4. ↵
    Intensive blood-glucose control with sulphonylureas or insulin compared with conventional treatment and risk of complications in patients with type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 33). UK Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS) Group. Lancet 1998; 352: 837–53.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  5. ↵
    Yusuf S, Sleight P, Pogue J, Bosch J, Davies R, Dagenais G. Effects of an angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitor, ramipril, on cardiovascular events in high-risk patients. The Heart Outcomes Prevention Evaluation Study Investigators. N Engl J Med 2000; 342: 145–53.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  6. ↵
    Grant RW, Buse JB, Meigs JB. Quality of diabetes care in US academic medical centers: low rates of medical regimen change. Diabetes Care 2005; 28: 337–442.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  7. ↵
    Shah BR, Hux JE, Laupacis A, Zinman B, van Walraven C. Clinical inertia in response to inadequate glycemic control: do specialists differ from primary care physicians? Diabetes Care 2005; 28: 600–6.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  8. ↵
    Rodondi N, Peng T, Karter AJ, et al. Therapy modifications in response to poorly controlled hypertension, dyslipidemia, and diabetes mellitus. Ann Intern Med 2006; 144: 475–84.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  9. ↵
    Berlowitz DR, Glickman M, Ash AS, Friedman R, Hickey EC, Kader B. Hypertension management in patients with diabetes. Diabetes Care 2003; 26: 355–9.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  10. ↵
    Safford MM, Shewchuk R, Qu H, et al. Reasons for not intensifying medications: differentiating “clinical inertia” from appropriate care. J Gen Intern Med 2007; 22: 1648–55.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  11. Parchman ML, Pugh JA, Romero RL, Bowers KW. Competing demands or clinical inertia: the case of elevated glycosylated hemoglobin. Ann Fam Med 2007; 5: 196–201.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  12. Grant RW, Adams AS, Trinacty CM, et al. Relationship between patient medication adherence and subsequent clinical inertia in type 2 diabetes glycemic management. Diabetes Care 2007; 30: 807–12.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  13. ↵
    Perlin JB, Pogach LM. Improving the outcomes of metabolic conditions: managing momentum to overcome clinical inertia. Ann Intern Med 2006; 144: 525–7.
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
  14. ↵
    Fang MC, McCarthy EP, Singer DE. Are patients more likely to see physicians of the same sex? Recent national trends in primary care medicine. Am J Med 2004; 117: 575–81.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  15. Bach PB, Pham HH, Schrag D, Tate RC, Hargraves JL. Primary care physicians who treat blacks and whites. N Engl J Med 2004; 351: 575–84.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  16. Hasnain-Wynia R, Baker DW, Nerenz D, et al. Disparities in health care are driven by where minority patients seek care. Arch Intern Med 2007; 167: 1233–88.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  17. ↵
    Feldman HA, McKinlay JB, Potter DA, et al. Nonmedical influences on medical decision making: an experimental technique using videotapes, factorial design, and survey sampling. Health Serv Res 1997; 32: 343–66.
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
  18. Peabody JW, Luck J, Glassman P, Dresselhaus TR, Lee M. Comparison of vignettes, standardized patients, and chart abstraction: a prospective validation study of 3 methods for measuring quality. JAMA 2000; 283: 1715–22.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  19. McKinlay JB, Lin T, Freund K, Moskowitz M. The unexpected influence of physician attributes on clinical decisions: results of an experiment. J Health Soc Behav 2002; 43: 92–106.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  20. ↵
    Strauss A, Corbin J. Basics of qualitative research: grounded theory procedures and techniques. Newbury Park, CA: Sage; 1990.
  21. ↵
    Schulman KA, Berlin JA, Harless W, et al. Correction: The effect of race and sex on physicians’ recommendations for cardiac catheterization. N Engl J Med 1999; 340: 618–26.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  22. ↵
    Lutfey KE, Campbell SM, Renfrew MR, Marceau LD, Roland M, McKinlay JB. How are patient characteristics relevant for physicians’ clinical decision making in diabetes? An analysis of qualitative results from a cross-national factorial experiment. Soc Sci Med 2008; 67: 1391–9.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine: 22 (5)
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine
Vol. 22, Issue 5
September-October 2009
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Cover (PDF)
  • Index by author
  • Back Matter (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Board of Family Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
The Decision to Intensify Therapy in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes: Results from an Experiment Using a Clinical Case Vignette
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Board of Family Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Board of Family Medicine web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
6 + 2 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
The Decision to Intensify Therapy in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes: Results from an Experiment Using a Clinical Case Vignette
Richard W. Grant, Karen E. Lutfey, Eric Gerstenberger, Carol L. Link, Lisa D. Marceau, John B. McKinlay
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine Sep 2009, 22 (5) 513-520; DOI: 10.3122/jabfm.2009.05.080232

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
The Decision to Intensify Therapy in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes: Results from an Experiment Using a Clinical Case Vignette
Richard W. Grant, Karen E. Lutfey, Eric Gerstenberger, Carol L. Link, Lisa D. Marceau, John B. McKinlay
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine Sep 2009, 22 (5) 513-520; DOI: 10.3122/jabfm.2009.05.080232
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Conclusion
    • Notes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • Guest Family Physician Commentaries
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Barriers to effective management of type 2 diabetes in primary care: qualitative systematic review
  • Effective Use of Structured Self-Management of Blood Glucose in Type 2 Diabetes: Lessons From the STeP Study
  • Why system inertia makes health reform so difficult
  • Guest Family Physician Commentaries
  • On Postpartum Depression, Hormonal Problems, and Practice Management for Medical Home Implementation
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Barriers to Follow-Up Colonoscopy After Positive FIT or Multitarget Stool DNA Testing
  • A Cross-Sectional Study of Factors Associated With Pediatric Scope of Care in Family Medicine
  • Social Inequities Between Prenatal Patients in Family Medicine and Obstetrics and Gynecology with Similar Outcomes
Show more Original Research

Similar Articles

Navigate

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues

Authors & Reviewers

  • Info For Authors
  • Info For Reviewers
  • Submit A Manuscript/Review

Other Services

  • Get Email Alerts
  • Classifieds
  • Reprints and Permissions

Other Resources

  • Forms
  • Contact Us

© 2021 American Board of Family Medicine

Powered by HighWire