Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • ARTICLES
    • Current Issue
    • Ahead of Print
    • Archives
    • Abstracts In Press
    • Special Issue Archive
    • Subject Collections
  • INFO FOR
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Call For Papers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • SUBMIT
    • Manuscript
    • Peer Review
  • ABOUT
    • The JABFM
    • The Editing Fellowship
    • Editorial Board
    • Indexing
    • Editors' Blog
  • CLASSIFIEDS
  • Other Publications
    • abfm

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
American Board of Family Medicine
  • Other Publications
    • abfm
American Board of Family Medicine

American Board of Family Medicine

Advanced Search

  • HOME
  • ARTICLES
    • Current Issue
    • Ahead of Print
    • Archives
    • Abstracts In Press
    • Special Issue Archive
    • Subject Collections
  • INFO FOR
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Call For Papers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • SUBMIT
    • Manuscript
    • Peer Review
  • ABOUT
    • The JABFM
    • The Editing Fellowship
    • Editorial Board
    • Indexing
    • Editors' Blog
  • CLASSIFIEDS
  • JABFM On Twitter
  • JABFM On YouTube
  • JABFM On Facebook
Research ArticleOriginal Research

Concordance of Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) and Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) to Assess Increased Risk of Depression among Postpartum Women

Barbara P. Yawn, Wilson Pace, Peter C. Wollan, Susan Bertram, Margary Kurland, Deborah Graham and Allen Dietrich
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine September 2009, 22 (5) 483-491; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3122/jabfm.2009.05.080155
Barbara P. Yawn
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Wilson Pace
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Peter C. Wollan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Susan Bertram
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Margary Kurland
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Deborah Graham
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Allen Dietrich
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

References

  1. ↵
    Lee DTS, Yip ASK, Chieu HFK, Chung TKH. Screening for Postnatal Depression Using the Double-Test Strategy. Psyosom Med 2000; 62: 258–63.
    OpenUrl
  2. Georgiopoulos AM, Bryan TL, Wollan P, Yawn BP. Routine screening for postpartum depression. J Fam Pract 2001; 50: 117–22.
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
  3. Georgiopoulos AM, Bryan TL, Yawn BP, Houston MS, Rummans TA, Therneau TM. Population-based screening for postpartum depression. Obstet Gynecol 1999; 93: 653–7.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  4. Beck CT, Gable RK. Further validation of the postpartum depression screening scale. Nurs Res 2001; 50: 155–64.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  5. Massoudi P, Wickberg B, Hwang P. Screening for postnatal depression in Swedish child health care. Acta Paediatr 2007; 96: 897–901.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  6. Morris-Rush JK, Freda MC, Bernstein PS. Screening for postpartum depression in an inner-city population. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2003; 188: 1217–9.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  7. Evins GG, Theofrastous JP, Galvin SL. Postpartum depression: a comparison of screening and routine clinical evaluation. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2000; 182: 1080–2.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  8. Chaudron LH, Szilagyi PG, Kitzman HJ, Wadkins HI, Conwell Y. Detection of postpartum depressive symptoms by screening at well-child visits. Pediatrics 2004; 113(3 Pt 1): 551–8.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  9. ↵
    Armstrong S, Small R. Screening for postnatal depression: not a simple task. Aust N Z J Public Health 2007; 31: 57–61.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  10. Peindle KS, Wisner KL, Hanusa BH. Identifying depression in the first postpartum year: guidelines for office-based screening and referral. J Affect Disord 2004; 80: 37–44.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  11. Gjerdingen DK, Yawn BP. Postpartum depression screening: importance, methods, barriers, and recommendations for practice. J Am Board Fam Med 2007; 20: 280–8.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  12. Goldsmith ME. Postpartum depression screening by family nurse practitioners. J Am Acad Nurse Pract 2007; 19: 321–7.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  13. ↵
    Cox JL, Holden JM, Sagovsky R. Detection of postnatal depression. Development of the 10-item Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale. Br J Psychiatry 1987; 150: 782–6.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  14. Areias MEG, Kumar R, Barros H, Figueiredo E. Comparative incidence of depression in women and men. During pregnancy and after childbirth validation of the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression scale in Portuguese mothers. Br J Psychiatry 1996; 169: 30–5.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  15. Boyce P, Stubbs J, Todd AN. The Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale: validation for an Australian sample. Aust N Z J Psychiatry 1993; 27: 472–6.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  16. ↵
    Wickberg B, Hwang CP. Screening for postnatal depression in a population-based Swedish sample. Acta Psychiatr Scand 1997; 95: 62–6.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  17. Milgrom J, Ericksen J, Negri L, Gemmill AW. Screening for postnatal depression in routine primary care: properties of the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale in an Australian sample. Aust N Z J Psychiatry 2005; 39: 833–9.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  18. ↵
    Cox J, Holden J, eds. Perinatal psychiatry: use and misuse of the Edinburgh Postnatal depression Scale. London: Gaskell; 1994: 145–68.
  19. ↵
    US Department of Health and Human Services, The Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. Topic Index: A to Z. U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Available at http://www.ahrq.gov/clinic/3rduspstf/depression/depressrr.htm.
  20. Pignone MP, Gaynes BN, Rushton JL, et al. Screening for depression in adults: a summary of the evidence for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Ann Intern Med 2002; 136: 765–76.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  21. Craig TJ, Van Natta P. Validation of the community mental health assessment interview instrument among psychiatric inpatients. Working Paper #B-27a for the Center for Epidemiologic Studies. Rockville, MD: National Institute of Mental Health; 1973.
  22. Weissman MM, Prusoff B, Newberry P. Comparison of the CES-D with standardized depression rating scales at three points in time. Technical Report from Yale University under Contract ASH 74–166. Rockville, MD: Center for Epidemiologic Studies, National Institute of Mental Health; 1975.
  23. Beck CT, Ward CH, Mendelson M, et al. An inventory for measuring depression. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1965; 12: 63–70.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  24. ↵
    Spitzer RL, Kroenke K, Williams JBW, et al. Validation and utility of a self-report version of PRIME-MD: the PHQ primary care study. JAMA 1999; 282: 1737–44.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  25. ↵
    Gilbody S, House AO, Sheldon TA. Screening and case finding instruments for depression. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2005;(4): CD002792.
  26. ↵
    Lowe B, Kroenke K, Herzog W, Grafe K. Measuring depression outcome with a brief self-report instrument: sensitivity to change of the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9). J Affect Disord 2004; 81: 61–6.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  27. ↵
    Lowe B, Unutzer J, Callahan CM, Perkins AJ, Kroenke K. Monitoring depression treatment outcomes with the patient health questionnaire-9. Med Care 2004; 42: 1194–201.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  28. ↵
    Kroenke K, Spitzer RL, Williams JB. The PHQ-9: validity of a brief depression severity measure. J Gen Intern Med 2001; 16: 606–13.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  29. ↵
    Bennett I, Coco A, Coyne J, et al. Efficiency of a two-item pre-screen to reduce the burden of depression screening in pregnancy and postpartum: an IMPLICIT Network study. J Am Board Fam Med 2008; 21: 317–25.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  30. ↵
    Westfall JM, Mold J, Fagnan L. Practice-based research—“Blue Highways” on the NIH roadmap. JAMA 2007; 297: 403–6.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  31. ↵
    Schulberg H, Lee P, Bruce M, et al. Suicidal ideation and risk levels among primary care patients with uncomplicated depression. Ann Fam Med 2005; 3: 523–8.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  32. ↵
    U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Depression in primary care, volume I. Detection and diagnosis. Rockville, MD: Public Health Service; 1993.
  33. ↵
    Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality: Identification of common mental disorders and management of depression in primary care. Available at http://www.guidelines.gov/summary/summary.aspx?doc_id=12994&nbr=006690&string=depression. Accessed July 16, 2009.
  34. ↵
    Kroenke K. Depression screening is not enough. Ann Intern Med 2001; 134: 418–20.
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
  35. Dietrich AJ, Oxman TE, Williams JW, et al. Going to scale: re-engineering systems for primary care treatment of depression. Ann Fam Med 2004; 2: 301–4.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  36. Dejesus RS, Vickers KS, Melin GJ, Williams MD. A system-based approach to depression management in primary care using the Patient Health Questionnaire-9. Mayo Clin Proc 2007; 82: 1395–402.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  37. Brody DS, Dietrich AJ, deGruy F, Kroenke K. The depression in primary care tool kit. Int J Psychiatry Med 2000; 30: 99–110.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  38. Dietrich A, Oxman T, Williams J, et al. Re-engineering systems for the treatment of depression in primary care: cluster randomized controlled trial. BMJ 2004; 329: 602.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  39. ↵
    Murray L, Carothers A. The validation of the Edinburgh Post-natal Depression Scale on a community sample. Br J Psychiatry 1990; 157: 288–90.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  40. ↵
    Rogers WH, Adler DA, Bungay KM, Wilson IB. Depression screening instruments made good severity measures in a cross-sectional analysis. J Clin Epidemiol 2005; 58: 370–7.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  41. ↵
    Gilbody S, Richards D, Brealey S, Hewitt C. Screening for depression in medical settings with the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ): a diagnostic meta-analysis. J Gen Intern Med 2007; 22: 1596–602.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  42. ↵
    Kroenke K, Spitzer RL, Williams JB. The PHQ-9: validity of a brief depression severity measure. J Gen Intern Med 2001; 16: 606–13.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  43. ↵
    Spanier GB. Measuring dyadic adjustment: New scales for assessing the quality of marriage and similar dyads. J Mar Fam 1976; 38: 15–28.
    OpenUrl
  44. ↵
    Lloyd BH, Abiden RR. Revision of the Parenting Stress Index. J Pediatr Psychol 1985; 10: 167–79.
    OpenUrlWeb of Science
  45. ↵
    Wickberg B, Hwang CP. The Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale: validation on a Swedish community sample. Acta Psychiatr Scand 1996; 94: 181–4.
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
  46. ↵
    Hanna B, Jarman H, Savage S. The clinical application of three screening tools for recognizing post-partum depression. Int J Nurs Pract 2004; 10: 72–9.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  47. ↵
    Lee DT, Yip AS, Chiu HF, Leung TY, Chung TK. Screening for postnatal depression: are specific instruments mandatory? J Affect Disord 2001; 63(1–3): 233–8.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  48. ↵
    U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Screening for depression: recommendations and rationale. Ann Intern Med 2002; 136: 760–4.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  49. ↵
    American Psychiatric Publishing, Inc. Psychiatry Online DSM library. Available at: www.psychiatryonline.com/dsmLibrary.aspx. Accessed July 4, 2009.
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine: 22 (5)
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine
Vol. 22, Issue 5
September-October 2009
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Cover (PDF)
  • Index by author
  • Back Matter (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Board of Family Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Concordance of Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) and Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) to Assess Increased Risk of Depression among Postpartum Women
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Board of Family Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Board of Family Medicine web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
2 + 0 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Concordance of Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) and Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) to Assess Increased Risk of Depression among Postpartum Women
Barbara P. Yawn, Wilson Pace, Peter C. Wollan, Susan Bertram, Margary Kurland, Deborah Graham, Allen Dietrich
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine Sep 2009, 22 (5) 483-491; DOI: 10.3122/jabfm.2009.05.080155

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Concordance of Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) and Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) to Assess Increased Risk of Depression among Postpartum Women
Barbara P. Yawn, Wilson Pace, Peter C. Wollan, Susan Bertram, Margary Kurland, Deborah Graham, Allen Dietrich
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine Sep 2009, 22 (5) 483-491; DOI: 10.3122/jabfm.2009.05.080155
Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Conclusion
    • Acknowledgments
    • Notes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Preventing the Voltage Drop: Keeping Practice-based Research Network (PBRN) Practices Engaged in Studies
  • Child Exposure to Parental Violence and Psychological Distress Associated With Delayed Milestones
  • On Postpartum Depression, Hormonal Problems, and Practice Management for Medical Home Implementation
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Impact of a Pharmacist-Run Electronic Consult Service in a Network of Primary Care Patient-Centered Medical Homes
  • Integrating Harm Reduction into Medical Care: Lessons from Three Models
  • An Estimate of Severe Harms Due to Screening Colonoscopy: A Systematic Review
Show more Original Research

Similar Articles

Navigate

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues

Authors & Reviewers

  • Info For Authors
  • Info For Reviewers
  • Submit A Manuscript/Review

Other Services

  • Get Email Alerts
  • Classifieds
  • Reprints and Permissions

Other Resources

  • Forms
  • Contact Us
  • ABFM News

© 2023 American Board of Family Medicine

Powered by HighWire