Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • ARTICLES
    • Current Issue
    • Ahead of Print
    • Archives
    • Abstracts In Press
    • Special Issue Archive
    • Subject Collections
  • INFO FOR
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Call For Papers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • SUBMIT
    • Manuscript
    • Peer Review
  • ABOUT
    • The JABFM
    • The Editing Fellowship
    • Editorial Board
    • Indexing
    • Editors' Blog
  • CLASSIFIEDS
  • Other Publications
    • abfm

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
American Board of Family Medicine
  • Other Publications
    • abfm
American Board of Family Medicine

American Board of Family Medicine

Advanced Search

  • HOME
  • ARTICLES
    • Current Issue
    • Ahead of Print
    • Archives
    • Abstracts In Press
    • Special Issue Archive
    • Subject Collections
  • INFO FOR
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Call For Papers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • SUBMIT
    • Manuscript
    • Peer Review
  • ABOUT
    • The JABFM
    • The Editing Fellowship
    • Editorial Board
    • Indexing
    • Editors' Blog
  • CLASSIFIEDS
  • JABFM on Bluesky
  • JABFM On Facebook
  • JABFM On Twitter
  • JABFM On YouTube
Research ArticleOriginal Research

High Performance in Screening for Colorectal Cancer: A Practice Partner Research Network (PPRNet) Case Study

Lynne S. Nemeth, Paul J. Nietert and Steven M. Ornstein
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine March 2009, 22 (2) 141-146; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3122/jabfm.2009.02.080108
Lynne S. Nemeth
College of Nursing (LSN), Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston
PhD, RN
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Paul J. Nietert
Department of Bioinformatics, Biometry, and Epidemiology (PJN), Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston
PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Steven M. Ornstein
Department of Family Medicine (SMO), Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

References

  1. ↵
    Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Increased use of colorectal cancer tests–United States, 2002 and 2004. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2006; 55: 308–11.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  2. ↵
    Brawarsky P, Brooks DR, Mucci LA, Wood PA. Effect of physician recommendation and patient adherence on rates of colorectal cancer testing. Cancer Detect Prev 2004; 28: 260–8.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. ↵
    Klabunde CN, Lanier D, Breslau EN, et al. Improving colorectal cancer screening in primary care: innovative strategies and future directions. J Gen Intern Med 2007; 22: 1195–205.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  4. ↵
    Feifer C, Ornstein SM. Strategies for increasing adherence to clinical guidelines and improving patient outcomes in small primary care practices. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf 2004; 30: 432–41.
    OpenUrl
  5. ↵
    Yin RK. Case study research. Design and methods, 3rd ed, vol. 5. Thousand Oaks (CA): Sage Publications; 2003.
  6. ↵
    Ornstein SM, Nietert PJ, Jenkins RG, et al. Improving diabetes care through a multi-component quality improvement model in a practice-based research network. Am J Med Qual 2007; 22: 34–41.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  7. ↵
    Nemeth LS, Wessell AM, Jenkins RG, Nietert PJ, Liszka HA, Ornstein SM. Strategies to accelerate translation of research into primary care within practices using electronic medical records. J Nurs Care Qual 2007; 22: 343–9.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  8. ↵
    Lincoln YS, Guba EG. Naturalistic inquiry. Beverly Hills (CA): Sage Publishers, Inc.; 1985.
  9. ↵
    Feifer C, Nemeth L, Nietert PJ, et al. Different paths to high-quality care: three archetypes of top-performing practice sites. Ann Fam Med 2007; 5: 233–41.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  10. ↵
    Sarfaty M, Wender R. How to increase colorectal cancer screening rates in practice. CA Cancer J Clin 2007; 57: 354–66.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  11. ↵
    Leventhal W, Ascanio R. Recognizing and overcoming barriers to colorectal screening in primary care. J S C Med Assoc 2008; 104: 25–8.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  12. ↵
    Klabunde CN, Meissner HI, Wooten KG, Breen N, Singleton JA. Comparing colorectal cancer screening and immunization status in older Americans. Am J Prev Med 2007; 33: 1–8.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  13. ↵
    Hudson SV, Ohman-Strickland P, Cunningham R, Ferrante JM, Hahn K, Crabtree BF. The effects of teamwork and system support on colorectal cancer screening in primary care practices. Cancer Detect Prev 2007; 31: 417–23.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  14. ↵
    Hing ES, Burt CW, Woodwell DA. Electronic medical record use by office-based physicians and their practices: United States, 2006. In: Advance data from vital and health statistics. Hyattsville (MD): National Center for Health Statistics; 2007.
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine: 22 (2)
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine
Vol. 22, Issue 2
March-April 2009
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Cover (PDF)
  • Index by author
  • Back Matter (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Board of Family Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
High Performance in Screening for Colorectal Cancer: A Practice Partner Research Network (PPRNet) Case Study
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Board of Family Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Board of Family Medicine web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
12 + 3 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
High Performance in Screening for Colorectal Cancer: A Practice Partner Research Network (PPRNet) Case Study
Lynne S. Nemeth, Paul J. Nietert, Steven M. Ornstein
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine Mar 2009, 22 (2) 141-146; DOI: 10.3122/jabfm.2009.02.080108

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
High Performance in Screening for Colorectal Cancer: A Practice Partner Research Network (PPRNet) Case Study
Lynne S. Nemeth, Paul J. Nietert, Steven M. Ornstein
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine Mar 2009, 22 (2) 141-146; DOI: 10.3122/jabfm.2009.02.080108
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Conclusions
    • Acknowledgments
    • Notes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Improving Colorectal Cancer Screening in Family Medicine: An Oklahoma Physicians Resource/Research Network (OKPRN) Study
  • Implementing and Evaluating Electronic Standing Orders in Primary Care Practice: A PPRNet Study
  • Systems Strategies to Support Cancer Screening in U.S. Primary Care Practice
  • Women's Physical Health, Mental Health, and Practical Hints for Common Practice Issues
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Integrating Adverse Childhood Experiences and Social Risks Screening in Adult Primary Care
  • A Pilot Comparison of Clinical Data Collection Methods Using Paper, Electronic Health Record Prompt, and a Smartphone Application
  • Associations Between Modifiable Preconception Care Indicators and Pregnancy Outcomes
Show more Original Research

Similar Articles

Navigate

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues

Authors & Reviewers

  • Info For Authors
  • Info For Reviewers
  • Submit A Manuscript/Review

Other Services

  • Get Email Alerts
  • Classifieds
  • Reprints and Permissions

Other Resources

  • Forms
  • Contact Us
  • ABFM News

© 2025 American Board of Family Medicine

Powered by HighWire