Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • ARTICLES
    • Current Issue
    • Ahead of Print
    • Archives
    • Abstracts In Press
    • Special Issue Archive
    • Subject Collections
  • INFO FOR
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Call For Papers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • SUBMIT
    • Manuscript
    • Peer Review
  • ABOUT
    • The JABFM
    • The Editing Fellowship
    • Editorial Board
    • Indexing
    • Editors' Blog
  • CLASSIFIEDS
  • Other Publications
    • abfm

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
American Board of Family Medicine
  • Other Publications
    • abfm
American Board of Family Medicine

American Board of Family Medicine

Advanced Search

  • HOME
  • ARTICLES
    • Current Issue
    • Ahead of Print
    • Archives
    • Abstracts In Press
    • Special Issue Archive
    • Subject Collections
  • INFO FOR
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Call For Papers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • SUBMIT
    • Manuscript
    • Peer Review
  • ABOUT
    • The JABFM
    • The Editing Fellowship
    • Editorial Board
    • Indexing
    • Editors' Blog
  • CLASSIFIEDS
  • JABFM on Bluesky
  • JABFM On Facebook
  • JABFM On Twitter
  • JABFM On YouTube
Article CommentaryCommentary

The Gordian Knot of Chronic Illness Care

Michael L. Parchman
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine November 2008, 21 (6) 487-489; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3122/jabfm.2008.06.080180
Michael L. Parchman
MD, MPH
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

According to legend, when Alexander the Great arrived in the kingdom of Phrygia in what is now central Turkey, he was faced with a unique challenge. The gods had assisted Gordius, the king of Phrygia, with tying his ox-cart to a pole with an intricate knot. The man who could undo the “Gordian Knot” would rule all Asia. When Alexander could not untie the knot, he unsheathed his sword and sliced it with one stroke, producing the “Alexandrian Solution.”

Family physicians today are faced with a similar set of circumstances. Numerous studies have documented gaps between current knowledge and outcomes of care for patients with chronic diseases.1–3 As the number and complexity of our patients with not 1, not 2, but multiple chronic illnesses rises, the challenge may seem to present a knot with no solution. Disturbingly, a recent report found that close to 60% of nonelderly adults report having one or more serious major chronic conditions, including hypertension, diabetes, emphysema, heart disease, asthma, or stroke.4 When combined with the elderly population and the growing complexity of managing each of these chronic conditions, it is no wonder that solutions to improving outcomes do not seem obvious. For example, one study has shown that if the typical family physician were to follow current guidelines for the 10 most common chronic diseases, the amount of time required would exceed the time we currently have for direct patient care overall, leaving no time for acute illnesses or delivery of preventive services.5

Several of the studies in this issue illustrate the challenges faced by family physicians in the management of their patients with chronic illnesses, especially those with diabetes. In his study of hypertension control before and after the release of Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure 7 Guidelines in May of 2003, Jackson found that, over the same time period, the proportion of patients with good blood pressure control increased by 15% among those without diabetes but only 6% among patients with diabetes.6 The gap seems to be growing. One explanation for this gap is that the level of competing demands during the encounter pose a significant challenge to achieving adequate blood pressure control in patients with diabetes in a manner similar to that documented with glucose control.7 Given that the average patient with diabetes seen in family physician offices is on more than 6 oral medications, and that good blood pressure control in the United Kingdom Prospective Diabetes Study required an average of 3 or more antihypertensive medications, who among us has not encountered the patient who complains that they are already on too many medications when we suggest that another medication is needed to achieve adequate blood pressure control.8,9

The study by Shani et al10 seems to suggest that the physician caring for the patient with diabetes is an important predictor of good glucose control, but none of the measured physician characteristics were significant predictors. Furthermore, clinic size was an important predictor, with a higher proportion of patients seen in intermediate-size clinics under good control. Other studies have also suggested that the setting in which a patient is seen might be an important predictor of chronic disease outcomes independent of the attending physician.11,12 Is it possible that some settings design their care processes in a manner that overcomes competing demands when a patient presents with multiple, complex chronic disease, including diabetes? Much more research is needed to answer the question, How do we redesign the family physician office of the future in manner that optimizes chronic disease outcomes?

Many continue to believe that technology is the answer to improving chronic disease outcomes. The case study by Boronat13 about the malfunctioning insulin pen device points to the danger of placing all of our eggs in this basket. It was not until this patient's primary care physician took the time, after 3 patient visits to the emergency department, to have the patient demonstrate in great detail her injection technique that the problem was uncovered. This patient-centric approach to care—one that family physicians excel at—is critical for patients with a complex chronic disease like diabetes.

Who among us has not ordered a comprehensive metabolic panel only to discover unexplained elevated liver function tests? In their analysis of a large national sample of community-dwelling adults in the United States, Mainous et al14 suggest that some of these people may have impaired fasting glucose or undiagnosed diabetes. It is possible that these patients have nonalcoholic steatohepatitis caused by their abnormal glucose metabolism, leading to mildly elevated liver function tests.15

Finally, the alarmingly high prevalence of hypertension and prehypertension among a healthy population of active duty military personnel reinforces the concern about the growing burden of chronic illness care.16 Such a burden will require a primary care workforce that currently does not exist, as illustrated by the primary care capacity crisis in Massachusetts with expansion of health insurance coverage.17

The Gordian Knot of chronic illness care in the United States will require creative “out-of-the-box” thinking, like that demonstrated by Alexander the Great. One speaker at a recent primary care research conference was introduced as someone “… who not only thinks outside the box, he frequently is not even in the same room as the box.” Although a single sword stroke is unlikely to undo this knot, all of us have a responsibility to tell our story if we are to redesign a health system that will facilitate our ability to do so, rather than one that raises obstacles to improving chronic disease outcomes. Only then will we unleash the full potential of the family physician to truly make lives better.18

Notes

  • This article was externally peer reviewed.

  • Funding: Dr. Parchman receives support from the National Institutes of Health (R18 DK075692) and the Department of Veterans Affairs, Veterans Health Administration, Health Services Research and Development Service (HSR&D IIR 06-063).

  • Conflict of interest: The views expressed in this article are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views of the Department of Veterans Affairs.

  • See Related Articles on Pages 490, 497, 504, 512, and 575.

  • Received for publication September 3, 2008.
  • Revision received September 3, 2008.
  • Accepted for publication September 4, 2008.

References

  1. ↵
    McGlynn EA, Asch SM, Adams J, et al. The quality of health care delivered to adults in the United States. N Engl J Med 2003; 348: 2635–45.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. Kerr EA, Gerzoff RB, Krein SL, et al. Diabetes care quality in the Veterans Affairs Health Care System and commercial managed care: the TRIAD study. Ann Intern Med 2004; 141: 272–81.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. Rundall TG, Shortell SM, Wang MC, et al. As good as it gets? Chronic care management in nine leading US physician organizations. BMJ 2002; 325: 958–61.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  4. ↵
    Hoffman C, Schwartz K. Eroding access among non-elderly U.S. adults with chronic conditions: ten years of change. Health Aff 2008; 27: w340–8.
    OpenUrl
  5. ↵
    Ostbye T, Yarnall KSH, Drause KM, Pollak KI, Gradison M, Michener JL. Is there time for management of patients with chronic diseases in primary care? Ann Fam Med 2005; 3: 209–14.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  6. ↵
    Jackson JH, Sobolski J, Krienke R, Wong KS, Frech-Tamas F, Nightengale B. Blood pressure control and pharmacotherapy patterns in the United States before and after the release of the Joint National Committee on the Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure (JNC 7) Guidelines. J Am Board Fam Med 2008: 21; 512–21.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  7. ↵
    Parchman ML, Pugh JA, Romero RL, Bowers KW. Competing demands or clinical inertia: the case of the elevated glycosoloted hemoglobin. Ann Fam Med 2007; 5: 196–201.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  8. ↵
    Grant RW, Pirraglia PA, Meigs JB, Singer DE. Trends on complexity of diabetes care in the United States from 1991 to 2000. Arch Intern Med 2004; 164: 1134–9.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  9. ↵
    Parchman ML, Romero RL, Pugh JA. Encounters by patients with type 2 diabetes–complex and demanding: an observational study. Ann Fam Med 2006; 4: 40–5.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  10. ↵
    Shani M, Taylor TR, Vinker S, et al. Characteristics of diabetics with poor glycemic control who achieve good control. J Am Board Fam Med 2008: 21; 490–6.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  11. ↵
    Krein SL, Hofer TP, Kerr EA, Hayward RA. Whom should we profile? Examining diabetes care practice variation among primary care providers, provider groups and health care facilities. Health Serv Res 2002; 37: 1159–80.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  12. ↵
    Yano EM, Soban LM, Parkerton PH, Etzioni DA. Primary care practice organization influences colorectal cancer screening performance. Health Serv Res 2007; 42: 1130–49.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  13. ↵
    Boronat M, García-Delgado Y, Pérez-Martín N, Nóvoa FJ. Severe deterioration of metabolic control caused by malfunction of a disposable insulin pen device. J Am Board Fam Med 2008: 21; 575–6.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  14. ↵
    Mainous AG, Diaz VA, King DE, Everett CJ, Player MS. The relationship of hepatitis antibodies and elevated liver enzymes with impaired fasting glucose and undiagnosed diabetes. J Am Board Fam Med 2008: 21; 497–503.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  15. ↵
    Sheth SG, Gordon FD, Chopra S. Nonalcoholic steatohepatitis. Ann Intern Med 1997; 126: 137–45.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  16. ↵
    Smoley BA, Smith NL, Runkle GP. Hypertension in a population of active duty service members. J Am Board Fam Med 2008: 21; 504–11.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  17. ↵
    Sack K. In Massachusetts, universal coverage strains care. New York Times 5 April 2008.
  18. ↵
    Gravelle H, Morris S, Sutton M. Are family physicians good for you? Endogenous doctor supply and individual health. Health Serv Res 2008; 43: 1128–44.
    OpenUrlPubMed
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine: 21 (6)
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine
Vol. 21, Issue 6
November-December 2008
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Cover (PDF)
  • Index by author
  • Back Matter (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Board of Family Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
The Gordian Knot of Chronic Illness Care
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Board of Family Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Board of Family Medicine web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
7 + 0 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
The Gordian Knot of Chronic Illness Care
Michael L. Parchman
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine Nov 2008, 21 (6) 487-489; DOI: 10.3122/jabfm.2008.06.080180

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
The Gordian Knot of Chronic Illness Care
Michael L. Parchman
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine Nov 2008, 21 (6) 487-489; DOI: 10.3122/jabfm.2008.06.080180
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Notes
    • References
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • Characteristics of Diabetics with Poor Glycemic Control Who Achieve Good Control
  • The Relationship of Hepatitis Antibodies and Elevated Liver Enzymes with Impaired Fasting Glucose and Undiagnosed Diabetes
  • Hypertension in a Population of Active Duty Service Members
  • Blood Pressure Control and Pharmacotherapy Patterns in the United States Before and After the Release of the Joint National Committee on the Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure (JNC 7) Guidelines
  • Severe Deterioration of Metabolic Control Caused by Malfunction of a Disposable Insulin Pen Device
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Chronic Disease: Increasing Prevalence Yet Better Control
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Empowering Family Physicians in Medical Staff Leadership to Foster Physician Well-Being
  • Maternity Care Deserts: Key Drivers of the National Maternal Health Crisis
  • The One Taboo Question
Show more Commentary

Similar Articles

Navigate

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues

Authors & Reviewers

  • Info For Authors
  • Info For Reviewers
  • Submit A Manuscript/Review

Other Services

  • Get Email Alerts
  • Classifieds
  • Reprints and Permissions

Other Resources

  • Forms
  • Contact Us
  • ABFM News

© 2025 American Board of Family Medicine

Powered by HighWire