Article Figures & Data
Tables
- Table 1.
Characteristics of Couples Beginning Treatment with Natural Procreative Technology, by Subsequent Conception Status
Patient Characteristic All Eligible Couples* NPT Treatment, Conceived NPT Treatment, Did Not Conceive Total (n)† 1072 364 708 Woman's age (mean years [range]) 35.8 (25–48) 34.8 (25–45) 36.4 (26–48) Prior years attempting to conceive (mean [range]) 5.6 (1–20) 4.8 (1–17) 6.1 (1–20) Had previous live birth (percent yes) 24 30 20 Received previous ART‡ (percent yes) 33 21 39 * One hundred sixty-seven couples were not eligible because they had been trying for less than 1 year or because they did not complete the evaluation after the initial consultation.
† Number of couples in each category. Age was available for all women. For previous years attempting to conceive, 30 (2.8%) had missing data; for previous births, 30 (2.8%) had missing data; for previous ART, 20 (1.9%) had missing data.
‡ Assisted reproductive technology (ART) includes in vitro fertilization with or without intracytoplasmic sperm injection.
- Table 2.
Common Diagnoses of Couples Receiving Treatment Before and After Evaluation with Natural Procreative Technology*
Diagnostic Category Before NPT Evaluation (n [%]) After NPT Evaluation (n [%]) Unexplained infertility 506 (47.2) 5 (0.5) Unexplained recurrent miscarriage 124 (11.6) 2 (0.2) Anovulation 31 (2.9) 36 (3.4) Polycystic ovarian syndrome 68 (6.3) 110 (10.3) Endometriosis 209 (19.5) 208 (24.6) Male factor 115 (10.7) 146 (13.6) Limited cervical mucus 12 (1.1) 276 (25.7) Suboptimal luteal progesterone 99 (9.2) 923 (86.1) Suboptimal luteal estrogen 2 (0.2) 676 (63.1) * This table is based on the 1072 couples that initiated evaluation. Diagnostic categories sum to more than 100% because couples could have more than one diagnosis (other than unexplained).
- Table 3.
Cumulative Outcomes per 100 Couples by Time Completed in Natural Procreative Technology Evaluation and Treatment
Time Interval (months) Cumulative Withdrawals from NPT (n “proportion”) Conceptions Live Births* Starting at Time Interval (n) Cumulative Conceptions (n) Crude Proportion Adjusted Proportion† Starting at Time Interval (n) Cumulative Live Births (n) Crude Proportion Adjusted Proportion† 0–3 105 (9.8) 1072 75 7.0 7.3 1072 55 5.1 5.4 4–6 233 (21.7) 892 152 14.2 15.9 895 111 10.4 11.8 7–12 478 (44.6) 687 278 25.9 35.5 694 205 19.1 27.1 13–18 624 (58.2) 316 326 30.4 48.5 337 255 23.8 41.8 19–24 672 (62.7) 122 354 33.0 64.8 132 273 25.5 52.8 25–36‡ 46 364 56 286 * Live births are assigned the time interval when the conception occurred rather than when the birth occurred.
† Adjusted by life-table analysis, where withdrawal or continuing treatment at the end of study follow-up are censoring events.
‡ Proportions are not calculated beyond 24 months.
- Table 4.
Live Births per 100 Couples at 24 months of Natural Procreative Technology Treatment by Characteristics of Couples Beginning Treatment
Couple Category Couples (n) Live Births (n) Crude Proportion Adjusted Proportion* All couples 1072 273 25.5 52.8 Woman's age (years) ≤30 86 29 33.7 59.1 >30–35 412 134 32.5 58.6 >35–40 423 89 21.0 46.1 >40 151 21 13.9 50.9 Time spent attempting to conceive (years) 1–3 246 90 36.6 66.0 >3–6 468 129 27.6 55.4 >6–9 210 39 18.6 44.9 >9 118 14 11.9 42.8 Previous live birth Yes 257 92 35.8 73.9 No 785 181 23.1 48.5 Previous ART attempts (n)† 0 702 216 30.8 61.5 1 128 29 22.7 41.9 2 125 18 14.4 34.9 ≥3 97 10 10.3 19.8 * Adjusted by life-table analysis, where withdrawal or continuing treatment at the end of study follow-up are censoring events. Adjusted proportions should be interpreted with caution because of small numbers in subgroups.
† Assisted Reproductive Technology (ART) includes in vitro fertilization (IVF) with or without intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI).
Outcome n (%) Multiple gestation 13 (4.5) Gestational age (weeks) ≥37 246 (86.0) <37 15 (5.2) Unknown 25 (8.7) Birth weight (grams) ≥2500 245 (85.6) 1500–2500 13 (4.5) <1500 4 (1.4) Unknown 24 (8.4)