Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • ARTICLES
    • Current Issue
    • Ahead of Print
    • Archives
    • Abstracts In Press
    • Special Issue Archive
    • Subject Collections
  • INFO FOR
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Call For Papers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • SUBMIT
    • Manuscript
    • Peer Review
  • ABOUT
    • The JABFM
    • The Editing Fellowship
    • Editorial Board
    • Indexing
    • Editors' Blog
  • CLASSIFIEDS
  • Other Publications
    • abfm

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
American Board of Family Medicine
  • Other Publications
    • abfm
American Board of Family Medicine

American Board of Family Medicine

Advanced Search

  • HOME
  • ARTICLES
    • Current Issue
    • Ahead of Print
    • Archives
    • Abstracts In Press
    • Special Issue Archive
    • Subject Collections
  • INFO FOR
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Call For Papers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • SUBMIT
    • Manuscript
    • Peer Review
  • ABOUT
    • The JABFM
    • The Editing Fellowship
    • Editorial Board
    • Indexing
    • Editors' Blog
  • CLASSIFIEDS
  • JABFM on Bluesky
  • JABFM On Facebook
  • JABFM On Twitter
  • JABFM On YouTube
OtherFamily Medicine And The Health Care System

Improving Mammography Screening Using Best Practices and Practice Enhancement Assistants: An Oklahoma Physicians Resource/Research Network (OKPRN) Study

Cheryl B. Aspy, Margaret Enright, LaWanna Halstead and James W. Mold
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine July 2008, 21 (4) 326-333; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3122/jabfm.2008.04.070060
Cheryl B. Aspy
PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Margaret Enright
MPH
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
LaWanna Halstead
RN, MPH
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
James W. Mold
MD, MPH
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

References

  1. ↵
    US Preventive Services Task Force. Guide to clinical preventive services. Washington, DC: Office of Disease Prevention and Health Promotion; 2002.
  2. ↵
    Alexander FE, Anderson TJ, Brown HK, et al. 14 years of follow-up from the Edinburgh randomised trial of breast-cancer screening. Lancet. 1999; 353: 1903–8.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  3. Andersson I, Janzon L. Reduced breast cancer mortality in women under age 50: updated results from the Malmo Mammographic Screening Program. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr 1997; (22): 63–7.
    OpenUrl
  4. Bjurstam N, Bjorneld L, Duffy SW, et al. The Gothenburg breast screening trial: first results on mortality, incidence, and mode of detection for women ages 39–49 years at randomization. Cancer 1997; 80: 2091–9.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  5. Frisell J, Lidbrink E, Hellstrom L, Rutqvist LE. Follow-up after 11 years–update of mortality results in the Stockholm mammographic screening trial. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 1997; 45: 263–70.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  6. Shapiro S. Periodic screening for breast cancer: the HIP Randomized Controlled Trial. Health Insurance Plan. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr 1997; (22): 27–30.
    OpenUrl
  7. Tabar L, Vitak B, Chen HH, et al. The Swedish Two-County Trial twenty years later. Updated mortality results and new insights from long-term follow-up. Radiol Clin North Am 2000; 38: 625–51.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  8. Humphrey LL, Helfand M, Chan BK, Woolf SH. Breast cancer screening: a summary of the evidence for the US Preventive Services Task Force. Ann Int Med 2002; 137(5 Pt 1): 347–60.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  9. Berry DA, Cronin KA, Plevritis SK, et al. Effect of screening and adjuvant therapy on mortality from breast cancer. N Engl J Med 2005; 353: 1784–92.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  10. ↵
    Oklahoma State Department of Health. Female breast cancer in Oklahoma. Chronic Disease Service 2000; 1: 1–4.
    OpenUrl
  11. ↵
    Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Behavioral risk factor surveillance system survey data. Atlanta (GA): US Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; 2004.
  12. ↵
    Belcher DW, Berg AO, Inui TS. Practical approaches to providing better preventive care: are physicians a problem or a solution? Am J Prev Med 1988; 4(4 Suppl): 27–48; discussion, 49–52.
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
  13. ↵
    Frame PS. Health maintenance in clinical practice: strategies and barriers. Am Fam Physician 1992; 45: 1192–200.
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
  14. ↵
    Kottke TE, Brekke ML, Solberg LI. Making “time” for preventive services. Mayo Clin Proc 1993; 68: 785–91.
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
  15. ↵
    Leininger LS, Finn L, Dickey L, et al. An office system for organizing preventive services: a report by the American Cancer Society Advisory Group on Preventive Health Care Reminder Systems. Arch Fam Med 1996; 5: 108–15.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  16. ↵
    Hahn D, Berger M. Implementation of a systematic health maintenance protocol in a private practice. J Fam Pract 1990; 31: 492–504.
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
  17. Pommerenke F. Implementing preventive services: practical strategies for primary care physicians. Cancer Prev 1992; 3: 1–13.
    OpenUrl
  18. McPhee S, Bird J, Fordham D, Rodnick J, Osborn E. Promoting cancer prevention activities by primary care physicians. JAMA 1991; 266: 538–44.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  19. ↵
    Gemson D, Ashford A, Dickey L, et al. Putting prevention into practice: impact of a multifaceted physician education program on preventive services in the inner city. Arch Intern Med 1995; 155: 2210–6.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  20. ↵
    Dietrich A, O'Connor G, Keller A, Carney P, Levy D, Whaley F. Cancer: improving early detection and prevention: a community practice randomized trial. BMJ 1992; 304: 687–91.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  21. ↵
    Ruffin MT, Gorenflo DW, Woodman B. Predictors of screening for breast, cervical, colorectal, and prostatic cancer among community-based primary care practices. J Am Board Fam Pract 2000; 13: 1–10.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  22. ↵
    Mold JW, Gregory M. Best practices research. Fam Med 2003; 35: 131–4.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  23. Cotton A, Aspy CB, Mold J, Stein H. Clinical decision-making in blood pressure management of patients with diabetes mellitus: an Oklahoma Physicians Resource/Research Network (OKPRN) Study. J Am Board Fam Med 2006; 19: 232–9.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  24. Ferrell CW, Aspy CB, Mold JW. Management of prescription refills in primary care: an Oklahoma physicians Resources/Research Network (OKPRN) Study. J Am Board Fam Med 2006; 19: 31–8.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  25. ↵
    Urbaniak GC, Plous S. Research Randomizer. c1997–2008. Available from: http://www.randomizer.org/form.htm. Accessed 30 April 2008.
  26. ↵
    Deming WE. The new economics for industry, government, education, 2nd ed. Cambridge (MA): The MIT Press; 2000.
  27. ↵
    Rao JN, Scott AJ. A simple method for the analysis of clustered binary data. Biometrics. 1992; 48: 577–85.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  28. ↵
    Preston JA, Scinto JD, Grady JN, Schulz AF, Petrillo MK. The effect of a multifaceted physician office-based intervention on older women's mammography use. J Am Geriatr Soc 2000; 48: 1–7.
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
  29. ↵
    Taylor V, Thompson B, Lessler D, Yasui Y, Montano D, Johnson KM. Strategies that improve mammography screening rates. JCOM 1999; 6: 21.
    OpenUrl
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine: 21 (4)
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine
Vol. 21, Issue 4
July-August 2008
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Cover (PDF)
  • Index by author
  • Back Matter (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Board of Family Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Improving Mammography Screening Using Best Practices and Practice Enhancement Assistants: An Oklahoma Physicians Resource/Research Network (OKPRN) Study
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Board of Family Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Board of Family Medicine web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
1 + 19 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Improving Mammography Screening Using Best Practices and Practice Enhancement Assistants: An Oklahoma Physicians Resource/Research Network (OKPRN) Study
Cheryl B. Aspy, Margaret Enright, LaWanna Halstead, James W. Mold
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine Jul 2008, 21 (4) 326-333; DOI: 10.3122/jabfm.2008.04.070060

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Improving Mammography Screening Using Best Practices and Practice Enhancement Assistants: An Oklahoma Physicians Resource/Research Network (OKPRN) Study
Cheryl B. Aspy, Margaret Enright, LaWanna Halstead, James W. Mold
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine Jul 2008, 21 (4) 326-333; DOI: 10.3122/jabfm.2008.04.070060
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Methodology
    • Data Collection
    • Data Analysis
    • Protection of Human Subjects
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Notes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • A Randomized Trial of High-Value Change Using Practice Facilitation
  • Communication is the Key to Success in Pragmatic Clinical Trials in Practice-based Research Networks (PBRNs)
  • The Primary Care Extension Program: A Catalyst for Change
  • Small Physician Practices In New York Needed Sustained Help To Realize Gains In Quality From Use Of Electronic Health Records
  • Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Practice Facilitation Within Primary Care Settings
  • A Randomized Colorectal Cancer Screening Intervention Trial in the Iowa Research Network (IRENE): Study Recruitment Methods and Baseline Results
  • No Longer Simply a Practice-based Research Network (PBRN): Health Improvement Networks
  • Third Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine Practice-based Research Theme Issue
  • Implementation of Evidence-Based Preventive Services Delivery Processes in Primary Care: An Oklahoma Physicians Resource/Research Network (OKPRN) Study
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • A Consultation Model for Intellectual and Developmental Disability Care
  • Goal-Oriented Prevention: How to Fit a Square Peg into a Round Hole
  • The Association Between Family Medicine Appointment Cancellations and Hospital Utilization in 2019 and 2020
Show more Family Medicine and the Health Care System

Similar Articles

Navigate

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues

Authors & Reviewers

  • Info For Authors
  • Info For Reviewers
  • Submit A Manuscript/Review

Other Services

  • Get Email Alerts
  • Classifieds
  • Reprints and Permissions

Other Resources

  • Forms
  • Contact Us
  • ABFM News

© 2025 American Board of Family Medicine

Powered by HighWire