Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • ARTICLES
    • Current Issue
    • Ahead of Print
    • Archives
    • Abstracts In Press
    • Special Issue Archive
    • Subject Collections
  • INFO FOR
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Call For Papers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • SUBMIT
    • Manuscript
    • Peer Review
  • ABOUT
    • The JABFM
    • The Editing Fellowship
    • Editorial Board
    • Indexing
    • Editors' Blog
  • CLASSIFIEDS
  • Other Publications
    • abfm

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
American Board of Family Medicine
  • Other Publications
    • abfm
American Board of Family Medicine

American Board of Family Medicine

Advanced Search

  • HOME
  • ARTICLES
    • Current Issue
    • Ahead of Print
    • Archives
    • Abstracts In Press
    • Special Issue Archive
    • Subject Collections
  • INFO FOR
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Call For Papers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • SUBMIT
    • Manuscript
    • Peer Review
  • ABOUT
    • The JABFM
    • The Editing Fellowship
    • Editorial Board
    • Indexing
    • Editors' Blog
  • CLASSIFIEDS
  • JABFM on Bluesky
  • JABFM On Facebook
  • JABFM On Twitter
  • JABFM On YouTube
Research ArticleOriginal Research

Self Determination Theory and Preventive Care Delivery: A Research Involving Outpatient Settings Network (RIOS Net) Study

Andrew L. Sussman, Robert L. Williams, Robert Leverence, Park W. Gloyd, Benjamin F. Crabtree and ; on Behalf of RIOS Net Clinicians
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine July 2008, 21 (4) 282-292; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3122/jabfm.2008.04.070159
Andrew L. Sussman
PhD, MCRP
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Robert L. Williams
MD, MPH
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Robert Leverence
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Park W. Gloyd Jr
MD, MPH
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Benjamin F. Crabtree
PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Tables

    • View popup
    Table 1.

    Clinician Interview, Focus Group, and Survey Participants

    Clinician Interviews (n = 20)Focus Groups (n = 10)Network Survey (n = 146)
    Gender
        Female9477
    Practice specialty
        Family physicians5583
        Pediatricians5232
        Mid-level practitioners (PA, NP)7218
        Internists3113
        Totals2010146
    Institutional setting
        University of New Mexico9454
        Community Health Center6435
        Indian Health Service5251
        Private practice006
        Totals2010146
    • PA, physician assistant; NP, nurse practitioner.

    • View popup
    Appendix 2:

    Results of Responses to Individual Survey Items

    Rank (%) (n = 146)
    1. Obesity can be viewed in a number of ways. Please rank the following statements in order according to how you view the problem of obesity.1st2nd3rd
        Obesity is best viewed as a disease, disorder, or illness amenable to medical intervention.61480
        Obesity is best viewed as a more general syndrome, the result of complex interactions between heredity and the physical environment.68266
        Obesity is best viewed as a matter of personal health and wellness, for which choices are strongly influenced by the emotional and relational domains of health.285814
    2. The approach to obesity can also be viewed in a number of ways. Please rank the following statements in order according to how you view solutions to the problem of obesity.
        Biomedical or technical advances (such as a pill) will ultimately offer the greatest benefit for prevention and treatment of obesity.41185
        Although genetic and molecular research may hold promise, efforts addressing environmental and socioeconomic factors will have the greatest benefit for prevention and treatment of obesity.58375
        Approaches favoring personal health and wellness will have the greatest benefit for prevention and treatment of obesity.41509
    3. Under what conditions or for which patients do you discuss obesity? Check all that apply.% (n = 146)
        All visits.21
        All well-child checks or annual exams.60
        Patients at risk for obesity or diabetes.90
        Teachable Moments–when presented with a condition affected by their obesity.94
        When a patient or family member wishes to discuss it.88
        I rarely discuss it.0
        Other.5
    4. Compared with other issues in the clinical encounter, I may choose not to spend time on counseling about obesity because:Location of mark on visual analogue scale, where strongly disagree = 0 and strongly agree = 100, mean (SD) (n = 143)
        Patients are not receptive to discussing this topic41.2 (24.2)
        I don't feel it is time well spent.23.0 (23.4)
        I don't have much success with this.50.0 (24.4)
        It is a societal problem that my efforts have little impact on.30.0 (24.8)
        Few patients are motivated to make the lifestyle changes needed.48.0 (23.4)
        There isn't enough time.52.6 (24.4)
        I don't feel like I have the skills or knowledge needed to be effective in this area.28.9 (22.5)
        My patients generally do not have the personal or community resources to be able to deal with this.48.1 (26.9)
    5. I spend time on counseling about obesity because:Location of mark on visual analogue scale, where strongly disagree = 0 and strongly agree = 100, mean (SD) (n = 142)
        I have had some success with this in the past.54.4 (21.3)
        It is recommended by clinical guidelines.59.0 (22.7)
        My patients are unlikely to hear a similar message elsewhere.52.5 (26.9)
        Interactions with my colleagues have influenced me to do so.36.8 (22.7)
        Because of my personal belief that the nonobese have a significantly better quality of life.69.6 (25.2)
    6. Which of the following is most important in your decision to spend time counseling about obesity.% (n = 135)
        I have had some success with this in the past.12
        It is recommended by clinical guidelines.12
        My patients are unlikely to hear a similar message elsewhere.10
        Interactions with my colleagues have influenced me to do so.2
        Because of my personal belief that the nonobese have a significantly better quality of life.64
    7. In treating obese patients, I consider a successful outcome to be (please choose one):% (n = 138)
        The patient must lose sufficient weight to have a BMI under 30.1
        The patient should progressively decrease weight, if only in small amounts.38
        A total weight loss of 5 to 10 lbs.4
        No additional weight gain.10
        Any positive change in health habits, even if there continues to be a slight increase in weight.43
        Other.4
    Location of mark on visual analogue scale, where strongly disagree = 0 and strongly agree = 100, mean (SD)
    8. More time in my schedule would allow me to have a meaningful impact on obesity in my practice:51.4 (23.1) (n = 142)
    9. More clinic resources (e.g., dieticians or promotoras) would allow me to have a meaningful impact on obesity in my practice:74.2 (22.1) (n = 140)
    10. Counseling regarding obesity is important in my practice:74.4 (18.6) (n = 142)
    11. Compared with other issues I must take care of in the brief clinical encounter, I give counseling regarding obesity a high priority:65.0 (20.1) (n = 142)
    Rank (%) (n = 143)
    12. Please rank the following statements, according to which is likely to have the most influence on the prevention of obesity:1st2nd3rd
        Improvement of my counseling skills.102466
        Enhancement of clinic support services (e.g., dieticians or promotoras).39528
        Join advocacy efforts aimed at legislation, communities, and schools.562024
    13. Do you currently participate in community outreach, advocacy or legislative efforts regarding obesity% (n = 145)
        Yes21
    How likely are you to devote time to these types of activities if a coordinated program were available in your local or regional healthcare community?%
        Not likely at all.17
        Somewhat likely.64
        Very likely.18
    14. The following would be useful to me in trying to increase my effectiveness in counseling for obesity prevention and treatment:Location of mark on visual analogue scale, where strongly disagree = 0 and strongly agree = 100, mean (SD)
        Education for counseling on specific diets.57.3 (27.1) (n = 138)
        Training on brief motivational counseling to increase my ability to help patients become ready to make lifestyle changes.69.7 (21.8) (n = 140)
    15. Based on our interviews with clinicians around the state, we have identified several considerations that are important to providers in making the decision about whether to spend time on counseling for obesity prevention in the brief clinical encounter. Please review this list and indicate in order of priority which of these is generally most important for you in determining whether to spend time with a patient on this topic. (1 = most important, etc.)Mean (SE)Rank (n = 142) %
    1st2nd3rd4th5th6th7th
        Acute vs. well-care visit.3.8 (0.16)1712141817149
        Patient agenda.2.7 (0.13)26232512734
        Presence/absence of teachable moment.2.9 (0.12)192424101022
        Perceived receptivity of patient to discussion.3.0 (0.12)182221211240
        Whether the patient is pediatric or adult.5.8 (0.12)2128133637
        Recent experiences I have had dealing with this topic.5.7 (0.12)2346183434
        My views about what would be best for this patient's overall health and well-being.3.6 (0.16)181711162378
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine: 21 (4)
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine
Vol. 21, Issue 4
July-August 2008
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Cover (PDF)
  • Index by author
  • Back Matter (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Board of Family Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Self Determination Theory and Preventive Care Delivery: A Research Involving Outpatient Settings Network (RIOS Net) Study
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Board of Family Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Board of Family Medicine web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
8 + 1 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Self Determination Theory and Preventive Care Delivery: A Research Involving Outpatient Settings Network (RIOS Net) Study
Andrew L. Sussman, Robert L. Williams, Robert Leverence, Park W. Gloyd, Benjamin F. Crabtree
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine Jul 2008, 21 (4) 282-292; DOI: 10.3122/jabfm.2008.04.070159

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Self Determination Theory and Preventive Care Delivery: A Research Involving Outpatient Settings Network (RIOS Net) Study
Andrew L. Sussman, Robert L. Williams, Robert Leverence, Park W. Gloyd, Benjamin F. Crabtree
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine Jul 2008, 21 (4) 282-292; DOI: 10.3122/jabfm.2008.04.070159
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Appendix 1. Clinician Interview Guide
    • Conclusion
    • Acknowledgments
    • Notes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Voices from Left of the Dial: Reflections of Practice-based Researchers
  • Third Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine Practice-based Research Theme Issue
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Successful Implementation of Integrated Behavioral Health
  • Identifying and Addressing Social Determinants of Health with an Electronic Health Record
  • Integrating Adverse Childhood Experiences and Social Risks Screening in Adult Primary Care
Show more Original Research

Similar Articles

Navigate

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues

Authors & Reviewers

  • Info For Authors
  • Info For Reviewers
  • Submit A Manuscript/Review

Other Services

  • Get Email Alerts
  • Classifieds
  • Reprints and Permissions

Other Resources

  • Forms
  • Contact Us
  • ABFM News

© 2025 American Board of Family Medicine

Powered by HighWire