Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • ARTICLES
    • Current Issue
    • Abstracts In Press
    • Archives
    • Special Issue Archive
    • Subject Collections
  • INFO FOR
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Call For Papers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • SUBMIT
    • Manuscript
    • Peer Review
  • ABOUT
    • The JABFM
    • The Editing Fellowship
    • Editorial Board
    • Indexing
    • Editors' Blog
  • CLASSIFIEDS
  • Other Publications
    • abfm

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
American Board of Family Medicine
  • Other Publications
    • abfm
American Board of Family Medicine

American Board of Family Medicine

Advanced Search

  • HOME
  • ARTICLES
    • Current Issue
    • Abstracts In Press
    • Archives
    • Special Issue Archive
    • Subject Collections
  • INFO FOR
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Call For Papers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • SUBMIT
    • Manuscript
    • Peer Review
  • ABOUT
    • The JABFM
    • The Editing Fellowship
    • Editorial Board
    • Indexing
    • Editors' Blog
  • CLASSIFIEDS
  • JABFM on Bluesky
  • JABFM On Facebook
  • JABFM On Twitter
  • JABFM On YouTube
Research ArticleOriginal Research

Cross-Sectional Comparison of Electronic and Paper Medical Records on Medication Counseling in Primary Care Clinics: A Southern Primary-care Urban Research Network (SPUR-Net) Study

Grace M. Kuo, Patricia Dolan Mullen, Amy McQueen, Paul R. Swank and John C. Rogers
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine March 2007, 20 (2) 164-173; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3122/jabfm.2007.02.060113
Grace M. Kuo
PharmD, MPH
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Patricia Dolan Mullen
DrPH
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Amy McQueen
PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Paul R. Swank
PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
John C. Rogers
MD, MPH, MEd
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

References

  1. ↵
    Hillestad R, Bigelow J, Bower A, et al. Can electronic medical record systems transform health care? Potential health benefits, savings, and costs. The adoption of interoperable EMR systems could produce efficiency and safety savings of $142 billion to $371 billion. Health Aff (Millwood) 2005; 24: 1103–17.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  2. ↵
    Bates DW, Ebell M, Gotlieb E, Zapp J, Mullins HC. A proposal for electronic medical records in U.S. primary care. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2003; 10: 1–10.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  3. ↵
    Gandhi TK, Weingart SN, Seger AC, et al. Impact of basic computerized prescribing on outpatient medication errors and adverse drug events. J Gen Intern Med 2001; 16: 195.
    OpenUrl
  4. ↵
    Physician Education of Their Patients About Prescription Medicines. Report 2 of the Council on Scientific Affairs (I-98) 1998 (cited 2006 April 18).
  5. ↵
    Committee on Identifying and Preventing Medication Errors. Aspden P, Wolcott, J, Bootman, JL., Cronenwett, LR, eds. IOM Report: Preventing Medication Errors. Quality Chasm. 2006, The National Academies Press: Washington DC.
  6. ↵
    Benjamin DM. Reducing medication errors and increasing patient safety: case studies in clinical pharmacology. J Clin Pharmacol 2003; 43: 768–83.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  7. ↵
    Bikowski RM, Ripsin CM, Lorraine VL. Physician-patient congruence regarding medication regimens. J Am Geriatr Soc 2001; 49: 1353–7.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  8. Harvey JL and Plumridge RJ. Comparative attitudes to verbal and written medication information among hospital outpatients. DICP 1991; 25: 925–8.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  9. Jenkins L, Britten N, Stevenson F, Barber N, Bradley C. Developing and using quantitative instruments for measuring doctor-patient communication about drugs. Patient Educ Couns 2003; 50: 273–8.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  10. ↵
    Makoul G, Arntson P and Schofield T. Health promotion in primary care: physician-patient communication and decision making about prescription medications. Soc Sci Med 1995; 41: 1241–54.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  11. ↵
    McGrath JM. Physicians’ perspectives on communicating prescription drug information. Qual Health Res 1999; 9: 731–45.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  12. Porteous T, Bond C, Robertson R, Hannaford P, Reiter E. Electronic transfer of prescription-related information: comparing views of patients, general practitioners, and pharmacists. Br J Gen Pract 2003; 53: 204–9.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  13. Quaid KA, Faden RR, Vining EP, Freeman JM. Informed consent for a prescription drug: impact of disclosed information on patient understanding and medical outcomes. Patient Educ Couns 1990; 15: 249–59.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  14. ↵
    Ruth D, Hodge MM, Murphy B. Patient drug education. Improving the working relationship between general practitioners and pharmacists. Aust Fam Physician 1994; 23: 1536–41.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  15. Sandars J and Esmail A. The frequency and nature of medical error in primary care: understanding the diversity across studies. Fam Pract 2003; 20: 231–6.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  16. ↵
    Sleath B, Roter D, Chewning B, Svarstad B. Asking questions about medication: analysis of physician-patient interactions and physician perceptions. Med Care 1999; 37: 1169–73.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  17. ↵
    Sleath B, Rubin RH, Campbell W, Gwyther L, Clark T. Physician-patient communication about over-the-counter medications. Soc Sci Med 2001; 53: 357–69.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  18. ↵
    Field TS, Gurwitz JH, Harrold LR, et al. Strategies for detecting adverse drug events among older persons in the ambulatory setting. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2004; 11: 492–8.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  19. Monane M, Matthias DM, Nagle BA, Kelly MA. Improving prescribing patterns for the elderly through an online drug utilization review intervention: a system linking the physician, pharmacist, and computer. JAMA 1998; 280: 1249–52.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  20. ↵
    Papshev D, Peterson AM. Electronic prescribing in ambulatory practice: promises, pitfalls, and potential solutions. Am J Manag Care 2001; 7: 725–36.
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
  21. Rozich JD, Haraden CR, Resar RK. Adverse drug event trigger tool: a practical methodology for measuring medication related harm. Qual Saf Health Care 2003; 12: 194–200.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  22. Tamblyn R, Huang A, Perreault R, et al. The medical office of the 21st century (MOXXI): effectiveness of computerized decision-making support in reducing inappropriate prescribing in primary care. CMAJ 2003; 169: 549–56.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  23. ↵
    Buck ML. Providing patients with written medication information. Ann Pharmacother 1998; 32: 962–9.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  24. ↵
    King NJ, Peck CL. Enhancing patient compliance with medical regimens: strategies for the general practitioner. Aust Fam Physician 1981; 10: 954–9.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  25. ↵
    Peck CL, King NJ. Increasing patient compliance with prescriptions. JAMA 1982; 248: 2874–8.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  26. ↵
    Peck CL, King NJ. Compliance and the doctor-patient relationship. Drugs 1985; 30: 78–84.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  27. ↵
    Morris LA. A survey of patients’ receipt of prescription drug information. Med Care 1982; 20: 596–605.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  28. ↵
    Morris LA, Tabak ER, Gondek K. Counseling patients about prescribed medication: 12-year trends. Med Care 1997; 35: 996–1007.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  29. ↵
    Arar NH, Wen L, McGrath J, Steinbach R, Pugh JA. Communicating about medications during primary care outpatient visits: the role of electronic medical records. Inform Prim Care 2005; 13: 13–22.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  30. ↵
    Margalit RS, Roter D, Dunevant MA, Larson S, Reis S. Electronic medical record use and physician-patient communication: an observational study of Israeli primary care encounters. Patient Educ Couns 2006; 61: 134–41.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  31. ↵
    Gandhi TK, Weingart SN, Borus J, et al. Adverse drug events in ambulatory care. N Engl J Med 2003; 348: 1556–64.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  32. ↵
    Johnson MW, Mitch WE, Sherwood J, Lopes L, Schmidt A, Hartley H. The impact of a drug information sheet on the understanding and attitude of patients about drugs. JAMA 1986; 256: 2722–4.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  33. ↵
    Ickovics JR, Meisler AW. Adherence in AIDS clinical trials: a framework for clinical research and clinical care. J Clin Epidemiol 1997; 50: 385–91.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  34. ↵
    Kessler DA. Remarks by the Commissioner. FDA. J Parenter Sci Technol 1991; 45: 118–21.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  35. ↵
    Scherwitz L, Hennrikus D, Yusim S, Lester J, Vallbona C. Physician communication to patients regarding medications. Patient Educ Couns 1985; 7: 121–36.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  36. ↵
    Gibbs S, Waters WE, George CF. The benefits of prescription information leaflets (2). Br J Clin Pharmacol 1989; 28: 345–51.
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
  37. Gibbs S, Waters WE, George CF. The benefits of prescription information leaflets (1). Br J Clin Pharmacol 1989; 27: 723–39.
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
  38. Morris LA, Halperin JA. Effects of written drug information on patient knowledge and compliance: a literature review. Am J Public Health 1979; 69: 47–52.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  39. ↵
    Schiff GD. Computerized prescriber order entry: models and hurdles. Am J Health Syst Pharm 2002; 59: 1456–60.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  40. ↵
    Physician order entry system cuts error rate, improves path compliance, tracks data. Health Care Cost Reengineering Rep 1997; 2: 152–7.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  41. Ball MJ, Douglas JV. IT, patient safety, and quality care. J Healthc Inf Manag 2002; 16: 28–33.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  42. Bates DW, Kuperman G, Teich JM. Computerized physician order entry and quality of care. Qual Manag Health Care 1994; 2: 18–27.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  43. Bates DW, Teich JM, Lee J, et al. The impact of computerized physician order entry on medication error prevention. J Am Med Inform Assoc 1999; 6: 313–21.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  44. Kaushal R, Bates DW. Information technology and medication safety: what is the benefit? Qual Saf Health Care 2002; 11: 261–5.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  45. Kuperman GJ, Teich JM, Gandhi TK, Bates DW. Patient safety and computerized medication ordering at Brigham and Women’s Hospital. Jt Comm J Qual Improv 2001; 27: 509–21.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  46. Lee F, Teich JM, Spurr CD, Bates DW. Implementation of physician order entry: user satisfaction and self-reported usage patterns. J Am Med Inform Assoc 1996; 3: 42–55.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  47. Lehman ML, Brill JH, Skarulis PC, Keller D, Lee C. Physician order entry impact on drug turn-around times. Proc AMIA Symp 2001; 359–63.
  48. Teich JM, Merchia PR, Schmiz JL, Kuperman GJ, Spurr CD, Bates DW. Effects of computerized physician order entry on prescribing practices. Arch Intern Med 2000; 160: 2741–7.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  49. Teich JM, Spurr CD, Schmiz JL, O’Connell EM, Thomas D. Enhancement of clinician workflow with computer order entry. Proc Annu Symp Comput Appl Med Care 1995; 459–63.
  50. Tierney WM. Adverse outpatient drug events—a problem and an opportunity. N Engl J Med 2003; 348: 1587–9.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  51. Weir C, Lincoln M, Roscoe D, Moreshead G. Successful implementation of an integrated physician order entry application: a systems perspective. Proc Annu Symp Comput Appl Med Care 1995; 790–4.
  52. ↵
    Field MH. The perils of CPOE. Lancet 363: 86, 2004.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  53. ↵
    Shabot MM. Ten commandments for implementing clinical information systems. Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent) 2004; 17: 265–9.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  54. ↵
    Mullen PD, Green LW, Persinger GS. Clinical trials of patient education for chronic conditions: a comparative meta-analysis of intervention types. Prev Med 1985; 14: 753–81.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine: 20 (2)
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine
Vol. 20, Issue 2
March-April 2007
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Board of Family Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Cross-Sectional Comparison of Electronic and Paper Medical Records on Medication Counseling in Primary Care Clinics: A Southern Primary-care Urban Research Network (SPUR-Net) Study
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Board of Family Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Board of Family Medicine web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
2 + 3 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Cross-Sectional Comparison of Electronic and Paper Medical Records on Medication Counseling in Primary Care Clinics: A Southern Primary-care Urban Research Network (SPUR-Net) Study
Grace M. Kuo, Patricia Dolan Mullen, Amy McQueen, Paul R. Swank, John C. Rogers
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine Mar 2007, 20 (2) 164-173; DOI: 10.3122/jabfm.2007.02.060113

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Cross-Sectional Comparison of Electronic and Paper Medical Records on Medication Counseling in Primary Care Clinics: A Southern Primary-care Urban Research Network (SPUR-Net) Study
Grace M. Kuo, Patricia Dolan Mullen, Amy McQueen, Paul R. Swank, John C. Rogers
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine Mar 2007, 20 (2) 164-173; DOI: 10.3122/jabfm.2007.02.060113
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Acknowledgments
    • Notes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Lessons from Initiating the First Veterans Health Administration (VA) Women's Health Practice-based Research Network (WH-PBRN) Study
  • North American Primary Care Research Group President's Award
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Identifying and Addressing Social Determinants of Health with an Electronic Health Record
  • Integrating Adverse Childhood Experiences and Social Risks Screening in Adult Primary Care
  • A Pilot Comparison of Clinical Data Collection Methods Using Paper, Electronic Health Record Prompt, and a Smartphone Application
Show more Original Research

Similar Articles

Navigate

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues

Authors & Reviewers

  • Info For Authors
  • Info For Reviewers
  • Submit A Manuscript/Review

Other Services

  • Get Email Alerts
  • Classifieds
  • Reprints and Permissions

Other Resources

  • Forms
  • Contact Us
  • ABFM News

© 2025 American Board of Family Medicine

Powered by HighWire