Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • ARTICLES
    • Current Issue
    • Ahead of Print
    • Archives
    • Abstracts In Press
    • Special Issue Archive
    • Subject Collections
  • INFO FOR
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Call For Papers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • SUBMIT
    • Manuscript
    • Peer Review
  • ABOUT
    • The JABFM
    • The Editing Fellowship
    • Editorial Board
    • Indexing
    • Editors' Blog
  • CLASSIFIEDS
  • Other Publications
    • abfm

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
American Board of Family Medicine
  • Other Publications
    • abfm
American Board of Family Medicine

American Board of Family Medicine

Advanced Search

  • HOME
  • ARTICLES
    • Current Issue
    • Ahead of Print
    • Archives
    • Abstracts In Press
    • Special Issue Archive
    • Subject Collections
  • INFO FOR
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Call For Papers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • SUBMIT
    • Manuscript
    • Peer Review
  • ABOUT
    • The JABFM
    • The Editing Fellowship
    • Editorial Board
    • Indexing
    • Editors' Blog
  • CLASSIFIEDS
  • JABFM on Bluesky
  • JABFM On Facebook
  • JABFM On Twitter
  • JABFM On YouTube
EditorialEditorial

Peer Reviewing for the Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine: What Does It Take?

Anne Victoria Neale, Kendra L. Schwartz and Marjorie A. Bowman
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine November 2006, 19 (6) 643-647; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3122/jabfm.19.6.643
Anne Victoria Neale
PhD, MPH
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Kendra L. Schwartz
MD, MSPH
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Marjorie A. Bowman
MD, MPA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

References

  1. ↵
    Neale AV, Bowman MA. Peer review process of the Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine. J Am Board Fam Med 2006; 19: 209–10.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  2. ↵
    International Committee of Medical Journal Editors. Uniform requirements for manuscripts submitted to biomedical journals. Available from: www.icmje.org. Accessed on August 3, 2006.
  3. ↵
    Neale AV, Schwartz KL, Bowman MA. Conflict of interest: can we minimize its influence in the biomedical literature? J Am Board Fam Pract 2005; 18: 411–3.
    OpenUrl
  4. ↵
    Roberts LW, Coverdale J, Edenharder K, Louie A. How to review a manuscript: a “down-to-earth” approach. Acad Psychiatry 2004; 28: 81–7.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  5. ↵
    McCarthy LH, Reilly REH. How to write a case report. Fam Med 2000; 32: 190–5.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  6. ↵
    Ebell MH, Siwek J, Weiss BD, et al. Strength of Recommendation Taxonomy (SORT): a patient-centered approach to grading evidence in the medical literature. J Am Board Fam Pract 2004; 17: 59–67.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. ↵
    Moher D, Schulz KF, Altman, DG. The CONSORT Statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomized trials. Ann Intern Med 2001; 134: 657–62.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  8. ↵
    Piaggio G, Elbourne DR, Altman DG, Popock SJ, Evans SJ, CONSORT Group. Reporting of non-inferiority and equivalence randomized trials: an extension of the CONSORT statement. JAMA 2006; 295: 1152–60.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  9. ↵
    Moher D, Cook DJ, Eastwood S Olkin I, Rennie D, Stroup DF. Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials: the QUOROM statement. Quality of reporting of meta-analyses. Lancet 1999; 354: 1896–900.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine: 19 (6)
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine
Vol. 19, Issue 6
November-December 2006
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Board of Family Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Peer Reviewing for the Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine: What Does It Take?
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Board of Family Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Board of Family Medicine web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
3 + 12 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Peer Reviewing for the Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine: What Does It Take?
Anne Victoria Neale, Kendra L. Schwartz, Marjorie A. Bowman
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine Nov 2006, 19 (6) 643-647; DOI: 10.3122/jabfm.19.6.643

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Peer Reviewing for the Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine: What Does It Take?
Anne Victoria Neale, Kendra L. Schwartz, Marjorie A. Bowman
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine Nov 2006, 19 (6) 643-647; DOI: 10.3122/jabfm.19.6.643
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Who Are Peer Reviewers and What Do They Do?
    • Ethical Guidelines for Journal Peer Reviewers
    • How to Be a Valued Peer Reviewer
    • Reviewers Advise Editors
    • Editor Evaluates Reviews
    • Editor Makes the Decision
    • Post-publication Peer Review
    • Resources for Reviewer Development
    • Benefits of Peer Reviewing
    • How to Become a Peer Reviewer
    • Notes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Peer Reviewers for the Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine in 2008
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Use of AI in Family Medicine Publications: A Joint Editorial from Journal Editors
  • Three JABFM Articles Are in the Primary Care Collaborative Curated List of 24 Essential Primary Care Research Articles
  • The Right Report from the Right Source at the Right Time – The National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine (NASEM) Primary Care Report
Show more Editorials

Similar Articles

Navigate

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues

Authors & Reviewers

  • Info For Authors
  • Info For Reviewers
  • Submit A Manuscript/Review

Other Services

  • Get Email Alerts
  • Classifieds
  • Reprints and Permissions

Other Resources

  • Forms
  • Contact Us
  • ABFM News

© 2025 American Board of Family Medicine

Powered by HighWire