Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • ARTICLES
    • Current Issue
    • Ahead of Print
    • Archives
    • Abstracts In Press
    • Special Issue Archive
    • Subject Collections
  • INFO FOR
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Call For Papers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • SUBMIT
    • Manuscript
    • Peer Review
  • ABOUT
    • The JABFM
    • The Editing Fellowship
    • Editorial Board
    • Indexing
    • Editors' Blog
  • CLASSIFIEDS
  • Other Publications
    • abfm

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
American Board of Family Medicine
  • Other Publications
    • abfm
American Board of Family Medicine

American Board of Family Medicine

Advanced Search

  • HOME
  • ARTICLES
    • Current Issue
    • Ahead of Print
    • Archives
    • Abstracts In Press
    • Special Issue Archive
    • Subject Collections
  • INFO FOR
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Call For Papers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • SUBMIT
    • Manuscript
    • Peer Review
  • ABOUT
    • The JABFM
    • The Editing Fellowship
    • Editorial Board
    • Indexing
    • Editors' Blog
  • CLASSIFIEDS
  • JABFM on Bluesky
  • JABFM On Facebook
  • JABFM On Twitter
  • JABFM On YouTube
Brief ReportBrief Report

Gastrointestinal Bleeding of Obscure Origin Undetected by Multiple Tests for Fecal Occult Blood and Diagnosed Only by Capsule Endoscopy: A Case Report

Donald J. Kovacs and Ted Berk
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine November 2006, 19 (6) 641-642; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3122/jabfm.19.6.641
Donald J. Kovacs
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ted Berk
MD, FACP
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

The term gastrointestinal bleeding of obscure origin is used to describe bleeding of unknown origin that persists or recurs after a negative initial esophagogastroduodenoscopy and colonoscopy.1 We report the case of a middle-aged woman with gastrointestinal bleeding of obscure origin who had 9 stool specimens that tested negative for occult blood but was found to have adenocarcinoma of the distal duodenum on capsule endoscopy. This case illustrates that, in the presence of unexplained iron-deficiency anemia, multiple negative fecal occult blood tests do not exclude the presence of GI blood loss, and that capsule endoscopy is a valuable diagnostic study in this context.

Case Reports

A 49-year old premenopausal female presented with the sole complaint of fatigue. She had been taking over-the-counter ibuprofen at bedtime. She had perceived no increase in her menstrual blood loss. The only finding on physical examination was slight pallor. Laboratory studies showed iron-deficiency anemia with a hemoglobin of 9.8 g/dL, hematocrit of 29.6%, serum iron of 9 μg/dL, iron-binding capacity of 326 μg/dL, and 3% iron saturation. Three stools tested guaiac negative for blood (Hemoccult II; Beckman Coulter). An esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD), colonoscopy, and small bowel follow-through radiograph series were negative. Although 6 additional stools were negative for blood, the patient developed orthostatic dizziness and was found to have a hemoglobin of 6.8 g/dL. She was transfused with 2 units of packed red blood cells.

The patient was then sent for a capsule endoscopy (at her own expense, because her insurance did not cover it), which revealed a tumor in the proximal small intestine. An EGD with enteroscopy using a pediatric colonoscope revealed adenocarcinoma in the fourth portion of the duodenum. At surgery a large, poorly differentiated tumor was resected, and the patient was found to have metastases in the liver and regional lymph nodes. Less than 1 year from her presentation, the patient died from her cancer.

Discussion

Two aspects of this case made it remarkable. First, a total of 9 stool specimens tested guaiac negative for blood, even in the face of worsening anemia. Second, routine upper and lower endoscopy failed to reveal the source of bleeding, which was only found using capsule endoscopy.

Although fecal occult-blood testing is recommended as a noninvasive screening method for colorectal cancer, its sensitivity is quite low. A recent study comparing fecal DNA versus fecal occult-blood testing for colorectal cancer screening found the sensitivity of Hemoccult II testing for invasive cancer to be approximately 13%.2 Another study testing 8000 patients with various methods of fecal occult-blood testing showed that the sensitivity of Hemoccult II for the detection of colorectal cancer was 37.1%, compared with 79.4% with the newer Hemoccult II Sensa.3 Guaiac-based tests are even less sensitive for the detection of bleeding from proximal sources because of degradation of hemoglobin as it passes through the GI tract. In our case, gastrointestinal bleeding from the proximal small bowel of sufficient degree to cause severe anemia escaped detection on 9 samples tested for occult blood with Hemoccult II. The detection of upper gastrointestinal blood with fecal occult blood testing was studied in healthy volunteers who drank 5, 10, or 20 mL of their own blood mixed in tomato juice for 3 to 5 days. Consecutive stools were tested from 2 days before until 4 days after the blood ingestion. Only 16% of the Hemoccult II samples were positive, 64% of Hemoccult II Sensa samples, and 67% of HemoQuant samples.4

Video capsule endoscopy requires 3 components: a video capsule endoscope approximately the size of a megavitamin pill, a recording device held in a waist belt that can store nearly 60,000 wireless transmitted images from the capsule during an 8-hour period, and a computer workstation for computer-assisted review of the images. The Food and Drug Administration now labels it a first-line test for gastrointestinal bleeding of obscure origin based on its superior diagnostic yield over push enteroscopy, small bowel series, and CT.5 Recently, 100 patients with GI bleeding of obscure origin were studied with capsule endoscopy. The sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values were 88.9%, 95%, 97%, and 86.2%, respectively. The presumed causes were discovered in 47 patients; small bowel angiodysplasia and small bowel ulcerations (which are usually because of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs) accounted for most of the findings.6 Additional causes of small bowel bleeding include Crohn’s disease, aortoenteric fistulas, diverticula, endometriosis, and hemobilia.1 Celiac disease is another disease of the small intestine that commonly presents with iron deficiency.7 A meta-analysis of the yield of capsule endoscopy compared with other diagnostic modalities in patients with obscure gastrointestinal bleeding found capsule endoscopy superior to push enteroscopy and small bowel series for diagnosing clinically significant small bowel pathology.8 Capsule endoscopy is fairly safe, the primary risk being entrapment of the capsule within the GI tract, which occurs in approximately 0.75% to 5% of cases. Such entrapment almost always occurs at the site of the small bowel pathology. Although surgery may be necessary to retrieve the capsule, it would most likely have been required to treat the underlying problem.9

Small bowel malignancies are uncommon, accounting for only 2% of all gastrointestinal neoplasms, and less than 0.4% of all cancers in the United States.10 However, small bowel tumors are the most frequent cause of obscure gastrointestinal bleeding in patients under 50 years of age.11 Adenocarcinomas are the most common type of small bowel tumors and most commonly occur in the duodenum.

Conclusion

Fecal occult blood testing, even if repeated multiple times, cannot be relied on to exclude gastrointestinal blood loss as the cause of iron deficiency anemia. Capsule endoscopy is extremely useful in the investigation of gastrointestinal bleeding of obscure origin, with a diagnostic yield substantially higher than small bowel follow-through radiograph.

Notes

  • This article was externally peer reviewed.

    Conflict of interest: none declared.

  • Received for publication January 30, 2006.
  • Revision received June 2, 2006.
  • Accepted for publication June 12, 2006.

References

  1. ↵
    AGA technical review: Evaluation and management of occult and obscure gastrointestinal bleeding. Gastroenterology 2000; 118: 201.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. ↵
    Imperiale TF, Ransohoff DF, Itzkowitz SH, et al. Fecal DNA versus fecal occult blood for colorectal-cancer screening in an average-risk population. N Engl J Med 2004; 351: 2704–14.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. ↵
    Allison JE, Tekawa IS, Ransom LJ, Adrain AL. A comparison of fecal occult-blood tests for colorectal cancer screening. N Engl J Med 1996; 334: 155.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. ↵
    Rockey DC, Auslander A, Greenberg PD. Detection of upper gastrointestinal blood with fecal occult blood tests. Am J Gastroenterol 1999; 94: 344–50.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. ↵
    Raju GS, Nath SK. Capsule endoscopy. Curr Gastroenterol Rep 2005; 7: 358–64.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  6. ↵
    Pennazio M, Santucci R, Rondonotti E, et al. Outcome of patients with obscure gastrointestinal bleeding after capsule endoscopy: Report of 100 consecutive cases. Gastroenterology 2004; 126: 643–53.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. ↵
    Marignani M, Angeletti S, Filippi L, et al. Occult and obscure bleeding, iron deficiency anemia, and other gastrointestinal stories (Review). Int J Mol Med 2005; 15: 129–35.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  8. ↵
    Triester SL, Leighton JA, Leontiadis GI, et al. A meta-analysis of the yield of capsule endoscopy compared to other diagnostic modalities in patients with obscure gastrointestinal bleeding. Am J Gastroenterol 2005; 100: 2407–18.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  9. ↵
    Carey EJ, Fleisher DE. Investigation of the small bowel in gastrointestinal bleeding–enteroscopy and capsule endoscopy. Gastroenterol Clin North Am 2005; 34: 719–34.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  10. ↵
    Jemal A, Murray T, Ward W, et al. Cancer statistics, 2005. CA Cancer J Clin 2005; 55: 10.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  11. ↵
    Lewis BS, Kornbluth A, Waye JD. Small bowel tumors: yield of enteroscopy. Gut 1991; 32: 763–5.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine: 19 (6)
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine
Vol. 19, Issue 6
November-December 2006
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Board of Family Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Gastrointestinal Bleeding of Obscure Origin Undetected by Multiple Tests for Fecal Occult Blood and Diagnosed Only by Capsule Endoscopy: A Case Report
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Board of Family Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Board of Family Medicine web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
2 + 2 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Gastrointestinal Bleeding of Obscure Origin Undetected by Multiple Tests for Fecal Occult Blood and Diagnosed Only by Capsule Endoscopy: A Case Report
Donald J. Kovacs, Ted Berk
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine Nov 2006, 19 (6) 641-642; DOI: 10.3122/jabfm.19.6.641

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Gastrointestinal Bleeding of Obscure Origin Undetected by Multiple Tests for Fecal Occult Blood and Diagnosed Only by Capsule Endoscopy: A Case Report
Donald J. Kovacs, Ted Berk
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine Nov 2006, 19 (6) 641-642; DOI: 10.3122/jabfm.19.6.641
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Case Reports
    • Discussion
    • Conclusion
    • Notes
    • References
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Association of Social Needs with Diabetes Outcomes in an Older Population
  • Insurance Instability Among Community-Based Health Center Patients with Diabetes Post-Affordable Care Act Medicaid Expansion
  • Factors Influencing Changing Scopes of Practice Among Contemporary Graduates of the Nation’s Largest Family Medicine Residency
Show more Brief Reports

Similar Articles

Navigate

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues

Authors & Reviewers

  • Info For Authors
  • Info For Reviewers
  • Submit A Manuscript/Review

Other Services

  • Get Email Alerts
  • Classifieds
  • Reprints and Permissions

Other Resources

  • Forms
  • Contact Us
  • ABFM News

© 2025 American Board of Family Medicine

Powered by HighWire