Where Should Family Medicine Papers be Published—Following the Impact Factor?

References

1. ↵
   Ingram TG. A cross-sectional analysis of family medicine publications in the indexed medical literature. Fam Med 1992; 24: 303–6.

   OpenUrlPubMed
2. ↵
   Weiss BD. Publications by family physicians in non-family medicine journals. Fam Pract Res J 1990; 10: 117–22.

   OpenUrlPubMed
3. ↵
   Wikepedia the free encyclopedia. Available from: http://en.wikepedia.org/wiki/Impact factor “and references therein” Accessed 5 September 2006.
4. ↵
   Garfield E. Citation indexes for science; a new dimension in documentation through association of ideas. Science 1955; 122: 108–11.

   OpenUrlFREE Full Text
5. ↵
   Dong P, Loh M, Mondry A. The “impact factor” revisited. Biomedical Digital Libraries 2005; 2: 7.

   OpenUrlPubMed
6. ↵
   Moed HF, Burger WJM, Frankfort JG, Van Raah AFJ. On the measurement of research performance: the use of bibliometric indicators. Leiden, Science Studies Unit, Lisbon, Institute University of Leiden, 1987.
7. ↵
   Seglen PO. Why the impact factor of journals should not be used for evaluating research. BMJ 1997; 314: 498–502.

   OpenUrlFREE Full Text
8. BioMed Central—the open access publisher. Available from: http://www.biomedcentral.com
9. ↵
   Murali NS, Murali HR, Auethavekiat P, et al. Impact of FUTON and NAA bias on visibility of research. Mayo Clin Proc 2004; 79: 1001–6.

   OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
10. ↵
    Hafbauer R, Frass M, Gmeiner B, Kaye AD. Euro-Factor—the new European scientific currency. Vienna: VICER Publishing: 2002.
11. ↵
    Sombatsompop N, Markpin T, Premkamolnetr N. A modified method for calculating the impact factors of journals in ISI journal citation reports: Polymer Science Category in 1997–2001. Scientometrics 2004; 60: 217–35.

    OpenUrl
12. ↵
    Rousseau R. Median and percentile impact factor: a set of new indicators. Scientometrics 2005; 63: 431–41.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
13. ↵
    Opthof T, Coronel R, Piper HM. Impact factors: no totum pro parte by skewness of citation. Cardiovasc Res 2004; 61: 201–3.

    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
14. ↵
    Cartwright VA, McGhee CN. Ophthalmology and vision science research. Part 1: Understanding and using journal impact factors and citation indices. J Cataract Refract Surg 2005; 31: 1999–2007.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
15. ↵
    Saha S, Saint S, Christakis DA. Impact factor: a valid measure of journal quality? J Med Libr Assoc 2003; 91: 42–6.

    OpenUrl
16. ↵
    Jefferson T, Wager E, Davidoff F. Measuring the quality of editorial peer review. JAMA 2002; 287: 2786–90.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
17. ↵
    Jefferson T, Alderson P, Wager E, Davidoff F. Effects of editorial peer review: a systemic review. JAMA 2002; 287: 2784–6.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science