Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • ARTICLES
    • Current Issue
    • Abstracts In Press
    • Archives
    • Special Issue Archive
    • Subject Collections
  • INFO FOR
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Call For Papers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • SUBMIT
    • Manuscript
    • Peer Review
  • ABOUT
    • The JABFM
    • The Editing Fellowship
    • Editorial Board
    • Indexing
    • Editors' Blog
  • CLASSIFIEDS
  • Other Publications
    • abfm

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
American Board of Family Medicine
  • Other Publications
    • abfm
American Board of Family Medicine

American Board of Family Medicine

Advanced Search

  • HOME
  • ARTICLES
    • Current Issue
    • Abstracts In Press
    • Archives
    • Special Issue Archive
    • Subject Collections
  • INFO FOR
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Call For Papers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • SUBMIT
    • Manuscript
    • Peer Review
  • ABOUT
    • The JABFM
    • The Editing Fellowship
    • Editorial Board
    • Indexing
    • Editors' Blog
  • CLASSIFIEDS
  • JABFM on Bluesky
  • JABFM On Facebook
  • JABFM On Twitter
  • JABFM On YouTube
Research ArticleOriginal Research

Effectiveness of Targeted Anticipatory Guidance during Well-child Visits: A Pilot Trial

Namrata A. Magar, Sevdalina Dabova-Missova and Dwenda K. Gjerdingen
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine September 2006, 19 (5) 450-458; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3122/jabfm.19.5.450
Namrata A. Magar
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Sevdalina Dabova-Missova
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Dwenda K. Gjerdingen
MD, MS
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Figure 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    Figure 1.

    A Parents’ Evaluation of Developmental Status (PEDS) response form.

Tables

  • Figures
    • View popup
    Table 1.

    Do’s and Don’ts for Infant Care: 0 to 5 Months

    Do
    • Show affection, cuddle, talk, and sing to your baby

    • Respond to your baby’s cry

    • Hold your baby when feeding him/her

    • Support baby’s head and neck

    • Supervise sibling and pet interaction

    • Use car seat (initially rear-facing) in back seat of car

    • Have baby sleep on back or side

    • Use a safe crib, with slats <2-3/8 inches apart, no soft bedding (pillows, quilts, etc)

    • Have functioning smoke detectors in bedrooms

    • Protect baby from sun with hats, clothes, stroller top, etc.

    • Keep hot water temperature at <120°F

    • Breastfeed, if possible

    • Encourage partner to help care for baby

    • Wash hands often

    Don’t
    • Punish baby

    • Leave baby unattended or let your baby fall

    • Jerk or shake baby

    • Expose baby to people with infections

    • Place strings, small/sharp objects, plastic bags, or balloons near baby

    • Use talc or baby walkers

    • Give baby soft toys or toys with small parts

    • Smoke, use recreational drugs or alcohol in excess

    • Feed baby solids

    • Give baby well water or honey in 1st year

    Other discussion topics
    • Parental attachment

    • Sleep

    • Feeding

    • Day care concerns

    • Care of skin, diarrhea, vomiting, congestion, fever

    • When to call doctor

    • Use of non-prescription medications

    • Other:

    • Please check (√) here _ if you have read the above.

    • If you would like to talk to your doctor about any of the issues listed above, please circle the topic(s).

    • View popup
    Table 2.

    Group Differences in Parents’ Responses to Well-Child Visits*

    Parents’ ResponsesExperimental Group (n = 67)Control Group (n = 70)P Value
    Perceptions regarding amount learned about taking care of child through visit3.89 (0.94)4.20 (0.96).031
    Satisfaction with education during visit4.17 (0.94)4.51 (0.78).021
    Perceptions about physician’s understanding of his/her concerns4.52 (0.78)4.64 (0.66).336
    Plans to do something different as a result of education received (n, %, χ2 analysis)14 (22.2%)11 (15.9%).358
    • * Unless otherwise indicated, responses are given as mean (SD), based on 1 to 5 Likert scale (where 1 is the least desirable and 5 is the most desirable response), and differences were determined by Mann-Whitney-Wilcoxon rank-sum tests.

    • View popup
    Table 3.

    Group Differences in Physicians’ Responses to Well-Child Visits*

    Physicians’ ResponsesExperimental Group n = 83Control Group n = 105P Value
    Satisfaction with parent education during visit:3.71 (1.02)3.61 (0.98).515
    Perceptions about parent’s level of interest in educational component of visit3.65 (0.96)3.55 (1.10).544
    Ease/difficulty of visit, compared to average visit (1 = much more difficult, 3 = about the same, 5 = much easier)3.69 (0.93)3.19 (0.75).000
    Would liked to have changed educational component of visit (n, %, χ2 analysis)15 (53.6%)18 (62.1%).516
    • * Unless otherwise indicated, responses are given as mean (SD), based on 1 to 5 Likert scale (where 1 is the least desirable and 5 is the most desirable response), and differences were determined by Student’s t tests.

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine: 19 (5)
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine
Vol. 19, Issue 5
September-October 2006
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Board of Family Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Effectiveness of Targeted Anticipatory Guidance during Well-child Visits: A Pilot Trial
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Board of Family Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Board of Family Medicine web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
11 + 0 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Effectiveness of Targeted Anticipatory Guidance during Well-child Visits: A Pilot Trial
Namrata A. Magar, Sevdalina Dabova-Missova, Dwenda K. Gjerdingen
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine Sep 2006, 19 (5) 450-458; DOI: 10.3122/jabfm.19.5.450

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Effectiveness of Targeted Anticipatory Guidance during Well-child Visits: A Pilot Trial
Namrata A. Magar, Sevdalina Dabova-Missova, Dwenda K. Gjerdingen
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine Sep 2006, 19 (5) 450-458; DOI: 10.3122/jabfm.19.5.450
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Methods
    • Results
    • Conclusions
    • Acknowledgments
    • Notes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Identifying and Addressing Social Determinants of Health with an Electronic Health Record
  • Integrating Adverse Childhood Experiences and Social Risks Screening in Adult Primary Care
  • A Pilot Comparison of Clinical Data Collection Methods Using Paper, Electronic Health Record Prompt, and a Smartphone Application
Show more Original Research

Similar Articles

Navigate

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues

Authors & Reviewers

  • Info For Authors
  • Info For Reviewers
  • Submit A Manuscript/Review

Other Services

  • Get Email Alerts
  • Classifieds
  • Reprints and Permissions

Other Resources

  • Forms
  • Contact Us
  • ABFM News

© 2025 American Board of Family Medicine

Powered by HighWire