Review ArticleClinical Review
A Systematic Review of Studies Comparing Myocardial Infarction Mortality for Generalists and Specialists: Lessons for Research and Health Policy
Arthur Hartz and Paul A. James
The Journal of the American Board of Family
Medicine May 2006, 19 (3) 291-302; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3122/jabfm.19.3.291

References
- ↵Greenfield S, Rogers W, Mangotich M, Carney MF, Tarlov AR. Outcomes of patients with hypertension and non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus treated by different systems and specialties: results from the medical outcomes study. JAMA 1995; 274: 1436–44.
- ↵Greenfield S, Nelson EC, Zubkoff M, et al. Variations in resource utilization among medical specialties and systems of care: results from the medical outcomes study. JAMA 1992; 267: 1624–30.
- ↵Harrold LR, Field TS, Gurwitz JH. Knowledge, patterns of care, and outcomes of care for generalists and specialists. J Gen Intern Med 1999; 14: 499–511.
- ↵Go A, Rao R, Dauterman K, Massie B. A systematic review of the effects of physician specialty on the treatment of coronary disease and heart failure in the United States. Am J Med 2000; 108: 216–26.
- ↵Chen J, Radford MJ, Wang Y, Krumholz HM. Care and outcomes of elderly patients with acute myocardial infarction by physician specialty: the effects of comorbidity and functional limitations. Am J Med 2000; 108: 460–9.
- ↵Ayanian JZ, Guadagnoli E, McNeil BJ, Cleary PD. Treatment and outcomes of acute myocardial infarction among patients of cardiologists and generalist physicians. Arch Intern Med 1997; 157: 2570–6.
- ↵Frances CD, Shlipak MG, Noguchi H, Heidenreich PA, McClellan M. Does physician specialty affect the survival of elderly patients with myocardial infarction? Health Serv Res 2000; 35: 1093–116.
- ↵Goldman L. The value of cardiology. N Engl J Med 1996; 335: 1918–9.
- ↵Nash IS, Corrato RR, Dlutowski MJ, O’Connor JP, Nash DB. Generalist versus specialist care for acute myocardial infarction. Am J Cardiol 1999; 83: 650–4.
- ↵Casale PN, Jones JL, Wolf FE, Pei Y, Eby LM. Patients treated by cardiologists have a lower in-hospital mortality for acute myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol 1998; 32: 885–9.
- ↵West S, King V, Carey TS, et al. Systems to rate the strength of scientific evidence. Evidence report/technology assessment no. 47 (Research Triangle Institute-University of North Carolina Evidence-based Practice Center. Contract no. 290-97-0011). Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. Publication No. 02-E016. Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. US Department of Health and Human Services; April 2002.
- ↵Rosen AK, Reid R, Broemeling A-M, Rakovski CC. Applying a risk-adjustment framework to primary care: can we improve on existing measures? Ann Fam Med 2003; 1: 44–51.
- ↵Nash IS, Nash DB, Fuster V. Do cardiologists do it better? J Am Coll Cardiol 1997; 29: 475–8.
- ↵Donabedian A. The quality of medical care. Science 1978; 200: 856–64.
- ↵
- ↵Baldwin LM, MacLehose RF, Hart LG, Beaver SK, Every N, Chan L. Quality of care for acute myocardial infarction in rural and urban US hospitals. J Rural Health 2004; 20: 99–108.
- ↵Hartz AJ, Krakauer H, Kuhn EM, et al. Hospital characteristics and mortality rates. N Engl J Med 1989; 321: 1720–5.
- ↵Norcini JJ, Kimball HR, Lipner RS. Certification and specialization: do they matter in the outcome of acute myocardial infarction?. Acad Med 2000; 75: 1193–8.
- ↵Sweeney R, Ulveling EF. A transformation for simplifying the interpretation of coefficients of binary variables in regression analysis. Am Stat 1972; 26: 30–2.
- ↵Marciniak TA, Mosedale L, Ellerbeck EF. Quality improvement at the national level. Lessons from the Cooperative Cardiovascular Project. Eval Health Prof 1998; 21: 525–36.
- ↵Ellerbeck EF, Jencks SF, Radford MJ, et al. Quality of care for Medicare patients with acute myocardial infarction. A 4-state pilot study from the Cooperative Cardiovascular Project. JAMA 1995; 273: 1509–14.
- ↵Jollis JG, DeLong ER, Peterson ED, et al. Outcome of acute myocardial infarction according to the specialty of the admitting physician. N Engl J Med 1996; 335: 1880–7.
- ↵Frances CD, Go AS, Dauterman KW, et al. Outcome following acute myocardial infarction: are differences among physician specialties the result of quality of care or case mix? Arch Intern Med 1999; 159: 1429–36.
- ↵Ayanian J, Landrum MB, Guadagnoli E, Gaccione P. Specialty of ambulatory care physicians and mortality among elderly patients after myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med 2002; 347: 1678–86.
- ↵Grumbach K, Hart LG, Mertz E, Coffman J, Palazzo L. Who is caring for the underserved? A comparison of primary care physicians and nonphysician clinicians in California and Washington. Ann Fam Med July 1 2003; 1: 97–104.
- ↵Heidenreich PA, Shlipak MG, Geppert J, McClellan M. Racial and sex differences in refusal of coronary angiography. Am J Med 2002; 113: 200–7.
- ↵Westfall JM, McGloin J. Impact of double counting and transfer bias on estimated rates and outcomes of acute myocardial infarction. Med Care 2001; 39: 459–68.
- ↵
- ↵LaVeist TA, Arthur M, Morgan A, Plantholt S, Rubinstein M. Explaining racial differences in receipt of coronary angiography: the role of physician referral and physician specialty. Med Care Res Rev 2003; 60: 453–67; discussion 496–508.
In this issue
The Journal of the American Board of Family
Medicine
Vol. 19, Issue 3
May-June 2006
A Systematic Review of Studies Comparing Myocardial Infarction Mortality for Generalists and Specialists: Lessons for Research and Health Policy
Arthur Hartz, Paul A. James
The Journal of the American Board of Family
Medicine May 2006, 19 (3) 291-302; DOI: 10.3122/jabfm.19.3.291
Jump to section
Related Articles
- No related articles found.
Cited By...
- The Paradox of Primary Care
- The Medical Home: Growing Evidence to Support a New Approach to Primary Care
- North American Primary Care Research Group President's Award
- Interpersonal continuity: old and new perspectives
- Myocardial Infarction Mortality in Rural and Urban Hospitals: Rethinking Measures of Quality of Care