Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • ARTICLES
    • Current Issue
    • Ahead of Print
    • Archives
    • Abstracts In Press
    • Special Issue Archive
    • Subject Collections
  • INFO FOR
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Call For Papers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • SUBMIT
    • Manuscript
    • Peer Review
  • ABOUT
    • The JABFM
    • The Editing Fellowship
    • Editorial Board
    • Indexing
    • Editors' Blog
  • CLASSIFIEDS
  • Other Publications
    • abfm

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
American Board of Family Medicine
  • Other Publications
    • abfm
American Board of Family Medicine

American Board of Family Medicine

Advanced Search

  • HOME
  • ARTICLES
    • Current Issue
    • Ahead of Print
    • Archives
    • Abstracts In Press
    • Special Issue Archive
    • Subject Collections
  • INFO FOR
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Call For Papers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • SUBMIT
    • Manuscript
    • Peer Review
  • ABOUT
    • The JABFM
    • The Editing Fellowship
    • Editorial Board
    • Indexing
    • Editors' Blog
  • CLASSIFIEDS
  • JABFM on Bluesky
  • JABFM On Facebook
  • JABFM On Twitter
  • JABFM On YouTube
Research ArticleOriginal Research

Management of Prescription Refills in Primary Care: An Oklahoma Physicians Resource/Research Network (OKPRN) Study

Charles W. Ferrell, Cheryl B. Aspy and James W. Mold
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine January 2006, 19 (1) 31-38; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3122/jabfm.19.1.31
Charles W. Ferrell
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Cheryl B. Aspy
PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
James W. Mold
MD, MPH
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Tables

    • View popup
    Table 1.

    Characteristics of the Five Audited Practices

    CharacteristicPhysician
    ABCDE
    Practice typeSmall group*SoloSmall group*SoloResidency faculty
    Average number of patients seen per week125108757040
    Payor mix: Medicare/Medicaid30%Not available65%25%Not available
        Commercial insurance59%35% combined50%
        Self-pay11%0%25%
    Scope of practiceNo OBNo OBNo OB proceduresNo OBFull scope
    Has an EMRNoYesNoNoYes
    Geographic locationSuburbsRuralRuralRuralUrban
    Size of town>50,000–<100,000<5,000>5,000–<30,000<5,000>250,000
    Pharmacies availableNational chains>2 locally ownedNational chains>2 locally ownedNational chains
    Steps for which practice satisfaction was high3, 4, 51, 521, 2, 3, 4, 51, 3
    • * Less than 6 clinicians.

    • View popup
    Table 2.

    Step 1: Patient Access to the System

    Site*Percentage Calling Pharmacy First†Mean (SD) Patient Satisfaction with Method‡Percentage Reporting <2 Minutes for Initial Contact§Mean Practice Satisfaction
    Clinic D‖334.3 (0.99)604.0
    Clinic B‖554.0 (1.3)564.7
    Clinic A863.9 (0.95)422.3
    Clinic C773.5 (1.1)673.0
    Clinic E‖883.2 (1.2)504.0
    • * Table is ordered high to low based on patient satisfaction.

    • † χ2 = 20.1, df = 4, P < .0001.

    • ‡ F4,128 = 3.5, P = .011; Newman-Keuls post hoc test revealed significant differences between clinics A and E (P = .03); B and E (P = .03); and D and E (P = .02).

    • § χ2 = 4.2, df = 4, P = .37.

    • ‖ Self-reported practice satisfaction rates of 4.0 or higher.

    • View popup
    Table 3.

    Step 2: Communication with Pharmacies

    Site*Method UsedError Rate (%)†Mean Cost Per Refill for the Communication Step‡Mean Practice Satisfaction Level
    Clinic D‖FAX0$0.184.0
    Clinic B§FAX/voice mail2$0.063.7
    Clinic C‖FAX2$0.134.0
    Clinic A§FAX/phone8$0.172.3
    Clinic EFAX/phone10$0.333.3
    • * Table is ordered low to high based on error rate.

    • † χ2= 12.6, df = 4, P = .013.

    • ‡ Includes chart retrieval.

    • § Self-reported practice satisfaction rates of 4.0 or higher.

    • View popup
    Table 4.

    Step 3: Decision-Making

    Site*Decision-MakerWritten ProtocolEMR†Error Rate (%)‡Mean Cost for Refill DecisionMean Practice Satisfaction Level
    Clinic A§MANoNo0$0.104.7
    Clinic CMDNoNo0$0.212.5
    Clinic D§MDNoNo0$0.825.0
    Clinic BLPNYesYes4$0.113.7
    Clinic E§MAYesYes10$0.364.0
    • * Table is ordered low to high based on error rate.

    • † EMR, electronic medical record; MA, medical assistant; LPN, licensed practical nurse.

    • ‡ χ2 = 19.6, df = 4, P = .001.

    • § Self-reported practice satisfaction rates of 4.0 or higher.

    • View popup
    Table 5.

    Step 4: Notification of Patients

    Site*Percentage of Patients Reporting Less Than 8 Hours for Total Refill Time†Patient Satisfaction‡Mean Practice Satisfaction Level
    Clinic D§883.95.0
    Clinic B703.93.3
    Clinic A§763.64.0
    Clinic C613.63.0
    Clinic E313.03.3
    • * Table is ordered high to low based on patient satisfaction.

    • † χ2=17.6, df = 4, P < .01.

    • ‡ Nonsignificant: F4,124 = 2.2, P = .07.

    • § Self-reported practice satisfaction rates of 4.0 or higher.

    • View popup
    Table 6.

    Step 5: Documentation

    Site*EMR†Error Rate (%)‡Mean Practice Satisfaction Level
    Clinic EYes03.7
    Clinic D§No05.0
    Clinic B§Yes14.3
    Clinic CNo23.0
    Clinic A§No34.0
    • * Table is ordered low to high based on error rate.

    • † EMR, electronic medical record.

    • ‡ χ2 = 3.3, df = 4, P > .05.

    • § Self-reported practice satisfaction rates of 4.0 or higher.

    • View popup
    Table 7.

    Best Method for Each Step

    Steps in the Prescription Refill ProcessBest Method
    Step 1. Patient access to the systemPatients should contact the pharmacy first when a refill is needed.
    Step 2. Communication with the pharmacyCommunication should be by FAX and initiated by the pharmacy.
    Step 3. Decision-makingLeast costly method is to have nurse or medical assistant make decisions regarding refills. Training with the physician, including feedback regarding decisions will improve accuracy. Written protocols were associated with increased error rates.
    Step 4. Notification of the patientThe pharmacy should notify the patient regarding the prescription refill decision.
    Step 5. DocumentationShould be done by the decision-maker at the time of the decision. An EMR can make this more efficient.
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine: 19 (1)
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine
Vol. 19, Issue 1
January-February 2006
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Board of Family Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Management of Prescription Refills in Primary Care: An Oklahoma Physicians Resource/Research Network (OKPRN) Study
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Board of Family Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Board of Family Medicine web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
4 + 6 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Management of Prescription Refills in Primary Care: An Oklahoma Physicians Resource/Research Network (OKPRN) Study
Charles W. Ferrell, Cheryl B. Aspy, James W. Mold
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine Jan 2006, 19 (1) 31-38; DOI: 10.3122/jabfm.19.1.31

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Management of Prescription Refills in Primary Care: An Oklahoma Physicians Resource/Research Network (OKPRN) Study
Charles W. Ferrell, Cheryl B. Aspy, James W. Mold
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine Jan 2006, 19 (1) 31-38; DOI: 10.3122/jabfm.19.1.31
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Acknowledgments
    • Notes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Development and implementation of a centralized comprehensive refill authorization program in an academic health system
  • The Most Frequently Read Practice-based Research (PBR) Articles in the Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine (JABFM)
  • Improving Colorectal Cancer Screening in Family Medicine: An Oklahoma Physicians Resource/Research Network (OKPRN) Study
  • Improving Mammography Screening Using Best Practices and Practice Enhancement Assistants: An Oklahoma Physicians Resource/Research Network (OKPRN) Study
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Associations Between Modifiable Preconception Care Indicators and Pregnancy Outcomes
  • Perceptions and Preferences for Defining Biosimilar Products in Prescription Drug Promotion
  • Evaluating Pragmatism of Lung Cancer Screening Randomized Trials with the PRECIS-2 Tool
Show more Original Research

Similar Articles

Navigate

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues

Authors & Reviewers

  • Info For Authors
  • Info For Reviewers
  • Submit A Manuscript/Review

Other Services

  • Get Email Alerts
  • Classifieds
  • Reprints and Permissions

Other Resources

  • Forms
  • Contact Us
  • ABFM News

© 2025 American Board of Family Medicine

Powered by HighWire