An Alternative Method of Determining Standard of Care in Alleged Cases of Malpractice

References

1. ↵
   Drechsler CT. Duty of care: liability for malpractice. In: American Jurisprudence: Physicians, Surgeons, and Other Healers. Vol. 61, Section 206. 2nd Ed. St. Paul (MN): West Press; 1999.
2. ↵
   Gross S. Expert evidence. Wis L Rev 1991; 1113–232.
3. ↵
   Meadow W, Sunstein, CR Statistics, not experts. Chicago (IL): John M. Olin Law & Economics Working Paper #109, (2D Series) 2000; 1–13.
4. ↵
   Hartz A, Lucas J, Cramm T, et al. Physician surveys to assess customary care in medical malpractice cases. J Gen Intern Med 2002; 17: 546–55.

   OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
5. ↵
   Boyarsky S. Practical measures to reduce medical expert witness bias. J Forensic Sci 1989; 34: 1259–65.

   OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
6. ↵
   Fisher C, Dombrowski M, Jaszczak S, Cook C, Sokol R. The expert witness: real issues and suggestions. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1995; 172: 1792–800.

   OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
7. ↵
   American Medical Association. Proceedings of the House of Delegates, 52nd Interim Meeting; 1998 Dec; Chicago (IL): AMA 1998; 104–10.
8. ↵
   Rasor D. Mandatory medical malpractice screening panels: a need to re-evaluate. Ohio St J Disp Resol 1993; 9: 115–38.
9. ↵
   Cramm T, Hartz AJ, Green MD. Ascertaining customary care in malpractice cases: asking those who know. Wake Forest Law Review 2002; 37: 699–756.

   OpenUrl
10. ↵
    Tunnell v. Ford Motor Co. 330 F. Supp. 2d 707 (W.D. Va. 2004), Shari Seidman Diamond, Reference Guide on Survey Research, in Federal Judicial Center, Reference Manual on Scientific Evidence. 2d ed: 229–76.