Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • ARTICLES
    • Current Issue
    • Ahead of Print
    • Archives
    • Abstracts In Press
    • Special Issue Archive
    • Subject Collections
  • INFO FOR
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Call For Papers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • SUBMIT
    • Manuscript
    • Peer Review
  • ABOUT
    • The JABFM
    • The Editing Fellowship
    • Editorial Board
    • Indexing
    • Editors' Blog
  • CLASSIFIEDS
  • Other Publications
    • abfm

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
American Board of Family Medicine
  • Other Publications
    • abfm
American Board of Family Medicine

American Board of Family Medicine

Advanced Search

  • HOME
  • ARTICLES
    • Current Issue
    • Ahead of Print
    • Archives
    • Abstracts In Press
    • Special Issue Archive
    • Subject Collections
  • INFO FOR
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Call For Papers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • SUBMIT
    • Manuscript
    • Peer Review
  • ABOUT
    • The JABFM
    • The Editing Fellowship
    • Editorial Board
    • Indexing
    • Editors' Blog
  • CLASSIFIEDS
  • JABFM on Bluesky
  • JABFM On Facebook
  • JABFM On Twitter
  • JABFM On YouTube
Research ArticleOriginal Research

Pedometers As a Means to Increase Ambulatory Activity for Patients Seen at a Family Medicine Clinic

Steven D. Stovitz, Jeffrey J. VanWormer, Bruce A. Center and Karin Lindstrom Bremer
The Journal of the American Board of Family Practice September 2005, 18 (5) 335-343; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3122/jabfm.18.5.335
Steven D. Stovitz
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jeffrey J. VanWormer
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Bruce A. Center
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Karin Lindstrom Bremer
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Figure 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    Figure 1.

    Mean (and percentage) of step improvement for the pedometer group.

Tables

  • Figures
    • View popup
    Table 1.

    Primary Reason for Office Visit

    Number of Participants (n = 94)
    Complete physical examination14 (15%)
    Laboratory values14 (15%)
    Gynecologic/reproductive13 (14%)
    Musculoskeletal13 (14%)
    Mental health11 (12%)
    Upper respiratory infection8 (9%)
    Diabetes5 (5%)
    Dermatologic3 (3%)
    Abdominal pain2 (2%)
    Asthma2 (2%)
    Pre-operation examination2 (2%)
    Miscellaneous7 (8%)
    • View popup
    Table 2.

    Baseline and Poststudy Characteristics of All Randomized Participants*

    Pedometer Group (n = 50)Comparison Group (n = 44)
    BaselinePostBaselinePost
    Demographic measures
        Age (years)38.0 ± 12.4—44.3 ± 13.8†—
        Gender (female)31 (62%)—32 (64%)—
        Weight (lbs)194.3 ± 44.2—192.8 ± 53.1—
        BMI (kg/m2)30.5 ± 7.3—31.5 ± 9.8—
        Systolic BP (mm/Hg)114.9 ± 11.8—118.6 ± 17.5—
        Diastolic BP (mm/Hg)68.9 ± 9.1—69.6 ± 8.9—
        Heart rate (bpm)76.1 ± 9.6—77.8 ± 11.6—
        Diabetes3 (6%)—4 (9%)—
        Hypertension6 (12%)—5 (11%)—
        Hyperlipidemia7 (14%)—10 (23%)—
        Smoker13 (26%)—15 (34%)—
    Lifestyle walking questionnaire
        LWQ 1: Blocks walked per day7.6 ± 8.612.5 ± 13.37.4 ± 8.110.3 ± 9.3
        LWQ 2: Blocks would walk vs. ride in car/bus4.3 ± 3.75.2 ± 4.83.6 ± 3.34.4 ± 3.5
        LWQ 3: Stairflights climbed per day7.1 ± 8.07.9 ± 8.56.1 ± 5.76.3 ± 6.0
        LWQ 4: Stairflights would climb vs. take elevator1.8 ± 1.82.6 ± 2.21.6 ± 1.92.1 ± 2.3
        LWQ 5: Days per week walking >30 minutes total1.6 ± 1.62.3 ± 2.11.5 ± 1.82.5 ± 2.2
        LWQ 6: Frequency rating of walking short trips‡2.7 ± 1.43.2 ± 1.63.1 ± 1.53.2 ± 1.5
        LWQ 7: Frequency rating of walking for fun/leisure‡2.5 ± 1.33.0 ± 1.52.4 ± 1.12.8 ± 1.2
    Walking stage-of-change
        Precontemplation0 (0%)0 (0%)1 (2%)2 (5%)
        Contemplation17 (34%)9 (18%)16 (36%)11 (25%)
        Preparation28 (56%)28 (56%)23 (52%)18 (40%)
        Action3 (6%)9 (18%)2 (5%)11 (25%)
        Maintenance2 (4%)4 (8%)2 (5%)2 (5%)
    Walking self-efficacy rating21.2 ± 4.420.7 ± 5.320.1 ± 6.820.5 ± 7.3
    • * Values for continuous variables are given as mean ± SD. Values for categorical variables are given as frequency (percentage of group total). For participants unavailable at follow-up, poststudy values were calculated by carrying the baseline value forward (intent-to-treat).

    • † Statistically significant difference (P < .05) between pedometer and comparison group.

    • ‡ Scaled from 1 to 6 (1 = never, 2 = ∼1/month, 3 = ∼1/week, 4 = ∼3/week, 5 = ∼1/day, 6 = ≥3/day).

    • View popup
    Table 3.

    Change in LWQ Items and Walking Self-Efficacy among Completers

    Pedometer Group (n = 21)Comparison Group (n = 23)Pedometer vs. Comparison Differential Change
    BaselinePostChangeBaselinePostChange
    Lifestyle walking questionnaire
        LWQ 1: Blocks walked per day9.0 ± 7.319.3 ± 14.410.3 ± 14.3*6.1 ± 6.711.7 ± 9.25.6 ± 9.2*4.7
        LWQ 2: Blocks would walk vs. ride in car/bus5.2 ± 3.97.2 ± 5.52.1 ± 4.1*3.7 ± 3.65.3 ± 3.71.6 ± 4.90.4
        LWQ 3: Stairflights climbed per day6.2 ± 6.57.7 ± 7.11.4 ± 7.44.7 ± 4.85.1 ± 5.50.4 ± 3.61.0
        LWQ 4: Stairflights would climb vs. take elevator1.8 ± 1.33.2 ± 2.11.4 ± 2.1*1.5 ± 1.52.5 ± 2.31.0 ± 2.1*0.4
        LWQ 5: Days per week walking ≥30 minutes total1.8 ± 2.13.3 ± 2.11.5 ± 2.4*1.2 ± 1.83.1 ± 2.41.9 ± 2.2*−0.4
        LWQ 6: Frequency rating of walking short trips‡2.5 ± 1.33.7 ± 1.51.1 ± 1.2*3.1 ± 1.53.3 ± 1.50.2 ± 1.41.0†
        LWQ 7: Frequency rating of walking for fun/leisure‡2.7 ± 1.23.4 ± 1.50.8 ± 1.3*2.3 ± 1.33.0 ± 1.40.7 ± 1.6*0.1
    Walking self-efficacy rating22.9 ± 5.020.8 ± 6.5−2.1 ± 6.220.2 ± 6.421.0 ± 7.50.7 ± 5.7−2.8
    • * Statistically significant change (P < .05) from baseline.

    • † Statistically significant difference (P < .05) between pedometer and comparison group.

    • ‡ Scored on a scale from 1 to 6 (1 = never, 2 = ∼1/month, 3 = ∼1/week, 4 = ∼3/week, 5 = ∼1/day, 6 = ≥3/day).

    • View popup
    Table 4.

    Walking Stage-of-Change Movement among Completers

    Poststudy
    PrecontemplationContemplationPreparationActionMaintenance
    Baseline
        Pedometer Group (n = 21)
            Precontemplation00000
            Contemplation02*7†01†
            Preparation002*5†0
            Action001‡0*1†
            Maintenance00002*
        Comparison Group (n = 23)
            Precontemplation00000
            Contemplation1‡7*1†3†0
            Preparation003*6†0
            Action00000
            Maintenance00002*
    • * Stable.

    • † Progress.

    • ‡ Regress.

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of the American Board of Family Practice: 18 (5)
The Journal of the American Board of Family Practice
Vol. 18, Issue 5
1 Sep 2005
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Board of Family Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Pedometers As a Means to Increase Ambulatory Activity for Patients Seen at a Family Medicine Clinic
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Board of Family Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Board of Family Medicine web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
1 + 2 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Pedometers As a Means to Increase Ambulatory Activity for Patients Seen at a Family Medicine Clinic
Steven D. Stovitz, Jeffrey J. VanWormer, Bruce A. Center, Karin Lindstrom Bremer
The Journal of the American Board of Family Practice Sep 2005, 18 (5) 335-343; DOI: 10.3122/jabfm.18.5.335

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Pedometers As a Means to Increase Ambulatory Activity for Patients Seen at a Family Medicine Clinic
Steven D. Stovitz, Jeffrey J. VanWormer, Bruce A. Center, Karin Lindstrom Bremer
The Journal of the American Board of Family Practice Sep 2005, 18 (5) 335-343; DOI: 10.3122/jabfm.18.5.335
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Appendix
    • Acknowledgments
    • Notes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • STRIVE pilot trial: a protocol for a multicentre pragmatic internal pilot randomised controlled trial of Structured TRaining to Improve fitness in a Virtual Environment (STRIVE) before surgery
  • PREPARE trial: a protocol for a multicentre randomised trial of frailty-focused preoperative exercise to decrease postoperative complication rates and disability scores
  • Prescribing exercise to help your patients lose weight
  • Physicians promoting physical activity using pedometers and community partnerships: a real world trial
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Evaluating Pragmatism of Lung Cancer Screening Randomized Trials with the PRECIS-2 Tool
  • Perceptions and Preferences for Defining Biosimilar Products in Prescription Drug Promotion
  • Successful Implementation of Integrated Behavioral Health
Show more Original Research

Similar Articles

Navigate

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues

Authors & Reviewers

  • Info For Authors
  • Info For Reviewers
  • Submit A Manuscript/Review

Other Services

  • Get Email Alerts
  • Classifieds
  • Reprints and Permissions

Other Resources

  • Forms
  • Contact Us
  • ABFM News

© 2025 American Board of Family Medicine

Powered by HighWire