Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • ARTICLES
    • Current Issue
    • Abstracts In Press
    • Archives
    • Special Issue Archive
    • Subject Collections
  • INFO FOR
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Call For Papers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • SUBMIT
    • Manuscript
    • Peer Review
  • ABOUT
    • The JABFM
    • The Editing Fellowship
    • Editorial Board
    • Indexing
    • Editors' Blog
  • CLASSIFIEDS
  • Other Publications
    • abfm

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
American Board of Family Medicine
  • Other Publications
    • abfm
American Board of Family Medicine

American Board of Family Medicine

Advanced Search

  • HOME
  • ARTICLES
    • Current Issue
    • Abstracts In Press
    • Archives
    • Special Issue Archive
    • Subject Collections
  • INFO FOR
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Call For Papers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • SUBMIT
    • Manuscript
    • Peer Review
  • ABOUT
    • The JABFM
    • The Editing Fellowship
    • Editorial Board
    • Indexing
    • Editors' Blog
  • CLASSIFIEDS
  • JABFM on Bluesky
  • JABFM On Facebook
  • JABFM On Twitter
  • JABFM On YouTube
Research ArticleSpecial Communications

Are Family Physicians Appropriately Screening for Postpartum Depression?

Dean A. Seehusen, Laura-Mae Baldwin, Guy P. Runkle and Gary Clark
The Journal of the American Board of Family Practice March 2005, 18 (2) 104-112; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3122/jabfm.18.2.104
Dean A. Seehusen
MC, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Laura-Mae Baldwin
MD, MPH
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Guy P. Runkle
MC, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Gary Clark
MC, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Tables

    • View popup
    Table 1.

    Demographic Characteristics of Study Group

    Characteristic (responses)Percentage or Average (SD)
    Male (n = 294)57.1%
    Age (n = 293)44.0 (7.3)
    Years since graduating residency (n = 288)12.0 (7.8)
    Practice setting (n = 287)
        Group82.9%
        Solo7.3%
        Other9.8%
    • View popup
    Table 2.

    Family Physician Beliefs about Postpartum Depression Screening

    Statement (responses)Agree (%)
    General beliefs about postpartum depression
        1. Therapy for postpartum depression is effective. (n = 294)94.9
        2. Postpartum depression affects the children of affected mothers. (n = 296)97.6
        3. Postpartum depression affects the spouses of affected women. (n = 296)99.0
    General beliefs about screening for postpartum depression
        1. Postpartum depression is common enough to warrant screening. (n = 295)87.5
        2. Postpartum depression is a serious enough problem to warrant screening. (n = 295)90.2
    Beliefs about screening women at postpartum visits
        1. Screening at every postpartum visit would take too much effort. (n = 292)19.2
        2. Screening at every postpartum visit would not be effective. (n = 293)3.4
    Beliefs about screening mothers at well-child visits
        1. Screening at every well-child visit up to one year-of-age would take too much effort. (n = 295)34.9
        2. Screening at every well-child visit would not be effective. (n = 291)7.2
    • View popup
    Table 3.

    Frequency of Screening for Postpartum Depression by Family Physician Demographics, Practice Setting, and Training Characteristics

    Population (Number of Respondents*)Often or Always Screen Women at Postpartum VisitsP value†Often or Always Screen Mothers at Well-Child VisitsP value
    Total (n = 298)70.2%46.0%
    Demographics
        Gender
            Women (n = 125, 126)78.4%.01154.8%.011
            Men (n = 167, 166)64.7%39.8%
        Age
            <38 (n = 69)81.2%.00447.8%NS‡
            38–44 (n = 80)78.8%48.8%
            45–49 (n = 66)62.1%47.0%
            >49 (n = 76)59.2%40.8%
        Practice setting
            Solo (n = 21)57.1%NS47.6%NS
            Group (n = 236, 237)72.0%46.0%
            Other (n = 28, 27)67.9%48.1%
    Training in PPD
        Medical School
            Yes (n = 200, 199)72.0%NS47.7%NS
            No (n = 91, 92)67.0%42.4%
        Residency
            Yes (n = 261)74.7%<.00148.3%.042
            No (n = 31)35.5%29.0%
        CME conferences
            Yes (n = 194, 193)74.2%NS51.3%.015
            No (n = 94, 99)63.3%36.4%
        Medical Literature
            Yes (n = 205)75.1%.00851.7%.004
            No (n = 87)59.8%33.3%
    • * If 2 numbers are shown, they represent postpartum visits and well-child visits, respectively.

    • † Significance determined using χ2 analysis.

    • ‡ NS, not significant; PPD, postpartum depression; CME, continuing medical education.

    • View popup
    Table 4.

    Association between Postpartum Depression Beliefs and Screening Practices

    Statement (responses*)Often or Always Screen Women at Postpartum VisitsP valueOften or Always Screen Mothers at Well-Child VisitsP value
    General beliefs about postpartum depression
        1. Postpartum depression affects the children of affected mothers.
            Agreed (n = 287)70.4%NS†46.7%NS†
            Did Not Agree (n = 7)71.4%28.6%
        2. Postpartum depression affects the spouses of affected women.
            Agreed (n = 291)70.8%NS†46.4%NS†
            Did Not Agree (n = 3)33.3%33.3%
        3. Therapy for postpartum depression is effective.
            Agreed (n = 277)70.8%NS†46.6%NS†
            Did Not Agree (n = 15)66.7%40.0%
    General beliefs about screening for postpartum depression
        1. Postpartum depression is common enough to warrant screening.
            Agreed (n = 256)77.7%<.001‡50.8%<.001‡
            Did Not Agree (n = 37)18.9%13.5%
        2. Postpartum depression is a serious enough problem to warrant screening.
            Agreed (n = 264)73.9%<.001‡48.5%.013‡
            Did Not Agree (n = 29)37.9%24.1%
    Beliefs about screening women at postpartum visits
        1. Screening at every postpartum visit would take too much effort.
            Agreed (n = 56)48.2%<.001‡21.4%<.001‡
            Did Not Agree (n = 234)76.1%52.1%
        2. Screening at every postpartum visit would not be effective.
            Agreed (n = 10,21)50.0%NS†20.0%NS†
            Did Not Agree (n = 281,268)71.2%47.0%
    Beliefs about screening mothers at well-child visits
        1. Screening at every well-child visit up to one year-of-age would take too much effort.
            Agreed (n = 102,103)60.8%.009‡26.2%<.001‡
            Did Not Agree (n = 191,190)75.4%56.8%
        2. Screening at every well-child visit would not be effective.
            Agreed (n = 21)71.4%23.8%.034‡
            Did Not Agree (n = 268)70.5%NS‡47.8%
    • * If two numbers are shown, they represent postpartum visits and well-child visits, respectively.

    • † Statistical analysis based on Fisher’s exact test.

    • ‡ Statistical analysis based on χ2 analysis.

    • View popup
    Table 5.

    Multivariate Analysis: Odds of More Frequent Screening by Family Physicians with Different Demographic, Training Characteristics, and Beliefs

    OR*95% CIP Value†
    Screening for PPD always or often at postpartum gynecologic visits
        Sex (female)2.21.1–4.2.02
        Residency training in PPD (yes)8.13.3–20.0<.000
        Medical literature training in PPD (yes)2.11.1–4.0.022
        PPD is common enough to warrant screening (agreed)1.91.5–2.4<.000
        Screening for PPD at every postpartum visit would take too much effort (agreed)0.80.7–1.0.039
    Screening mothers for PPD always or often at well-child visits
        Sex (female)1.61.0–2.8.065
        Residency training in PPD (yes)2.71.1–6.5.030
        Medical literature training in PPD (yes)2.41.4–4.3.002
        PPD is common enough to warrant screening (agreed)1.51.1–1.9.003
        Screening for PPD at every well-child visit would take too much effort (agreed)0.70.6–0.8<.000
    • * OR, odds ratio adjusted for other variables in the model; CI, confidence interval; PPD, postpartum depression.

    • † All variables with significance of P < .1 were left in each model.

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of the American Board of Family Practice: 18 (2)
The Journal of the American Board of Family Practice
Vol. 18, Issue 2
1 Mar 2005
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Board of Family Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Are Family Physicians Appropriately Screening for Postpartum Depression?
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Board of Family Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Board of Family Medicine web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
3 + 9 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Are Family Physicians Appropriately Screening for Postpartum Depression?
Dean A. Seehusen, Laura-Mae Baldwin, Guy P. Runkle, Gary Clark
The Journal of the American Board of Family Practice Mar 2005, 18 (2) 104-112; DOI: 10.3122/jabfm.18.2.104

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Are Family Physicians Appropriately Screening for Postpartum Depression?
Dean A. Seehusen, Laura-Mae Baldwin, Guy P. Runkle, Gary Clark
The Journal of the American Board of Family Practice Mar 2005, 18 (2) 104-112; DOI: 10.3122/jabfm.18.2.104
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Conclusions
    • Notes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • An Autoethnographic Examination of Postpartum Depression
  • Stepped Care Treatment of Postpartum Depression: Impact on Treatment, Health, and Work Outcomes
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Integrating Community and Clinical Data to Assess Patient Risks with A Population Health Assessment Engine (PHATE)
  • Primary Care Is an Essential Ingredient to a Successful Population Health Improvement Strategy
  • Hepatitis C Update and Expanding the Role of Primary Care
Show more Special Communications

Similar Articles

Navigate

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues

Authors & Reviewers

  • Info For Authors
  • Info For Reviewers
  • Submit A Manuscript/Review

Other Services

  • Get Email Alerts
  • Classifieds
  • Reprints and Permissions

Other Resources

  • Forms
  • Contact Us
  • ABFM News

© 2025 American Board of Family Medicine

Powered by HighWire