Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • ARTICLES
    • Current Issue
    • Abstracts In Press
    • Archives
    • Special Issue Archive
    • Subject Collections
  • INFO FOR
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Call For Papers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • SUBMIT
    • Manuscript
    • Peer Review
  • ABOUT
    • The JABFM
    • The Editing Fellowship
    • Editorial Board
    • Indexing
    • Editors' Blog
  • CLASSIFIEDS
  • Other Publications
    • abfm

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
American Board of Family Medicine
  • Other Publications
    • abfm
American Board of Family Medicine

American Board of Family Medicine

Advanced Search

  • HOME
  • ARTICLES
    • Current Issue
    • Abstracts In Press
    • Archives
    • Special Issue Archive
    • Subject Collections
  • INFO FOR
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Call For Papers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • SUBMIT
    • Manuscript
    • Peer Review
  • ABOUT
    • The JABFM
    • The Editing Fellowship
    • Editorial Board
    • Indexing
    • Editors' Blog
  • CLASSIFIEDS
  • JABFM on Bluesky
  • JABFM On Facebook
  • JABFM On Twitter
  • JABFM On YouTube
Research ArticleOriginal Article

Episiotomy in Low-Risk Vaginal Deliveries

Richard E. Allen and Ronald W. Hanson
The Journal of the American Board of Family Practice January 2005, 18 (1) 8-12; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3122/jabfm.18.1.8
Richard E. Allen
MD, MPH
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ronald W. Hanson Jr
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Tables

    • View popup
    Table 1.

    Demographic Characteristics in Low-Risk Groups by Specialty

    CharacteristicOB* (n = 2318)FP (n = 802)P Value for Difference
    Age [Mean (SD)]26.3 (4.9)25.8 (4.7).01
    Age
        ≤1983 (3%)47 (6%).01
        20 to 342066 (89%)717 (89%)NS
        ≥35169 (7%)38 (5%).01
    Gestational age [mean weeks (SD)]39.0 (1.1)39.0 (1.2)NS
    Parity
        Nulliparous879 (38%)284 (35%)NS
        Multiparous1439 (62%)518 (65%)NS
    Time of day
        7:00 am to 5:59 pm1340 (58%)414 (52%)0.01
        6:00 pm to 10:59 pm445 (19%)169 (21%)NS
        11:00 pm to 6:59 am533 (23%)219 (27%)0.02
    • * OB, obstetrician; FP, family physician; NS, not significant at α = 0.05 level.

    • View popup
    Table 2.

    Clinical Management and Outcomes by Physician Specialty

    OutcomeOB* (n = 2318)FP (n = 802)Unadjusted Risk Ratio [95% CI]
    Episiotomy1248 (54%)261 (33%)1.65 [1.49 to 1.84]
    Epidural anesthesia2097 (91%)677 (84%)1.07 [1.04 to 1.11]
    Induction742 (32%)193 (24%)1.33 [1.16 to 1.52]
    Forceps extraction342 (15%)34 (4%)3.07 [2.18 to 4.33]
    Vacuum extraction16 (1%)74 (9%)0.08 [0.04 to 0.13]
    Third or fourth degree perineal laceration83 (4%)23 (3%)1.25 [0.79 to 1.97]
    Malposition37 (2%)17 (2%)0.75 [0.43 to 1.33]
    Shoulder dystocia14 (1%)13 (2%)0.37 [0.18 to 0.79]
    Abnormal fetal heart rate/rhythm105 (5%)27 (3%)1.35 [0.89 to 2.04]
    Infant weight >4 kg214 (9%)59 (7%)1.26 [0.95 to 1.66]
    • * OB, obstetrician; FP, family physician; CI, 95% confidence interval.

    • View popup
    Table 3.

    Multivariate Analysis of Episiotomy Use and Associated Risk Factors

    CharacteristicEpisiotomies (%)Adjusted Odds Ratio* [CI]†
    Practitioner
        FP261 (33%)1.0
        OB1248 (54%)2.38 [1.98 to 2.87]
    Parity
        Multiparous782 (40%)1.0
        Nulliparous727 (63%)2.13 [1.81 to 2.48]
    Anesthesia
        Local or none119 (34%)1.0
        Epidural1390 (50%)1.38 [1.07 to 1.77]
    Induction
        None1040 (48%)1.0
        Induction469 (50%)1.01 [0.85 to 1.19]
    Instrumented delivery
        None1136 (43%)1.0
        Forceps317 (84%)5.08 [3.75 to 6.88]
        Vacuum56 (62%)2.85 [1.78 to 4.58]
    Fetal complications
        None1111 (43%)1.0
        Shoulder dystocia15 (56%)1.92 [0.85 to 4.34]
        Heart rate or rhythm94 (71%)1.22 [0.79 to 1.89]
        Weight >4 kg142 (52%)1.13 [0.86 to 1.48]
    Time of day
        Night324 (43%)1.0
        Day or evening1185 (50%)1.22 [1.02 to 1.45]
    Age
        20 to 341359 (49%)1.0
        Teen67 (52%)0.83 [0.56 to 1.23]
        ≥3583 (40%)0.83 [0.61 to 1.13]
    • * Adjusted for all factors shown in table.

    • † CI, 95% confidence interval; FP, family physician; OB, obstetrician.

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of the American Board of Family Practice: 18 (1)
The Journal of the American Board of Family Practice
Vol. 18, Issue 1
1 Jan 2005
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Board of Family Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Episiotomy in Low-Risk Vaginal Deliveries
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Board of Family Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Board of Family Medicine web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
15 + 1 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Episiotomy in Low-Risk Vaginal Deliveries
Richard E. Allen, Ronald W. Hanson
The Journal of the American Board of Family Practice Jan 2005, 18 (1) 8-12; DOI: 10.3122/jabfm.18.1.8

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Episiotomy in Low-Risk Vaginal Deliveries
Richard E. Allen, Ronald W. Hanson
The Journal of the American Board of Family Practice Jan 2005, 18 (1) 8-12; DOI: 10.3122/jabfm.18.1.8
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Notes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • How Much Time Do Patients with Diabetes Spend on Self-Care?
  • Screening for Bipolar Disorder in Patients Treated for Depression in a Family Medicine Clinic
  • Screening for Dementia: Family Caregiver Questionnaires Reliably Predict Dementia
Show more Original Articles

Similar Articles

Navigate

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues

Authors & Reviewers

  • Info For Authors
  • Info For Reviewers
  • Submit A Manuscript/Review

Other Services

  • Get Email Alerts
  • Classifieds
  • Reprints and Permissions

Other Resources

  • Forms
  • Contact Us
  • ABFM News

© 2025 American Board of Family Medicine

Powered by HighWire