Radiographs in the Office: Is a Second Reading Always Needed?

References

1. ↵
   Sunshine JH, Bansal S, Evens RG. Radiology performed by nonradiologists in the United States: who does what? AJR Am J Roentgenol 1993; 161: 419–29.

   OpenUrlPubMed
2. Sunshine JH, Mabry MR, Bansal S. The volume and cost of radiologic services in the United States: who does what? AJR Am J Roentgenol 1991; 157: 609–13.

   OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
3. Levin DC. The practice of radiology by nonradiologists: cost, quality and utilization issues. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1994; 162: 513–8.

   OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
4. ↵
   Spettell CM, Levin DC, Rao VM, Sunshine JH, Bansal S. Practice patterns of radiologists and nonradiologists: national Medicare data on the performance of chest and skeletal radiography and abdominal and pelvic sonography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1998; 171: 3–5.

   OpenUrlPubMed
5. ↵
   Halvorsen JG, Kunian A. Radiology in family practice: experience in community practice. Fam Med 1988; 20: 112–7.

   OpenUrlPubMed
6. ↵
   Smith PD. Office use of X-rays by family physicians in Wisconsin. Wis Med J 1998; 97: 51.
7. ↵
   Kruitzky L, Haddy RI, Curry RW Sr. Interpretation of chest roentgenograms by primary care physicians. South Med 1987; 80: 1347–51.

   OpenUrl
8. ↵
   Halvorsen JG, Kunian A, Gjerdingen D, Connolly J, Koopmeiners M, Cesnik J. The interpretation of office radiographs by family physicians. J Fam Pract 1989; 28: 426–32.

   OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
9. ↵
   Halvorsen JG, Kunian A. Radiology in family practice: a prospective study of 14 community practices. Fam Med 1990; 22: 112–7.

   OpenUrlPubMed
10. ↵
    Bergus GR, Franken EA Jr, Koch TJ, Smith WL, Evans ER, Berbaum KS. Radiologic interpretation by family physicians in an office practice setting. J Fam Pract 1995; 41: 352–6.

    OpenUrlPubMed
11. Franken EA Jr, Bergus GR, Koch TJ, Berbaum KS, Smith WL. Added value of radiologist consultation to family practitioners in the outpatient setting. Radiology 1995; 197: 759–62.

    OpenUrlPubMed
12. Strasser RP, Bass MJ, Brennan M. The effect of an on-site radiology facility on radiologic utilization in family practice. J Fam Pract 1987; 24: 619–23.

    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
13. ↵
    Mucci B. The selective reporting of x-ray films from the accident and emergency department. Injury 1983; 14: 343–4.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
14. ↵
    McLain PL, Kirkwood CR. The quality of emergency room radiograph interpretations. J Fam Pract 1985; 20: 443–8.

    OpenUrlPubMed
15. O’Leary MR, Smith MS, O’Leary DS, et al. Application of clinical indicators in the emergency department. JAMA 1989; 262: 3444–7.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
16. Warren JS, Lara K, Connor PD, Cantrell J, Hahn RG. Correlation of emergency department radiographs: results of a quality assurance review in an urban community hospital setting. J Am Board Fam Pract 1993; 6: 255–9.
17. Preston CA, Marr JJ 3d, Amaraneni KK, Suthar BS. Reduction of “callbacks” to the ED due to discrepancies in plain radiograph interpretation. Am J Emerg Med 1998; 16: 160–2.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
18. ↵
    Knollmann BC, Corson AP, Twigg HL, Schulman KA. Assessment of joint review of radiologic studies by a primary care physician and a radiologist. J Gen Intern Med 1996; 11: 608–12.

    OpenUrlPubMed
19. ↵
    Fleiss JL. Statistical methods for rates and proportions. 2nd ed. New York: John Wiley; 1981. p. 38–46.
20. ↵
    Herman PG, Gerson DE, Hessel SJ, et al. Disagreements in chest roentgen interpretation. Chest 1975; 68: 278–82.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
21. Tuddenham WJ. Visual search, image organization and reader error in roentgen diagnosis Radiology 1962; 78: 694–704.
22. Herman PG, Hessel SJ. Accuracy and its relationship to experience in the interpretations of chest radiographs. Invest Radiol 1975; 1: 62–7.
23. Revesz G, Kundel HK. Psychophysical studies of detection errors in chest radiology. Radiology 1977; 123: 559–62.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
24. ↵
    Rhea JT, Potsaid MS, Deluca SA. Errors of interpretation as elicited by a quality audit of an emergency radiology facility. Radiology 1979; 132: 277–80.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
25. Hessel SJ, Herman PG, Swensson RG. Improving performance by multiple interpretations of chest radiographs: effectiveness and cost. Radiology 1978; 127: 589–94.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
26. ↵
    Swensson RG, Hessel SJ, Herman PG. Omissions in radiology: faulty search or stringent reporting criteria? Radiology 1977; 123: 563–7.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
27. Yerushalmy J. The statistical assessment of the variability in observer perception and description of roentgenographic pulmonary shadows. Radiol Clin North Am 1969; 7: 381–92.

    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
28. ↵
    Hanley JA, Lippman-Hand A. If nothing goes wrong, is everything all right? JAMA 1983; 249: 1743–5.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
29. ↵
    Schreiber MH. The clinical history as a factor in roentgenogram interpretation. JAMA 1963; 185: 399–01.
30. McNeil BJ, Hanley JA, Funkenstein HH, Wallman J. Paired receiver operating characteristic curves and the effect of history on radiographic interpretation: CT of the head as a case study. Radiology 1983; 149: 75–7.

    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
31. Potchen EJ, Gard JW, Lazar P, Lahaie P, Andary M. The effect of clinical history data on chest film interpretation: direction or distraction. Invest Radiol 1979; 14: 404.

    OpenUrl
32. Elmore JG, Wells CK, Howard DH, Feinstein AR. The impact of history on mammographic interpretations [abstract]. JAMA 1997; 277: 49–52.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
33. ↵
    Swensson RG, Hessel SJ, Herman PG. The value of searching films without specific preconceptions. Invest Radiol 1985; 20: 100–7.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
34. ↵
    Elmore JG, Wells CK, Lee CH, Howard DH, Feinstein AR. Variability in radiologists’ interpretations of mammograms. N Engl J Med 1994; 331: 1493–9.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
35. ↵
    Egglin TK, Feinstein AR. Context bias, a problem in diagnostic radiology. JAMA 1996; 276: 1752–55.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
36. ↵
    Smith PD. Family physician interpretation of outpatient radiographs. Radiology (Position Paper). Shawnee Mission (KS): American Academy of Family Physicians. Available at: http://www.aafp.org/x7036.xml
37. ↵
    Bhargavan M, Sunshine JH, Schepps B. Too few radiologists? AJR Am J Roentgenol 2002; 178: 1075–82.

    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
38. Sunshine JH, Cypel YS, Schepps B. Diagnostic radiologists in 2000: basic characteristics, practices, and issues related to the radiologist shortage. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2002; 178: 291–301.

    OpenUrlPubMed
39. Hawkins J. Addressing the shortage of radiologists. Radiol Manage 2001; 23: 26–8.

    OpenUrl