Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • ARTICLES
    • Current Issue
    • Abstracts In Press
    • Archives
    • Special Issue Archive
    • Subject Collections
  • INFO FOR
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Call For Papers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • SUBMIT
    • Manuscript
    • Peer Review
  • ABOUT
    • The JABFM
    • The Editing Fellowship
    • Editorial Board
    • Indexing
    • Editors' Blog
  • CLASSIFIEDS
  • Other Publications
    • abfm

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
American Board of Family Medicine
  • Other Publications
    • abfm
American Board of Family Medicine

American Board of Family Medicine

Advanced Search

  • HOME
  • ARTICLES
    • Current Issue
    • Abstracts In Press
    • Archives
    • Special Issue Archive
    • Subject Collections
  • INFO FOR
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Call For Papers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • SUBMIT
    • Manuscript
    • Peer Review
  • ABOUT
    • The JABFM
    • The Editing Fellowship
    • Editorial Board
    • Indexing
    • Editors' Blog
  • CLASSIFIEDS
  • JABFM on Bluesky
  • JABFM On Facebook
  • JABFM On Twitter
  • JABFM On YouTube
Research ArticleOriginal Article

Effectiveness of Interventions to Increase Papanicolaou Smear Use

K. Robin Yabroff, Patricia Mangan and Jeanne Mandelblatt
The Journal of the American Board of Family Practice May 2003, 16 (3) 188-203; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3122/jabfm.16.3.188
K. Robin Yabroff
PhD, MBA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Patricia Mangan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jeanne Mandelblatt
MD, MPH
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Tables

    • View popup
    Table 1.

    Study Characteristics.

    CharacteristicsNo.PercentReferences
    Studies46100.0
    Study design
     Randomized controlled trial*3167.478 ,83–89 ,93–95 ,97 ,98 ,101 ,102–104 ,106–109 ,111–113 ,116 ,118–121 ,123 ,124
     Concurrently controlled1532.679 ,82 ,90 ,92 ,96 ,99 ,100 ,105 ,110 ,114 ,115 ,117 ,122
    Type of control
     Usual care3065.278–84 ,87–89 ,92–100 ,102 ,107 ,109 ,110 ,112 ,114 ,115 ,117 ,122–124
     Active control1634.885 ,86 ,90 ,101 ,103–106 ,108 ,111 ,113 ,116 ,118–121
    Interventions63100.0
    Intervention target
     Patients2438.178 ,80–89 ,94 ,96 ,100 ,102 ,103 ,111–113 ,116 ,122
     Physicians2539.785 ,86 ,90 ,92 ,93 ,95 ,97 ,101 ,104 ,107 ,108 ,111 ,114 ,115 ,118–121 ,124
     Patients and physicians1219.079 ,85 ,98 ,99 ,106 ,109–111 ,116 ,121 ,123 ,124
     System23.2105 ,117
    Intervention strategy
     Behavioral2234.985 ,86 ,90 ,92 ,93 ,95–97 ,101 ,103 ,104 ,107 ,109 ,111 ,115 ,116 ,118–121 ,124
     Cognitive57.997 ,102 ,108 ,113 ,119
     Sociologic57.980 ,83 ,84 ,87 ,100
     Behavioral and cognitive1015.985 ,94 ,97–99 ,106 ,110 ,112 ,114 ,121
     Cognitive and sociologic34.878 ,88 ,89
     Behavioral, cognitive, and sociologic57.979 ,81 ,82 ,122 ,123
    Intervention content
     Behavioral strategy
     Postcard or letter reminder1625.479 ,85 ,86 ,94 ,103 ,106 ,111 ,112 ,116 ,123 ,124
     Telephone reminder23.2103 ,86
     Health diary23.296 ,99
     Chart reminder2234.985 ,86 ,95 ,98 ,106 ,107 ,108 ,109 ,110 ,111 ,114 ,115 ,116 ,118 ,119 ,121 ,123 ,124
     Office reminders or poster display34.879 ,99 ,110
     Patient-carried prompt46.398 ,106 ,109 ,120
     Flow sheet or checklist requiring completion914.390 ,92 ,93 ,97 ,104 ,106 ,108 ,110 ,116
     Mass media reminders11.681
     Financial incentives34.882 ,101 ,122
     Cognitive strategy
     Educational letter or pamphlet1320.679 ,81 ,82 ,85 ,94 ,99 ,102 ,106 ,113 ,121 ,123
     Telephone or in-person counseling34.879 ,112 ,121
     Educational mass media23.278 ,79
     Educational workshop or presentation914.378 ,79 ,97 ,98 ,106 ,110 ,114 ,123
     Audit with feedback57.997 ,106 ,108 ,119
     Sociologic strategy
     Peer or lay health workers1015.978 ,79 ,80 ,82 ,83 ,84 ,87 ,88 ,100 ,122
     Culturally sensitive videotape34.880 ,81 ,89
    Outcome measurement
     Self-report1532.678–84 ,87,88 ,97 ,99 ,100 ,102 ,112 ,113
     Chart audit2350.089 ,90 ,92–96 ,98 ,101 ,105–110 ,114 ,115 ,118 ,120–124
     Claims or electronic record1021.783 ,85 ,86 ,103 ,104 ,111 ,116–119
    Patient age-group
     <40 years1430.482 ,84–89 ,93 ,100 ,106 ,111 ,113 ,117 ,121
     40–49 years2350.078 ,80 ,82–84 ,86–89 ,93 ,97 ,100 ,102 ,103 ,106 ,108 ,109 ,111–113 ,116 ,117 ,124
     50–59 years2860.978 ,80 ,82–84 ,87–89 ,92 ,93 ,95–100 ,103 ,104 ,106–109 ,112 ,113 ,115–117 ,124
     60+ years1941.379 ,80 ,84 ,87 ,89 ,93–95 ,97 ,98 ,100 ,103 ,104–106 ,112 ,113 ,117 ,120
     Not stated919.681 ,90 ,101 ,110 ,114 ,118 ,119 ,122 ,123
    Patient race
     >20% African American1941.379 ,85 ,87 ,89 ,92 ,98 ,99 ,101 ,104–108 ,111 ,113 ,115 ,120 ,122 ,124
     >20% Hispanic, Latina613.080 ,84 ,89 ,96 ,98 ,106
     >20% Asian, Pacific Islander36.581 ,82 ,100
     >20% Native American24.388 ,117
     >20% White1226.178 ,83 ,98 ,102 ,103 ,108 ,109 ,111 ,113 ,115 ,120 ,124
     Not stated1430.486 ,90 ,93–95 ,97 ,110 ,112 ,114 ,116 ,118 ,119 ,121 ,123
    Percentage with health insurance
     <50%48.780 ,84 ,88 ,89
     50–74%48.781 ,98 ,111 ,113
     75%+1634.878 ,82 ,83 ,85 ,86 ,92 ,94 ,99 ,101 ,103 ,105 ,106 ,108 ,109 ,112 ,116
     Not stated2247.879 ,87 ,90 ,93 ,95–97 ,100 ,102 ,104 ,107 ,110 ,114 ,115 ,117–124
    Previous Papanicolaou smear use
     0–24%36.578 ,103 ,121
     25–49%1021.782–85 ,88 ,90 ,98 ,102 ,111 ,117
     50–74%613.079 ,81 ,87 ,92 ,106 ,114
     75%+12.278
     Not stated2963.080 ,83 ,86 ,89 ,93–97 ,99–101 ,103 ,104 ,105 ,107–110 ,112 ,113 ,115 ,116 ,118–120 ,122–124
    Time for assessment
     <3 months12.290
     3–6 months1226.184 ,89 ,94–96 ,99 ,102 ,104 ,114–116 ,121
     6–12 months1328.386 ,93 ,103 ,105 ,108 ,111 ,117 ,119 ,120 ,122 ,124
     12+ months2043.478–83 ,85 ,87 ,88 ,92 ,97 ,98 ,100 ,101 ,106 ,107 ,110 ,113 ,118 ,123
     Not stated12.2112
    • * May add to more than 100%, because many interventions used multiple components.

    • View popup
    Table 2.

    Patient-Targeted Interventions to Increase Papanicolaou Smear Use.

    InterventionAuthor, YearIntervention ContentSample Size (No.)Number (%) ScreenedEffect Size95% CI
    InterventionControlInterventionControl
    Behavioral, usual-care controlsDickey & Petiti, 199296 *Health diary reminder14273111 (78.2)39 (53.4)24.411.1, 37.7
    Behavioral, active controlsOrnstein et al, 1991111Letter reminder1,054843394 (37.4)388 (46.0)−8.6−13.1, −4.1
    Lantz et al, 1995103Letter, telephone reminders23623845 (19.1)14 (5.9)13.27.4, 19.0
    Somkin et al, 1997116Letter reminder1,1881,188230 (19.4)108 (9.1)10.47.6, 13.2
    Binstock et al, 199786Phone reminder1,5261,526536 (35.1)249 (16.3)18.815.8, 21.8
    Binstock et al, 199786Letter reminder1,5261,526403 (26.4)249 (16.3)10.17.2, 13.0
    Cognitive theory-based, active controls, static deliveryKreuter & Strecher, 1996102Educational letter483230 (62.5)21 (65.6)−3.0−24.4, 18.4
    Kreuter & Strecher, 1996102Educational letter463224 (52.2)21 (65.6)−14.0−35.9, 7.9
    Rimer et al, 1999113Educational letter206206107 (52.0)115 (56.0)−4.0−13.6, 5.6
    Cognitive theory-based, active controls, interactiveRimer et al, 1999113Telephone counseling206206132 (64.0)115 (56.0)8.0−1.4, 17.4
    Behavioral and cognitive (generic)Clementz et al, 199094Letter reminder, educational pamphlet1027621 (20.6)23 (30.3)−9.7−22.7, 3.3
    Reding et al, 1997112Letter reminder, telephone education23324045 (19.2)14 (5.8)13.57.6, 19.4
    Burack et al, 199885Letter reminder, educational pamphlet964964280 (29.0)270 (28.0)1.0−3.0, 5.0
    SociologicYancey et al, 199589Culturally sensitive video868876168 (19.4)120 (13.7)5.72.2, 9.2
    Suarez et al, 199780Lay health worker, culturally sensitive videoPre: 450Pre: 473Pre: 205 (45.6)Pre: 237 (50.1)−0.7−9.8, 8.4
    Post: 450Post: 473Post: 231 (51.3)Post: 268 (56.7)
    Sung et al, 199787Lay health worker16315896 (58.7)98 (62.1)−3.4−14.1, 7.3
    Margolis et al, 199883Lay health worker501466352 (70.3)293 (62.9)7.41.5, 13.3
    Navarro et al, 199884Lay health worker199162130 (65.3)99 (61.1)4.2−5.8, 14.2
    Gotay et al, 2000100Lay health workerPre: 318Pre: 360Pre: 188 (59.0)Pre: 277 (63.0)7.0−3.3, 17.3
    Post: 318Post: 360Post: 213 (67.0)Post: 232 (64.0)
    Sociologic and cognitive, usual-care controlsDignan et al, 199688Lay health worker385430282 (73.2)275 (64.0)9.22.9, 15.5
    Allen et al, 200178Lay health worker, mass media, workshop1,3741,2881,116 (81.2)1,011 (78.5)2.7−0.3, 5.7
    Sociologic, behavioral, and cognitive, usual-care controlsWhitman et al, 1994122Lay health worker, financial incentives, workshopPre: 284Pre: 189Pre: 34 (12.0)Pre: 74 (39.0)36.025.1, 46.9
    Post: 283Post: 175Post: 74 (26.0)Post: 30 (17.0)
    Bird et al, 199882Lay health worker, financial incentives, educational pamphletPre: 306Pre: 339Pre: 141 (46.1)Pre: 136 (40.1)18.07.6, 28.4
    Post: 346Post: 372Post: 228 (65.9)Post: 156 (41.9)
    Jenkins et al, 199981Educational pamphlet, mass media, culturally sensitive videoPre: 451Pre: 482Pre: 245 (54.4)Pre: 210 (43.6)−0.1−9.9, 8.3
    Post: 454Post: 422Post: 217 (47.7)Post: 156 (37.0)
    • CI = confidence interval.

    • * Based on the Papanicolaou smear being recommended or completed.

    • View popup
    Table 3.

    Provider-Targeted Interventions to Increase Papanicolaou Smear Use.

    InterventionAuthor, YearContent InterventionSample SizeNumber (%) ScreenedEffect Size95% CI
    InterventionControlInterventionControl
    Behavioral, usual-care controlMcDonald et al, 1984107 *Computerized reminderNANA(38.0)(23.0)15.0NA
    Tierney et al, 1986119Computerized reminder409409106 (26.0)115 (28.0)−2.0−8.1, 4.1
    Cheney & Ramsdell, 198793Flow sheet w/completion13213275 (57.0)†99 (75.0)†−18.0−29.2, −6.8
    Becker et al, 1989124Chart reminder1461239 (6.2)7 (5.7)0.5−5.2, 6.1
    Cowan et al, 199295 *Chart reminder32234 (12.5)1 (4.3)8.2−5.9, 22.3
    Dietrich et al, 199297 *Flow sheet w/completionNANA(71.0)(61.0)10.0NA
    Cardozo et al, 199892Flow sheet w/completionPre: 82Pre: 94Pre: 35 (43.0)Pre: 92 (98.0)44.028.2, 59.8
    Post: 74Post: 82Post: 58 (79.0)Post: 74 (90.0)
    Schreiner et al, 1988115 *Chart reminderNANAPre: (25.0)Pre: (28.0)6.0NA
    Post: (34.0)Post: (31.0)
    Behavioral, active controlGonzalez et al, 198990 *Flow sheet w/completionPre: 52Pre: 47Pre: 21 (40.0)Pre: 14 (30.0)23.0−3.4, 49.4
    Post: 52Post: 47Post: 34 (65.0)Post: 15 (32.0)
    McPhee et al, 1989108 ‡Computerized reminder432432245 (56.7)†199 (46.0)†10.74.1, 17.3
    Turner et al, 1989121Computerized reminder424214 (33.1)12 (27.5)5.6−14.0, 25.2
    Turner et al, 1990120 *Patient carried prompt9415128 (29.8)30 (19.9)10.0−1.2, 21.2
    Ornstein et al, 1991111Computerized reminder1,111843487 (43.8)388 (46.0)−2.2−6.7, 3.3
    Litzelman et al, 1993104Flow sheet w/completion1,4601,459307 (21.0)263 (18.0)3.00.1, 5.9
    Tape & Campbell, 1993118 *Computerized reminder462443114 (24.7)106 (23.9)0.8−4.8, 6.4
    Binstock et al, 199786Memo reminder1,5261,526389 (25.5)249 (16.3)9.26.3, 12.1
    Binstock et al, 199786Computerized reminder1,5261,526365 (23.9)249 (16.3)7.64.8, 10.4
    Burack et al, 199885Computerized reminder960964278 (29.0)270 (28.0)1.0−3.0, 5.0
    Hillman et al, 1998101 *Financial incentivesNANA(42.7)(33.1)9.6NA
    Cognitive, usual-care controlsTierney et al, 1986119Audit with feedback409409131 (32.0)115 (28.0)4.0−2.3, 10.3
    McPhee et al, 1989108 ‡Audit with feedback432432233 (54.0)†199 (46.0)†8.01.4, 14.6
    Dietrich et al, 199297 *Workshop, audit with feedbackNANA(63.0)(61.0)2.0NA
    Behavioral and cognitive, usual-care controlsTierney et al, 1986119Audit with feedback, computerized reminder40940990 (22.0)115 (28.0)−6.0−11.9, −0.1
    Robie, 1988114Workshop, chart reminderPre: 13Pre: 28Pre: 4 (31.0)Pre: 6 (21.0)18.0−21.3, 57.3
    Post: 20Post: 32Post: 10 (50.0)Post: 7 (22.0)
    Dietrich et al, 199297 *Workshop, audit with feedback, flow sheet w/completionNANA(65.0)(61.0)4.0NA
    • NA = not available.

    • * Based on the Papanicolaou smear being recommended or completed.

    • † Represents compliance scores.

    • ‡ Three-year rates of Papanicolaou smear use converted to annual rates.

    • View popup
    Table 4.

    Patient- and Provider-Targeted Interventions to Increase Papanicolaou Smear Use.

    InterventionAuthor, YearIntervention ContentSample SizeNumber (%) ScreenedEffect Size95% CI
    InterventionControlInterventionControl
    Behavioral, usual-care controlBecker et al, 1989124Chart reminder, reminder letter11412314 (12.3)7 (5.7)6.6−0.7, 13.9
    McPhee et al, 1991109 *Computerized reminder, patient-carried prompt710710366 (51.6)†286 (40.3)†11.36.1, 16.5
    Behavioral, active controlsOrnstein et al, 1991111Computerized reminder, reminder letter1,006843402 (40.0)387 (46.0)−6.0−10.5, −1.5
    Somkin et al, 1997116Reminder letter, reminder with completion1,1881,188271 (22.8)108 (9.1)13.810.9, 16.7
    Behavioral and cognitive, usual-care controlsGemson et al, 199599 ‡Educational pamphlet, health diary, office reminderPre: 38Pre: 35Pre: NAPre: NA6.0NA
    Post: 71Post: 53Post: NAPost: NA
    Dietrich et al, 199898 ‡Chart reminder, educational workshop, patient-carried prompt1,059918585 (55.2)572 (62.2)−7.0−10.6, −3.4
    Melnikow et al, 2000110Computerized reminder, reminder with completion, educational workshop, office reminderPre: 295Pre: 310Pre: 136 (46.0)Pre: 205 (66.0)3.0−8.0, 14.0
    Post: 295Post: 310Post: 139 (47.0)Post: 198 (64.0)
    Behavioral and cognitive, active controlsTurner et al, 1989121Computerized reminder, educational pamphlet424217 (40.0)12 (27.5)12.5−7.5, 32.5
    Burack et al, 199885Letter reminder, educational pamphlet, computerized reminder960964307 (32.0)270 (28.0)4.0−0.1, 8.1
    Manfredi et al, 1998106Reminder with completion, audit with feedback, patient-carried prompt, educational workshop821647429 (52.3)269 (41.6)10.04.9, 15.1
    Behavioral, cognitive (generic), and sociologicWilliams et al, 1998123Reminder letter, educational pamphlet, computerized reminder, educational workshop725725159 (21.9)183 (25.2)−3.3−7.7, 1.1
    Behavioral, theory-based cognitive and sociologicPaskett et al, 199979Reminder letter, health diary, chart reminders, educational mass media, educational pamphlet, educational counseling, lay health worker, educational workshopPre: 125Pre: 123Pre: 91 (73.0)Pre: 82 (67.0)21.06.0, 36.0
    Post: 168Post: 134Post: 146 (87.0)Post: 80 (60.0)
    • NA = not available.

    • * Three-year rates of Papanicolaou smear use converted to annual rates of Papanicolaou smear use.

    • † Represents compliance scores.

    • ‡ Based on Papanicolaou being recommended or completed.

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of the American Board of Family Practice: 16 (3)
The Journal of the American Board of Family Practice
Vol. 16, Issue 3
1 May 2003
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
  • Tribute: In Appreciation of a Very Special Colleague
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Board of Family Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Effectiveness of Interventions to Increase Papanicolaou Smear Use
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Board of Family Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Board of Family Medicine web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
4 + 3 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Effectiveness of Interventions to Increase Papanicolaou Smear Use
K. Robin Yabroff, Patricia Mangan, Jeanne Mandelblatt
The Journal of the American Board of Family Practice May 2003, 16 (3) 188-203; DOI: 10.3122/jabfm.16.3.188

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Effectiveness of Interventions to Increase Papanicolaou Smear Use
K. Robin Yabroff, Patricia Mangan, Jeanne Mandelblatt
The Journal of the American Board of Family Practice May 2003, 16 (3) 188-203; DOI: 10.3122/jabfm.16.3.188
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Notes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Screening for Bipolar Disorder in Patients Treated for Depression in a Family Medicine Clinic
  • Screening for Dementia: Family Caregiver Questionnaires Reliably Predict Dementia
  • Help-Seeking for Insomnia among Adult Patients in Primary Care
Show more Original Articles

Similar Articles

Navigate

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues

Authors & Reviewers

  • Info For Authors
  • Info For Reviewers
  • Submit A Manuscript/Review

Other Services

  • Get Email Alerts
  • Classifieds
  • Reprints and Permissions

Other Resources

  • Forms
  • Contact Us
  • ABFM News

© 2025 American Board of Family Medicine

Powered by HighWire