Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • ARTICLES
    • Current Issue
    • Ahead of Print
    • Archives
    • Abstracts In Press
    • Special Issue Archive
    • Subject Collections
  • INFO FOR
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Call For Papers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • SUBMIT
    • Manuscript
    • Peer Review
  • ABOUT
    • The JABFM
    • The Editing Fellowship
    • Editorial Board
    • Indexing
    • Editors' Blog
  • CLASSIFIEDS
  • Other Publications
    • abfm

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
American Board of Family Medicine
  • Other Publications
    • abfm
American Board of Family Medicine

American Board of Family Medicine

Advanced Search

  • HOME
  • ARTICLES
    • Current Issue
    • Ahead of Print
    • Archives
    • Abstracts In Press
    • Special Issue Archive
    • Subject Collections
  • INFO FOR
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Call For Papers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • SUBMIT
    • Manuscript
    • Peer Review
  • ABOUT
    • The JABFM
    • The Editing Fellowship
    • Editorial Board
    • Indexing
    • Editors' Blog
  • CLASSIFIEDS
  • JABFM on Bluesky
  • JABFM On Facebook
  • JABFM On Twitter
  • JABFM On YouTube
Review ArticleClinical Review

Breast Cancer Screening in Older Women: The Importance of Shared Decision Making

Sarina Schrager, Viktoriya Ovsepyan and Elizabeth Burnside
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine May 2020, 33 (3) 473-480; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3122/jabfm.2020.03.190380
Sarina Schrager
From the University of Wisconsin Department of Family Medicine and Community Health, Madison (SS); the University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison (VO); and the University of Wisconsin Department of Radiology, Madison (EB).
MD, MS
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Viktoriya Ovsepyan
From the University of Wisconsin Department of Family Medicine and Community Health, Madison (SS); the University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison (VO); and the University of Wisconsin Department of Radiology, Madison (EB).
BA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Elizabeth Burnside
From the University of Wisconsin Department of Family Medicine and Community Health, Madison (SS); the University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison (VO); and the University of Wisconsin Department of Radiology, Madison (EB).
MD, MS, MPH
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Incidence of breast cancer increases with age up until age 80. Screening mammography has demonstrated efficacy in decreasing mortality from breast cancer among women between 50 and 74 years of age. However, most major organizations do not include women over 74 in their recommendations due to the lack of evidence in this age-group. This article will review current recommendations for breast cancer screening in women over the age of 74. It will also present clear guidelines for primary care clinicians to follow that incorporate shared decision-making techniques, tools for estimating the risks and benefits of screening mammography, and strategies for integrating a patient's life expectancy and comorbidities into the decision-making process. We also emphasize the importance of using thoughtful communication strategies to fully engage older women in the breast cancer screening discussion.

  • Breast Cancer
  • Communication
  • Early Detection of Cancer
  • Incidence
  • Mammography
  • Primary Health Care
  • Risk Assessment
  • Shared Decision Making

Case

Ms. Brown is a 76-year-old woman with well-controlled hypertension but no other medical problems. She comes in for a physical. You bring up breast cancer screening and discuss the mixed recommendations for continuing screening mammography in women over 74. What should you tell her?

Background

Age is the major risk factor for breast cancer. Breast cancer accounts for 30% of all new cancer diagnoses in women.1 Breast cancer deaths have declined significantly in the United States due to improvements in early detection and treatment efficacy, but breast cancer still accounts for 30% of all new cancer diagnoses in women.1 Approximately 41% of all incident breast cancers and 57% of all breast cancer deaths occur among women aged 65 years and older.2 Furthermore, women ≥ 65 who develop breast cancers have higher death rates and poorer outcomes.3⇓–5 The incidence of breast cancer continues to increase until age 80.6

Screening mammography has been shown to be effective in reducing breast cancer mortality in women aged 50 to 74 years.3 However, because none of the randomized trials of screening mammography included women over the age of 74, and very few trials included women over the age of 70, screening recommendations for older women are lacking and remain controversial. The decision to continue screening in women over the age of 74 should be individualized, taking into account potential benefits and harms of screening in the context of a woman's overall health, life expectancy, and values. This article aims to provide a guide for primary care clinicians who take care of women over the age of 74.

Screening Guidelines for Women over 74

Most guidelines suggest that breast cancer screening should continue until the age of 74, but beyond that age, professional organizations differ in their recommendations (Table 1). The American Cancer Society advises physicians to continue screening patients as long as they are in “good overall health” and have a life expectancy of 10 year or longer,7 whereas the American College of Physicians recommends screening stop at age 74.8 The United States Preventive Services Task Force offers no recommendation, due to insufficient evidence.9

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 1.

Summary of Screening Mammography Recommendations in Older Women at Average Risk

Benefits and Harms

Although randomized trials did not include women over the age of 74, observational studies have shown a reduction in breast cancer mortality associated with mammographic detection of breast cancer in women 75 years and older.10 Modeling studies have also shown that continuing biennial screening to age 79 years (vs 69 years) reduces breast cancer mortality by 6% to 10%.11 When biennial screening mammography is continued into a woman's 70s (rather than until age 69), 2 fewer women per 1000 die from breast cancer after 10 years.12 The specificity and sensitivity of mammography improves with older age. Mammography in women older than 80 years has a sensitivity of 86% and specificity of 94% (vs sensitivity = 73% and specificity = 92% in 50-year-old women).13 As women age, the proportion of invasive ductal cancer versus ductal carcinoma in situ cases rises, while the proportion of cases with positive nodes decreases.14 Elderly women who forgo screening are more likely to present with highest stage cancers4,15,16 and show reduced survival.4,18⇓–20 Therefore, the most obvious benefit of continuing screening in older women is finding breast cancer at a point when potentially harmful treatment can be minimized, life expectancy maintained, and morbidity avoided.

The potential harms of breast cancer screening in older women include false positive results and overdiagnosis. Among women 75 years and older, 200 out of 1000 who are screened over 10 years will experience a false alarm,10 which can cause pain, anxiety, and distress.21,22 False positive mammogram results decrease with age.12 Overdiagnosis, a phenomenon in which a cancer detected by screening would not have gone on to cause symptoms or death, is a harm of screening that increases with age.10,23,24

Follow-up procedures such as additional mammograms, ultrasounds, and breast biopsies may be more painful and frightening for older women who have cognitive impairment (dementia) and other comorbidities (arthritis, hemiparesis).22,25,26 Further, treatments for breast cancer (surgery, chemotherapy, and radiation) may confer greater risks in older women and impact their quality of life without prolonging their life.

It is important to communicate the possible harms of breast cancer screening to patients, because many older adults tend to overestimate the benefits of screening and underestimate the harms.27,28

Taking into Account General Health, Comorbidity, and Life Expectancy

Several guidelines recommend screening women who have a life expectancy of at least 10 years and good overall health (Table 1). Based on 2008 US Life Tables, approximately 50% of 80-year-old women and 25% of 85-year-old women will live at least 10 years (Figure 1).10,29

Figure 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
Figure 1.

An algorithmic approach to breast cancer screening for women over the age of 74.

Studies show that breast cancer screening does not benefit older women with severe or multiple comorbidities, due to competing causes of mortality.4,16,20 Although women with a life expectancy of less than 10 years are unlikely to experience a mortality reduction from screening mammography,7,9,10,30 many women with serious comorbidities are still receiving routine screening mammograms.31,32 Among older women, breast cancer risk factors such as lifelong obesity, high bone density, and high breast density are also more predictive of late-life breast cancer than factors such as age at first birth or age at first menarche.10

An algorithm included in this article can help guide the decision-making process (Figure 2). Another resource that may be helpful for physicians is ePrognosis (https://eprognosis.ucsf.edu), a repository of geriatric prognostic indices. These indices incorporate age, comorbidities, and functional status to predict long-term mortality among older women and can be used to corroborate clinical judgment.33 For instance, a risk calculator on the ePrognosis website can be used to estimate a woman's probability of living for 10 years or longer by inputting information about the patient's age, BMI, past medical history, and ability to perform normal daily activities. If the 10-year mortality risk is calculated as <50%, the life expectancy is estimated to be greater than 10 years, and screening may be recommended to the patient. Another option on ePrognosis is an online breast cancer screening aid. This tool requires input of similar patient information as the risk calculator and then offers a screening recommendation on the final page. Information that a patient may find useful, such as supporting data about benefits and harms of screening, the risk of false positives, and mortality estimates, accompanies the recommendation.

Figure 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
Figure 2.

Life expectancy of women in the United States.10 This figure shows that age alone is a crude predictor of life expectancy because considerable variability in longevity exists among women in the United States.

Strategies for an Effective Discussion

Because the decision to continue breast cancer screening in older women should be most appropriately individualized, it is important to use a shared decision-making process with the patient. Data show that patients appreciate discussions of stopping screening most from a trusted clinician. Therefore, these conversations should take place between the primary care physician and the patient. It is logical to start discussing when to stop screening as a woman nears 74, which is when the recommendations change. That way, the clinician and patient can have a series of conversations about the topic of screening, how often to screen, and when or whether to stop screening at a certain age. Screening conversations can also include a partner or family member who can help delineate health priorities.

Key shared decision-making elements for the clinician are discussing both the risks and benefits of mammography and then assessing the patient's understanding of the information presented.34 Conveying numbers using absolute risk reduction, natural frequencies, and descriptive, everyday language (rather than technical jargon) will also improve the patient's comprehension.35 When discussing breast cancer screening, it is necessary to explore the patient's preferences as well. For instance, screening mammography should not be performed on women who would not choose further evaluation or treatment based on abnormal screening results. In addition, some patients may find little value in the slight mortality benefit that screening offers and may wish to avoid the potential harms of screening.

Health decision aids are a helpful tool for presenting information about screening mammography to women. They often include visual aids and present risk with absolute risk reductions instead of relative risk reductions, to maximize the patient's understanding. Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center offers 2 decision aids for older women, 1 xfor women aged 75 to 84 and another for women aged 85 or older.36⇓–38 The Center for Medical Psychology and Evidence-Based Decision-Making also offers a decision aid for women 70 years or older.39 These decision aids can be printed out, and they offer more detailed information than the online ePrognosis breast cancer screening aid. The University of Sydney tool is a 24-page interactive worksheet geared specifically for women over 70 that women can print out and work through (http://www.psych.usyd.edu.au/cemped/docs/Mammogram_DecisionAid.pdf).39

Case (Continued)

We go through the decision aid with Ms. Brown. She has well-controlled hypertension, does not smoke, and can walk 3 blocks with no assistance. She has not been admitted to the hospital in the last year. The decision aid assigns points to each question (ie, have you ever been diagnosed with cancer, can you walk 3 blocks), and the lower the score (the more negative answers), the more likely that the potential benefits of a mammogram will outweigh the potential harms. Based on her overall good health, it is likely that she would continue to benefit from screening if she decides to continue.

Additional aids can be found on the Ottawa Patient Decision Aids Inventory.40 A case study is included in this article that shows how to use the Beth Israel health decision aid for women aged 75 to 84,37 and elements of the three-talk shared decision-making model,41,42 to discuss breast cancer screening with older women (Box 1). The three-talk model is a method of ensuring that shared decision making is taking place. It makes sure that the clinician includes a statement about the choice that needs to be made (choice talk), the options to choose between (option talk), and then concludes with a decision that is adherent to the patient's values (decision talk).

BOX 1:

Case—using a health decision aid and the three-talk model to discuss breast cancer screening in older women

Jane Brown is a 76-year-old woman presenting for a physical. She has well-controlled hypertension, lives on her own, and maintains a physically active lifestyle. Jane has been getting biannual screening mammograms for many years and finds them reassuring because she has personally known women with breast cancer. At this appointment, Jane is wondering if she needs to schedule a screening mammogram.

1. Choice Talk

You let your patient know that she can continue with biannual screening, or stop screening altogether, and that you can work with her to reach a decision that would be best for her. To start, you tell her that it is unclear if screening mammograms benefit women over the age of 74, and you explain why. Then, you offer to discuss her overall health, life expectancy, and personal preferences together with her to decide whether to continue, or stop, biannual screening.

Example: Beyond age 74, it is unknown whether women benefit from routine screening mammograms. This controversy exists because trials of screening mammography did not include women over the age of 74. Some organizations say that women should stop screening when they are 74 years old, whereas others recommend screening to continue as long as the woman is in good overall health and has a life expectancy of more than years. To reach a decision, you and I need to discuss your overall health, review the risks and benefits of screening, and then decide together what the best option would be for you.

2. Option Talk

You discuss individual comorbidities and potential risks and benefits of continuing to do screening mammography.

Example: When we take into consideration your age, weight, lack of significant medical conditions, and the ease with which you are able to perform normal daily activities, we see that mammograms may help you live longer. Studies show that the potential benefit of screening mammograms (ie, reducing breast cancer mortality) occurs ∼5 to 10 years after mammography. Because you are likely to live longer than that, screening mammograms may benefit you. Was that clear? What questions do you have for me?

Example: When we look at your list of medical problems as well as your age, the potential harms of screening mammography may outweigh the benefits for you. Would you be willing to undergo surgery, and potentially other treatments if a mammogram were to diagnose a breast cancer? What questions do you have about whether to continue breast cancer screening?

Next, you use a patient decision aid to review the potential harms and benefits of screening mammography in older women. You explain to your patient the risks of false positives and overdiagnosis, as well as the potential mortality benefit, and show her the pictographs that convey this information in the decision aid. Briefly, you review the treatment options for breast cancer, so that each patient considers whether or not she would choose treatment, if cancer was found on her mammograms. Afterward, you assess your patient's understanding.

Example: The benefit of screening mammograms is catching a cancer while it is small, improving the chance that you will only need minor surgery. Studies suggest that, among women who get screening mammograms, 1 less woman out of a 1000 will die of breast cancer in the next 5 years.

There are several potential harms of screening mammograms as well. For instance, 100 women out of a 1000 will experience false positives in the next 5 years, as you can see in this graph. These false positives can cause pain, anxiety, and lead to additional tests. Overdiagnosis, which is finding a cancer that would not have harmed you in your lifetime, is another harm of screening, and the risk for overdiagnosis increases with age. If breast cancer is found, your treatment options are surgery, hormonal therapy, and radiation therapy. Each of these options has risks for side effects and complications, as briefly described in this decision aid.

To make sure that I explained everything clearly, can you tell me in your own words about the risks and benefits of screening?

3. Decision Talk

Now that you have discussed whether screening mammograms are likely to benefit Jane and reviewed the risks and benefits of screening with her, you ask your patient about her preferences for screening.

Example: Now that we've discussed screening in more detail, can you share your thoughts with me? Do the harms of screening concern you more, or do you think that the potential for finding a breast cancer early outweighs the risks of screening?

Last, you integrate your patient's preferences and values into the final decision and remind her that you can revisit this discussion in the future as well.

Example: To summarize, you understand the risks of continuing with breast cancer screening, but you would still like to get biannual mammograms. You've had close friends that passed away from breast cancer, and continuing with screening will give you some peace of mind. Is that correct?

I will order the mammogram for you. Please know that we can always talk about screening again at your next appointment.

Last, framing discussions in terms of the balance between potential benefits of screening and harms has been found to be more effective than simply citing national guideline recommendations.43⇓⇓–46 This balance is especially important when explaining that screening mammograms would not be beneficial for a person with multiple comorbidities and a life expectancy of less than 10 years. In women with a shorter life expectancy, it is important to emphasize that the patient is more likely to experience harms than benefits from breast cancer screening. Focusing on interventions that are likely to help the patient over a shorter time frame will likely provide more value. Additional strategies, videos, and practice phrases for communicating prognosis to patients can be found on the ePrognosis website.47 Literature suggests that patients prefer to hear recommendations about screening cessation in the context of their other health conditions, rather than being told that they should stop screening.45,46

Conclusion

Although guidelines are conflicting about whether to continue screening mammography in older women, clinicians can use shared decision making to help women make decisions about screening. Using these communication strategies and decision aids along with life expectancy calculators, clinicians can fully engage older women in the breast cancer screening process.

Notes

  • This article was externally peer reviewed.

  • Funding: There has been no extramural funding to support this work.

  • Conflict of interest: None.

  • To see this article online, please go to: http://jabfm.org/content/33/3/473.full.

  • Received for publication October 16, 2019.
  • Revision received December 17, 2019.
  • Accepted for publication December 18, 2019.

References

  1. 1.↵
    1. Siegel RL,
    2. Miller KD,
    3. Jemal A
    . Cancer statistics. CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians 2018;68:7–30.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. 2.↵
    1. Howlader N,
    2. Noone AM,
    3. Krapcho M,
    4. et al.
    [Internet]. SEER cancer statistics review, 1975-2009, National Cancer Institute, based on November 2011 SEER data submission, posted to the SEER web site 2012. Bethesda, MD, National Cancer Institute. Available from: https://seer.cancer.gov/csr/1975_2009_pops09/.
  3. 3.↵
    1. Hillner BE,
    2. Penberthy L,
    3. Desch CE,
    4. McDonald MK,
    5. Smith TJ,
    6. Retchin SM
    . Variation in staging and treatment of local and regional breast cancer in the elderly. Breast Cancer Res Tr 1996;40:75–86.
    OpenUrl
  4. 4.↵
    1. McCarthy EP,
    2. Burns RB,
    3. Freund KM,
    4. Ash AS,
    5. et al
    . Mammography use, breast cancer stage at diagnosis, and survival among older women. J Am Geriatr Soc 2000;48:1226–33.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  5. 5.↵
    1. Randolph WM,
    2. Goodwin JS,
    3. Mahnken JD,
    4. Freeman JL
    . Regular mammography use is associated with elimination of age-related disparities in size and stage of breast cancer at diagnosis. Ann Intern Med 2002;137:783–90.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. 6.↵
    1. Howlader N,
    2. Noone AM,
    3. Krapcho M,
    4. et al.
    [Internet]. SEER cancer statistics review, 1975-2012, based on November 2014 SEER data submission, posted to the SEER web site 2015. Bethesda, MD, National Cancer Institute. Available from: http://seer.cancer.gov/csr/1975_2012/.
  7. 7.↵
    1. Oeffinger KC,
    2. Fontham ETH,
    3. Etzioni R,
    4. et al
    . Breast cancer screening for women at average risk: 2015 guideline update from the American Cancer Society. JAMA 2015;314:1599–614.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  8. 8.↵
    1. Qaseem A,
    2. Lin JS,
    3. Mustafa RA,
    4. Horwitch CA,
    5. Wilt TJ
    . Screening for breast cancer in average-risk women: a guidance statement from the American College of Physicians. Ann Intern Med 2019;170:547–60.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  9. 9.↵
    1. Siu AL
    , US Preventive Services Task Force. Screening for breast cancer: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement. Ann Intern Med 2016;164:279–96.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  10. 10.↵
    1. Walter LC,
    2. Schonberg MA
    . Screening mammography in older women: a review. JAMA 2014;311:1336–47.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  11. 11.↵
    1. Mandelblatt JS,
    2. Cronin KA,
    3. Bailey S,
    4. et al
    . Effects of mammography screening under different screening schedules: model estimates of potential benefits and harms. Ann Intern Med 2009;151:738–47.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  12. 12.↵
    1. Barratt A,
    2. Howard K,
    3. Irwig I,
    4. Salkeld G,
    5. Houssami N
    . Model of outcomes of screening mammography: information to support informed choices. BMJ 2005;330:936.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  13. 13.↵
    1. Carney PA,
    2. Miglioretti DL,
    3. Yankaskas BC,
    4. et al
    . Individual and combined effects of age, breast density, and hormone replacement therapy use on the accuracy of screening mammography. Ann Intern Med 2003;138:168–75.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  14. 14.↵
    1. O'Meara ES,
    2. Braithwaite D,
    3. Onega T
    1. Henderson LM
    , for the Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium, O'Meara ES, Braithwaite D, Onega T. Performance of digital screening mammography among older women in the United States. Cancer 2015;121:1379–86.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  15. 15.↵
    1. Vyas A,
    2. Madhavan S,
    3. Sambamoorthi U
    . Association between persistence with mammography screening and stage at diagnosis among elderly women diagnosed with breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2014;148:645–54.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  16. 16.↵
    1. Badgwell BD,
    2. Giordano SH,
    3. Duan ZZ,
    4. et al
    . Mammography before diagnosis among women age 80 years and older with breast cancer. JCO 2008;26:2482–8.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  17. 17.
    American Academy of Family Physicians [Internet]. Breast cancer—clinical preventive service recommendation. American Academy of Family Physicians; 2016 [cited 2019 May 21]. Available from: https://www.aafp.org/patient-care/clinical-recommendations/all/breast-cancer.html
  18. 18.↵
    1. Vacek PM,
    2. Skelly JM
    . A prospective study of the use and effects of screening mammography in women aged 70 and older. J Am Geriatr Soc 2015;63:1–7.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  19. 19.↵
    1. Dijck JV,
    2. Verbeek AL,
    3. Beex LV,
    4. et al
    . Breast-cancer mortality in a non-randomized trial on mammographic screening in women over age 65. Int J Cancer 1997;70:164–8.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  20. 20.↵
    1. McPherson CP,
    2. Swenson KK,
    3. Lee MW
    . The effect of mammographic detection and comorbidity on the survival of older women with breast cancer. J Am Geriatr Soc 2002;50:1061–8.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  21. 21.↵
    1. Bond M,
    2. Pavey T,
    3. Welch K,
    4. et al
    . Systematic review of the psychological consequences of false- positive screening mammograms. Health Technol Assess 2013;17:1–170.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  22. 22.↵
    1. Walter LC,
    2. Eng C,
    3. Covinsky KE
    . Screening mammography for frail older women: what are the burdens? J Gen Intern Med 2001;16:779–84.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  23. 23.↵
    1. Welch HG,
    2. Black WC
    . Overdiagnosis in cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 2010;102:605–13.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  24. 24.↵
    1. Puliti D,
    2. Duffy SW,
    3. Miccinesi G,
    4. et al
    . Overdiagnosis in mammographic screening for breast cancer in Europe: a literature review. J Med Screen 2012;19:42–56.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  25. 25.↵
    1. Sox HC
    . Screening for disease in older people. J Gen Intern Med 1998;13:424–5.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  26. 26.↵
    1. Raik BL,
    2. Miller FG,
    3. Fins JJ
    . Screening and cognitive impairment: ethics of forgoing mammography in older women. J Am Geriatr Soc 2004;52:440–4.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  27. 27.↵
    1. Schwartz LM,
    2. Woloshin S,
    3. Fowler FJ Jr.,
    4. Welch HG
    . Enthusiasm for cancer screening in the United States. JAMA 2004;291:71–8.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  28. 28.↵
    1. Hoffman RM,
    2. Lewis CL,
    3. Pignone MP,
    4. et al
    . Decision-making processes for breast, colorectal, and prostate cancer screening: the DECISIONS survey. Med Decis Making 2010;30:53–64S.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  29. 29.↵
    1. Arias E
    . United States life tables 2008. National Vital Statistics Reports 2012;61:3.
    OpenUrl
  30. 30.↵
    National Comprehensive Cancer Network [Internet]. Breast cancer screening and diagnosis. Version 1. 2016. Available from: https://www.nccn.org/.
  31. 31.↵
    1. Sima CS,
    2. Panageas KS,
    3. Schrag D
    . Cancer screening among patients with advanced cancer. JAMA 2010;304:1584–91.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  32. 32.↵
    1. Tan A,
    2. Kuo YF,
    3. Goodwin JS
    . Potential overuse of screening mammography and its association with access to primary care. Med Care 2014;52:490–5.
    OpenUrl
  33. 33.↵
    1. Yourman LC,
    2. Lee SJ,
    3. Schonberg MA,
    4. Wildera EW,
    5. Smith AK
    . Prognostic indices for older adults: a systematic review. JAMA 2012;307:182–92. Prognostic indices available from: http://www.eprognosis.org.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  34. 34.↵
    1. Schrager SB,
    2. Phillips G,
    3. Burnside E
    . A simple approach to shared decision making in cancer screening. Fam Pract Manag 2017;24:5–10.
    OpenUrl
  35. 35.↵
    1. Schrager S
    . Five ways to communicate risks so that patients understand. Fam Pract Manag 2018;25:28–31.
    OpenUrl
  36. 36.↵
    1. Schonberg MA,
    2. Hamel MB,
    3. Davis RB,
    4. et al
    . Development and evaluation of a decision aid on mammography screening for women aged 75 and older. JAMA Intern Med 2014;174:417–24.
    OpenUrl
  37. 37.↵
    1. Schonberg M
    [Internet]. Should I continue having mammograms? For women age 75 to 84 Years. Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center; 2013. Available from: https://www.bidmc.org/-/media/files/beth-israel-org/research/research-by-department/medicine/general-medicine-research/research-faculty/decision-aid-758432019.pdf.
  38. 38.↵
    1. Schonberg M
    [Internet]. Should I continue having mammograms? For women age 85 or older. Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center; 2013. Available from: https://www.bidmc.org/-/media/files/beth-israel-org/research/research-by-department/medicine/general-medicine-research/research-faculty/decision-aid-8532019.pdf.
  39. 39.↵
    University of Sydney [Internet]. Should I continue having mammograms to screen for breast cancer? A decision aid for women aged 70 and older at their next screening mammogram. 2003. Available from: http://www.psych.usyd.edu.au/cemped/docs/Mammogram_DecisionAid.pdf.
  40. 40.↵
    The Ottawa Hospital Research Institute [Internet]. Patient decision aids. 2019. Available from: https://decisionaid.ohri.ca/AZsearch.php?criteria=breast+cancer+&search=Go.
  41. 41.↵
    1. Elwyn G,
    2. Frosch D,
    3. Thomson R,
    4. et al
    . Shared decision making: a model for clinical practice. J Gen Intern Med 2012;27:1361–7.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  42. 42.↵
    Schrager SL [Internet]. Breast cancer screening shared decision making toolkit. Madison: University of Wisconsin-Madison School of Medicine & Public Health; 2018. Available from: https://www.hipxchange.org/ScreeningMammo.
  43. 43.↵
    1. Schonberg MA,
    2. Ramanan RA,
    3. McCarthy EP,
    4. Marcantonia ER
    . Decision making and counseling around mammography screening for women aged 80 or older. J Gen Intern Med 2006;21:979–85.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  44. 44.↵
    1. Torke AM,
    2. Schwartz P,
    3. Holtz LR
    . Older adults and forgoing cancer screening: “I think it would be strange.” JAMA Intern Med 2013;173:526–31.
    OpenUrl
  45. 45.↵
    1. Schoenborn NL,
    2. Lee K,
    3. Pollack CE,
    4. et al
    . Older adults' views and communication preferences about cancer screening cessation. JAMA Intern Med 2017;177:1121–8.
    OpenUrl
  46. 46.↵
    1. Schoenborn NL,
    2. Boyd CM,
    3. Lee SJ,
    4. Cayea D,
    5. Pollack CE
    . Communicating about stopping cancer screening: comparing clinicians' and older adults perspectives. Gerontologist 2019;99:S67–76.
    OpenUrl
  47. 47.↵
    1. Lee S,
    2. Smith A,
    3. Widera E,
    4. Yourman L,
    5. Schonberg M,
    6. Ahalt C
    [Internet]. Prognosis communication. ePrognosis. 2020. Available from: https://eprognosis.ucsf.edu/communication/index.php.
  48. 48.
    Practice bulletin number 179: breast cancer risk assessment and screening in average-risk women. Obstet Gynecol 2017;130: 241–3.
    OpenUrl
  49. 49.
    1. Monticciolo DL,
    2. Newell MS,
    3. Hendrick ER,
    4. et al
    . Breast cancer screening for average-risk women: recommendations from the ACR Commission on Breast Imaging. J Am Coll Radiol 2017;14:1137–43.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  50. 50.
    Canadian Task Force on Preventive Health Care [Internet]. Breast cancer update. 2018 [cited 2019 May 21]. Available from: https://canadiantaskforce.ca/guidelines/published-guidelines/breast-cancer-update/.
  51. 51.
    National Health Service [Internet]. National Health Service breast screening programme overview. 2015 [cited 2019 May 27]. Available from: https://www.gov.uk/guidance/breast-screening-programme-overview.
  52. 52.
    Royal Australian College of General Practitioners. Guidelines for preventive activities in general practice. 9th ed. East Melbourne: Royal Australian College of General Practitioners; 2018.
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of the American Board of Family     Medicine: 33 (3)
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine
Vol. 33, Issue 3
May/June 2020
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Cover (PDF)
  • Index by author
  • Back Matter (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Board of Family Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Breast Cancer Screening in Older Women: The Importance of Shared Decision Making
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Board of Family Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Board of Family Medicine web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
1 + 1 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Breast Cancer Screening in Older Women: The Importance of Shared Decision Making
Sarina Schrager, Viktoriya Ovsepyan, Elizabeth Burnside
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine May 2020, 33 (3) 473-480; DOI: 10.3122/jabfm.2020.03.190380

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Breast Cancer Screening in Older Women: The Importance of Shared Decision Making
Sarina Schrager, Viktoriya Ovsepyan, Elizabeth Burnside
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine May 2020, 33 (3) 473-480; DOI: 10.3122/jabfm.2020.03.190380
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Case
    • Background
    • Screening Guidelines for Women over 74
    • Benefits and Harms
    • Taking into Account General Health, Comorbidity, and Life Expectancy
    • Strategies for an Effective Discussion
    • Case (Continued)
    • Conclusion
    • Notes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Well-Being, New Technologies, and Clinical Evidence for Family Physicians
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Interpretating Normal Values and Reference Ranges for Laboratory Tests
  • Non-Surgical Management of Urinary Incontinence
  • Screening and Diagnosis of Type 2 Diabetes in Sickle Cell Disease
Show more Clinical Review

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • Breast Cancer
  • Communication
  • Early Detection of Cancer
  • Incidence
  • Mammography
  • Primary Health Care
  • Risk Assessment
  • Shared Decision Making

Navigate

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues

Authors & Reviewers

  • Info For Authors
  • Info For Reviewers
  • Submit A Manuscript/Review

Other Services

  • Get Email Alerts
  • Classifieds
  • Reprints and Permissions

Other Resources

  • Forms
  • Contact Us
  • ABFM News

© 2025 American Board of Family Medicine

Powered by HighWire