Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • ARTICLES
    • Current Issue
    • Abstracts In Press
    • Archives
    • Special Issue Archive
    • Subject Collections
  • INFO FOR
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Call For Papers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • SUBMIT
    • Manuscript
    • Peer Review
  • ABOUT
    • The JABFM
    • The Editing Fellowship
    • Editorial Board
    • Indexing
    • Editors' Blog
  • CLASSIFIEDS
  • Other Publications
    • abfm

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
American Board of Family Medicine
  • Other Publications
    • abfm
American Board of Family Medicine

American Board of Family Medicine

Advanced Search

  • HOME
  • ARTICLES
    • Current Issue
    • Abstracts In Press
    • Archives
    • Special Issue Archive
    • Subject Collections
  • INFO FOR
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Call For Papers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • SUBMIT
    • Manuscript
    • Peer Review
  • ABOUT
    • The JABFM
    • The Editing Fellowship
    • Editorial Board
    • Indexing
    • Editors' Blog
  • CLASSIFIEDS
  • JABFM on Bluesky
  • JABFM On Facebook
  • JABFM On Twitter
  • JABFM On YouTube
Review ArticleClinical Review

Breast Cancer Screening in Older Women: The Importance of Shared Decision Making

Sarina Schrager, Viktoriya Ovsepyan and Elizabeth Burnside
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine May 2020, 33 (3) 473-480; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3122/jabfm.2020.03.190380
Sarina Schrager
From the University of Wisconsin Department of Family Medicine and Community Health, Madison (SS); the University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison (VO); and the University of Wisconsin Department of Radiology, Madison (EB).
MD, MS
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Viktoriya Ovsepyan
From the University of Wisconsin Department of Family Medicine and Community Health, Madison (SS); the University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison (VO); and the University of Wisconsin Department of Radiology, Madison (EB).
BA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Elizabeth Burnside
From the University of Wisconsin Department of Family Medicine and Community Health, Madison (SS); the University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison (VO); and the University of Wisconsin Department of Radiology, Madison (EB).
MD, MS, MPH
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Figure 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    Figure 1.

    An algorithmic approach to breast cancer screening for women over the age of 74.

  • Figure 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    Figure 2.

    Life expectancy of women in the United States.10 This figure shows that age alone is a crude predictor of life expectancy because considerable variability in longevity exists among women in the United States.

Tables

  • Figures
    • View popup
    Table 1.

    Summary of Screening Mammography Recommendations in Older Women at Average Risk

    Source (Year Issued)Should Women in Their 70s Get Mammograms?If Yes, How Frequently?
    Siu and US Preventive Services Task Force (2016)9Yes, until age 74.
    Beyond age 74: no recommendation due to insufficient evidence. If offered, patients should understand the uncertainty about the balance of benefits and harms.
    Every 2 years
    Oeffinger et al/American Cancer Society (2015)7Yes.
    Continue screening as long as a patient has good overall health and a life expectancy of 10 years or longer.
    1 to 2 years
    Qaseem et al/American College of Physicians (2019)8Yes, until age 74.
    Beyond age 74: screening not recommended. Patients aged 75 years or older, or of any age if they have serious health conditions, are unlikely to benefit yet still experience harms from screening and treatment.
    Every 2 years
    American Academy of Family Physicians (2016)17Yes, until age 74.
    Beyond age 74: no recommendation due to insufficient evidence. If offered, patients should understand the uncertainty about the balance of benefits and harms.
    Every 2 years
    American College of Obstetricians & Gynecologists (2017)48Yes, until age 75.
    Beyond age 75: decision to stop screening should be based on a shared decision-making process that includes a discussion of the patient's health status and longevity.
    1 to 2 years
    Moticciolo et al/American College of Radiology (2017)49Yes
    The age to stop screening should be based on each patient's health status rather than an age-based determination. Screening recommendations should be tailored to individual circumstances such as life expectancy, comorbidities, and the intention to seek (and ability to tolerate) treatment if a cancer is detected.
    Every year
    Canadian Task Force on Preventive Health Care (2018)50Yes, until age 74.
    Beyond age 74: no recommendation due to insufficient evidence.
    2 to 3 years
    National Health Service, United Kingdom (2015)51Yes, until age 73.
    Beyond age 73: no recommendation, but patients remain eligible for screening.
    Every 3 years
    Royal Australian College of General Practitioners (2018)52Yes, until age 74.
    Beyond age 74: no recommendation due to insufficient evidence from randomized trials. However, observational studies favor extending screening to patients with a life expectancy of at least 10 years.
    Every 2 years
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of the American Board of Family     Medicine: 33 (3)
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine
Vol. 33, Issue 3
May/June 2020
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Cover (PDF)
  • Index by author
  • Back Matter (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Board of Family Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Breast Cancer Screening in Older Women: The Importance of Shared Decision Making
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Board of Family Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Board of Family Medicine web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
4 + 14 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Breast Cancer Screening in Older Women: The Importance of Shared Decision Making
Sarina Schrager, Viktoriya Ovsepyan, Elizabeth Burnside
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine May 2020, 33 (3) 473-480; DOI: 10.3122/jabfm.2020.03.190380

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Breast Cancer Screening in Older Women: The Importance of Shared Decision Making
Sarina Schrager, Viktoriya Ovsepyan, Elizabeth Burnside
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine May 2020, 33 (3) 473-480; DOI: 10.3122/jabfm.2020.03.190380
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Case
    • Background
    • Screening Guidelines for Women over 74
    • Benefits and Harms
    • Taking into Account General Health, Comorbidity, and Life Expectancy
    • Strategies for an Effective Discussion
    • Case (Continued)
    • Conclusion
    • Notes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Well-Being, New Technologies, and Clinical Evidence for Family Physicians
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Interpretating Normal Values and Reference Ranges for Laboratory Tests
  • Non-Surgical Management of Urinary Incontinence
  • Screening and Diagnosis of Type 2 Diabetes in Sickle Cell Disease
Show more Clinical Review

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • Breast Cancer
  • Communication
  • Early Detection of Cancer
  • Incidence
  • Mammography
  • Primary Health Care
  • Risk Assessment
  • Shared Decision Making

Navigate

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues

Authors & Reviewers

  • Info For Authors
  • Info For Reviewers
  • Submit A Manuscript/Review

Other Services

  • Get Email Alerts
  • Classifieds
  • Reprints and Permissions

Other Resources

  • Forms
  • Contact Us
  • ABFM News

© 2025 American Board of Family Medicine

Powered by HighWire