Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • ARTICLES
    • Current Issue
    • Abstracts In Press
    • Archives
    • Special Issue Archive
    • Subject Collections
  • INFO FOR
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Call For Papers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • SUBMIT
    • Manuscript
    • Peer Review
  • ABOUT
    • The JABFM
    • The Editing Fellowship
    • Editorial Board
    • Indexing
    • Editors' Blog
  • CLASSIFIEDS
  • Other Publications
    • abfm

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
American Board of Family Medicine
  • Other Publications
    • abfm
American Board of Family Medicine

American Board of Family Medicine

Advanced Search

  • HOME
  • ARTICLES
    • Current Issue
    • Abstracts In Press
    • Archives
    • Special Issue Archive
    • Subject Collections
  • INFO FOR
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Call For Papers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • SUBMIT
    • Manuscript
    • Peer Review
  • ABOUT
    • The JABFM
    • The Editing Fellowship
    • Editorial Board
    • Indexing
    • Editors' Blog
  • CLASSIFIEDS
  • JABFM on Bluesky
  • JABFM On Facebook
  • JABFM On Twitter
  • JABFM On YouTube
Research ArticleOriginal Research

Impact of an Online Group-Coaching Program on Ambulatory Faculty Physician Well-Being: A Randomized Trial

Tyra Fainstad, Carlos Rodriguez, Carlee Kreisel, Jennifer Caragol, Pari Shah Thibodeau, Marisa Kostiuk and Adrienne Mann
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine December 2024, jabfm.2024.240022R1; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3122/jabfm.2024.240022R1
Tyra Fainstad
From the University of Colorado, School of Medicine, Aurora, CO (TF, CR, CK, JC, PST, MK, AM); Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz, Medical Campus, Aurora, CO (TF); Department of Family Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO (CR, CK, JC, MK); Department of Psychiatry, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO (PST); Division of Hospital Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical, Campus, Aurora, CO (AM); Veterans’ Health Administration, Eastern CO Health Care System, Aurora, CO (AM).
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Carlos Rodriguez
From the University of Colorado, School of Medicine, Aurora, CO (TF, CR, CK, JC, PST, MK, AM); Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz, Medical Campus, Aurora, CO (TF); Department of Family Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO (CR, CK, JC, MK); Department of Psychiatry, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO (PST); Division of Hospital Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical, Campus, Aurora, CO (AM); Veterans’ Health Administration, Eastern CO Health Care System, Aurora, CO (AM).
PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Carlee Kreisel
From the University of Colorado, School of Medicine, Aurora, CO (TF, CR, CK, JC, PST, MK, AM); Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz, Medical Campus, Aurora, CO (TF); Department of Family Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO (CR, CK, JC, MK); Department of Psychiatry, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO (PST); Division of Hospital Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical, Campus, Aurora, CO (AM); Veterans’ Health Administration, Eastern CO Health Care System, Aurora, CO (AM).
MPH
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jennifer Caragol
From the University of Colorado, School of Medicine, Aurora, CO (TF, CR, CK, JC, PST, MK, AM); Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz, Medical Campus, Aurora, CO (TF); Department of Family Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO (CR, CK, JC, MK); Department of Psychiatry, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO (PST); Division of Hospital Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical, Campus, Aurora, CO (AM); Veterans’ Health Administration, Eastern CO Health Care System, Aurora, CO (AM).
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Pari Shah Thibodeau
From the University of Colorado, School of Medicine, Aurora, CO (TF, CR, CK, JC, PST, MK, AM); Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz, Medical Campus, Aurora, CO (TF); Department of Family Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO (CR, CK, JC, MK); Department of Psychiatry, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO (PST); Division of Hospital Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical, Campus, Aurora, CO (AM); Veterans’ Health Administration, Eastern CO Health Care System, Aurora, CO (AM).
PhD, MSW, LCSW
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Marisa Kostiuk
From the University of Colorado, School of Medicine, Aurora, CO (TF, CR, CK, JC, PST, MK, AM); Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz, Medical Campus, Aurora, CO (TF); Department of Family Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO (CR, CK, JC, MK); Department of Psychiatry, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO (PST); Division of Hospital Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical, Campus, Aurora, CO (AM); Veterans’ Health Administration, Eastern CO Health Care System, Aurora, CO (AM).
PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Adrienne Mann
From the University of Colorado, School of Medicine, Aurora, CO (TF, CR, CK, JC, PST, MK, AM); Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz, Medical Campus, Aurora, CO (TF); Department of Family Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO (CR, CK, JC, MK); Department of Psychiatry, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO (PST); Division of Hospital Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical, Campus, Aurora, CO (AM); Veterans’ Health Administration, Eastern CO Health Care System, Aurora, CO (AM).
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Figure 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    Figure 1.

    Study schema.

  • Figure 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    Figure 2.

    Mean change in distress scales from baseline visit, estimated from linear mixed effects models.

  • Figure 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    Figure 3.

    Mean change in well-being scales from baseline visit, estimated from linear mixed effects models.

Tables

  • Figures
    • View popup
    Table 1.

    Baseline Characteristics of All Enrolled Participants (ITT)

    Variable/OutcomeOverall N = 1601Waitlist N = 781Intervention N = 821P value2
    Age0.70
     Mean (SD)42.0 (8.4)42.1 (8.1)41.9 (8.7)
     Median (Range)40.0 (26.0 to 68.0)41.0 (31.0 to 65.0)40.0 (26.0 to 68.0)
    Years since training ended0.85
     Mean (SD)10.4 (8.2)10.4 (7.8)10.5 (8.6)
     Median (Range)8.0 (0.0 to 36.0)9.3 (0.0 to 30.0)8.0 (0.0 to 36.0)
    Department/Specialty0.89
     Family medicine65 (40.6%)32 (41.0%)33 (40.2%)
     Internal medicine54 (33.8%)28 (35.9%)26 (31.7%)
     OBGYN17 (10.6%)9 (11.5%)8 (9.8%)
     Pediatrics13 (8.1%)5 (6.4%)8 (9.8%)
     Physical medicine and rehab7 (4.4%)3 (3.8%)4 (4.9%)
     Other/Prefer not to answer4 (2.5%)1 (1.3%)3 (1.9%)
    Degree0.03
     MD or DO141 (88.1%)64 (82.1%)77 (93.9%)
     Other12 (7.5%)10 (12.8%)2 (2.4%)
     PhD4 (2.5%)3 (3.8%)1 (1.2%)
     PsyD3 (1.9%)1 (1.3%)2 (2.4%)
    Behavioral health clinician0.56
     No148 (92.5%)71 (91.0%)77 (94.0%)
     Yes12 (7.5%)5 (6.4%)7
    Gender identity0.24
     Cis female131 (81.9%)67 (85.9%)64 (78.0%)
     Cis male27 (16.9%)11 (14.1%)16 (19.5%)
     Other2 (1.3%)0 (0.0%)2 (2.4%)
    Race and ethnic identity0.56
     Asian6 (3.8%)4 (5.2%)2 (2.5%)
     Hispanic or Latinx4 (2.5%)1 (1.3%)3 (3.7%)
     Other13 (8.2%)5 (6.5%)8 (9.9%)
     Unanswered2 (1.3%)1 (0.6%)1 (0.6%)
     White135 (85.4%)67 (87.0%)68 (84.0%)
    Clinical Full Time Equivalents (FTE)0.2
     >76%63 (39.4%)33 (42.3%)30 (36.6%)
     51 to 75%41 (25.6%)15 (19.2%)26 (31.7%)
     26 to 50%38 (23.8%)22 (28.2%)16 (19.5%)
     0 to 25%18 (11.3%)8 (10.3%)10 (12.2%)
    Outcomes at Baseline
    Distress outcomes:
    Burnout
    MBI mmotional exhaustion scale0.7
     Mean (SD)30 (10)30 (11)30 (9)
     Median (IQR)31 (23, 37)32 (23, 38)31 (25, 37)
     Range6 to 526 to 527 to 49
    MBI personal accomplishment scale0.4
     Mean (SD)37.6 (5.9)38.1 (5.7)37.1 (6.1)
     Median (IQR)38.0 (34.0, 42.3)39.0 (34.0, 43.0)38.0 (33.5, 42.0)
     Range22 to 4824 to 4822.0 to 48.0
    MBI depersonalization scale0.6
     Mean (SD, range)9.4 (5.7)9.2 (6.0)9.5 (5.3)
     Median (IQR)9.0 (5.0, 13.0)8.0 (5.0, 13.0)9.5 (5.0, 12.8)
     Range0 to 240 to 240 to 22
    Met definition for positive burnout104 (66%)48 (63%)56 (68%)0.5
    Imposter syndrome
    Young imposter syndrome scale0.4
     Mean (SD)4.83 (2.30)4.66 (2.28)4.99 (2.32)
     Median (IQR)5.0 (3.0, 7.0)5.00 (3.0, 6.0)5.00 (3.0, 7.0)
     Range0 to 80 to 80 to 8
    Met definition for positive impostor syndrome89 (57%)42 (55%)47 (59%)0.6
    Moral injury
    Moral injury symptom scale0.2
     Mean (SD)39 (13)38 (12)41 (14)
     Median (IQR)38 (30, 49)37 (30, 45)39 (31, 51)
     Range11-7911-6615-79
    Loneliness
    UCLA Loneliness scale>0.9
     Mean (SD)4.91 (1.8)4.92 (1.8)4.89 (1.8)
     Median (IQR)5.00 (3.0, 6.0)5.00 (3.0, 6.0)5.00 (3.0, 6.0)
     Range3.0-9.03.0-9.03.0-9.0
    Well-being outcomes
    Self-compassion
    Self compassion scale score0.9
     Mean (SD)36 (7)36 (7)36 (8)
     Median (IQR)35 (31, 40)36 (31, 40)35 (31, 40)
     Range17-5722-5517-57
    Flourishing
    Secure flourishing index0.2
     Mean (SD)7.02 (1.1)7.13 (1.2)6.91 (1.1)
     Median (IQR)7.1 (6.3, 7.9)7.21 (6.5, 8.0)6.88 (6.2, 7.8)
     Range3.1-9.33.1-9.34.50-9.08
    • ↵1 n (%).

    • ↵2 Wilcoxon rank sum test; Fisher's exact test.

    • Abbreviations: SD, standard deviation; IQR, interquartile range.

    • View popup
    Table 2.

    Mean Change in Response from Baseline, Established from Linear Mixed-Effects Models

     Control Group No.Estimated Change, Points (S.E.) [95% CI]Intervention Group No.Estimated Change, Points (S.E.) [95% CI]Absolute Difference (S.E.) in Score Change, Intervention vs Control [95% CI]P value
    Distress outcomes
    Burnout
     Emotional exhaustion scorePre76−2.13 (1.02)82−3.35 (1.08)−1.22 (−4.16 to 1.72)0.41
    Post6253
     Depersonalization ScorePre77−0.33 (0.53)82−2.05 (0.57)−1.72 (−3.26 to −0.17)0.03
    Post6456
     Personal accomplishment scorePre77−0.35 (0.58)791.3 (0.61)1.65 (−0.02 to 3.32)0.05
    Post6356
    Moral injury
     Moral injury symptom scale scorePre77−1.76 (1.18)80−3.71 (1.24)−1.95 (−5.32 to 1.42)0.26
    Post6255
    Imposter syndrome
     Young imposter syndrome scale scorePre76−0.18 (0.22)79−1 (0.24)−0.82 (−1.47 to −0.18)0.01
    Post6253
    Loneliness
     UCLA Loneliness scale scorePre77−0.17 (0.16)81−0.18 (0.16)−0.01 (−0.45 to 0.44)0.98
    Post6355
    Well-being outcomes
    Self-compassion
     Self-compassion scorePre761.54 (1.1)792.48 (1.19)0.95 (−2.25 to 4.15)0.56
    Post6455
    Flourishing
     Secure flourishing indexPre740.04 (0.11)740.39 (0.12)0.35 (0.03 to 0.66)0.03
    Post6053
    Mean change in response from baseline, established from linear mixed-effects models
    Burnout
     Emotional exhaustion scorePre76−2.13 (1.02)82−3.35 (1.08)−1.22 (−4.16 to 1.72)0.41
    Post6253
     Depersonalization scorePre77−0.33 (0.53)82−2.05 (0.57)−1.72 (−3.26 to −0.17)0.03
    Post6456
     Personal accomplishment scorePre77−0.35 (0.58)791.3 (0.61)1.65 (−0.02 to 3.32)0.05
    Post6356
    Imposter syndrome
     Young imposter syndrome scale scorePre76−0.18 (0.22)79−1 (0.24)−0.82 (−1.47 to −0.18)0.01
    Post6253
    Post6355
    Flourishing
     Secure flourishing indexPre740.04 (0.11)740.39 (0.12)0.35 (0.03 to 0.66)0.03
    Post6053
    • Abbreviations: SE, standard error; CI, confidence interval.

  • Appendix 2: Follow Up Responders vs Non-Responders

    Completed
    VariableOverall, N = 1601Pre-Survey Only, N = 401Both Surveys, N = 1201p-value
    Age0.93
     Mean (SD)42.0 (8.4)41.9 (8.9)42.0 (8.3)
     Median (IQR)40.0 (35.0, 46.0)42.0 (34.0, 46.3)40.0 (36.0, 44.3)
     Range26.0-68.026.0-65.030.0-68.0
    Years since training0.87
     Mean (SD)10.4 (8.2)10.4 (7.7)10.4 (8.4)
     Median (IQR)8.0 (4.0, 14.3)8.5 (3.4, 15.5)8.0 (4.0, 14.0)
     Range0.0-36.01.0-30.00.0-36.0
    Behavioral health clinician0.18
     No148 (92.5%)35 (87.5%)113 (94.2%)
     Yes12 (7.5%)5 (12.5%)7 (5.8%)
    Specialty0.15
     Family medicine65 (40.6%)15 (37.5%)50 (41.7%)
     Internal medicine54 (33.8%)12 (30.0%)42 (35.0%)
     OBGYN17 (10.6%)8 (20.0%)9 (7.5%)
     Pediatrics13 (8.1%)2 (5.0%)11 (9.2%)
     Physical medicine and rehab7 (4.4%)2 (5.0%)5 (4.2%)
     Other/Prefer not to answer4 (2.5%)1 (2.5%)3 (2.5%)
    Degree0.03
     MD or DO141 (88.1%)34 (85.0%)107 (89.2%)
     Other12 (7.5%)3 (7.5%)9 (7.5%)
     PhD4 (2.5%)0 (0.0%)4 (3.3%)
     PsyD3 (1.9%)3 (7.5%)0 (0.0%)
     Prefer not to answer0 (0.0%)0 (0.0%)0 (0.0%)
    Gender identity0.70
     Cis female131 (81.9%)35 (87.5%)96 (80.0%)
     Cis male27 (16.9%)5 (12.5%)22 (18.3%)
     Other2 (1.3%)0 (0.0%)2 (1.7%)
    Race and ethnic identity0.86
     White135 (85.4%)33 (82.5%)102 (85.0%)
     Other13 (8.1%)4 (10.0%)9 (7.5%)
     Asian6 (3.8%)2 (5.0%)4 (3.3%)
     Hispanic or Latinx4 (2.5%)1 (2.5%)3 (2.5%)
     Unanswered2 (1.3%)1 (2.5%)1 (0.8%)
    Clinical FTE0.25
     >76%63 (39.4%)21 (52.5%)42 (35.0%)
     51-75%41 (25.6%)9 (22.5%)32 (26.7%)
     26-50%38 (23.8%)6 (15.0%)32 (26.7%)
     0-25%18 (11.3%)4/40 (10.0%)14 (11.7%)
    • Abbreviations: SD, standard deviation; IQR, Interquartile range; FTE, full-time equivalent.

Previous
Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of the American Board of Family     Medicine: 38 (1)
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine
Vol. 38, Issue 1
January-February 2025
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Cover (PDF)
  • Index by author
  • Back Matter (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Board of Family Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Impact of an Online Group-Coaching Program on Ambulatory Faculty Physician Well-Being: A Randomized Trial
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Board of Family Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Board of Family Medicine web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
1 + 9 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Impact of an Online Group-Coaching Program on Ambulatory Faculty Physician Well-Being: A Randomized Trial
Tyra Fainstad, Carlos Rodriguez, Carlee Kreisel, Jennifer Caragol, Pari Shah Thibodeau, Marisa Kostiuk, Adrienne Mann
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine Dec 2024, jabfm.2024.240022R1; DOI: 10.3122/jabfm.2024.240022R1

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Impact of an Online Group-Coaching Program on Ambulatory Faculty Physician Well-Being: A Randomized Trial
Tyra Fainstad, Carlos Rodriguez, Carlee Kreisel, Jennifer Caragol, Pari Shah Thibodeau, Marisa Kostiuk, Adrienne Mann
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine Dec 2024, jabfm.2024.240022R1; DOI: 10.3122/jabfm.2024.240022R1
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Introduction
    • Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Limitations
    • Conclusion
    • Acknowledgments
    • Appendix 1: Trial Protocol
    • Notes
    • References
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Improving Health Through Family Medicine: New Opportunities, Missed Opportunities
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Evaluating Pragmatism of Lung Cancer Screening Randomized Trials with the PRECIS-2 Tool
  • Regional Variation in Scope of Practice by Family Physicians
  • Successful Implementation of Integrated Behavioral Health
Show more Original Research

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • Burnout
  • Coaching
  • Physicians
  • Psychological Well-Being

Navigate

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues

Authors & Reviewers

  • Info For Authors
  • Info For Reviewers
  • Submit A Manuscript/Review

Other Services

  • Get Email Alerts
  • Classifieds
  • Reprints and Permissions

Other Resources

  • Forms
  • Contact Us
  • ABFM News

© 2025 American Board of Family Medicine

Powered by HighWire