Measuring Research Capacity: Development of the PACER Tool

References

1. 1.↵
   1. Kilmarx PH,
   2. Maitin T,
   3. Adam T,
   4. et al

   . Increasing effectiveness and equity in strengthening health research capacity using data and metrics: recent advances of the ESSENCE mechanism. Ann Glob Health 2023;89:38.

   OpenUrlPubMed
2. 2.↵
   1. Myers BA,
   2. Kahn KL

   . Practical publication metrics for academics. Clin Transl Sci 2021;14:1705–12.

   OpenUrlPubMed
3. 3.↵
   1. Cooke J,
   2. Nancarrow S,
   3. Dyas J,
   4. Williams M

   . An evaluation of the 'Designated Research Team' approach to building research capacity in primary care. BMC Fam Pract 2008;9:37.

   OpenUrlPubMed
4. 4.↵
   1. Ekeroma AJ,
   2. Shulruf B,
   3. McCowan L,
   4. Hill AG,
   5. Kenealy T

   . Development and use of a research productivity assessment tool for clinicians in low-resource settings in the Pacific Islands: a Delphi study. Health Res Policy Syst 2016;14:9.

   OpenUrlPubMed
5. 5.↵
   1. Frontera WR,
   2. Fuhrer MJ,
   3. Jette AM,
   4. et al

   . Rehabilitation medicine summit: building research capacity. J Spinal Cord Med 2006;29:70–81.

   OpenUrlPubMed
6. 6.↵
   1. Wootton R

   . A simple, generalizable method for measuring individual research productivity and its use in the long-term analysis of departmental performance, including between-country comparisons. Health Res Policy Syst 2013;11:2.

   OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
7. 7.↵
   1. Ewigman B,
   2. Davis A,
   3. Vansaghi T,
   4. et al

   . Building research & scholarship capacity in departments of family medicine: a new joint Adfm-Napcrg initiative. Ann Fam Med 2016;14:82–3.

   OpenUrlFREE Full Text
8. 8.↵
   1. Arksey H,
   2. O'Malley L

   . Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework. Int J Soc Res Methodol 2005;8:19–32.

   OpenUrlCrossRef
9. 9.↵
   1. Levac D,
   2. Colquhoun H,
   3. O'Brien KK

   . Scoping studies: advancing the methodology. Implement Sci 2010;5:69.

   OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
10. 10.↵
    1. Cooper S,
    2. Cant R,
    3. Kelly M,
    4. et al

    . An evidence-based checklist for improving scoping review quality. Clin Nurs Res 2021;30:230–40.

    OpenUrlPubMed
11. 11.↵
    1. Ouzzani M,
    2. Hammady H,
    3. Fedorowicz Z,
    4. Elmagarmid A

    . Rayyan-a web and mobile app for systematic reviews. Syst Rev 2016;5:210.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
12. 12.↵
    1. Tricco AC,
    2. Lillie E,
    3. Zarin W,
    4. et al

    . PRISMA extension for scoping reviews (PRISMA-ScR): checklist and explanation. Ann Intern Med 2018;169:467–73.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
13. 13.
    1. Sandstrom U,
    2. Sandstrom E

    . A metric for academic performance applied to Australian universities 2001-2004. Accessed Oct 2, 2023. Available at: http://eprints.rclis.org/10577/1/2metrics.pdf.
14. 14.
    1. Humphries D,
    2. Ma M,
    3. Collins N,
    4. et al

    . Assessing research activity and capacity of community-based organizations: refinement of the CREAT instrument using the Delphi method. J Urban Health 2019;96:912–22.

    OpenUrlPubMed
15. 15.
    1. Gill SD,
    2. Gwini SM,
    3. Otmar R,
    4. Lane SE,
    5. Quirk F,
    6. Fuscaldo G

    . Assessing research capacity in Victoria's south-west health service providers. Aust J Rural Health 2019;27:505–13.

    OpenUrlPubMed
16. 16.
    1. Holden L,
    2. Pager S,
    3. Golenko X,
    4. Ware RS

    . Validation of the research capacity and culture (RCC) tool: measuring RCC at individual, team and organisation levels. Aust J Prim Health 2012;18:62–7.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
17. 17.
    1. Lee SA,
    2. Byth K,
    3. Gifford JA,
    4. et al

    . Assessment of health research capacity in Western Sydney Local Health District (WSLHD): a study on medical, nursing and allied health professionals. J Multidiscip Healthc 2020;13:153–63.

    OpenUrlPubMed
18. 18.
    1. Rahman M,
    2. Fukui T

    . Biomedical research productivity: factors across the countries. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 2003;19:249–52.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
19. 19.
    1. Huang JS

    . Building research collaboration networks - an interpersonal perspective for research capacity building. J Res Adm 2014;45:89–112.

    OpenUrl
20. 20.
    1. Rubio DM

    . Common metrics to assess the efficiency of clinical research. Eval Health Prof 2013;36:432–46.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
21. 21.
    1. Sarre G,
    2. Cooke J

    . Developing indicators for measuring research capacity development in primary care organizations: a consensus approach using a nominal group technique. Health Soc Care Community 2009;17:244–53.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
22. 22.↵
    1. Cooke J

    . A framework to evaluate research capacity building in health care. BMC Fam Pract 2005;6:44.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
23. 23.
    1. Bates I,
    2. Akoto AY,
    3. Ansong D,
    4. et al

    . Evaluating health research capacity building: an evidence-based tool. PLoS Med 2006;3:e299.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
24. 24.
    1. Matus J,
    2. Wenke R,
    3. Hughes I,
    4. Mickan S

    . Evaluation of the research capacity and culture of allied health professionals in a large regional public health service. J Multidiscip Healthc 2019;12:83–96.

    OpenUrlPubMed
25. 25.↵
    1. Patel VM,
    2. Ashrafian H,
    3. Ahmed K,
    4. et al

    . How has healthcare research performance been assessed?: a systematic review. J R Soc Med 2011;104:251–61.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
26. 26.
    1. Cole DC,
    2. Boyd A,
    3. Aslanyan G,
    4. Bates I

    . Indicators for tracking programmes to strengthen health research capacity in lower- and middle-income countries: a qualitative synthesis. Health Res Policy Syst 2014;12:17.

    OpenUrlPubMed
27. 27.
    1. Bilardi D,
    2. Rapa E,
    3. Bernays S,
    4. Lang T

    . Measuring research capacity development in healthcare workers: a systematic review. BMJ Open 2021;11:e046796.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
28. 28.
    1. Kotsemir M,
    2. Shashnov S

    . Measuring, analysis and visualization of research capacity of university at the level of departments and staff members. Scientometrics 2017;112:1659–89.

    OpenUrl
29. 29.↵
    1. Kreiman G,
    2. Maunsell JH

    . Nine criteria for a measure of scientific output. Front Comput Neurosci 2011;5:48.

    OpenUrlPubMed
30. 30.
    1. Matus J,
    2. Walker A,
    3. Mickan S

    . Research capacity building frameworks for allied health professionals - a systematic review. BMC Health Serv Res 2018;18:716.

    OpenUrlPubMed
31. 31.↵
    1. Boulkedid R,
    2. Abdoul H,
    3. Loustau M,
    4. Sibony O,
    5. Alberti C

    . Using and reporting the Delphi method for selecting healthcare quality indicators: a systematic review. PLoS One 2011;6:e20476.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
32. 32.↵
    1. Godin B

    . On the origins of bibliometrics. Scientometrics 2006;68:109–33.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
33. 33.↵
    1. Roldan-Valadez E,
    2. Salazar-Ruiz SY,
    3. Ibarra-Contreras R,
    4. Rios C

    . Current concepts on bibliometrics: a brief review about impact factor, Eigenfactor score, CiteScore, SCImago journal rank, source-normalised impact per paper, H-index, and alternative metrics. Ir J Med Sci 2019;188:939–51.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
34. 34.↵
    1. Blakeman K

    . Bibliometrics in a digital age: help or hindrance. Sci Prog 2018;101:293–310.

    OpenUrlPubMed
35. 35.↵
    1. Chandrashekhar Y,
    2. Narula J

    . Challenges for research publications: what is journal quality and how to measure it? J Am Coll Cardiol 2015;65:1702–5.

    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
36. 36.↵
    1. Belter CW

    . Bibliometric indicators: opportunities and limits. J Med Libr Assoc 2015;103:219–21.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
37. 37.↵
    1. Lodato JE,
    2. Aziz N,
    3. Bennett RE,
    4. Abernethy AP,
    5. Kutner JS

    . Achieving palliative care research efficiency through defining and benchmarking performance metrics. Curr Opin Support Palliat Care 2012;6:533–42.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed