Current and Future Challenges to Publishing Family Medicine Research

References

1. 1.↵
   1. Harper DM

   . Family medicine researchers—Why? Who? How? When? Fam Med 2021;53:647–9.

   OpenUrlPubMed
2. 2.↵
   1. Gotler RS

   . Unfinished business: the role of research in family medicine. Ann Fam Med 2019;17:70–6.

   OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
3. 3.↵
   1. Sexton SM,
   2. Richardson CR,
   3. Schrager SB,
   4. et al

   . Systemic racism and health disparities: a statement from editors of family medicine journals. Ann Fam Med 2021;19:2–3.

   OpenUrlFREE Full Text
4. 4.↵
   1. Schrager S,
   2. Sexton S,
   3. Bowman M,
   4. Richardson C

   . Family medicine editors collaborate toward antiracist publishing., Learned Publishing 2023;36:68–72.

   OpenUrl
5. 5.↵
   1. Ebell MH,
   2. Siwek J,
   3. Weiss BD,
   4. et al

   . Strength of recommendation taxonomy (SORT): a patient-centered approach to grading evidence in the medical literature. Am Fam Physician 2004;69:548–56.

   OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
6. 6.↵
   1. Bowman MA,
   2. Saultz JW,
   3. Phillips WR

   . Beware of predatory journals: a caution from editors of three family medicine journals. J Am Board Fam Med 2018;31:671–6.

   OpenUrlFREE Full Text
7. 7.↵
   1. Seehusen DA,
   2. Rogers TS,
   3. Al Achkar M,
   4. Chang T

   . Coaching, mentoring, and sponsoring as career development tools. Fam Med 2021;53:175–80.

   OpenUrlPubMed
8. 8.↵
   1. Al Achkar M,
   2. Rogers TS,
   3. Weidner A,
   4. Seehusen DA,
   5. South-Paul JE

   . How to sponsor, coach, and mentor: a qualitative study with family medicine department chairs. Fam Med 2023;55:143–51.

   OpenUrlPubMed
9. 9.↵
   1. Ghasemi A,
   2. Mirmiran P,
   3. Kashfi K,
   4. Bahadoran Z

   . Scientific publishing in biomedicine: a brief history of scientific journals. Int J Endocrinol Metab 2022;21:e131812.

   OpenUrl
10. 10.↵
    1. Albert KM

    . Open access: implications for scholarly publishing and medical libraries. J Med Libr Assoc 2006;94:253–62.

    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
11. 11.↵
    1. Sharma H,
    2. Verma S

    . Predatory journals: the rise of worthless biomedical science. J Postgrad Med 2018;64:226–31.

    OpenUrlPubMed
12. 12.↵
    1. Älgå A,
    2. Eriksson O,
    3. Nordberg M

    . The development of preprints during the COVID-19 pandemic. J Intern Med 2021;290:480–3.Aug. Epub 2021 Feb 9.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
13. 13.↵
    1. Llor C,
    2. Moragas A,
    3. Maier M

    . Evaluation of publication of COVID-19-related articles initially presented as preprints. JAMA Netw Open 2022;5:e2245745Dec 1. Erratum in: JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Feb 1;6(2):e230341.

    OpenUrlPubMed
14. 14.↵
    1. Chiarelli A,
    2. Johnson R,
    3. Pinfield S,
    4. Richens E

    . Preprints and scholarly communication: adoption, practices, drivers and barriers. F1000Res 2019;8:971. Jun 26.

    OpenUrl
15. 15.↵
    1. Kronick DA

    . Peer review in 18th-century scientific journalism. JAMA 1990;263:1321–2.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
16. 16.
    Family Medicine. Reviewer information. Available at: https://journals.stfm.org/familymedicine/reviewers. Accessed: November 28, 2023.
17. 17.
    American Family Physician. Reviewers’ guide. Available at: https://www.aafp.org/pubs/afp/reviewers.html. Accessed: November 28, 2023.
18. 18.↵
    Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine. Available at: https://www.jabfm.org/content/information-reviewers# Accessed: November 28, 2023.
19. 19.↵
    1. Jefferson T,
    2. Alderson P,
    3. Wager E,
    4. Davidoff F

    . Effects of editorial peer review: a systematic review. JAMA 2002;287:2784–6.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
20. 20.↵
    1. Rennie D,
    2. Flanagin A

    . Three decades of peer review congresses. JAMA 2018;319:350–3.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
21. 21.↵
    1. El-Guebaly N,
    2. Foster J,
    3. Bahji A,
    4. Hellman M

    . The critical role of peer reviewers: challenges and future steps. Nordisk Alkohol Nark 2023;40:14–21.Feb. Epub 2022 Sep 1.

    OpenUrlPubMed
22. 22.↵
    1. Stoesser K,
    2. Frame KA,
    3. Sanyer O,
    4. et al

    . Increasing URiM family medicine residents at University of Utah Health. PRiMER 2021;5:42.

    OpenUrlPubMed
23. 23.↵
    1. Boyd RW,
    2. Lindo EG,
    3. Weeks LD,
    4. McLemore MR

    . On racism: a new standard for publishing on racial health inequities. Health Affairs Blog. 2020; July 2.
24. 24.↵
    Joint Statement of Principles. C4DISC Coalition for Diversity and Inclusion in Scholarly Communications. Accessed August 6, 2023. Available at: https://c4disc.org/joint-statement-of-principles/.
25. 25.↵
    1. Worthen M,
    2. Leonard TH,
    3. Blair TR,
    4. Gupta N

    . Experiences of parents caring for infants with rare scalp mass as identified through a disease-specific blog. J Am Board Fam Med 2015;28:750–8.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
26. 26.↵
    1. Klee D,
    2. Covey C,
    3. Zhong L

    . Social media beliefs and usage among family medicine residents and practicing family physicians. Fam Med 2015;47:222–6.

    OpenUrlPubMed
27. 27.↵
    1. Strome A,
    2. Moore-Petinak N,
    3. Waselewski M,
    4. Chang T

    . Youths' knowledge and perceptions of health risks associated with unprotected oral sex. Ann Fam Med 2022;20:72–6.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
28. 28.↵
    1. Murdoch TB,
    2. Detsky AS

    . The inevitable application of big data to health care. JAMA 2013;309:1351–2.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
29. 29.↵
    1. Yang J,
    2. Li Y,
    3. Liu Q,
    4. et al

    . Brief introduction of medical database and data mining technology in big data era. J Evid Based Med 2020;13:57–69. Epub 2020 Feb 22.

    OpenUrlPubMed
30. 30.↵
    1. Sainani KL

    . Clinical versus statistical significance. PM R 2012;4:442–5.

    OpenUrlPubMed
31. 31.↵
    1. Lee CH,
    2. Yoon HJ

    . Medical big data: promise and challenges. Kidney Res Clin Pract 2017;36:3–11.Mar. Epub 2017 Mar 31.

    OpenUrlPubMed
32. 32.↵
    Why ChatGPT should not be used to write academic scientific manuscripts for publication. Ann Fam Med 2023;2958. Mar 31. Epub ahead of print.
33. 33.↵
    1. Chen A,
    2. Chen DO

    . Accuracy of chatbots in citing journal articles. JAMA Netw Open 2023;6:e2327647.

    OpenUrlPubMed
34. 34.↵
    1. Hosseini M,
    2. Resnik DB,
    3. Holmes K

    . The ethics of disclosing the use of artificial intelligence tools in writing scholarly manuscripts. Research Ethics, 2023;19:449–65.

    OpenUrl
35. 35.↵
    Defining the Role of Authors and Contributors. International Committee of Medical Journal Editors. Accessed August 8, 2023. Available at: https://www.icmje.org/recommendations/browse/roles-and-responsibilities/defining-the-role-of-authors-and-contributors.html.
36. 36.↵
    1. Staiman A

    . Academic publishers are missing the point on ChatGPT. The Scholarly Kitchen. March 31, 2023. Available at: https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2023/03/31/guest-post-academic-publishers-are-missing-the-point-on-chatgpt/.
37. 37.↵
    1. Green LA,
    2. Fryer GE Jr.,
    3. Yawn BP,
    4. Lanier D,
    5. Dovey SM

    . The ecology of medical care revisited. N Engl J Med 2001;344:2021–5.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
38. 38.↵
    1. LettAsabor E,
    2. Beltrán ES,
    3. Cannon AM,
    4. Arah OA

    . Conceptualizing, contextualizing, and operationalizing race in quantitative health sciences research. Ann Fam Med 2022;20:157–63.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
39. 39.↵
    1. Reddick B

    . Fallacies and dangers of practicing race-based medicine. Am Fam Physician 2021;104:122–3.

    OpenUrlPubMed
40. 40.↵
    1. Vyas DA,
    2. Eisenstein LG,
    3. Jones DS

    . Hidden IN PLAIN SIGHT - RECONSIDERING THE USE OF RACE CORRECTION IN CLINICAL ALgorithms. N Engl J Med 2020;383:874–82. Epub 2020 Jun 17.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
41. 41.↵
    1. Takeshita J,
    2. Wang S,
    3. Loren AW,
    4. et al

    . Association of racial/ethnic and gender concordance between patients and physicians with patient experience ratings. JAMA Netw Open 2020;3:e2024583.

    OpenUrlPubMed