Research ArticleOriginal Research

Primary Care Providers Experiences Implementing Low-Dose Computed Tomography Recommendations for Lung Cancer Screening

Sara E. Golden, Jessica J. Currier, NithyaPriya Ramalingam, Mary Patzel, Jackilen Shannon, Melinda M. Davis and Christopher G. Slatore
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine December 2023, jabfm.2023.230109R1; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3122/jabfm.2023.230109R1

References

  1. 1.↵
    1. Howlader NA,
    2. Krapcho M,
    3. Miller D,
    4. et al
    . SEER cancer statistics review, 1975–2018, National Cancer Institute. 2020.
  2. 2.↵
    1. Siegel RL,
    2. Miller KD,
    3. Fuchs HE,
    4. Jemal A
    . Cancer statistics, 2021. CA Cancer J Clin 2021;71:7–33.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. 3.↵
    U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Screening for lung cancer: US preventive services task force recommendation statement. JAMA 2021;325:962–70.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. 4.↵
    1. Ersek JL,
    2. Eberth JM,
    3. McDonnell KK,
    4. et al
    . Knowledge of, attitudes toward, and use of low-dose computed tomography for lung cancer screening among family physicians. Cancer 2016;122:2324–31.
    OpenUrl
  5. 5.↵
    1. Church TR,
    2. Black WC
    , National Lung Screening Trial Research Teamet al. Results of initial low-dose computed tomographic screening for lung cancer. N Engl J Med 2013;368:1980–91.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  6. 6.
    1. de Koning HJ,
    2. van der Aalst CM,
    3. de Jong PA,
    4. et al
    . Reduced lung-cancer mortality with volume CT screening in a randomized trial. N Engl J Med 2020;382:503–13.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. 7.↵
    Force USPST. Lung Cancer Screening Final Recommendation Statement. 2021. April 19, 2021. Available at: https://www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/uspstf/recommendation/lung-cancer-screening.
  8. 8.↵
    1. Mead N,
    2. Bower P
    . Patient-centredness: A conceptual framework and review of the empirical literature. Soc Sci Med 2000;51:1087–110.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  9. 9.↵
    1. Elwyn G,
    2. Frosch D,
    3. Thomson R,
    4. et al
    . Shared decision making: a model for clinical practice. J Gen Intern Med 2012;27:1361–7.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  10. 10.
    1. Sullivan DR,
    2. Golden SE,
    3. Ganzini L,
    4. Wiener RS,
    5. Eden KB,
    6. Slatore CG
    . Association of decision-making with patients' perceptions of care and knowledge during longitudinal pulmonary nodule surveillance. Annals ATS 2017;14:1690–6.
    OpenUrl
  11. 11.↵
    1. Levinson W,
    2. Kao A,
    3. Kuby A,
    4. Thisted RA
    . Not all patients want to participate in decision making. A national study of public preferences. J Gen Intern Med 2005;20:531–5.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  12. 12.↵
    1. Fedewa SA,
    2. Kazerooni EA,
    3. Studts JL,
    4. et al
    . State variation in low-dose computed tomography scanning for lung cancer screening in the United States. J Natl Cancer Inst 2021;113:1044–52.
    OpenUrl
  13. 13.↵
    1. Sahar L,
    2. Smith R
    . If we build it, they will come…maybe. Chest 2021;160:34–5.
    OpenUrl
  14. 14.↵
    1. Boudreau JH,
    2. Miller DR,
    3. Qian S,
    4. Nunez ER,
    5. Caverly TJ,
    6. Wiener RS
    . Access to lung cancer screening in the Veterans Health Administration: does geographic distribution match need in the population? Chest 2021;160:358–67.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  15. 15.↵
    1. Niranjan S,
    2. Opoku-Agyeman W,
    3. Carroll N,
    4. et al.
    Access to lung cancer screening in the Veterans Health Administration: does geographic distribution match need in the population? Annals ATS 2021;18:1577–80.
    OpenUrl
  16. 16.↵
    1. Bodily B,
    2. Ashurst J,
    3. Fredriksen J
    . Results of lung cancer screening in a rural setting: a retrospective cohort study. Cureus 2022;14:e23299.
    OpenUrl
  17. 17.↵
    1. Zahnd WE,
    2. Eberth JM
    . Lung cancer screening utilization: a behavioral risk factor surveillance system analysis. Am J Prev Med 2019;57:250–5.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  18. 18.↵
    1. Henley SJ,
    2. Anderson RN,
    3. Thomas CC,
    4. Massetti GM,
    5. Peaker B,
    6. Richardson LC
    . Invasive cancer incidence 2004–2013, and deaths 2006–2015, in nonmetropolitan and metropolitan counties—United States. MMWR Surveill Summ 2017;66:1–13.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  19. 19.↵
    1. Zahnd WE,
    2. Fogleman AJ,
    3. Jenkins WD
    . Rural-urban disparities in stage of diagnosis among cancers with preventive opportunities. Am J Prev Med 2018;54:688–98.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  20. 20.↵
    1. Martin AN,
    2. Hassinger TE,
    3. Kozower BD,
    4. Camacho F,
    5. Anderson RT,
    6. Yao N
    . Disparities in lung cancer screening availability: lessons from southwest Virginia. Ann Thorac Surg 2019;108:412–6.
    OpenUrl
  21. 21.↵
    1. Slatore C,
    2. Golden S,
    3. Thomas T,
    4. Bumatay S,
    5. Shannon J,
    6. Davis M
    . “It’s really like any other study”: Rural radiology facilities performing low-dose computed tomography for lung cancer screenin. Annals ATS 2021;18:2058–66.
    OpenUrl
  22. 22.↵
    1. Nelson-Brantley H,
    2. Ellerbeck EF,
    3. McCrea-Robertson S
    . Implementation of cancer screening in rural primary care practices after joining an accountable care organisation: a multiple case study. Fam Med Community Health 2021;9.
  23. 23.↵
    1. Carey M,
    2. Noble N,
    3. Mansfield E,
    4. Waller A,
    5. Henskens F,
    6. Sanson-Fisher R
    . The role of eHealth in optimizing preventive care in the primary care setting. J Med Internet Res 2015;17:e126.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  24. 24.↵
    1. Deller B,
    2. Tripathi V,
    3. Stender S,
    4. Otolorin E,
    5. Johnson P,
    6. Carr C
    . Task shifting in maternal and newborn health care: key components from policy to implementation. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2015;130:Suppl S25–S31.
    OpenUrl
  25. 25.↵
    1. Liu Y,
    2. Zupan NJ,
    3. Shiyanbola OO,
    4. et al
    . Factors influencing patient adherence with diabetic eye screening in rural communities: a qualitative study. PLoS One 2018;13:e0206742.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  26. 26.↵
    1. Wang H,
    2. Roy S,
    3. Kim J,
    4. Farazi PA,
    5. Siahpush M,
    6. Su D
    . Barriers of colorectal cancer screening in rural USA: a systematic review. Rural Remote Health 2019;19:5181.
    OpenUrl
  27. 27.↵
    1. Slatore CG,
    2. Golden SE,
    3. Thomas T,
    4. et al
    . Beliefs and practices of primary care providers regarding performing low-dose CT studies for lung cancer screening. Chest 2022;161:853–9.
    OpenUrl
  28. 28.↵
    1. Davis MM,
    2. Gunn R,
    3. Kenzie E,
    4. et al
    . Integration of improvement and implementation science in practice-based research networks: a longitudinal, comparative case study. J Gen Intern Med 2021;36:1503–13.
    OpenUrl
  29. 29.↵
    About rural and frontier data: Oregon office of rural health geographic definitions. Oregon Office of Rural Health. 2021. Accessed August 3, 2022. Available at: https://www.ohsu.edu/oregon-office-of-rural-health/about-rural-and-frontier-data2021.
  30. 30.↵
    Urban and Rural. United States Census Bureau. 2020. Accessed May 25, 2023. Available at: https://www.census.gov/programs-surveys/geography/guidance/geo-areas/urban-rural.html.
  31. 31.↵
    1. Davis MM,
    2. Gunn R,
    3. Cifuentes M,
    4. et al
    . Clinical workflows and the associated tasks and behaviors to support delivery of integrated behavioral health and primary care. J Ambul Care Manage 2019;42:51–65.
    OpenUrl
  32. 32.↵
    1. Damschroder LJ,
    2. Aron DC,
    3. Keith RE,
    4. et al
    . Fostering implementation of health services research findings into practice: a consolidated framework for advancing implementation science. mplementation Sci 2009;4: 1–15.
    OpenUrl
  33. 33.↵
    1. Saunders B,
    2. Sim J,
    3. Kingstone T,
    4. et al
    . Saturation in qualitative research: exploring its conceptualization and operationalization. Qual Quant 2018;52:1893–907.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  34. 34.↵
    1. Malterud K,
    2. Siersma VD,
    3. Guassora AD
    . Sample size in qualitative interview studies: guided by information power. Qual Health Res 2016;26:1753–60.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  35. 35.↵
    1. Hsieh HF,
    2. Shannon SE
    . Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qual Health Res 2005;15: 1277–88.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  36. 36.↵
    1. Miles MH
    . Qualitative Data Analysis. 2nd ed. Sage Publications; 1994.
  37. 37.↵
    1. Chin J,
    2. Jensen TS,
    3. Ashby L,
    4. et al
    . Screening for lung cancer with low-dose CT—translating science into Medicare coverage policy. N Engl J Med 2015;372:2083–5.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  38. 38.↵
    Is Lung Cancer Screening Right for Me? A Decision Aid for People Considering Lung Cancer Screening With Low-Dose Computed Tomography. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. 2016. Accessed May 25, 2023. Available at: https://effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/products/lung-cancer-screening/overview.
  39. 39.↵
    1. Melzer AC,
    2. Golden SE,
    3. Ono SS,
    4. et al
    . “We just never have enough time”: Clinician views of lung cancer screening processes and implementation. Ann Am Thorac Soc 2020.
  40. 40.↵
    1. Sedani AE,
    2. Davis OC,
    3. Clifton SC,
    4. et al
    . Facilitators and barriers to implementation of lung cancer screening: a framework-driven systematic review. J Natl Cancer Inst 2022;114:1449–67.
    OpenUrl
  41. 41.↵
    1. Armstrong C
    . Lung cancer screening recommendations from the ACCP. Am Fam Phy 2021;98:688–9.
    OpenUrl
  42. 42.↵
    Clinical Preventive Service Recommendation: Lung Cancer. American Academy of Family Physicians. 2023. Accessed May 25, 2023. Available at: https://www.aafp.org/family-physician/patient-care/clinical-recommendations/all-clinical-recommendations/lung-cancer.html.
  43. 43.↵
    Moyer VA, US PST Force. Screening for lung cancer: U.S. preventive services task force recommendation statement. Ann Intern Med 2014;160:330–8.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  44. 44.↵
    1. Coughlin JM,
    2. Zang Y,
    3. Terranella S,
    4. et al
    . Understanding barriers to lung cancer screening in primary care. J Thorac Dis 2020;12:2536–44.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  45. 45.↵
    1. Mazzone PJ,
    2. Silvestri GA,
    3. Souter LH,
    4. et al
    . Screening for lung cancer: CHEST guideline and expert panel report. Chest 2021;160:e427–e494.
    OpenUrl
  46. 46.↵
    1. Lehto M,
    2. Pitkala K,
    3. Rahkonen O,
    4. Laine MK,
    5. Raina M,
    6. Kauppila T
    . Do electronic reminders alter recorded diagnoses in primary care office-hours practices of health centers: a register-based study in a Finnish city. SAGE Open Med 2021;9:20503121211036117.
    OpenUrl
  47. 47.↵
    1. Filippi A,
    2. Sabatini A,
    3. Badioli L,
    4. et al
    . Effects of an automated electronic reminder in changing the antiplatelet drug-prescribing behavior among Italian general practitioners in diabetic patients: An intervention trial. Diabetes Care 2003;26:1497–500.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  48. 48.↵
    1. Kenealy T,
    2. Arroll B,
    3. Petrie KJ
    . Patients and computers as reminders to screen for diabetes in family practice. Randomized-controlled trial. J Gen Intern Med 2005;20:916–21.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  49. 49.↵
    1. Jacobson Vann JC,
    2. Jacobson RM,
    3. Coyne-Beasley T,
    4. Asafu-Adjei JK,
    5. Szilagyi PG
    . Patient reminder and recall interventions to improve immunization rates. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2018;1:CD003941.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  50. 50.↵
    1. Silvestri GA,
    2. Goldman L,
    3. Burleson J,
    4. et al
    . Characteristics of persons screened for lung cancer in the United States: a cohort study. Ann Intern Med 2022;175:1501–5.
    OpenUrl
  51. 51.↵
    1. Weinstock TG,
    2. Tewari A,
    3. Patel H,
    4. et al
    . No stone unturned: Nodule Net, an intervention to reduce loss to follow-up of lung nodules. Respir Med 2019;157:49–51.
    OpenUrl
  52. 52.↵
    1. Porter J,
    2. Boyd C,
    3. Skandari MR,
    4. et al
    . Revisiting the time needed to provide adult primary care. J Gen Intern Med 2023;38:147–55.
    OpenUrl
  53. 53.↵
    1. Caverly TJ,
    2. Hayward RA,
    3. Burke JF
    . Much to do with nothing: microsimulation study on time management in primary care. BMJ 2018;363:k4983.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  54. 54.↵
    1. Mazzone PJ
    . Obstacles to and solutions for a successful lung cancer screening program. Semin Respir Crit Care Med 2016;37:659–69.
    OpenUrl
  55. 55.↵
    1. Black L
    . Lung cancer screening: implementation of and barriers to a nurse practitioner-led program. Clin J Oncol Nurs 2018;22:601–5.
    OpenUrl
  56. 56.↵
    1. Golden SE,
    2. Ono SS,
    3. Melzer A,
    4. et al
    . “I already know that smoking ain't good for me”: patient and clinician perspectives on lung cancer screening decision-making discussions as a teachable moment. Chest 2020;158:1250–9.
    OpenUrl
  57. 57.↵
    1. Kathuria H,
    2. Detterbeck FC,
    3. Fathi JT,
    4. et al
    . Stakeholder research priorities for smoking cessation interventions within lung cancer screening programs. An official American Thoracic Society research statement. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2017;196:1202–12.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  58. 58.↵
    1. Odahowski CL,
    2. Zahnd WE,
    3. Eberth JM
    . Challenges and opportunities for lung cancer screening in rural America. J Am Coll Radiol 2019;16:590–5.
    OpenUrl
  59. 59.↵
    1. Jenkins WD,
    2. Matthews AK,
    3. Bailey A,
    4. et al
    . Rural areas are disproportionately impacted by smoking and lung cancer. Prev Med Rep 2018;10:200–3.
    OpenUrl
  60. 60.↵
    1. Reihani AR,
    2. Ahari J,
    3. Manning EP,
    4. et al
    . Barriers and facilitators to lung cancer screening in the United States: a systematic review of the qualitative literature. J Health Soc Sci 2021;6:333–48.
    OpenUrl
  61. 61.↵
    1. Hoffman RM,
    2. Sussman AL,
    3. Getrich CM,
    4. et al
    . Attitudes and beliefs of primary care providers in New Mexico about lung cancer screening using low-dose computed tomography. Prev Chronic Dis 2015;12:E108.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  62. 62.↵
    1. Hasson RM,
    2. Fay KA,
    3. Phillips JD,
    4. et al
    . Rural barriers to early lung cancer detection: exploring access to lung cancer screening programs in New Hampshire and Vermont. Am J Surg 2021;221:725–30.
    OpenUrl
  63. 63.↵
    1. Mishra SI,
    2. Sussman AL,
    3. Murrietta AM,
    4. et al
    . Patient perspectives on low-dose computed tomography for lung cancer screening, New Mexico, 2014. Prev Chronic Dis 2016;13:E108.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  64. 64.↵
    1. Salmani H,
    2. Ahmadi M,
    3. Shahrokhi N
    . The impact of mobile health on cancer screening: a systematic review. Cancer Inform 2020;19:117693512095419.
    OpenUrl
  65. 65.↵
    1. Greenwald ZR,
    2. El-Zein M,
    3. Bouten S,
    4. et al
    . Mobile screening units for the early detection of cancer: a systematic review. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2017;26:1679–94.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  66. 66.↵
    1. Severance TS,
    2. Milgrom Z,
    3. Carson A,
    4. et al
    . Cancer prevention, screening, and survivorship ECHO: a pilot experience with an educational telehealth program. Cancer Med 2022;11:238–44.
    OpenUrl
  67. 67.↵
    1. Pruthi S,
    2. Shmidt E,
    3. Sherman MM,
    4. et al
    . Promoting a breast cancer screening clinic for underserved women: a community collaboration. Ethn Dis 2010;20:463–6.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  68. 68.↵
    1. Abubaker-Sharif M,
    2. Shusted C,
    3. Myers P,
    4. et al
    . Primary care physician perceptions of shared decision making in lung cancer screening. J Cancer Educ 2020;37:1–9.
    OpenUrl
  69. 69.↵
    1. Atere-Roberts J,
    2. Smith JL,
    3. Hall IJ
    . Interventions to increase breast and cervical cancer screening uptake among rural women: a scoping review. Cancer Causes Control 2020;31:965–77.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  70. 70.↵
    1. Triplette M,
    2. Thayer JH,
    3. Pipavath SN,
    4. et al
    . Poor uptake of lung cancer screening: opportunities for improvement. J Am Coll Radiol 2019;16:446–50.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  71. 71.↵
    1. Percac,
    2. Lima S,
    3. Ashburner JM,
    4. Rigotti NA,
    5. et al
    . Patient navigation for lung cancer screening among current smokers in community health centers a randomized controlled trial. Cancer Med 2018;7:894–902.
    OpenUrl
  72. 72.↵
    1. Miech EJ,
    2. Rattray NA,
    3. Flanagan ME,
    4. et al
    . Inside help: an integrative review of champions in healthcare related implementation. SAGE Open Med 2018;6:205031211877326.
    OpenUrl
  73. 73.↵
    Changes: appoint a safety champion for every unit. Institute for Healthcare Improvement. 2018. Accessed August 14, 2023. Available at: https://www.ihi.org/resources/Pages/Changes.
  74. 74.↵
    The diversity of Oregon’s licensed health care workforce. Oregon Health Authority. 2022. Accessed May 25, 2022. Available at: https://www.oregon.gov/oha/HPA/HP-HCW/Meeting%20Documents/4.-Workforce-Diversity Report.pdf.
  75. 75.
    Rural-Urban Commuting Area Codes. U.S. Department of Agriculture Economic Research Service. 2020. Accessed August 3, 2022. Available at: https://www.ers.usda.gov/data-products/rural-urban-commuting-area-codes.aspx.
  76. 76.
    Defining the PCMH. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. 2022. Accessed March 14, 2023. Available at: https://www.ahrq.gov/ncepcr/research/care-coordination/pcmh/define.html.
  77. 77.
    Rural Health Clinics. Office of Rural Health. 2021. Accessed March 14, 2023. Available at: https://www.ruralhealthinfo.org/topics/rural-health-clinics.
  78. 78.
    What is a community health center. Alameda Health Consortium. n.d. Accessed March 14, 2023. Available at: https://www.alamedahealthconsortium.org/community-health-center/.
Back to top

In this issue

Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Email Article
Citation Tools

Jump to section

Keywords