Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • ARTICLES
    • Current Issue
    • Ahead of Print
    • Archives
    • Abstracts In Press
    • Special Issue Archive
    • Subject Collections
  • INFO FOR
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Call For Papers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • SUBMIT
    • Manuscript
    • Peer Review
  • ABOUT
    • The JABFM
    • The Editing Fellowship
    • Editorial Board
    • Indexing
    • Editors' Blog
  • CLASSIFIEDS
  • Other Publications
    • abfm

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
American Board of Family Medicine
  • Other Publications
    • abfm
American Board of Family Medicine

American Board of Family Medicine

Advanced Search

  • HOME
  • ARTICLES
    • Current Issue
    • Ahead of Print
    • Archives
    • Abstracts In Press
    • Special Issue Archive
    • Subject Collections
  • INFO FOR
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Call For Papers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • SUBMIT
    • Manuscript
    • Peer Review
  • ABOUT
    • The JABFM
    • The Editing Fellowship
    • Editorial Board
    • Indexing
    • Editors' Blog
  • CLASSIFIEDS
  • JABFM on Bluesky
  • JABFM On Facebook
  • JABFM On Twitter
  • JABFM On YouTube
Research ArticleOriginal Research

Integrating Harm Reduction into Medical Care: Lessons from Three Models

Ji Eun Chang, Zoe Lindenfeld and Holly Hagan
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine May 2023, jabfm.2022.220303R3; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3122/jabfm.2022.220303R3
Ji Eun Chang
From the Department of Public Health Policy and Management, School of Global Public Health, New York University, New York, NY (JEC, ZL); Department of Social Behavioral Sciences and Epidemiology, School of Global Public Health, New York University, New York, NY (HH).
PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Zoe Lindenfeld
From the Department of Public Health Policy and Management, School of Global Public Health, New York University, New York, NY (JEC, ZL); Department of Social Behavioral Sciences and Epidemiology, School of Global Public Health, New York University, New York, NY (HH).
BS
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Holly Hagan
From the Department of Public Health Policy and Management, School of Global Public Health, New York University, New York, NY (JEC, ZL); Department of Social Behavioral Sciences and Epidemiology, School of Global Public Health, New York University, New York, NY (HH).
PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Figure 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    Figure 1.

    Themes of harm reduction-informed medical care by organizational level.

Tables

  • Figures
    • View popup
    Table 1.

    Description of Sites

    Site 1Site 2Site 3
    ModelFree-standing clinic modelCo-located model in Hospital SystemCo-located model in Syringe exchange program
    SettingNon-Urban, Ithaca NYUrban, East Harlem NYUrban, Bronx NY
    ServicesPrimary care, medication for opioid use disorder (MOUD), Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) and Hepatitis C (HCV) testing, pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP), Mental health, social servicesPrimary care, MOUD, risk reduction counseling, HCV treatment, overdose response training, and behavioral servicesPrimary care, MOUD, HIV and HCV treatment, PrEP, referrals to specialty care
    Number of Interview Participants7 (Director of operations, clinical supervisor/primary care provider, director of financing strategy, psychologist, physician, community health worker)7 (Patient navigator, nurse care manager, nurse practitioner, physician, social worker, research physician (2), operations coordinator)6 (Nurse, care coordinator, physician (2), registered nurse, project director)
    • View popup
    Table 2.

    Common Themes of Harm Reduction-Informed Care

    ThemesExamplesIllustrative Quote(s)
    Provider as both learner and informer
    • Provider views patients as experts in their own drug use and strives to learn what patients’ goals in treatment are

    “Letting the patient feel like they're autonomous in their treatment decisions is really important. I actually will tell patients, consider me a tool for your health and I will take on the doctor role and I will tell you what my advice is and my recommendations, but I don't ever want you to feel like I'm trying to tell you what to do.”
    • Providers are not directive or forceful but function as sources of information for patients, providing a realistic range of support options to develop a treatment plan consistent with? patient’s goals.

    • Provider aims to be compliant to patient’s needs (not vice versa) and to help patients adopt safer behaviors.

    “Harm reduction means you're giving somebody all the tools, you're informing the person, the participant. You're giving them all the tools they have to make the safest decisions, but ultimately, their decisions are their decisions”
    Pragmatic measures of success
    • Providers recognize that complete abstinence may not be a realistic goal for many patients.

    “I would qualify that success is that they're engaging with us, having an honest relationship with us, and are able to come to us when there are new problems coming up for them.”
    • Focus is placed on the process of treatment rather than outcomes

    • Measures of success based on care processes (ie, patient engagement and retention), having an open, honest relationship with patients, and reaching patients’ self-identified goals.

    “We're not expecting that people are going to be completely abstinent, that might not even be their goal and that's totally okay. But just seeing progress and being happy with that. Like, patients like coming in time to get a refill, that's great”
    Collaborative and interdisciplinary care teams
    • Ensuring a wide range of providers and specialists are available to address varied patient needs

    “We’re constantly talking to each other. We have weekly team meetings. We’re constantly emailing each other about the various needs of our patient. We know each other, we’re a small team and I think that makes it very easy for me to pick up the phone and call.”
    • Routine staff meetings to collaboratively discuss issues and questions related to patient care

    • Relying on other team members for support during difficult situations

    Developing a stigma-free culture
    • Having strong leadership team dedicated to harm-reduction

    “We create an environment where people are free to discuss their drug use without fear of being stigmatized or judged, so that we can give people the tools to reduce their harms around the health issues that arise for people who inject drugs”
    “We do interview all of our clinic-facing providers, like nurses and front desk and everything. They do an interview with the team huddle. And this guy came on last week and he was like, I just really want to treat addicts and everyone’s eyes rolled. And that was the end, the guy didn’t get the job”
    • Intentional hiring and screening practices for culture-fit

    • Ongoing training and education on using stigma-free language versed in trauma-informed care (ie, in charting) and treating all patients with respect

    • Constant communication and check-ins between staff to ensure fidelity to harm-reduction principles

    Creating a comfortable and welcoming physical space
    • Providing showers, bathroom, and laundry facilities on site

    “Patients have a comfortable relationship with the clinic. Some of them, they come in, and often we're not even registering them with the doctor. They're just sitting and talking to us in the nurse’s office. We're not busy, and they can come in and talk to us.”
    “Our staff works really hard at making sure that patients don't feel stigmatized, that they don't feel judged or looked upon as less than. I think physically the fact that patients can come in and grab a cup of coffee, which if you're injection drug users, the fact that you have the space to do that safely in, I think is really quite critical.”
    • Allowing patients to bring belongings such as large bags, carts, pets in the clinic

    • Handing out snacks to patients to make wait times less onerous

    • Remembering patients’ names

    • Reducing paperwork burden for patients

    Low-threshold care with flexible scheduling
    • Adopting a walk-in model for appointments with no penalties for no-shows or late arrivals

    “In our clinic, we have basically a policy that patients certainly need appointment times, but often they're late for their appointment times or early for their appointment times, and we'll basically see them whenever. So that just allows a lot more flexibility for them to be able to be seen.”
    “We do urine toxicology tests. We try to say that very much upfront, this is not punitive, this is it just to have an open conversation. We're not trying to stop your prescription. Even if you're using opioids”
    • No penalties or discontinued services for disclosing medication misuse

    • Using urine toxicology to start conversations rather than for punitive purposes

    • Enacting policies to protect patient privacy (i.e. to courts)

    Reaching beyond the clinic to disseminate harm reduction orientation
    • Carving out time to teach harm reduction principles in medical schools and residency training programs

    “Very few current internal medicine residency programs even teach what harm reduction is, or how to provide low threshold MAT. We are involved in a training program locally to do just that.”
    • Holding training sessions with other local community organizations

    Creating robust referral networks to enhance transitions of care
    • Developing referral networks to ensure patients are treated with respect when receiving services outside of the clinic

    • Supporting patients during external transitions (ie, scheduling external appointments, providing MetroCards)

    “We don't send people to places where they're going to be treated poorly or abused by providers, we're not going to send them because that reflects back on us. So, we're careful about our referrals naturally.”
    • View popup
    Appendix Table 1.

    Standard Interview Guide

    Interview Questions
    Section I: Program Descriptive Information
    • 1. Briefly describe the type of practice and the services provided

    • 2. Briefly describe the history of the program’s integrated services

    • 3. Briefly describe the interactions between patients and staff members

    • 4. Briefly describe the organization of the care team

    Section II: Harm Reduction Approaches and Services
    What do you consider to be critical elements of harm-reduction-informed care?
    • 5. What does a harm reduction-oriented model of treatment look like in your practice?

    • 6. How would you describe your organization’s philosophy toward patient care?

    • 7. Could you provide me with an example of applying these philosophies to delivering care to patients?

    • 8. How do you assess whether you are being true to these concepts?

    • 9. What mechanisms does the practice have in place to build a culture of harm reduction?

    • 10. Describe the decision-making process that takes place in your clinic around patient care.

    • 11. Describe how you enact and integrate the following harm reduction concepts in your clinic:

      • Humanism: Providers have respect for patients and the decisions they make, providing care without moral judgments.

      • Pragmatism: Providers have realistic expectations and support a range of options for reducing harm.

      • Individualism: Support is tailored to individual patients’ needs.

      • Autonomy: Patients and providers negotiate the best plan of care.

      • Incrementalism: Any positive change acknowledged and reinforced.

      • Accountability: Patients are responsible for (and experience) the consequences of their behavior but are given additional chances to improve.

    Section III: Facilitators and Barriers
    • 12. What factors help facilitate the provision of harm-reduction oriented care in your practice?

    • 13. What factors prevent the provision of harm-reduction oriented care in your practice?

    • 14. What advice do you have for providers that want to adopt a harm-reduction-oriented approach to care integration?

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of the American Board of Family     Medicine: 37 (6)
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine
Vol. 37, Issue 6
November-December 2024
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Cover (PDF)
  • Index by author
  • Back Matter (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Board of Family Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Integrating Harm Reduction into Medical Care: Lessons from Three Models
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Board of Family Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Board of Family Medicine web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
4 + 0 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Integrating Harm Reduction into Medical Care: Lessons from Three Models
Ji Eun Chang, Zoe Lindenfeld, Holly Hagan
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine May 2023, jabfm.2022.220303R3; DOI: 10.3122/jabfm.2022.220303R3

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Integrating Harm Reduction into Medical Care: Lessons from Three Models
Ji Eun Chang, Zoe Lindenfeld, Holly Hagan
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine May 2023, jabfm.2022.220303R3; DOI: 10.3122/jabfm.2022.220303R3
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Introduction
    • Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Conclusions
    • Appendix
    • Notes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Evaluating Pragmatism of Lung Cancer Screening Randomized Trials with the PRECIS-2 Tool
  • Perceptions and Preferences for Defining Biosimilar Products in Prescription Drug Promotion
  • Successful Implementation of Integrated Behavioral Health
Show more Original Research

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • Access to Primary Care
  • Harm Reduction
  • New York
  • Opiate Substitution Treatment
  • Opioid-Related Disorders
  • Primary Health Care
  • Qualitative Research

Navigate

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues

Authors & Reviewers

  • Info For Authors
  • Info For Reviewers
  • Submit A Manuscript/Review

Other Services

  • Get Email Alerts
  • Classifieds
  • Reprints and Permissions

Other Resources

  • Forms
  • Contact Us
  • ABFM News

© 2025 American Board of Family Medicine

Powered by HighWire