Variation in Support for Documentation Among Primary Care Physicians by Gender

References

1. 1.↵
   1. Tait SD,
   2. Oshima SM,
   3. Ren Y,
   4. et al

   . Electronic health record use by sex among physicians in an Academic Health Care System. JAMA Intern Med 2021;181:288–90.

   OpenUrl
2. 2.↵
   1. Gupta K,
   2. Murray SG,
   3. Sarkar U,
   4. et al.

   Differences in ambulatory EHR use patterns for male vs. female physicians. N Engl J Med Catal 2019.
3. 3.↵
   Active Physicians by Sex and Specialty [Internet]. AAMC; 2019 [Accessed 17 July 2021]. Available from: https://www.aamc.org/data-reports/workforce/interactive-data/active-physicians-sex-and-specialty-2019.
4. 4.↵
   1. Rotenstein LS,
   2. Holmgren AJ,
   3. Downing NL,
   4. Bates DW

   . Differences in total and after-hours electronic health record time across ambulatory specialties. JAMA Intern Med 2021;181:863–5.

   OpenUrl
5. 5.↵
   1. Adler-Milstein J,
   2. Zhao W,
   3. Willard-Grace R,
   4. et al.

   Electronic health records and burnout: Time spent on the electronic health record after hours and message volume associated with exhaustion but not with cynicism among primary care clinicians. J Am Med Inform Assoc JAMIA 2020;27:531–8.

   OpenUrl
6. 6.↵
   1. Rotenstein L,
   2. Harry E,
   3. Wickner P,
   4. et al

   . Contributors to gender differences in burnout and professional fulfillment: a survey of physician faculty. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf 2021;47(11):723–730.

   OpenUrl
7. 7.↵
   1. Templeton K,
   2. Bernstein CA,
   3. Sukhera J,
   4. et al

   . Gender-based differences in burnout: issues faced by women physicians. NAM Perspect. 2019. Discussion Paper, National Academy of Medicine, Washington, DC.
8. 8.↵
   1. Mishra P,
   2. Kiang JC,
   3. Grant RW

   . Association of medical scribes in primary care with Physician workflow and patient experience. JAMA Intern Med 2018;178:1467–72.

   OpenUrl
9. 9.↵
   1. Gidwani R,
   2. Nguyen C,
   3. Kofoed A,
   4. et al

   . Impact of scribes on physician satisfaction, patient satisfaction, and charting efficiency: a randomized controlled trial. Ann Fam Med 2017;15:427–33.

   OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
10. 10.↵
    1. Lyon C,
    2. English AF,
    3. Smith PC

    . A team-based care model that improves job satisfaction. Fam Pract Manag 2018;25:6–11.

    OpenUrl
11. 11.↵
    2019 NEHRS public use file documentation [Internet]. CDC; 2021 [Accessed 19 December 2021]. Available from: https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/nehrs/NEHRS2019Doc-508.pdf.
12. 12.↵
    2018 NEHRS public use file documentation [Internet]. CDC; 2021 [Accessed 19 December 2021]. Available from: https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/nehrs/NEHRS-2018Doc-508.pdf.
13. 13.↵
    National Electronic Health Records Survey [Internet]. CDC; 2021 [Accessed 7 November 2021]. https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/nehrs/about.htm.
14. 14.↵
    Standards and guidelines for statistical surveys [Internet]. SAMHSA; 2006. Available from: https://www.samhsa.gov/data/sites/default/files/standards_stat_surveys.pdf.
15. 15.↵
    1. Willis J,
    2. Antono B,
    3. Bazemore A

    . The state of primary care in the United States: a chartbook of facts and statistics. October 2020.
16. 16.↵
    1. Basu S,
    2. Phillips RS,
    3. Bitton A,
    4. et al.

    Finance and time use implications of team documentation for primary care: a microsimulation. Ann Fam Med 2018;16:308–13.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
17. 17.↵
    1. Lin SY,
    2. Shanafelt TD,
    3. Asch SM

    . Reimagining clinical documentation with artificial intelligence; Mayo Clin Proc 2018 May;93(5):563–565.