Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • ARTICLES
    • Current Issue
    • Abstracts In Press
    • Archives
    • Special Issue Archive
    • Subject Collections
  • INFO FOR
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Call For Papers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • SUBMIT
    • Manuscript
    • Peer Review
  • ABOUT
    • The JABFM
    • The Editing Fellowship
    • Editorial Board
    • Indexing
    • Editors' Blog
  • CLASSIFIEDS
  • Other Publications
    • abfm

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
American Board of Family Medicine
  • Other Publications
    • abfm
American Board of Family Medicine

American Board of Family Medicine

Advanced Search

  • HOME
  • ARTICLES
    • Current Issue
    • Abstracts In Press
    • Archives
    • Special Issue Archive
    • Subject Collections
  • INFO FOR
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Call For Papers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • SUBMIT
    • Manuscript
    • Peer Review
  • ABOUT
    • The JABFM
    • The Editing Fellowship
    • Editorial Board
    • Indexing
    • Editors' Blog
  • CLASSIFIEDS
  • JABFM on Bluesky
  • JABFM On Facebook
  • JABFM On Twitter
  • JABFM On YouTube
Review ArticleClinical Review

Do Oral Contraceptive Agents Affect The Risk Of Breast Cancer? A Meta-Analysis Of The Case-Control Reports

Wendy Hawley, James Nuovo, C. Peter DeNeef and Patrick Carter
The Journal of the American Board of Family Practice March 1993, 6 (2) 123-135; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3122/jabfm.6.2.123
Wendy Hawley
From the Department of Family Medicine, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle (WH, JN, CPD), and from the Department of Family Medicine, Silas B. Hays Army Hospital, Fort Ord, CA (PC). Address reprint requests to James Nuovo, MD, Department of Family Practice, University of California, Davis, 2221 Stockton Boulevard, Sacramento, CA 95817.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
James Nuovo
From the Department of Family Medicine, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle (WH, JN, CPD), and from the Department of Family Medicine, Silas B. Hays Army Hospital, Fort Ord, CA (PC). Address reprint requests to James Nuovo, MD, Department of Family Practice, University of California, Davis, 2221 Stockton Boulevard, Sacramento, CA 95817.
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
C. Peter DeNeef
From the Department of Family Medicine, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle (WH, JN, CPD), and from the Department of Family Medicine, Silas B. Hays Army Hospital, Fort Ord, CA (PC). Address reprint requests to James Nuovo, MD, Department of Family Practice, University of California, Davis, 2221 Stockton Boulevard, Sacramento, CA 95817.
MD, PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Patrick Carter
From the Department of Family Medicine, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle (WH, JN, CPD), and from the Department of Family Medicine, Silas B. Hays Army Hospital, Fort Ord, CA (PC). Address reprint requests to James Nuovo, MD, Department of Family Practice, University of California, Davis, 2221 Stockton Boulevard, Sacramento, CA 95817.
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Background: We designed a study to assess the association of oral contraceptive use and the development of breast cancer for women in the following groups: (1) ever oral contraceptive users, (2) long-term oral contraceptive users, and (3) oral contraceptive users before a first full-term pregnancy.

Methods: A MEDLINE search of studies published in English from 1966 to 1990 was conducted using the following key words: “oral contraceptive and breast carcinoma.” Eligible studies included all published case-control reports of nonduplicated data on a population (hospital or community-based). The following data were extracted from each report: country, age of subjects, number of cases and controls, whether it was a hospital or community-based study, and results. Two evaluators using a quality-assessment instrument independently and blindly reviewed the methods and data analysis section from each eligible study. In the category of “ever oral contraceptive users,” an estimate of the pooled relative risk with 95 percent confidence intervals (CIs) was calculated. In the categories of “duration of oral contraceptive use” and “duration of oral contraceptive use before a first full-term pregnancy,” Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient (rs) was calculated.

Results: For the categories of “ever oral contraceptive users” and “long-term oral contraceptive users,” no association between the use of oral contraceptives and the development of breast cancer could be detected (pooled relative risk “ever oral contraceptive users” = 1.07, 95 percent CI 0.78 to 1.36, rs “duration of use” –0.153, P = 0.189). For the category of “oral contraceptive use before a first full-term pregnancy,” a significant correlation was found (rs = +0.497. P = 0.011).

Many reports failed to demonstrate adequate protection against the biases most relevant to case-control methods (namely, recall bias, interviewer bias, surveillance bias, and nonresponse bias) and therefore received low-quality scores.

Conclusions: This meta-analysis suggests a possible increased risk for breast cancer in women who use oral contraceptives before a first full-term pregnancy. The data, however, are confounded by studies that are generally of low quality. Further studies addressing the risk for breast cancer in oral contraceptive users need to be designed with methods that limit the biases inherent in case-control studies.

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of the American Board of Family     Practice: 6 (2)
The Journal of the American Board of Family Practice
Vol. 6, Issue 2
1 Mar 1993
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Index by author
  • Back Matter (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Board of Family Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Do Oral Contraceptive Agents Affect The Risk Of Breast Cancer? A Meta-Analysis Of The Case-Control Reports
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Board of Family Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Board of Family Medicine web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
5 + 8 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Do Oral Contraceptive Agents Affect The Risk Of Breast Cancer? A Meta-Analysis Of The Case-Control Reports
Wendy Hawley, James Nuovo, C. Peter DeNeef, Patrick Carter
The Journal of the American Board of Family Practice Mar 1993, 6 (2) 123-135; DOI: 10.3122/jabfm.6.2.123

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Do Oral Contraceptive Agents Affect The Risk Of Breast Cancer? A Meta-Analysis Of The Case-Control Reports
Wendy Hawley, James Nuovo, C. Peter DeNeef, Patrick Carter
The Journal of the American Board of Family Practice Mar 1993, 6 (2) 123-135; DOI: 10.3122/jabfm.6.2.123
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Interpretating Normal Values and Reference Ranges for Laboratory Tests
  • Non-Surgical Management of Urinary Incontinence
  • Screening and Diagnosis of Type 2 Diabetes in Sickle Cell Disease
Show more Clinical Reviews

Similar Articles

Navigate

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues

Authors & Reviewers

  • Info For Authors
  • Info For Reviewers
  • Submit A Manuscript/Review

Other Services

  • Get Email Alerts
  • Classifieds
  • Reprints and Permissions

Other Resources

  • Forms
  • Contact Us
  • ABFM News

© 2025 American Board of Family Medicine

Powered by HighWire