Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • ARTICLES
    • Current Issue
    • Ahead of Print
    • Archives
    • Abstracts In Press
    • Special Issue Archive
    • Subject Collections
  • INFO FOR
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Call For Papers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • SUBMIT
    • Manuscript
    • Peer Review
  • ABOUT
    • The JABFM
    • The Editing Fellowship
    • Editorial Board
    • Indexing
    • Editors' Blog
  • CLASSIFIEDS
  • Other Publications
    • abfm

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
American Board of Family Medicine
  • Other Publications
    • abfm
American Board of Family Medicine

American Board of Family Medicine

Advanced Search

  • HOME
  • ARTICLES
    • Current Issue
    • Ahead of Print
    • Archives
    • Abstracts In Press
    • Special Issue Archive
    • Subject Collections
  • INFO FOR
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Call For Papers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • SUBMIT
    • Manuscript
    • Peer Review
  • ABOUT
    • The JABFM
    • The Editing Fellowship
    • Editorial Board
    • Indexing
    • Editors' Blog
  • CLASSIFIEDS
  • JABFM on Bluesky
  • JABFM On Facebook
  • JABFM On Twitter
  • JABFM On YouTube
Research ArticleOriginal Research

Regional Variation in Scope of Practice by Family Physicians

Alyssa Lambert, Sarah E. Fleischer, Omer Atac, Andrew Bazemore and Lars E. Peterson
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine January 2025, 38 (1) 28-45; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3122/jabfm.2024.240201R1
Alyssa Lambert
From the CHRISTUS Health/Texas A&M University School of Medicine – Family Medicine Residency, Corpus Christi, TX (AL); American Board of Family Medicine, Lexington, KY (SEF, AB, LEP); Health Management and Policy, College of Public Health, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY (OA); Public Health, International School of Medicine, Istanbul Medipol University, Istanbul, Turkiye (OA); Department of Family and Community Medicine, College of Medicine, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY (LEP).
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Sarah E. Fleischer
From the CHRISTUS Health/Texas A&M University School of Medicine – Family Medicine Residency, Corpus Christi, TX (AL); American Board of Family Medicine, Lexington, KY (SEF, AB, LEP); Health Management and Policy, College of Public Health, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY (OA); Public Health, International School of Medicine, Istanbul Medipol University, Istanbul, Turkiye (OA); Department of Family and Community Medicine, College of Medicine, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY (LEP).
MS
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Omer Atac
From the CHRISTUS Health/Texas A&M University School of Medicine – Family Medicine Residency, Corpus Christi, TX (AL); American Board of Family Medicine, Lexington, KY (SEF, AB, LEP); Health Management and Policy, College of Public Health, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY (OA); Public Health, International School of Medicine, Istanbul Medipol University, Istanbul, Turkiye (OA); Department of Family and Community Medicine, College of Medicine, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY (LEP).
MD, PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Andrew Bazemore
From the CHRISTUS Health/Texas A&M University School of Medicine – Family Medicine Residency, Corpus Christi, TX (AL); American Board of Family Medicine, Lexington, KY (SEF, AB, LEP); Health Management and Policy, College of Public Health, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY (OA); Public Health, International School of Medicine, Istanbul Medipol University, Istanbul, Turkiye (OA); Department of Family and Community Medicine, College of Medicine, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY (LEP).
MD, MPH
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Lars E. Peterson
From the CHRISTUS Health/Texas A&M University School of Medicine – Family Medicine Residency, Corpus Christi, TX (AL); American Board of Family Medicine, Lexington, KY (SEF, AB, LEP); Health Management and Policy, College of Public Health, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY (OA); Public Health, International School of Medicine, Istanbul Medipol University, Istanbul, Turkiye (OA); Department of Family and Community Medicine, College of Medicine, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY (LEP).
MD, PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Figure 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    Figure 1.

    Divisional variation from mean scope of practice score for early career and mid to late career family physicians.

  • Figure 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    Figure 2.

    Adjusted associations between scope of practice score and division controlling for clinician, practice, community, and health care market characteristics for early career and mid to late career family physicians.

  • Figure
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
  • Figure
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
  • Figure
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
  • Figure
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
  • Figure
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab

Tables

  • Figures
    • View popup
    Table 1.

    Divisional Variation of Clinician, Practice, Community, and Healthcare Market Characteristics of Early Career Family Physicians, 2017 to 2022

     East North CentralEast South CentralMiddle AtlanticMountainNew EnglandPacificSouth AtlanticWest North CentralWest South CentralFull Population
    Scope of practice score
    Mean (SD)
    15.99 (2.68)15.53 (2.91)15.22 (2.84)17.10 (2.81)16.05 (2.76)16.23 (2.81)15.40 (2.88)17.51 (2.56)15.43 (3.09)16.04 (2.90)
    Domain 1: Clinician
    Age
    Mean (SD)
    34.74 (4.07)35.43 (4.67)34.92 (4.26)35.19 (3.86)35.51 (4.43)35.68 (3.95)35.48 (4.76)34.48 (3.97)35.38 (4.63)35.23 (4.30)
    Gender (percent)
     Woman860 (54.0%)258 (49.1%)624 (58.3%)506 (51.6%)296 (64.9%)1,353 (59.7%)1,106 (55.7%)606 (57.6%)681 (52.3%)6,290 (56.0%)
    Race (percent)
     American Indian or Alaska Native8 (0.5%)5 (1.0%)4 (0.4%)12 (1.2%)2 (0.5%)29 (1.3%)14 (0.7%)9 (0.9%)18 (1.4%)101 (0.9%)
     Asian298 (19.3%)70 (13.6%)317 (30.0%)132 (13.7%)72 (16.6%)700 (31.5%)327 (16.7%)105 (10.1%)295 (23.2%)2,316 (21.1%)
     Black or African American92 (5.9%)50 (9.7%)82 (7.8%)17 (1.8%)25 (5.8%)90 (4.1%)288 (14.7%)32 (3.1%)120 (9.4%)796 (7.2%)
     Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander6 (0.4%) 0 (0%)1 (0.1%)4 (0.4%)2 (0.5%)22 (1.0%)10 (0.5%)1 (0.1%)6 (0.5%)52 (0.5%)
     White1,110 (71.7%)381 (74.0%)610 (57.7%)771 (80.1%)320 (73.9%)1,264 (56.9%)1,265 (64.8%)875 (84.5%)800 (62.9%)7,396 (67.3%)
     Other34 (2.2%)9 (1.7%)43 (4.1%)27 (2.8%)12 (2.8%)116 (5.2%)49 (2.5%)14 (1.4%)32 (2.5%)336 (3.1%)
    Ethnicity (percent)
     Hispanic or Latino60 (3.9%)14 (2.7%)69 (6.5%)84 (8.7%)17 (3.9%)272 (12.2%)213 (10.9%)31 (3.0%)201 (15.8%)961 (8.7%)
    International medical graduate status (percent)
     International medical graduate507 (31.8%)149 (28.4%)448 (41.8%)194 (19.8%)127 (27.9%)622 (27.4%)726 (36.6%)181 (17.2%)480 (36.9%)3,434 (30.6%)
    Degree type, MD versus DO (percent)
     DO degree323 (20.3%)109 (20.8%)220 (20.5%)221 (22.5%)73 (16.0%)486 (21.4%)330 (16.6%)277 (26.3%)205 (15.7%)2,244 (20.0%)
    Residency location (percent)
     Small rural1 (0.1%)12 (2.4%)2 (0.2%)0 (0%) 1 (0.2%)4 (0.2%)2 (0.1%) 0 (0%)11 (1.0%)33 (0.3%)
     Large rural65 (4.4%)55 (11.0%)21 (2.0%)22 (2.4%)30 (6.7%)64 (3.0%)80 (4.4%)48 (4.8%)38 (3.3%)423 (4.0%)
     Urban1,419 (95.6%)431 (86.5%)1,020 (97.8%)879 (97.6%)416 (93.1%)2,097 (96.9%)1,755 (95.5%)952 (95.2%)1,099 (95.7%)10,068 (95.7%)
    Domain 2: Practice
    Practice type (percent)
     Academic health center230 (16.7%)42 (10.1%)148 (17.1%)88 (10.4%)57 (14.5%)182 (9.1%)207 (13.1%)91 (9.9%)128 (12.4%)1,173 (12.4%)
     Federally qualified health center130 (9.4%)43 (10.3%)120 (13.8%)144 (17.0%)96 (24.5%)373 (18.7%)151 (9.6%)45 (4.9%)73 (7.0%)1,175 (12.5%)
     Federal military14 (1.0%)29 (7.0%)16 (1.8%)51 (6.0%)7 (1.8%)108 (5.4%)155 (9.8%)23 (2.5%)57 (5.5%)460 (4.9%)
     Rural health center50 (3.6%)28 (6.7%)10 (1.2%)54 (6.4%)5 (1.3%)73 (3.7%)37 (2.3%)120 (13.0%)60 (5.8%)437 (4.6%)
     Independently owned133 (9.7%)83 (19.9%)128 (14.7%)119 (14.0%)36 (9.2%)192 (9.6%)243 (15.4%)104 (11.3%)193 (18.6%)1,231 (13.1%)
     Managed care/HMO32 (2.3%)8 (1.9%)15 (1.7%)50 (5.9%)12 (3.1%)364 (18.2%)128 (8.1%)10 (1.1%)39 (3.8%)658 (7.0%)
     Hospital/Health system732 (53.2%)163 (39.1%)394 (45.4%)277 (32.7%)165 (42.1%)524 (26.2%)570 (36.2%)482 (52.3%)408 (39.4%)3,715 (39.4%)
     Other56 (4.1%)21 (5.0%)37 (4.3%)65 (7.7%)14 (3.6%)181 (9.1%)85 (5.4%)46 (5.0%)78 (7.5%)583 (6.2%)
    Principal practice ownership (percent)
     Not owner1,042 (92.5%)240 (81.1%)636 (92.8%)459 (86.0%)258 (95.6%)962 (76.2%)1,000 (87.1%)608 (88.5%)671 (87.4%)5,876 (86.7%)
     Owner85 (7.5%)56 (18.9%)49 (7.2%)75 (14.0%)12 (4.4%)300 (23.8%)148 (12.9%)79 (11.5%)97 (12.6%)901 (13.3%)
    Practice size (percent)
     Group1,335 (96.9%)393 (94.2%)834 (96.1%)830 (97.9%)387 (98.7%)1,964 (98.3%)1,518 (96.3%)906 (98.4%)978 (94.4%)9,145 (97.0%)
     Solo42 (3.1%)24 (5.8%)34 (3.9%)18 (2.1%)5 (1.3%)33 (1.7%)58 (3.7%)15 (1.6%)58 (5.6%)287 (3.0%)
    Practice specialty mix (percent)
     Family medicine only690 (50.1%)197 (47.2%)411 (47.4%)378 (44.6%)159 (40.6%)566 (28.3%)741 (47.0%)475 (51.6%)434 (41.9%)4,051 (42.9%)
     Multiple specialties (Not only primary care)321 (23.3%)88 (21.1%)195 (22.5%)182 (21.5%)81 (20.7%)577 (28.9%)316 (20.1%)219 (23.8%)266 (25.7%)2,245 (23.8%)
     Primary care specialty mix366 (26.6%)132 (31.7%)262 (30.2%)288 (34.0%)152 (38.8%)854 (42.8%)519 (32.9%)227 (24.6%)337 (32.5%)3,137 (33.3%)
    Domain 3: Community
    Social deprivation index (SD)46.13 (28.70)56.67 (22.49)43.16 (30.91)47.76 (26.57)35.46 (27.24)60.48 (24.61)52.60 (26.94)27.73 (21.56)59.51 (24.74)49.91 (28.04)
    Rurality (percent)
     Isolated25 (1.6%)16 (3.1%)13 (1.2%)33 (3.4%)15 (3.3%)29 (1.3%)24 (1.2%)77 (7.3%)11 (0.8%)243 (2.2%)
     Small rural142 (9.0%)77 (14.8%)57 (5.3%)97 (9.9%)39 (8.6%)144 (6.4%)124 (6.3%)187 (17.8%)118 (9.1%)985 (8.8%)
     Large rural93 (5.9%)59 (11.3%)16 (1.5%)87 (8.9%)31 (6.8%)83 (3.7%)43 (2.2%)160 (15.2%)80 (6.2%)652 (5.8%)
     Urban1,323 (83.6%)370 (70.9%)980 (91.9%)758 (77.7%)370 (81.3%)2,003 (88.7%)1,790 (90.4%)626 (59.6%)1,090 (83.9%)9,310 (83.2%)
    Premature death rate (percent)
     High22 (1.4%)129 (24.9%)2 (0.2%)52 (5.3%) 0 (0%)9 (0.4%)204 (10.3%)27 (2.6%)96 (7.4%)541 (4.8%)
     Medium787 (49.6%)348 (67.1%)469 (44.0%)234 (24.0%)96 (21.1%)219 (9.7%)785 (39.6%)454 (43.2%)488 (37.5%)3,880 (34.7%)
     Low778 (49.0%)42 (8.1%)595 (55.8%)690 (70.7%)360 (78.9%)2,028 (89.9%)991 (50.1%)570 (54.2%)716 (55.1%)6,770 (60.5%)
    Domain 4: Healthcare market
    Beds per hospital (percent)
     High1,128 (71.1%)332 (64.0%)919 (86.2%)618 (63.3%)353 (77.4%)1,859 (82.3%)1,550 (78.3%)517 (49.2%)881 (67.8%)8,157 (72.9%)
     Medium387 (24.4%)159 (30.6%)123 (11.5%)298 (30.5%)99 (21.7%)361 (16.0%)336 (17.0%)392 (37.3%)323 (24.8%)2,478 (22.1%)
     Low72 (4.5%)28 (5.4%)24 (2.3%)60 (6.1%)4 (0.9%)39 (1.7%)94 (4.7%)142 (13.5%)96 (7.4%)559 (5.0%)
    Medicare cost per capita (percent)
     High461 (29.0%)113 (21.8%)507 (47.6%)83 (8.5%)246 (53.9%)1,305 (57.8%)664 (33.5%)164 (15.6%)748 (57.5%)4,291 (38.3%)
     Medium864 (54.4%)357 (68.8%)443 (41.6%)459 (47.0%)130 (28.5%)448 (19.8%)1,098 (55.5%)619 (58.9%)521 (40.1%)4,939 (44.1%)
     Low262 (16.5%)49 (9.4%)116 (10.9%)434 (44.5%)80 (17.5%)506 (22.4%)218 (11.0%)268 (25.5%)31 (2.4%)1,964 (17.5%)
    External reasons for not practicing OB or inpatient medicine (percent)
     No1,204 (75.6%)368 (70.1%)712 (66.5%)684 (69.7%)311 (68.2%)1,546 (68.2%)1,265 (63.7%)790 (75.1%)893 (68.6%)7,773 (69.2%)
     Yes388 (24.4%)157 (29.9%)359 (33.5%)297 (30.3%)145 (31.8%)720 (31.8%)721 (36.3%)262 (24.9%)409 (31.4%)3,458 (30.8%)
    Ratio of primary care physicians
     High50 (3.2%)47 (9.1%)0 (0%) 43 (4.4%)0 (0%) 34 (1.5%)39 (2.0%)162 (15.4%)69 (5.3%)444 (4.0%)
     Medium517 (32.6%)212 (40.8%)242 (22.7%)326 (33.4%)120 (26.3%)743 (32.9%)595 (30.1%)492 (46.8%)559 (43.0%)3,806 (34.0%)
     Low1,020 (64.3%)260 (50.1%)824 (77.3%)607 (62.2%)336 (73.7%)1,482 (65.6%)1,346 (68.0%)397 (37.8%)672 (51.7%)6,944 (62.0%)
    • *External reasons for not practicing OB and Internal Medicine includes selecting either “challenges with privileging” or “not available in the practice I joined”, as reasons for not practicing either inpatient medicine or obstetric care.

    • ±All tests have P-values of < 0.0001.

    • Abbreviation: SD, Standard deviation.

    • View popup
    Table 2.

    Divisional Variation of Clinician, Practice, Community, and Healthcare Market Characteristics of Mid to Late Career Family Physicians, 2017 to 2022

     East North CentralEast South CentralMiddle AtlanticMountainNew EnglandPacificSouth AtlanticWest North CentralWest South CentralFull Population
    Scope of practice score
    Mean (SD)
    13.68 (3.51)12.63 (3.81)12.59 (3.54)13.42 (3.86)13.20 (3.44)12.26 (3.75)11.49 (3.62)14.95 (3.98)12.20 (3.82)12.77 (3.83)
    Domain 1: Clinician
    Age
    Mean (SD)
    50.08 (9.39)50.37 (9.65)50.54 (9.72)50.04 (8.94)51.04 (9.45)49.45 (9.06)50.56 (9.39)50.22 (9.29)49.46 (9.09)50.09 (9.31)
    Gender (percent)
     Female2,588 (45.2%)711 (37.1%)1,683 (48.5%)1,251 (42.2%)832 (52.5%)3,464 (50.5%)3,002 (44.1%)1,432 (43.0%)1596 (38.8%)16,559 (45.0%)
    Race (percent)
     American Indian or Alaska Native31 (0.5%)12 (0.6%)12 (0.3%)44 (1.5%)8 (0.5%)62 (0.9%)48 (0.7%)35 (1.1%)59 (1.4%)311 (0.8%)
     Asian881 (15.4%)179 (9.3%)657 (19.0%)277 (9.3%)201 (12.7%)1,867 (27.2%)1,028 (15.1%)261 (7.8%)775 (18.8%)6,126 (16.7%)
     Black or African American277 (4.8%)188 (9.8%)225 (6.5%)66 (2.2%)51 (3.2%)223 (3.3%)854 (12.6%)93 (2.8%)320 (7.8%)2,297 (6.2%)
     Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander20 (0.3%)1 (0.1%)12 (0.3%)17 (0.6%)5 (0.3%)85 (1.2%)28 (0.4%)9 (0.3%)17 (0.4%)194 (0.5%)
     White4,222 (73.7%)1,464 (76.4%)2,347 (67.7%)2,388 (80.5%)1,254 (79.1%)3,943 (57.5%)4,423 (65.0%)2,823 (84.8%)2,696 (65.5%)25,560 (69.5%)
     Other298 (5.2%)71 (3.7%)214 (6.2%)174 (5.9%)66 (4.2%)673 (9.8%)419 (6.2%)109 (3.3%)248 (6.0%)2,272 (6.2%)
    Ethnicity (percent)
     Hispanic or Latino239 (4.2%)39 (2.0%)180 (5.2%)232 (7.8%)61 (3.8%)641 (9.4%)642 (9.4%)92 (2.8%)542 (13.2%)2,668 (7.3%)
    International medical graduate status (percent)
     International medical graduate1,367 (24.2%)331 (17.4%)1,056 (31.1%)439 (14.9%)303 (19.3%)1,721 (25.4%)1,926 (28.7%)401 (12.1%)1,112 (27.3%)8,656 (23.8%)
    Degree type, MD versus DO (percent)
     DO degree610 (10.6%)188 (9.8%)480 (13.8%)447 (15.1%)191 (12.1%)740 (10.8%)559 (8.2%)466 (14.0%)412 (10.0%)4,093 (11.1%)
    Residency location (percent)
     Small rural2 (0.0%)27 (1.5%)3 (0.1%)1 (0.0%) 0 (0%)1 (0.0%)8 (0.1%)0 (0%) 8 (0.2%)50 (0.2%)
     Large rural161 (3.1%)175 (9.8%)51 (1.6%)78 (3.0%)110 (7.4%)123 (1.9%)219 (3.6%)153 (5.2%)105 (3.0%)1,175 (3.5%)
     Urban5,026 (96.9%)1,580 (88.7%)3,191 (98.3%)2,524 (97.0%)1,368 (92.6%)6,202 (98.0%)5,839 (96.3%)2,803 (94.8%)3,382 (96.7%)31,915 (96.3%)
    Domain 2: Practice
    Practice type (percent)
     Academic health center426 (8.7%)106 (7.0%)292 (9.7%)186 (7.3%)101 (7.4%)351 (5.9%)405 (7.1%)226 (8.2%)280 (8.3%)2,373 (7.6%)
     Federally qualified health center254 (5.2%)64 (4.2%)211 (7.0%)221 (8.7%)201 (14.6%)590 (9.8%)271 (4.8%)91 (3.3%)124 (3.7%)2,027 (6.5%)
     Federal military86 (1.8%)83 (5.5%)69 (2.3%)112 (4.4%)24 (1.7%)223 (3.7%)411 (7.2%)83 (3.0%)174 (5.2%)1,265 (4.1%)
     Rural health center123 (2.5%)57 (3.8%)19 (0.6%)82 (3.2%)28 (2.0%)101 (1.7%)61 (1.1%)148 (5.4%)97 (2.9%)716 (2.3%)
     Independently owned1,231 (25.2%)596 (39.4%)993 (32.8%)829 (32.6%)329 (23.9%)1,418 (23.7%)1,987 (35.0%)606 (22.0%)1,295 (38.4%)9,284 (29.8%)
     Managed care/HMO83 (1.7%)8 (0.5%)23 (0.8%)139 (5.5%)14 (1.0%)1,239 (20.7%)278 (4.9%)64 (2.3%)81 (2.4%)1,929 (6.2%)
     Hospital/Health system2,354 (48.2%)470 (31.1%)1,189 (39.3%)699 (27.5%)582 (42.4%)1,363 (22.7%)1,734 (30.5%)1,369 (49.6%)964 (28.6%)10,724 (34.4%)
     Other324 (6.6%)128 (8.5%)228 (7.5%)276 (10.8%)95 (6.9%)710 (11.8%)529 (9.3%)172 (6.2%)356 (10.6%)2,818 (9.1%)
    Principal practice ownership (percent)
     Not owner3,807 (78.0%)970 (64.2%)2,249 (74.4%)1,809 (71.1%)1,113 (81.0%)3,766 (62.8%)4,064 (71.6%)2,202 (79.8%)2,266 (67.2%)22,246 (71.4%)
     Owner1,074 (22.0%)542 (35.8%)775 (25.6%)735 (28.9%)261 (19.0%)2,229 (37.2%)1,612 (28.4%)557 (20.2%)1,105 (32.8%)8,890 (28.6%)
    Practice size (percent)
     Group4,369 (89.5%)1,296 (85.7%)2,601 (86.0%)2,341 (92.0%)1,263 (91.9%)5,480 (91.4%)4,923 (86.7%)2,614 (94.7%)2,804 (83.2%)27,691 (88.9%)
     Solo512 (10.5%)216 (14.3%)423 (14.0%)203 (8.0%)111 (8.1%)515 (8.6%)753 (13.3%)145 (5.3%)567 (16.8%)3,445 (11.1%)
    Practice specialty mix (percent)
     Family medicine only2,488 (54.3%)790 (55.9%)1,590 (56.8%)1,162 (49.4%)621 (49.7%)1,914 (34.6%)2,774 (53.1%)1,344 (52.1%)1,623 (51.5%)14,306 (49.5%)
     Multiple specialties (Not only primary care)958 (20.9%)245 (17.3%)486 (17.4%)505 (21.5%)222 (17.8%)1,728 (31.2%)931 (17.8%)690 (26.7%)643 (20.4%)6,408 (22.2%)
     Primary care specialty mix1,136 (24.8%)379 (26.8%)721 (25.8%)684 (29.1%)406 (32.5%)1,888 (34.1%)1,522 (29.1%)546 (21.2%)883 (28.0%)8,165 (28.3%)
    Health care professional collaboration in practice
     Physician assistant2,183 (38.1%)629 (32.8%)1,575 (45.4%)1,769 (59.6%)786 (49.6%)3,645 (53.2%)3,139 (46.2%)1,907 (57.3%)1,588 (38.6%)17,221 (46.8%)
    Domain 3: Community
     Social deprivation index (SD)41.88 (28.14)53.47 (22.74)38.71 (29.35)44.58 (26.76)31.01 (24.59)58.82 (24.23)49.09 (27.09)27.51 (20.89)59.81 (25.15)47.11 (27.83)
    Rurality (percent)
     Isolated147 (2.6%)52 (2.7%)49 (1.4%)91 (3.1%)100 (6.3%)73 (1.1%)88 (1.3%)180 (5.4%)47 (1.1%)827 (2.3%)
     Small rural414 (7.2%)180 (9.4%)89 (2.6%)193 (6.5%)103 (6.5%)152 (2.2%)162 (2.4%)396 (11.9%)210 (5.1%)1,899 (5.2%)
     Large rural567 (9.9%)317 (16.6%)192 (5.5%)295 (10.0%)147 (9.3%)337 (4.9%)424 (6.2%)518 (15.6%)313 (7.6%)3,110 (8.5%)
     Urban4,591 (80.3%)1,364 (71.3%)3,130 (90.5%)2,381 (80.4%)1,231 (77.9%)6,280 (91.8%)6,111 (90.1%)2,228 (67.1%)3,536 (86.1%)30,852 (84.1%)
    Premature death rate (percent)
     High138 (2.5%)479 (26.2%)18 (0.5%)117 (4.0%)10 (0.6%)37 (0.6%)649 (9.9%)89 (2.7%)315 (7.9%)1,852 (5.2%)
     Medium2,805 (49.9%)1,145 (62.6%)1,353 (40.5%)631 (21.8%)385 (25.0%)515 (7.7%)2,627 (40.0%)1,174 (35.9%)1,368 (34.3%)12,003 (33.6%)
     Low2,676 (47.6%)206 (11.3%)1,968 (58.9%)2,151 (74.2%)1,146 (74.4%)6,139 (91.8%)3,288 (50.1%)2,005 (61.4%)2,309 (57.8%)21,888 (61.2%)
    Domain 4: Healthcare market
    Beds per hospital (percent)
     High3,651 (65.0%)1,175 (64.2%)2,819 (84.4%)1,891 (65.2%)1,035 (67.2%)5,571 (83.2%)5,073 (77.3%)1,766 (54.0%)2,834 (71.0%)25,815 (72.2%)
     Medium1,670 (29.7%)555 (30.3%)435 (13.0%)874 (30.1%)487 (31.6%)1,035 (15.5%)1,138 (17.3%)1,152 (35.3%)932 (23.3%)8,278 (23.2%)
     Low298 (5.3%)100 (5.5%)85 (2.5%)134 (4.6%)19 (1.2%)88 (1.3%)353 (5.4%)350 (10.7%)226 (5.7%)1,653 (4.6%)
    Medicare cost per capita (percent)
     High1,440 (25.6%)316 (17.3%)1,438 (43.1%)220 (7.6%)756 (49.1%)3,847 (57.5%)2,000 (30.5%)365 (11.2%)2,443 (61.2%)12,825 (35.9%)
     Medium3,173 (56.5%)1,280 (69.9%)1,540 (46.1%)1,339 (46.2%)449 (29.1%)1,430 (21.4%)3,797 (57.8%)2,074 (63.5%)1,468 (36.8%)16,550 (46.3%)
     Low1,006 (17.9%)234 (12.8%)361 (10.8%)1,340 (46.2%)336 (21.8%)1,417 (21.2%)767 (11.7%)829 (25.4%)81 (2.0%)6,371 (17.8%)
    External reasons for not practicing OB or Inpatient Medicine (percent)
     No3,906 (68.2%)1,290 (67.4%)2,158 (62.2%)1,870 (63.0%)952 (60.1%)4,136 (60.4%)4,121 (60.6%)2,292 (68.8%)2,720 (66.1%)23,445 (63.8%)
     Yes1,823 (31.8%)625 (32.6%)1,310 (37.8%)1,096 (37.0%)633 (39.9%)2,717 (39.6%)2,679 (39.4%)1,039 (31.2%)1,396 (33.9%)13,318 (36.2%)
    • *All tests have P-values of < 0.0001.

    • Abbreviation: SD, Standard deviation.

    • View popup
    Table 3.

    Scope of Practice Score by Clinician, Practice, Community, and Healthcare Market Characteristics for Early Career (NGS) and Mid to Late Career (CCQ) Family Physicians, 2017 to 2022

    Scope of Practice Score
    NGSCCQ
    Mean (SD)Mean (SD)
    Clinician
     Gender
      Female15.79 (2.87)12.56 (3.76)
      Male15.86 (2.76)13.04 (3.87)
     Race
      American Indian or Alaska Native15.85 (2.43)13.15 (3.67)
      Asian14.88 (2.86)11.28 (3.43)
      Black or African American15.01 (2.81)11.47 (3.62)
      Native Hawaiian or other Pacific Islander16.32 (2.57)11.87 (3.42)
      Other15.25 (2.86)13.38 (3.79)
      White16.20 (2.73)11.94 (3.80)
     Ethnicity
      Hispanic or Latino15.25 (3.24)11.40 (3.77)
      Not Hispanic or Latino15.87 (2.78)12.93 (3.81)
     International medical graduates
      US medical graduate16.12 (2.70)13.29 (3.79)
      International medical graduate15.07 (2.98)11.29 (3.53)
     Degree type
      DO15.96 (2.56)13.00 (3.82)
      MD15.79 (2.89)12.79 (3.82)
     Residency location
      Small rural residency16.09 (3.00)12.71 (4.57)
      Large rural residency14.33 (4.39)13.59 (4.29)
      Urban residency15.82 (2.81)12.79 (3.80)
    Practice
     Practice type
      Academic health center17.67 (2.76)15.52 (4.05)
      FQHĈ13.31 (3.52)
      Federal militarŷ8.86 (3.80)
      Hospital/health system15.52 (2.64)13.11 (3.39)
      Independently owned Medical practice15.59 (2.82)12.85 (3.48)
      Managed care/HMO14.81 (2.66)10.52 (3.35)
      RHĈ16.22 (3.75)
      Other practice typê10.67 (3.86)
     Practice ownership
      Owns practice15.16 (2.93)12.78 (3.94)
      Does not own practice15.85 (2.82)12.91 (3.53)
     Practice size
      Group practice15.85 (2.82)12.87 (3.85)
      Solo practice15.16 (2.93)12.38 (3.54)
     Practice specialties
      Family medicine only16.36 (2.76)13.49 (3.74)
      Multiple specialties (not just primary care)15.30 (2.87)12.18 (3.85)
      Primary care specialty mix15.38 (2.73)12.13 (3.74)
    Collaboration
      Collaborates with PA#13.12 (3.87)
      Does not collaborate with PA#12.58 (3.77)
    Community
     Rurality
      Isolated18.00 (2.26)16.08 (3.66)
      Small rural16.83 (2.54)16.15 (3.88)
      Large rural18.02 (2.53)14.38 (3.88)
      Urban15.58 (2.79)12.36 (3.62)
     Premature death rate
      High premature death16.10 (2.25)16.08 (3.66)
      Medium premature death16.04 (2.79)16.15 (3.88)
      Low premature death15.69 (2.87)14.38 (3.88)
    Healthcare market
     Beds per hospital
      Beds per hospital - High15.58 (2.81)12.22 (3.66)
      Beds per hospital - Medium16.48 (2.75)14.27 (3.83)
      Beds per hospital - Low16.92 (2.77)14.82 (3.74)
     Medicare cost per capita
      Medicare cost per capita - High15.24 (2.91)11.85 (3.80)
      Medicare cost per capita - Medium15.92 (2.69)13.06 (3.70)
      Medicare cost per capita - Low16.78 (2.70)14.19 (3.69)
     Reasons for not practicing OB or Inpatient Medicine
      Yes15.49 (2.46)13.26 (3.97)
      No15.96 (2.95)12.05 (3.42)
     Ratio of primary care physicians
      High18.5 (2.7)16.7 (3.9)
      Medium16.4 (2.9)13.5 (3.7)
      Low15.7 (2.9)12.2(3.7)
    • *Scope score ranges from 0–30.

    • ̂Sample sizes were too small to produce a reliable regression model.

    • #Data not available in NGS.

    • NGS is National Graduate Survey. CCQ is Continuous Certification Questionnaire.

    • Abbreviations: SD, Service delivery; MD, Doctor of Medicine; DO, Doctor of Osteopathic Medicine; FQHC, Federally qualified health center; HMO, Health maintenance organization; RHC, Rural health clinic; OB, Obstetrics; PA, Physician assistant.

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of the American Board of Family     Medicine: 38 (1)
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine
Vol. 38, Issue 1
January-February 2025
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Cover (PDF)
  • Index by author
  • Back Matter (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Board of Family Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Regional Variation in Scope of Practice by Family Physicians
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Board of Family Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Board of Family Medicine web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
2 + 1 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Regional Variation in Scope of Practice by Family Physicians
Alyssa Lambert, Sarah E. Fleischer, Omer Atac, Andrew Bazemore, Lars E. Peterson
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine Jan 2025, 38 (1) 28-45; DOI: 10.3122/jabfm.2024.240201R1

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Regional Variation in Scope of Practice by Family Physicians
Alyssa Lambert, Sarah E. Fleischer, Omer Atac, Andrew Bazemore, Lars E. Peterson
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine Jan 2025, 38 (1) 28-45; DOI: 10.3122/jabfm.2024.240201R1
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Introduction
    • Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Conclusion
    • Appendix Table 1. Adjusted Associations Between Scope of Practice Score and Division Controlling for Clinician, Practice, Community, and Healthcare Market Characteristics for Early Career and Mid to Late Career Family Physicians
    • Appendix Table 2. Adjusted Associations Between Scope of Practice Score and Division Controlling for Clinician, Practice, Community, and Healthcare Market Characteristics for Early Career Family Physicians
    • Appendix Table 3. Adjusted Associations Between Scope of Practice Score and Division Controlling for Clinician, Practice, Community, and Healthcare Market Characteristics for Mid to Late Career Family Physicians
    • Notes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • A Pilot Comparison of Clinical Data Collection Methods Using Paper, Electronic Health Record Prompt, and a Smartphone Application
  • Associations Between Modifiable Preconception Care Indicators and Pregnancy Outcomes
  • Perceptions and Preferences for Defining Biosimilar Products in Prescription Drug Promotion
Show more Original Research

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • Delivery of Health Care
  • Family Medicine
  • Family Physicians
  • Health Workforce
  • Primary Health Care
  • Scope of Practice
  • Secondary Data Analysis

Navigate

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues

Authors & Reviewers

  • Info For Authors
  • Info For Reviewers
  • Submit A Manuscript/Review

Other Services

  • Get Email Alerts
  • Classifieds
  • Reprints and Permissions

Other Resources

  • Forms
  • Contact Us
  • ABFM News

© 2025 American Board of Family Medicine

Powered by HighWire